Efficacy of entecavir treatment among chronic hepatitis B nucleos(t)ide-naïve and -experienced patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of entecavir (ETV) among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) nucleos(t)ide-naive and -experienced patients in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study 85 CHB patients who had been receiving ETV and who attended our clinic since 2007 were included. Fifty patients were nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naïve. Factors including sex, positive HBeAg, baseline HBV DNA level, baseline alanine aminotransferase level, and prior lamivudine (LAM) resistance were evaluated in terms of their predictive role in treatment response, which was defined as a serum HBV DNA decrease of <31.4 copies/mL. RESULTS: Resistance was detected in 18 (51.4%) of 35 lamivudine-experienced patients. Virological response (VR) was achieved in 48 (96.0%) of NA-naive patients, while 16 (45.7%) of NA-experienced patients achieved VR. LAM-resistant patients had significantly lower response rates (P < 0.001). More responders with a low initial viral load achieved VR at the end of the 12-month follow-up period compared to those with a high initial viral load (91.7% vs. 70.0%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: ETV has greater efficacy in NA-naïve patients and in NA-experienced patients without prior LAM resistance. The rate of VR achievement at 12 months was higher in patients who initially had a low viral load with ETV treatment.

Clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to complications of brucellosis: an experience of 12 years.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical presentations, laboratory findings, prevalence and pattern of complications and the response to treatment of brucellosis in a 12-year period in a Turkish research hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2008, 231 patients were diagnosed with brucellosis and treated in our clinic. Medical records of 189 of the 231 patients with at least one demonstrable complication of the disease were reviewed for anamnesis, diagnosis, complications, treatment and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The decreasing order of the complications was: hematological, 104 (55%); osteoarticular, 70 (37%); hepatobiliary, 59 (31%), and gastrointestinal, 23 (12%). The most common laboratory findings were anemia, lymphomonocytosis, elevated sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, and elevated aminotransaminases. CONCLUSION: The hematological, osteoarticular and hepatobiliary manifestations were predominant. Bursitis, synovitis, glomerulonephritis, cutaneous lesion and deep vein thrombosis were the rare complications observed in our study. In clinical practice, brucellosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis in the presence of infrequent complications.