RESUMEN
Background and purpose: In vivo dosimetry is not standard in brachytherapy and some errors go undetected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of multi-channel vaginal cylinder pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy using in vivo dosimetry. Materials and methods: In vivo dosimetry data was collected during the years 2019-2022 for 22 patients (32 fractions) receiving multi-channel cylinder pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy. An inorganic scintillation detector was inserted in a cylinder channel. Each fraction was analysed as independent data sets. In vivo dosimetry-based source-tracking was used to determine the relative source-to-detector position. Measured dose was compared to planned and re-calculated source-tracking based doses. Assuming no change in organ and applicator geometry throughout treatment, the planned and source-tracking based dose distributions were compared in select volumes via γ-index analysis and dose-volume-histograms. Results: The mean ± SD planned vs. measured dose deviations in the first pulse were 0.8 ± 5.9 %. In 31/32 fractions the deviation was within the combined in vivo dosimetry uncertainty (averaging 9.7 %, k = 2) and planning dose calculation uncertainty (1.6 %, k = 2). The dwell-position offsets were < 2 mm for 88 % of channels, with the largest being 5.1 mm (4.0 mm uncertainty, k = 2). 3 %/2 mm γ pass-rates averaged 97.0 % (clinical target volume (CTV)), 100.0 % (rectum), 99.9 % (bladder). The mean ± SD deviation was -1. 1 ± 2.9 % for CTV D98, and -0.2 ± 0.9 % and -1.2 ± 2.5 %, for bladder and rectum D2cm3 respectively, indicating good agreement between intended and delivered dose. Conclusions: In vivo dosimetry verified accurate and stable dose delivery in multi-channel vaginal cylinder based pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is rarely performed in brachytherapy (BT), allowing potential dose misadministration to go unnoticed. This study presents a clinical routine-calibration method of detectors for IVD in high (HDR) and pulsed dose rate (PDR) Ir-192 BT. PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric precision and feasibility of an in-clinic calibration routine of detectors for IVD in afterloading BT. METHODS: Calibrations were performed in a PMMA phantom with two needles inserted 20 mm apart. The source was loaded in one of the needles at 15 dwells for 10 s. The detector was placed in the other needle, and its signal was recorded. The mean signal at each dwell position was fitted to the expected dose rate with the calibration factor and the detector's longitudinal position being free parameters. The method was tested with an inorganic scintillation detector using one Ir-192 FlexiSource HDR and two Ir-192 GammaMedPlus PDR sources and followed by validation measurements in water. RESULTS: The standard measurement uncertainty (k = 1) of the calibration factor in absolute terms (Gy/s) was 3.2/3.4% for the HDR/PDR source. The uncertainty was dominated by source strength uncertainty, and the precision of the method was <1%. The mean ± 1SD of the difference in measured and expected dose rate during validation was 1.5 ± 4.7% (HDR) and 0.0 ± 4.1% (PDR) with a positional uncertainty in the setup of 0.33/0.23 mm (HDR/PDR) (k = 1). CONCLUSION: A precise and feasible in-clinic calibration method for IVD and source strength consistency tests in BT was presented.