Volume deficits of subcortical nuclei in mood disorders A postmortem study.

Structural changes in subcortical nuclei may underlie clinical symptoms of mood disorders. The goal was to determine whether macrostructural changes exist in brain areas assumed to be involved in regulation of mood and whether such changes differ between major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. A case-control design was used to compare volumes of all major subcortical nuclei. Brains of patients with major depressive disorder (n = 9) or bipolar disorder (n = 11) or of individuals without a neuropsychiatric disorder (n = 22) were included. Exclusion criteria were a history of substance abuse or histological signs of neurodegenerative disorders. Volumes of the striato-pallidal nuclei, of the hypothalamus, thalamus, amygdala, hippocampus and basal limbic forebrain were determined in the right and left hemisphere by planimetry of 20 mum whole brain serial paraffin sections. Comparisons between patients with bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and controls showed a significant (Lambda = 0.35, F(20,56) = 1.93, P = 0.028) overall difference in volumes of all investigated regions with strong effect sizes ( f > 0.40) contributed by the hypothalamus, external pallidum, putamen and thalamus. As compared to controls, a strong effect size (f > 0.40) was found in the bipolar group for smaller volumes of the hypothalamus, external pallidum, putamen and thalamus,whereas in patients with major depressive disorder a strong effect size was only found for a smaller volume of the external pallidum. In conclusion our data suggest that pathways presumably involved in mood regulation have structural pathology in affective disorders with more pronounced abnormalities in bipolar disorder.

Association between conformational mutations in neuroserpin and onset and severity of dementia.

BACKGROUND: The aggregation of specific proteins is a common feature of the familial dementias, but whether the formation of neuronal inclusion bodies is a causative or incidental factor in the disease is not known. To clarify this issue, we investigated five families with typical neuroserpin inclusion bodies but with various neurological manifestations. METHODS: Five families with neurodegenerative disease and typical neuronal inclusions had biopsy or autopsy material available for further examination. Immunostaining confirmed that the inclusions were formed of neuroserpin aggregates, and the responsible mutations in neuroserpin were identified by sequencing of the neuroserpin gene (SERPINI1) in DNA from blood samples or from extraction of histology specimens. Molecular modelling techniques were used to predict the effect of the gene mutations on three-dimensional protein structure. Brain sections were stained and the topographic distribution of the neuroserpin inclusions plotted. FINDINGS: Each of the families was heterozygous for an amino acid substitution that affected the conformational stability of neuroserpin. The least disruptive of these mutations (S49P), as predicted by molecular modelling, resulted in dementia after age 45 years, and presence of neuroserpin inclusions in only a few neurons. By contrast, the most severely disruptive mutation (G392E) resulted, at age 13 years, in progressive myoclonus epilepsy, with many inclusions present in almost all neurons. INTERPRETATION: The findings provide evidence that inclusion-body formation is in itself a sufficient cause of neurodegeneration, and that the onset and severity of the disease is associated with the rate and magnitude of neuronal protein aggregation.