A comparison of renal phosphorus regulation in thermally injured and multiple trauma patients receiving specialized nutrition support.

To compare phosphorus intake and renal phosphorus regulation between thermally injured patients and multiple trauma patients, 40 consecutive critically ill patients, 20 with thermal injury and 20 with multiple trauma, who required enteral tube feeding were evaluated. Phosphorus intakes were recorded for 14 days from the initiation of tube feeding which was started 1 to 3 days postinjury. Serum for determination of phosphorus concentrations was collected at days 1, 3, 7, and 14 of the study period. A 24-hour urine collection was obtained during the first and second weeks of nutrition support for urinary phosphorus excretion, fractional excretion of phosphorus, renal threshold phosphate concentration, and phosphorus clearance. Average total daily phosphorus intake during the 14-day study for thermally injured patients and multiple trauma patients was 0.99+/-0.26 mmol/kg/d vs 0.58+/-0.21 mmol/kg/d, respectively, p < .001. Serum phosphorus concentration on the third day of observation was significantly lower in the thermally injured group than those with multiple trauma (1.9+/-0.8 mg/dL vs 3.0+/-0.8 mg/dL, p < or = .01). A trend toward hypophosphatemia in the thermally injured group persisted by the seventh day of feeding (2.7+/-1.2 mg/dL vs 3.3+/-0.6 mg/dL, p < or = .04). Differences in urinary phosphorus excretion was not statistically significant between the thermally injured and multiple trauma groups (271+/-213 mg/d vs 171+/-181 mg/d for week 1, and 320+/-289 mg/d vs 258+/-184 mg/d for week 2, respectively). Urinary phosphorus clearance, fractional excretion of phosphorus, or renal threshold phosphate concentrations were also not significantly different between thermally injured and multiple trauma patients. During nutrition support, serum phosphorus concentrations are lower in thermally injured patients compared with multiple trauma patients despite receiving a significantly greater intake of phosphorus. Renal phosphorus regulation does not significantly contribute to the profound hypophosphatemia observed in thermally injured patients when compared with multiple trauma patients during nutrition support.

Oxandrolone in trauma patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of oxandrolone administration on nutritional and clinical outcomes after multiple trauma. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center in a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-two patients requiring enteral nutrition, 60 of whom completed the study. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either oxandrolone 10 mg or placebo twice/day for a maximum of 28 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total urinary nitrogen, prealbumin, nitrogen balance, total body water, and body cell mass were measured on day 1 of enteral nutrition and then at day 7, day 10, and study exit. Patients were assessed daily for metabolic and infectious complications. The two groups were similar for demographics and dosage of enteral nutrition. Measurement of total urinary nitrogen at study entry showed both groups to be highly catabolic (oxandrolone 17.2 +/- 4.9, placebo 19.1 +/- 10.8 g/day, NS). On days 7 and 10, total urinary nitrogen increased in both groups; however, there was no significant difference between groups. Nitrogen balance was negative throughout the study in each group. Body cell mass decreased slightly in both groups over the study period. Prealbumin serum concentrations increased significantly in both groups at day 10 and study exit compared with study entry. The groups did not differ significantly for length of hospital stay (oxandrolone 30.8 +/- 17.9, placebo 27.0 +/- 25.7 days), length of intensive care unit stay (oxandrolone 17.1 +/- 7.8, placebo 15.5 +/- 9.7 days), and frequency of pneumonia or sepsis (oxandrolone 48, placebo 43 episodes). CONCLUSION: Oxandrolone 20 mg/day does not have obvious benefit in nutritional and clinical outcomes during the first month after multiple trauma.

Sequential group trial to determine gastrointestinal site of absorption and systemic exposure of azathioprine.

Azathioprine (AZA) is used in the treatment of patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease; however, its use is limited because of systemic toxicity associated with long-term use. Ileocecal delivery of AZA might be advantageous if local intestinal therapeutic effects could be provided with decreased systemic side effects. Decreased cecal systemic absorption would allow higher dosages of AZA to be administered. A two-phase study was performed to compare the systemic exposure of AZA and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) following administration of AZA into the stomach, jejunum, and cecum and to compare the systemic exposure to AZA and 6-MP following administration of three different dosages of AZA into the cecum. In phase I, six healthy male volunteers received three 50 mg sequential doses of AZA via an oral tube directly placed into the stomach, jejunum, and cecum, respectively. In phase II, six healthy male volunteers received three different dosages (50, 300, 600 mg of AZA) into the cecum. Plasma concentrations of AZA and 6-MP at various times were quantified and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and mean residence time (MRT) were determined. No significant differences in the AUC of AZA were seen at the different sites. The AUC of 6-MP following administration of AZA into the jejunum (67.0 +/- 30.1 ng x hr/ml) was higher compared to the stomach (39.9 +/- 38.1 ng/hr/ml) and cecum (29.2 +/- 10.9 ng x hr/ml). Jejunal absorption was 68% higher than absorption from the stomach and 129% higher than that of the cecum. Gastric absorption was 27% higher than that of the cecum. Increased dosages given into the cecum resulted in increased AUCs of AZA and 6-MP. The AUCs of AZA following 50, 300, and 600 mg dosages were 16.9 +/- 7.4, 52.3 +/- 67.2, and 132 +/- 151 ng x hr/ml, respectively, and the AUCs of 6-MP were 22.2 +/- 14.9, 63.4 +/- 50.6, and 104 +/- 115 ng x hr/ml, respectively. Systemic exposure to 6-MP is reduced following administration of AZA into the cecum, most likely secondary to reduced absorption of 6-MP from the colon. Higher dosages of AZA presented to the cecum do result in increased systemic absorption, but may still allow more drug to be administered with less toxicity than the same dose received orally.

Sequential single doses of cisapride, erythromycin, and metoclopramide in critically ill patients intolerant to enteral nutrition: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of enteral cisapride, metoclopramide, erythromycin, and placebo for promoting gastric emptying in critically ill patients with intolerance to gastric enteral nutrition (EN). DESIGN: A randomized, crossover study. SETTING: Adult medical intensive care unit at a university-affiliated private hospital and trauma intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Ten adult, critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients not tolerating a fiber-containing EN product defined as a single aspirated gastric residual volume >150 mL or two aspirated gastric residual volumes >120 mL during a 12-hr period. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 10 mg of cisapride, 200 mg of erythromycin ethylsuccinate, 10 mg of metoclopramide, and placebo as 20 mL of sterile water every 12 hrs over 48 hrs. Acetaminophen solution (1000 mg) was administered concurrently. Gastric residual volumes were assessed, and plasma acetaminophen concentrations were serially determined by TDx between 0 and 12 hrs to evaluate gastric emptying. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gastric residual volumes during the study were not significantly different between agents. No differences in area under the concentration vs. time curve or elimination rate constant were identified between agents. Metoclopramide and cisapride had a significantly shorter mean residence time of absorption than erythromycin (6.3+/-4.5 [SEM] mins and 10.9+/-5.8 vs. 30.1+/-4.5 mins, respectively [p<.05]). Metoclopramide (9.7+/-15.3 mins) had a significantly shorter time to peak concentration compared with erythromycin and placebo (60.7+/-8.1 and 50.9+/-13.5 mins, respectively [p<.05]). The time to onset of absorption was significantly shorter for metoclopramide vs. cisapride (5.7+/-4.5 vs. 22.9+/-5.7 mins [p<.05]). CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients intolerant to EN, single enteral doses of metoclopramide or cisapride are effective for promoting gastric emptying in critically ill patients with gastric motility dysfunction. Additionally, metoclopramide may provide a quicker onset than cisapride.