RESUMEN
Background: Esketamine has received approval as a nasal spray (ESK-NS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and evidence from real-world investigations has confirmed the effectiveness of ESK-NS, albeit with interindividual differences in response. Heart rate variability (HRV), defined as the fluctuation in time interval between consecutive heartbeats, can be used to measure autonomic dysfunction in psychiatric disorders and its role has been investigated in diagnosis and prognosis of depression. Methods: This preliminary report aims to evaluate HRV parameters and their association with treatment outcome in 18 patients (55.6% males, 55.6 ± 9.39 years old) with TRD treated with a target dose of ESK-NS for one month (mean dose: 80.9 ± 9.05 mg). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and a 3 min resting electrocardiogram were used to assess changes in depressive symptoms and HRV measurements before and after treatment. Results: Responders (n = 8, 44.5%; based on ≥30% BDI scores reduction) displayed lower HRV values than non-responders at baseline (p = 0.019), which increased at one month (p = 0.038). Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves obtained from a logistic regression displayed a discriminative potential for baseline HRV in our sample (AUC = 0.844). Conclusions: These preliminary observations suggest a mutual interaction between esketamine and HRV, especially in relation to treatment response. Further studies are required to investigate electrophysiological profiles among predictors of response to ESK-NS and allow for personalized intervention strategies in TRD that still represent a public health concern.
RESUMEN
Background/Objectives: Lithium taken during pregnancy was linked in the past with increased risk for foetal/newborn malformations, but clinicians believe that it is worse for newborn children not to treat the mothers' underlying psychiatric illness. We set to review the available evidence of adverse foetal outcomes in women who received lithium treatment for some time during their pregnancy. Methods: We searched four databases and a register to seek papers reporting neonatal outcomes of women who took lithium during their pregnancy by using the appropriate terms. We adopted the PRISMA statement and used Delphi rounds among all the authors to assess eligibility and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool to evaluate the RoB of the included studies. Results: We found 28 eligible studies, 10 of which met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The studies regarded 1402 newborn babies and 2595 women exposed to lithium. Overall, the systematic review found slightly increased adverse pregnancy outcomes for women taking lithium for both the first trimester only and any time during pregnancy, while the meta-analysis found increased odds for cardiac or other malformations, preterm birth, and a large size for gestational age with lithium at any time during pregnancy. Conclusions: Women with BD planning a pregnancy should consider discontinuing lithium when euthymic; lithium use during the first trimester and at any time during pregnancy increases the odds for some adverse pregnancy outcomes. Once the pregnancy has started, there is no reason for discontinuing lithium; close foetal monitoring and regular blood lithium levels may obviate some disadvantages of lithium administration during pregnancy.