RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Glycaemic variability (GV) refers to variations in blood glucose levels, and may affect stroke outcomes. This study aims to assess the effect of GV on acute ischaemic stroke progression. METHODS: We performed an exploratory analysis of the multicentre, prospective, observational GLIAS-II study. Capillary glucose levels were measured every 4 hours during the first 48 hours after stroke, and GV was defined as the standard deviation of the mean glucose values. The primary outcomes were mortality and death or dependency at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications, stroke recurrence, and the impact of the route of insulin administration on GV. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were included. Higher GV values were observed in patients who died (n = 16; 7.8%; 30.9 mg/dL vs 23.3 mg/dL; p = 0.05). In a logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and comorbidity, both GV (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.003-1.06; p = 0.03) and stroke severity (OR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.2; p = 0.004) were independently associated with mortality at 3 months. No association was found between GV and the other outcomes. Patients receiving subcutaneous insulin showed higher GV than those treated with intravenous insulin (38.95 mg/dL vs 21.34 mg/dL; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High GV values during the first 48 hours after ischaemic stroke were independently associated with mortality. Subcutaneous insulin may be associated with higher VG levels than intravenous administration.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Hiperglucemia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Glucemia/análisis , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Glucosa , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperglucemia/complicaciones , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Insulina/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on health, society and economics worldwide. Therefore, vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have recently emerged as an important measure to fight the pandemic. ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-AstraZeneca) is an adenovirus-vectored vaccine that expresses the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. It shows an acceptable safety profile. Nevertheless, several cases of unusual thrombosis and thrombocytopenia have been reported after initial vaccination with ChAdOx1-S mimicking autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. This condition has been called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) and complications such as intracerebral haemorrhage have been described. CASE REPORT: We present a case of intracerebral haemorrhage after ChAdOx1-S vaccination. Middle-aged patient with no prior medical history was seen in the emergency room 16 days after the first dose of ChAdOx1-S vaccine with sudden onset left hemiplegia and severe holocranial oppressive headache. She did not receive heparin treatment in the previous 100 days. Blood test showed moderate thrombocytopenia and a right frontal lobar haemorrhage was seen on computed tomography scan, computed tomography venography was negative for thrombosis. The presence of antibodies against platelet factor 4 was confirmed. The patient's neurological condition progressively worsened. She developed a treatment resistant intracranial hypertension syndrome and she died three weeks later. CONCLUSIONS: TTS is a rare adverse effect of ChAdOx1-S vaccine, defined by the presence of thrombosis in uncommon locations. In our case we report an spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage probable due to the thrombocytopenia related to probable TTS. It represents a rare clinical presentation of TTS.
TITLE: Hemorragia intracerebral fatal asociada al síndrome de trombosis con trombocitopenia tras la vacuna ChAdOx1-S.Introducción. La pandemia por COVID-19 ha tenido un impacto devastador en la salud, la sociedad y la economía en el mundo. Por ello, las vacunas contra el coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave 2 (SARS-CoV-2) han surgido como medida importante para combatir la pandemia. ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-AstraZeneca) es una vacuna vectorizada por adenovirus que expresa la proteína de espiga del SARS-CoV-2. Se han notificado varios casos de trombosis y trombocitopenia inusuales tras la ChAdOx1-S que imitan la trombocitopenia autoinmune inducida por heparina. Esta situación se denomina síndrome de trombosis con trombocitopenia (STT), y se han descrito casos de hemorragia intracerebral secundaria. Caso clínico. Presentamos un caso de hemorragia intracerebral tras la vacunación con ChAdOx1-S. Una paciente de mediana edad sin antecedentes médicos de interés fue atendida en urgencias 16 días después de la primera dosis de ChAdOx1-S con una hemiplejía izquierda de inicio repentino y una cefalea opresiva holocraneal grave. No recibió heparina los 100 días anteriores. El análisis de sangre mostró trombocitopenia moderada y en la tomografía computarizada se observó una hemorragia lobar frontal derecha sin trombosis en la venografía por tomografía computarizada. Se confirmó la presencia de anticuerpos contra el factor 4 de las plaquetas en la sangre. La paciente presentó un síndrome de hipertensión intracraneal resistente al tratamiento y falleció tres semanas después. Conclusiones. El STT es un efecto adverso infrecuente de la vacuna ChAdOx1-S que se define por la presencia de trombosis en localizaciones infrecuentes. En nuestro caso, describimos una hemorragia intracerebral espontánea secundaria a la trombocitopenia desencadenada por el STT. Representa una presentación clínica poco frecuente del STT.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Trombocitopenia , Trombosis , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Cerebral/etiología , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Femenino , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Factor Plaquetario 4 , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Trombocitopenia/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The treatment of symptomatic carotid near-occlusion is controversial. Our aim was to analyze the results of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stent placement in patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion and to identify factors related to technical failure, periprocedural complications, and restenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective nonrandomized study. Patients with angiography-confirmed carotid near-occlusion were included. We assessed the revascularization rate and periprocedural stroke or death. Twenty-four-month clinical and carotid imaging follow-up was performed, and rates of carotid restenosis or occlusion, ipsilateral stroke, and mortality were analyzed. Carotid artery stent placement, carotid endarterectomy, and medical treatment were compared. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one patients were included. Forty-four carotid artery stent placement and 23 carotid endarterectomy procedures were performed within 6 months after the event. Complete revascularization was achieved in 83.6%, 81.8% in the carotid artery stent placement group and 87% with carotid endarterectomy (P = .360). Periprocedural stroke or death occurred in 6% (carotid artery stent placement = 2.3%; carotid endarterectomy = 13%; P = .077) and was not related to revascularization failure. The carotid restenosis or occlusion rate was 8.3% (5% restenosis, 3.3% occlusion); with carotid artery stent placement it was 10.5%; and with carotid endarterectomy it was 4.5% (P = .419). The 24-month cumulative rate of ipsilateral stroke was 4.8% in the carotid artery stent placement group, 17.4% for carotid endarterectomy, and 13.1% for medical treatment (P = .223). Mortality was 12%, 4.5%, and 5.6%, respectively (P = .422). Revascularization failure and restenosis occurred more frequently in patients with full collapse compared with patients without full collapse (33.3% versus 5.6%, P = .009; 21.4% versus 2.9%, P = .032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stent placement and carotid endarterectomy are associated with high rates of failure and periprocedural stroke. Carotid near-occlusion with full collapse appears to be associated with an increased risk of technical failure and restenosis. Carotid near-occlusion revascularization does not seem to reduce the risk of stroke at follow-up compared with medical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas , Estenosis Carotídea , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/complicaciones , Stents/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack present considerable risk of future vascular events. Reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol decreases the incidence of new vascular events, although in a substantial number of patients, the currently available lipid-lowering therapies fail to achieve the therapeutic goals recommended in clinical guidelines. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide updated information on the role of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab in the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with history of ischaemic stroke. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify the main evidence on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in these patients and the recommended therapeutic targets of LDL cholesterol. The results were discussed in 2 consensus meetings that constituted the basis for the drafting of the document. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9 inhibitors are effective in reducing vascular risk in secondary prevention; evolocumab specifically has achieved this reduction in patients with history of ischaemic stroke. Moreover, both alirocumab and evolocumab present good safety profiles, even in patients achieving LDL cholesterol levels <â¯20â¯mg/dL, and no signs of cognitive impairment have been observed in patients treated with evolocumab who achieved very low levels of LDL cholesterol. In the light of this evidence, we provide practical recommendations about the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with history of ischaemic stroke and follow-up of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticolesterolemiantes , Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , Proproteína Convertasa 9 , Prevención Secundaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , SubtilisinasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Recent analyses emphasise that The Benchmark Stroke Door-to-Needle Time (DNT) should be 30min. This study aimed to determine if a new in-hospital IVT protocol is effective in reducing door-to-needle time and correcting previously identified factors associated with delays. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2014, we gradually introduced a series of measures aimed to reduce door-to-needle time for patients receiving IVT, and compared it before (2009-2012) and after (2014-2017) the new protocol was introduced. RESULTS: The sample included 239 patients before and 222 after the introduction of the protocol. Median overall door-to-needle time was 27min after the protocol was fully implemented (a 48% reduction on previous door-to-needle time [52min], P<.001)]. Median door-to-needle time was lower when pre-hospital code stroke was activated (22min). We observed a 26-min reduction in the median time from onset to treatment (P<.001). After the protocol was implemented, the "3-hour-effect" did not affect door-to-needle time (P=.98). Computed tomography angiography studies performed before IVT were associated with increased door-to-needle time (P<.001); however, the test was performed after IVT was started in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital reorganisation and multidisciplinary collaboration brought median door-to-needle time below 30min and corrected previously identified delay factors. Furthermore, overall time from onset to treatment was also reduced and more stroke patients were treated within 90min of symptom onset.
Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica , Tiempo de TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The ultrasonographic and hemodynamic features of patients with carotid near-occlusion (CNO) are still not well known. Our aim was to describe the ultrasonographic and hemodynamic characteristics of a cohort of patients with CNO. METHODS: A prospective, observational, nationwide, and multicenter study was conducted from January/2010 to May/2016. Patients with digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-confirmed CNO were included. We collected information on clinical and demographic characteristics, carotid and transcranial ultrasonography and DSA findings, presence of full-collapse, collateral circulation, and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were analyzed. Ultrasonographic and DSA diagnosis of CNO were concordant in only 44%. This disagreement was related to the presence/absence of full-collapse: 45% of patients with CNO with full-collapse were classified as a complete carotid occlusion, and 40% with a CNO without full-collapse were interpreted as severe stenosis (p < 0.001). Mean velocities (mV) and pulsatility indexes (PIs) were significantly lower in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery compared with the contralateral (43 cm/s vs 58 cm/s, p < 0.001; 0.80 vs 1.00, p < 0.001). Collateral circulation was identified in 92% of patients, with the anterior communicating artery (73%) being the most frequent. CVR was decreased or exhausted in 66% of cases and was more frequent in patients with a poor or absent collateral network compared with patients with ≥ 2 collateral arteries (82% vs 56%, p = 0.051). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of carotid ultrasonography in the diagnosis of CNO seems to be limited, with significant discrepancies with DSA. Decreased ipsilateral mV, PI, and CVR suggest a hemodynamic compromise in patients with CNO.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas , Estenosis Carotídea , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Circulación Colateral , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Ultrasonografía Doppler TranscranealRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack present considerable risk of future vascular events. Reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol decreases the incidence of new vascular events, although in a substantial number of patients, the currently available lipid-lowering therapies fail to achieve the therapeutic goals recommended in clinical guidelines. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide updated information on the role of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab in the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with history of ischaemic stroke. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify the main evidence on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in these patients and the recommended therapeutic targets of LDL cholesterol. The results were discussed in 2 consensus meetings that constituted the basis for the drafting of the document. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9 inhibitors are effective in reducing vascular risk in secondary prevention; evolocumab specifically has achieved this reduction in patients with history of ischaemic stroke. Moreover, both alirocumab and evolocumab present good safety profiles, even in patients achieving LDL cholesterol levels <20 mg/dL, and no signs of cognitive impairment have been observed in patients treated with evolocumab who achieved very low levels of LDL cholesterol. In the light of this evidence, we provide practical recommendations about the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with history of ischaemic stroke and follow-up of these patients.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Glycaemic variability (GV) refers to variations in blood glucose levels, and may affect stroke outcomes. This study aims to assess the effect of GV on acute ischaemic stroke progression. METHODS: We performed an exploratory analysis of the multicentre, prospective, observational GLIAS-II study. Capillary glucose levels were measured every 4 hours during the first 48 hours after stroke, and GV was defined as the standard deviation of the mean glucose values. The primary outcomes were mortality and death or dependency at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications, stroke recurrence, and the impact of the route of insulin administration on GV. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were included. Higher GV values were observed in patients who died (n = 16; 7.8%; 30.9 mg/dL vs 23.3 mg/dL; p = 0.05). In a logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and comorbidity, both GV (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.003-1.06; p = 0.03) and stroke severity (OR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.2; p = 0.004) were independently associated with mortality at 3 months. No association was found between GV and the other outcomes. Patients receiving subcutaneous insulin showed higher GV than those treated with intravenous insulin (38.95 mg/dL vs 21.34 mg/dL; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High GV values during the first 48 hours after ischaemic stroke were independently associated with mortality. Subcutaneous insulin may be associated with higher VG levels than intravenous administration.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The existence of contraindications to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is considered a criterion for direct transfer of patients with suspected acute stroke to thrombectomy-capable centers in the prehospital setting. Our aim was to assess the utility of this criterion in a setting where routing protocols are defined by the Madrid - Direct Referral to Endovascular Center (M-DIRECT) prehospital scale. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the M-DIRECT study. Reported contraindications to IVT were retrospectively collected from emergency medical services reports and categorized into late window, anticoagulant treatment and other contraindications. Final diagnosis and treatment rates were compared between patients with and without reported IVT contraindications and according to anticoagulant treatment or late window categories. RESULTS: The M-DIRECT study included 541 patients. Reported IVT contraindications were present in 227 (42.0%) patients. Regarding final diagnosis no significant differences were found between patients with or without reported IVT contraindications: ischaemic stroke (any) 65.6% vs. 62.1%, ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) 32.2% vs. 28.3%, hemorrhagic stroke 15.4% vs. 15.6%, stroke mimic 18.9% vs. 22.3% respectively. Amongst patients with LVO, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed less often in the presence of IVT contraindications (56.2% vs. 74.2%). M-DIRECT-positive patients had higher rates of LVO and EVT compared with M-DIRECT-negative patients independent of reported IVT contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: Reported IVT contraindications alone do not increase EVT likelihood and should not be considered to determine routing in urban stroke networks.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Contraindicaciones , Fibrinolíticos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del Tratamiento , TriajeRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The overload of the healthcare system and the organisational changes made in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may be having an impact on acute stroke care in the Region of Madrid. METHODS: We conducted a survey with sections addressing hospital characteristics, changes in infrastructure and resources, code stroke clinical pathways, diagnostic testing, rehabilitation, and outpatient care. We performed a descriptive analysis of results according to the level of complexity of stroke care (availability of stroke units and mechanical thrombectomy). RESULTS: The survey was completed by 22 of the 26 hospitals in the Madrid Regional Health System that attend adult emergencies, between 16 and 27 April 2020. Ninety-five percent of hospitals had reallocated neurologists to care for patients with COVID-19. The numbers of neurology ward beds were reduced in 89.4% of hospitals; emergency department stroke care pathways were modified in 81%, with specific pathways for suspected SARS-CoV2 infection established in 50% of hospitals; and SARS-CoV2-positive patients with acute stroke were not admitted to neurology wards in 42%. Twenty-four hour on-site availability of mechanical thrombectomy was improved in 10 hospitals, which resulted in a reduction in the number of secondary hospital transfers. The admission of patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke was avoided in 45% of hospitals, and follow-up through telephone consultations was implemented in 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The organisational changes made in response to the SARS-Co2 pandemic in hospitals in the Region of Madrid have modified the allocation of neurology department staff and infrastructure, stroke units and stroke care pathways, diagnostic testing, hospital admissions, and outpatient follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Citas y Horarios , Reconversión de Camas , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Departamentos de Hospitales/organización & administración , Hospitales Urbanos/organización & administración , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Trombolisis Mecánica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neurología/organización & administración , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina , Terapia Trombolítica/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in complete saturation of healthcare capacities, making it necessary to reorganise healthcare systems. In this context, we must guarantee the provision of acute stroke care and optimise code stroke protocols to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and rationalise the use of hospital resources. The Madrid Stroke multidisciplinary group presents a series of recommendations to achieve these goals. METHODS: We conducted a non-systematic literature search using the keywords "stroke" and "COVID-19" or "coronavirus" or "SARS-CoV-2." Our literature review also included other relevant studies known to the authors. Based on this literature review, a series of consensus recommendations were established by the Madrid Stroke multidisciplinary group and its neurology committee. RESULTS: These recommendations address 5 main objectives: 1) coordination of action protocols to ensure access to hospital care for stroke patients; 2) recognition of potentially COVID-19-positive stroke patients; 3) organisation of patient management to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare professionals; 4) avoidance of unnecessary neuroimaging studies and other procedures that may increase the risk of infection; and 5) safe, early discharge and follow-up to ensure bed availability. This management protocol has been called CORONA (Coordinate, Recognise, Organise, Neuroimaging, At home). CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations presented here may assist in the organisation of acute stroke care and the optimisation of healthcare resources, while ensuring the safety of healthcare professionals.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/transmisión , Contención de Riesgos Biológicos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Tiempo de Internación , Neuroimagen , Pandemias/prevención & control , Transferencia de Pacientes , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Ropa de Protección , España/epidemiología , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
TITLE: Tratamiento del angioedema orolingual inducido por alteplasa mediante icatibant.
Asunto(s)
Angioedema/inducido químicamente , Angioedema/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Bradiquinina/análogos & derivados , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Boca/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de la Boca/tratamiento farmacológico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Bradiquinina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Lengua/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de la Lengua/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to identify whether post-stroke hyperglycaemia (PSH) influences the levels of circulating biomarkers of brain damage and repair, and to explore whether these biomarkers mediate the effect of PSH on the ischaemic stroke (IS) outcome. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the Glycaemia in Acute Stroke II study. Biomarkers of inflammation, prothrombotic activity, endothelial dysfunction, blood-brain barrier rupture, cell death and brain repair processes were analysed at 24-48 h (baseline) and 72-96 h (follow-up) after IS. The associations of the biomarkers and stroke outcome (modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months) based on the presence of PSH were compared. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients participated in this sub-study. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) at admission was negatively correlated with glucose levels. PSH was associated with a trend toward higher levels of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) at baseline. The EPCs in the PSH group then decreased in the follow-up samples (-8.5 ± 10.3) compared with the non-PSH group (4.7 ± 7.33; P = 0.024). However, neither BDNF nor EPC values had correlation with the 3-month outcome. Higher interleukin-6 at follow-up was associated with poor outcomes (modified Rankin Scale > 2) independently of PSH. CONCLUSION: Post-stroke hyperglycaemia appears to be associated with a negative regulation of BDNF and a different reaction in EPC levels. However, neither BDNF nor EPCs showed significant mediation of the PSH association with IS outcome, and only higher interleukin-6 in the follow-up samples (72-96 h) was related to poor outcomes, independently of PSH status. Further studies are needed to achieve definite conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia/análisis , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo/sangre , Hiperglucemia/etiología , Interleucina-6/sangre , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores , Barrera Hematoencefálica , Isquemia Encefálica/sangre , Células Progenitoras Endoteliales , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of recurrent stroke amongst patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion (SCNO) has not been clearly established, and its management remains controversial. The aim was to define the 24-month risk of recurrent stroke and to analyse the effect of the different treatment modalities (medical treatment and revascularization) in a population of patients with SCNO. METHODS: A multicentre, nationwide, prospective study from January 2010 to May 2016 was performed. Patients with angiography-confirmed SCNO were included. The primary end-point was ipsilateral ischaemic stroke including periprocedural events within 24 months following the presenting event. Revascularization results and periprocedural complications, ipsilateral transient ischaemic attack, disabling or fatal stroke, and mortality were also noted. RESULTS: The study population comprised 141 patients from 17 Spanish centres. Seventy patients (49.6%) were treated by revascularization (carotid stenting in 47, endarterectomy in 23). Complete revascularization was achieved in 58 patients (83%). Periprocedural stroke or death occurred in 5.7%. The 24-month cumulative incidence of the primary end-point was 11.1% (95% confidence interval 5.8-16.4; n = 15), 12% in the medical treatment group and 10.2% in the revascularization group, log-rank P = 0.817. The cumulative rates of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, disabling or fatal stroke, and mortality, were 17%, 4.5% and 7.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke in patients with SCNO seems to be lower than the known rate associated with severe carotid stenosis without near-occlusion. The potential benefit of revascularization in the prevention of stroke in patients with SCNO may be influenced by the effectiveness and safety of the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Angiografía Cerebral , Revascularización Cerebral , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Determinación de Punto Final , Femenino , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , España/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidadRESUMEN
Stroke continues to be one of the leading causes of death and disability in the world. One of the main problems with a patient who has survived from a stroke is the possibility of developing a new vascular episode again. Hypertension is the modifiable vascular risk factor with the greatest impact for both primary prevention and stroke recurrence. The Group for the study of Hypertension and Brain (GEHYC) from the Spanish Society of Hypertension aims to spread the importance of strict control of blood pressure in order to prevent cerebrovascular diseases. In this article, this multidisciplinary Group reviews the latest evidence regarding antihypertensive treatment and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Objetivos , Conductas de Riesgo para la Salud , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Prevención SecundariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of conventional glucose management, which aimed to maintain glucose levels <155 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L), on glucose control and the outcomes of patients with acute ischaemic stroke (IS) in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients with acute IS. Patients were classified into four groups based on their initial 48-h capillary glucose levels and the administration of and response to corrective treatment: (i) untreated and maximum glucose levels <155 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L) within the first 48 h; (ii) treated and good responders [glucose levels persistently <155 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L)]; (iii) treated and non-responders [any glucose values ≥155 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L) during the 24 h after the start of corrective treatment]; and (iv) untreated with any glucose value ≥155 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L). The primary outcome was death or dependence at 3 months (blinded rater). RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were included. Ninety-seven (45.5%) patients developed glucose levels ≥155 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L), 69 (71.1%) underwent corrective treatment and 31 patients underwent no corrective treatment at the physician's discretion [28 of whom had isolated values ≥155 mg/dL (8.5 mmol/L)]. Only 11 (16%) patients responded to conventional treatment, whereas 58 (84%) patients were non-responsive. Non-responders showed a twofold higher risk of death or dependence at 3 months (odds ratio, 2.472; 95% confidence interval, 1.096-5.576; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of response to conventional treatment for glucose management in acute IS is frequent and associated with poor outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Hiperglucemia/complicaciones , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glucemia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The VI European Guidelines for Cardiovascular Prevention recommend combining population and high-risk strategies with lifestyle changes as a cornerstone of prevention, and propose the SCORE function to quantify cardiovascular risk. The guidelines highlight disease specific interventions, and conditions as women, young people and ethnic minorities. Screening for subclinical atherosclerosis with noninvasive imaging techniques is not recommended. The guidelines distinguish four risk levels (very high, high, moderate and low) with therapeutic objectives for lipid control according to risk. Diabetes mellitus confers a high risk, except for subjects with type 2 diabetes with less than <10 years of evolution, without other risk factors or complications, or type 1 diabetes of short evolution without complications. The decision to start pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension will depend on the blood pressure level and the cardiovascular risk, taking into account the lesion of target organs. The guidelines don't recommend antiplatelet drugs in primary prevention because of the increased bleeding risk. The low adherence to the medication requires simplified therapeutic regimes and to identify and combat its causes. The guidelines highlight the responsibility of health professionals to take an active role in advocating evidence-based interventions at the population level, and propose effective interventions, at individual and population level, to promote a healthy diet, the practice of physical activity, the cessation of smoking and the protection against alcohol abuse.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Estilo de Vida , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Europa (Continente) , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Rol Profesional , Factores de Riesgo , EspañaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion, it has recently been shown that mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with stent retrievers is better than medical treatment alone. However, few hospitals can provide MT 24 h/day 365 days/year, and it remains unclear whether selected patients with acute stroke should be directly transferred to the nearest MT-providing hospital to prevent treatment delays. Clinical scales such as Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) have been developed to predict large-vessel occlusion at a pre-hospital level, but their predictive value for MT is low. We propose new criteria to identify patients eligible for MT, with higher accuracy. METHODS: The Direct Referral to Endovascular Center criteria were defined based on a retrospective cohort of 317 patients admitted to a stroke center. The association of age, sex, RACE scale score and blood pressure with the likelihood of receiving MT were analyzed. Cut-off points with the highest association were thereafter evaluated in a prospective cohort of 153 patients from nine stroke units comprising the Madrid Stroke Network. RESULTS: Patients with a RACE scale score ≥ 5, systolic blood pressure <190 mmHg and age <81 years showed a significantly higher probability of undergoing MT (odds ratio, 33.38; 95% confidence interval, 12-92.9). This outcome was confirmed in the prospective cohort, with 68% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 42% positive and 94% negative predictive values for MT, ruling out 83% of hemorrhagic strokes. CONCLUSIONS: The Direct Referral to Endovascular Center criteria could be useful for identifying patients suitable for MT.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Transferencia de Pacientes , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Stents , Trombectomía , Tiempo de TratamientoRESUMEN
The VI European Guidelines for Cardiovascular Prevention recommend combining population and high-risk strategies with lifestyle changes as a cornerstone of prevention, and propose the SCORE function to quantify cardiovascular risk. The guidelines highlight disease specific interventions, and conditions as women, young people and ethnic minorities. Screening for subclinical atherosclerosis with noninvasive imaging techniques is not recommended. The guidelines distinguish four risk levels (very high, high, moderate and low) with therapeutic objectives for lipid control according to risk. Diabetes mellitus confers a high risk, except for subjects with type 2 diabetes with less than <10 years of evolution, without other risk factors or complications, or type 1 diabetes of short evolution without complications. The decision to start pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension will depend on the blood pressure level and the cardiovascular risk, taking into account the lesion of target organs. The guidelines don't recommend antiplatelet drugs in primary prevention because of the increased bleeding risk. The low adherence to the medication requires simplified therapeutic regimes and to identify and combat its causes. The guidelines highlight the responsibility of health professionals to take an active role in advocating evidence-based interventions at the population level, and propose effective interventions, at individual and population level, to promote a healthy diet, the practice of physical activity, the cessation of smoking and the protection against alcohol abuse.