Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Densitom ; 26(1): 36-44, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36372621

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Describe fracture risk assessment practices among physicians treating osteoporosis in a real-life setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic center. Inclusion criteria involved adults (aged ≥18 years) who received minimum adequate therapy (bisphosphates, raloxifene, or denosumab ≥ 3 years or teriparatide ≥ 18 months). Of 1,814 charts randomly selected and reviewed, 274 patients met the inclusion criteria. Risk stratification tools included fragility fractures, Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), and fracture risk assessment using the FRAX tool. Fracture risk assessment was performed before therapy initiation (N= 274) and at the time of institution of the drug holiday (N=119). High-risk patients were defined as the presence of a fragility fracture, T-score ≤-2.5, or a high-risk score by FRAX calculation. FRAX scores were independently calculated by the research team for comparison and assessment purposes. RESULTS: Before initiation of therapy (N=274) versus upon starting a drug holiday (DH; N=119), 29.9% versus 3.4% had a history of fragility fractures (P<0.001), 58.8% versus 67.2% had a DXA scan performed (P>0.05), 10.5% versus 10.9% of physicians calculated a FRAX score (P>0.05), and 71.5% versus 66.4% were considered at high risk and eligible for therapy. A DXA scan was performed after DH in 40.2% of these patients and at least once in 95.3% of the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: The reporting of FRAX score in DXA scan reports may significantly increase its utilization in fracture risk assessment. We recommend comprehensive fracture risk assessment utilizing history of prevalent osteoporosis fractures, DXA assessment, and FRAX scoring.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Densidad Ósea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Absorciometría de Fotón , Factores de Riesgo
2.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0273724, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36054093

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The commonly held association of hyperthyroidism with sinus tachycardia and widened pulse pressure (PP) has not been reassessed in decades despite patients with hyperthyroidism in current practice not always present with these signs. The study objective was to assess prevalence and variability of sinus tachycardia and widened PP in present day among individuals with different degrees of hyperthyroidism. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from 248 adult patients in an outpatient setting with biochemical evidence of hyperthyroidism, recorded heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) who were not treated with medications that can influence these parameters. RESULTS: Mean age was 42.0 ± 14.2 years with 66.9% being female. Median free thyroxine (fT4) level was 3.49 (IQR 2.42-4.58) ng/dL and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) 0.02 (IQR 0.01-0.03) mIU/L. Tachycardia, defined as HR >100 bpm, was present in 28.2%. In the lowest and highest fT4 quartiles, tachycardia was present in 16.4% and 38.7% respectively. Using logistic regression, tachycardia was associated with higher fT4 and diastolic BP. More lenient outcome of tachycardia with HR >90 bpm was seen in 47.2%. Widened PP, defined as >50 mmHg, was observed in 64.1% of patients and correlated with higher fT4 and BP. CONCLUSIONS: Tachycardia is not a common feature of hyperthyroidism today. The relatively infrequent finding of tachycardia in this study compared to older studies may reflect differences in the way medicine is practiced today. The increased ordering of thyroid function tests most likely unmasked cases of mild or asymptomatic thyrotoxicosis. A widened PP was a more prevalent clinical finding in this study.


Asunto(s)
Hipertiroidismo , Tiroxina , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertiroidismo/complicaciones , Hipertiroidismo/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taquicardia/complicaciones , Taquicardia Sinusal/epidemiología , Taquicardia Sinusal/etiología , Tirotropina
3.
Endocr Pract ; 28(10): 1078-1085, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35787466

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Published literature on physicians' preferences and sequential treatment patterns of osteoporosis therapy is scarce. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who received bisphosphonates, denosumab, and/or raloxifene for at least 3 consecutive years or teriparatide for at least 18 months for osteoporosis. Data collection spanned 10 years, from October 2007 to September 2016, at a tertiary care center in the United States. RESULTS: In total, 12 885 patients were identified on the basis of receiving at least 1 treatment at any point in time; 1814 patients were randomly reviewed, and 274 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 68.8 ± 10.7 years, and women represented 90.9% of all the cases. Primary care physicians and rheumatologists constituted 65.7% and 22.6% of the prescribers, respectively. Before instituting a drug holiday, alendronate was the most common initial treatment (percentage, mean duration ± standard deviation in years: 69%, 5.4 ± 2.4 years) followed by ibandronate (9.5%, 4.9 ± 2.1 years) and raloxifene (9.1%, 5.2 ± 1.6 years). Denosumab was the most common second course of treatment, accounting for 29.3% of 82 patients who were subsequently prescribed another therapy, followed by alendronate (24.4%) and zoledronate (20.7%). Among patients who were placed on a drug holiday and eventually restarted on osteoporosis therapy, denosumab was the most common treatment instituted (n = 21), accounting for 40% of the total patients, followed by alendronate (32%) and zoledronate (16%). There was a progressive decline in osteoporosis therapy over the duration of the study. CONCLUSION: Alendronate was the most common initial therapy. Denosumab was the most common second course of treatment prescribed.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica , Osteoporosis , Anciano , Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Ácido Ibandrónico/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Clorhidrato de Raloxifeno/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Teriparatido/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , Ácido Zoledrónico/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA