Application of nonpenetrating titanium clips for primary spinal dural closure following intradural tethered cord release in pediatric tethered cord syndrome: Profile of safety, efficacy, efficiency, and complications.

Introduction: Surgical treatment for tethered cord syndrome (TCS) involves a laminotomy for intradural lysis of filum terminale (LFT), with the goal of releasing excess tension on the conus medullaris by dividing the filum terminale. While LFT alleviates clinical symptoms, it is associated with risks and complications, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and infection, either superficial or deep. Some risks and complications of LFT relate to efficiency and quality of primary dural closure and its downstream effects. We sought to assess the utility of nonpenetrating titanium clips (TC) for primary dural closure with a particular focus on operative duration, associated costs, and complication profiles in a series of pediatric patients undergoing LFT, hypothesizing that TC utilization leads to more efficient closure and therefore potentially lower costs and potentially associated anesthetic length and risks. Methods: A 4-surgeon, single institution series of 28 pediatric patients underwent LFT with subsequent dural closure performed with either the AnastoClip® nonpenetrating titanium clips or traditional suture technique between July 2022 and May 2023. In order to compare the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness between the two dural closure techniques, relevant data were collected including patient demographics and rates of CSF leak, infection at three-month follow-up, and reoperation. Operative durations and times from beginning to end of dural closure were recorded. Results: A total of 28 pediatric patients (mean age: 5.9 years, 43% female, range: 0.71-17 years) with TCS underwent LFT. All patients underwent procedures involving intradural surgery of the lumbar region. Dural closure was performed using traditional suturing in 19 patients (67.9%) and TC in 9 (32.1%). With respect to duration of dural closure, the average time to closure using traditional suturing techniques was 1271 s (or 21 min and 11 s), while the average time for TC was 265 s (or 4 min and 25 s). At three-month follow-up, one case of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak or infection was observed in the suture cohort and required reoperation. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes in the TC group were excellent, consistent with previous reports; our findings further suggest that TCs result in more efficient dural closure than traditional suturing techniques. Our findings suggest that TC may be a safe, efficacious, and more efficient alternative to traditional suture for achieving dural closure in pediatric patients with TCS undergoing LFT surgery.

Evaluating Surgical Cervical Arthrodesis With a Novel MRI Grading Score.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-institution retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-scoring system to differentiate arthrodesis from pseudoarthrosis following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Diagnostic workup following fusion surgery often includes MRI to evaluate neural structures and computed tomography (CT) and/or dynamic x-rays to evaluate instrumentation and arthrodesis. The use of MRI alone for these evaluations would protect patients from harmful CT and x-ray ionizing radiation. METHODS: Neurosurgical attending evaluated CTs for arthrodesis or pseudoarthrosis. Blinded neuroradiology attending and neurosurgery senior resident evaluated independent T1 and T2 region of interest (ROI) signal intensity over instrumented disk space. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) at the cisterna magnum and distal adjacent uninstrumented vertebral body (VB) were also calculated. ROI interspace /ROI CSF and ROI interspace /ROI VB quotients were used to create T1- and T2-interspace interbody scores (IIS). RESULTS: Study population (n=64 patients, 50% female) with a mean age of 51.72 years and 109 instrumented levels with 45 fused levels (41.3%) were included. T1-weighted MRI, median T1-IIS CSF for arthrodesis was 176.20 versus 130.92 for pseudoarthrosis ( P <0.0001), T1-IIS VB for arthrodesis was 68.52 and pseudoarthrosis was 52.71 ( P <0.0001). T2-weighted MRI, median T2-IIS CSF for arthrodesis was 27.72 and 14.21 for pseudoarthrosis ( P <0.0001), while T2-IIS VB for arthrodesis was 67.90 and 41.02 for pseudoarthrosis ( P <0.0001). The greatest univariable discriminative capability for arthrodesis via AUROC was T1-IIS VB (0.7743). CONCLUSION: We describe a novel MRI scoring system that may help determine arthrodesis versus pseudoarthrosis following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Postoperative symptomatic patients may only require MRI, which would protect patients from ionizing radiation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Utilization of Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty in the Management of Compression Fractures: National Trends and Predictors of Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the utilization of kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty procedures in the management of compression fractures. With the growing elderly population and the associated increase in rates of osteoporosis, vertebral compression fractures have become a daily encounter for spine surgeons. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the optimal management of this patient population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 91 million longitudinally followed patients from 2016 to 2019 was performed using the PearlDiver Patient Claims Database. Patients with compression fractures were identified using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, and a subset of patients who received kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty were identified using Common Procedural Terminology codes. Baseline demographic and clinical data between groups were acquired. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of receiving kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty. RESULTS: A total of 348,457 patients with compression fractures were identified with 9.2% of patients receiving kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty as their initial treatment. Of these patients, 43.5% underwent additional kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty 30 days after initial intervention. Patients receiving kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty were significantly older (72.2 vs. 67.9, p < 0.05), female, obese, had active smoking status and had higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index scores. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that female sex, smoking status, and obesity were the 3 strongest predictors of receiving kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty (odds ratio, 1.27, 1.24, and 1.14, respectively). The annual rate of kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty did not change significantly (range, 8%-11%). CONCLUSION: The majority of vertebral compression fractures are managed nonoperatively. However, certain patient factors such as smoking status, obesity, female sex, older age, osteoporosis, and greater comorbidities are predictors of undergoing kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty.