What explains sub-national variation in maternal mortality rates within developing countries? A political economy explanation.

Available evidence on maternal mortality rates (MMR) reveals stark differences not only between but also sub-nationally within countries. However, the causes of sub-national variation in MMR remain under-researched and under-theorised. This is a serious problem given the widespread reliance on local authorities to deliver health services in developing countries, which means that sub-national efforts to curb MMR are critical. We propose a multi-level political economy analysis framework which, when applied in Uganda, usefully explained the sub-national differences. Drawing on process tracing and rigorous comparative case study analysis of two otherwise similar districts, this approach was able to identify certain political economy factors as being critical to shaping different levels of progress on MMR. The key variables that matter at district level are not necessarily the 'formal' factors identified in the literature, such as levels of democracy and citizens' power. Rather, the character of the local ruling coalition influences how they play out in practice. This analysis of local power relations needs to be located within a similar understanding of the political economy of health provisioning at a national level, which in many developing country contexts is itself profoundly shaped by international actors. Since the early 2000s, political developments have catalyzed a growing sense of vulnerability within Uganda's ruling coalition leading to political capture of the health ministry and undermining efforts to prioritise maternal health at the national level. With development agencies further undermining the emergence of a coherent centralized strategy, performance at the local level has become dependent on whether 'developmental coalitions' of political, bureaucratic and social players emerge to fill the vacuum. The paper concludes that the large variance in capacity and commitment to reduce maternal mortality within subnational levels of government has to be understood in relation to the local political settlement within which health service provision operates.

The epidemiology of 'bewitchment' as a lay-reported cause of death in rural South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Cases of premature death in Africa may be attributed to witchcraft. In such settings, medical registration of causes of death is rare. To fill this gap, verbal autopsy (VA) methods record signs and symptoms of the deceased before death as well as lay opinion regarding the cause of death; this information is then interpreted to derive a medical cause of death. In the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, South Africa, around 6% of deaths are believed to be due to 'bewitchment' by VA respondents. METHODS: Using 6874 deaths from the Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System, the epidemiology of deaths reported as bewitchment was explored, and using medical causes of death derived from VA, the association between perceptions of witchcraft and biomedical causes of death was investigated. RESULTS: The odds of having one's death reported as being due to bewitchment is significantly higher in children and reproductive-aged women (but not in men) than in older adults. Similarly, sudden deaths or those following an acute illness, deaths occurring before 2001 and those where traditional healthcare was sought are more likely to be reported as being due to bewitchment. Compared with all other deaths, deaths due to external causes are significantly less likely to be attributed to bewitchment, while maternal deaths are significantly more likely to be. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how societies interpret the essential factors that affect their health and how health seeking is influenced by local notions and perceived aetiologies of illness and death could better inform sustainable interventions and health promotion efforts.

Governing chronic poverty under inclusive liberalism: the case of the Northern Uganda Social Action Fund.

The paradigm of 'inclusive neoliberalism' that currently characterises international development places a particular emphasis on community-based responses to the often structural problems of poverty and exclusion. Such approaches have become increasingly controversial: celebrated by optimists as the most empowering way forward for marginal citizens on the one hand, and derided as an abrogation of responsibility by development trustees by sceptics on the other. Uganda provides a particularly interesting context to explore these debates, not least because it has become a standard bearer for inclusive neoliberalism at the same time that regional inequalities within it have become increasingly apparent. Our investigation of the flagship response to deep impoverishment in its northern region, the World Bank-funded Northern Uganda Social Action Fund, offers greater support to the sceptics, not least because of the ways in which the more pernicious tendencies within inclusive neoliberalism have converged with the contemporary politics of development in Uganda.

Confronting HIV/AIDS in a South African village: the impact of health-seeking behaviour.

Much social science research on HIV/AIDS focuses on its impact within affected communities and how people try to cope with its consequences. Based on fieldwork in rural South Africa, this article shows ways in which the inhabitants of a village react to illness, in general, and the role their reactions play in facilitating the spread of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS. There is potentially a strong connection between the manner in which people respond to illness in general, and actual transmission of infection. By influencing the way villagers react to episodes of ill health, folk beliefs about illness and illness causation may create avenues for more people to become infected. This suggests that efforts to combat the HIV/AIDS pandemic cannot succeed without tackling the effects of folk beliefs. Therefore, in addressing the problem of HIV/AIDS, experts should focus on more than disseminating information about cause and transmission, and promoting abstinence, safe sex, and other technocratic fixes. Our findings suggest that people need information to facilitate not only decision-making about how to self-protect against infection, but also appropriate responses when infection has already occurred.