RESUMEN
Purpose There is an acute shortage of neurosurgeons and spine surgeons especially in rural areas of low- and middle-income countries including India. Patients of spine surgery need to travel long distances for follow-up at tertiary care hospitals. This study was done to evaluate role and success rate of telemedicine in follow-up after spine surgery based on patients' diagnosis and demographic features and to identify barriers to successful telemedicine consultations. Materials and Methods All patients undergoing spine surgeries including craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgeries from January 2021 to June 2022 were included in the study. Success rate of telemedicine was calculated using a simple formula: Success rate of telemedicine = successful telemedicine consultations / total number of telemedicine consultation × 100. Success rate was evaluated with respect to demographic features and underlying disease-related factors. Results Eighty-four patients formed the study group in which a total of 181 video teleconsultations were done. Overall success rate of telemedicine was 82.87%. Higher socioeconomic and educational statuses were related to higher success rates of tele-consultations ( p < 0.05). Difficulty in assessing neurological condition using video call in follow-up cases of CVJ and issues related to Internet communication network leading to inability to video call and share image/videos were major causes of failures. Conclusion Telemedicine may prove an effective option for following up patients undergoing spine surgeries except CVJ, which is likely to improve further with improvements in Internet connectivity.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Accessing the petrous apex (PA) via an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is challenging due to its posterior and lateral anatomical relationship with the paraclival carotid artery. Typically, the EEA requires the mobilization or compression of the vessel and the use of angled-lens endoscopes and instruments. A sublabial contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) corridor has been used to overcome these challenges. Still, it requires extensive osteo-meatal disruption and drilling of the medial pterygoid process, which risks the vidian nerve and increases nasal morbidity. Furthermore, the CTM corridor positions the endoscope in the same horizontal plane as the instruments passing through the nostrils, leading to fencing. The authors propose a novel minimally invasive route to the PA, the precaruncular contralateral medial transorbital (cMTO) corridor, to address these issues. This anatomical study compares the EEA+CTM and EEA+cMTO corridors in accessing the PA. METHODS: The authors dissected 14 fresh, preinjected cadaveric specimens (28 sides) using neuronavigation to complete EEA, cMTO, and CTM on each side. In addition to qualitative analysis, they measured and compared the working distance between the entry point (nose, orbit, maxilla) and the petrosal process of the sphenoid bone (PPSB), superomedial PA, and foramen lacerum (FL); angle of attack (AoA); area of surgical freedom; endoscope-instrument fencing angle; and visual angle for each approach. RESULTS: The cMTO corridor provided the shortest working distance to the petroclival region (PA = 67.4 ± 4.47 mm, PPSB = 67.57 ± 4.33 mm, and FL = 66.30 ± 4.77 mm) compared to the CTM (PA = 75.85 ± 3.63 mm, PPSB = 76 ± 3.96 mm, and FL = 74.52 ± 4.26 mm) and to the EEA (PA = 85.16 ± 3.16 mm, PPSB = 84.55 ± 3.02 mm, and FL = 83.42 ± 3.21 mm, p < 0.001). Both CTM and cMTO corridors had a similar visual angle to the PA (20.72° ± 2.16° and 21.63° ± 1.84°, respectively), offering a similar but significantly better visualization than EEA alone (44.71° ± 3.24°, p < 0.001). The cMTO corridor provided better instrument maneuverability than the CTM, as evidenced by a significantly greater fencing angle (30.9° ± 4.9°) than with the CTM (21.7° ± 4.02°, p < 0.001). The vertical AoAs for the EEA, cMTO, and CTM corridors were 9.79° ± 1.75°, 10.65° ± 0.82°, and 9.82° ± 1.43°, respectively (p = 0.009), whereas in the horizontal plane, these were 9.29° ± 1.51°, 9.10° ± 0.73°, and 10.49° ± 1.43° (p < 0.001), respectively. Both the CTM and cMTO corridors offered similar areas of surgical freedom (678.06 ± 99.5 mm2 and 673.59 ± 104.8 mm2, p = 0.986), but they were more significant than that provided by the EEA 487.29 ± 112.9 mm2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EEA+cMTO multiport technique may be a better alternative than the EEA+CTM multiport approach for targeting the petroclival region. However, clinical validation is required to confirm these laboratory findings.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive endoscopic endonasal multiport approaches create additional visualization angles to treat skull base pathologies. The sublabial contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) approach and superior eyelid lateral transorbital approach, frequently used nowadays, have been referred to as the "third port" when used alongside the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). The endoscopic precaruncular contralateral medial transorbital (cMTO) corridor, on the other hand, is an underrecognized but unique port that has been used to repair CSF rhinorrhea originating from the lateral sphenoid sinus recess. However, no anatomical feasibility studies or clinical experience exists to assess its benefits and demonstrate its potential role in multiport endoscopic access to the other contralateral skull base areas. In this study, the authors explored the application and potential utility of multiport EEA combined with the endoscopic cMTO approach (EEA/cMTO) to three target areas of the contralateral skull base: lateral recess of sphenoid sinus (LRSS), petrous apex (PA) and petroclival region, and retrocarotid clinoidocavernous space (CCS). METHODS: Ten cadaveric specimens (20 sides) were dissected bilaterally under stereotactic navigation guidance to access contralateral LRSS via EEA/cMTO. The PA and petroclival region and retrocarotid CCS were exposed via EEA alone, EEA/cMTO, and EEA combined with the sublabial CTM approach (EEA/CTM). Qualitative and quantitative assessments, including working distance and visualization angle to the PA, were recorded. Clinical application of EEA/cMTO is demonstrated in a lateral sphenoid sinus CSF leak repair. RESULTS: During the qualitative assessment, multiport EEA/cMTO provides superior visualization from a high vantage point and better instrument maneuverability than multiport EEA/CTM for the PA and retrocarotid CCS, while maintaining a similar lateral trajectory. The cMTO approach has significantly shorter working distances to all three target areas compared with the CTM approach and EEA. The mean distances to the LRSS, PA, and retrocarotid CCS were 50.69 ± 4.28 mm (p < 0.05), 67.11 ± 5.05 mm (p < 0.001), and 50.32 ± 3.6 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean visualization angles to the PA obtained by multiport EEA/cMTO and EEA/CTM were 28.4° ± 3.27° and 24.42° ± 5.02° (p < 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multiport EEA/cMTO to the contralateral LRSS offers the advantage of preserving the pterygopalatine fossa contents and the vidian nerve, which are frequently sacrificed during a transpterygoid approach. This approach also offers superior visualization and better instrument maneuverability compared with EEA/CTM for targeting the petroclival region and retrocarotid CCS.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía , Base del Cráneo , Humanos , Base del Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Base del Cráneo/anatomía & histología , Nariz/cirugía , Hueso Petroso/cirugía , Hueso Esfenoides/cirugía , CadáverRESUMEN
Background Drilling in neurosurgery is an integral part of surgical exposure, especially in skull base approaches and craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgeries. Most of such drillings are done in close proximity to the neurovascular structures in skull base surgeries and cervical-medullary junction or facet/pedicle in CVJ surgeries. Reluctance to drilling among young neurosurgeons is due to less hands-on experience during training and also, in the early part of the career, due to fear of injury to neurovascular structures. Methods Five commonest bone removals for skull base region and CVJ surgeries that can be safely done using manual instruments were identified based on experiences of senior authors. The authors highlight key technical nuances to widen surgical corridors using manual instruments safely for skull base surgical approaches. Results Basic neuroanatomical concepts and basic physics help in using manual instruments safely for bone removals in various skull base surgical approaches. Conclusions Manual instruments may be used for bone removals in selected skull base surgical approaches, which help young neurosurgeons to perform these surgeries in limited-resource settings.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Expanded endonasal approaches (EEAs) have proven safe and effective in treating select petrous apex (PA) pathologies. Angled endoscopes and instruments have expanded indications for such approaches; however, the complex neurovascular anatomy surrounding the petrous region remains a significant challenge. This study evaluates the feasibility, anatomic aspects, and limitations of a contralateral nasofrontal trephination (CNT) route as a complementary corridor improving access to the PA. METHODS: Expanded endonasal and CNT approaches to the PA were carried out bilaterally in 15 cadaveric heads with endovascular latex injections. The distance to the PA, angle between instruments through the 2 approach portals, and surgical freedom were measured and compared. RESULTS: Three-dimensional DICOM-based modeling and visualization indicate that the CNT route reduces the distance to the target located within the contralateral PA by an average of 3.33 cm (19%) and affords a significant increase in the angle between instruments (15.60°; 54%). Furthermore, the vertical vector of approach is improved by 28.97° yielding a caudal reach advantage of 2 cm. The area of surgical freedom afforded by 3 different approaches (endonasal, endonasal with an endoscope in CNT portal, and endonasal with an instrument in CNT portal) was compared at 4 points: the dural exit point of the 6th cranial nerve, jugular foramen, foramen lacerum, and petroclival fissure. The mean area of surgical freedom provided by both approaches incorporating the CNT corridor was superior to EEA alone at each of the surgical targets ( P = <.001). CONCLUSION: The addition of a CNT portal provides an additional avenue to expand on the classical EEA to the PA. This study provides insight into the anatomic nuances and potential clinical benefits of a dual-port approach to the PA.
Asunto(s)
Cadáver , Hueso Petroso , Humanos , Hueso Petroso/cirugía , Hueso Petroso/anatomía & histología , Trepanación/métodos , Trepanación/instrumentación , Cavidad Nasal/cirugía , Cavidad Nasal/anatomía & histología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodosRESUMEN
Cavernomas are histologically benign vascular malformations found at different sites in the brain. A rare site for such cavernomas, however, is the anterior optic pathway, comprising the optic nerve, chiasma, and optic tract-called optochiasmatic cavernomas (OCC). These lesions usually present with sudden onset or progressive vision loss, headache, and features mimicking pituitary apoplexy. In this paper, we describe a case of OCC operated at our center. We carry out an updated review of literature depicting cases of OCC, their clinical presentation, management, and postoperative complications. We also propose a novel classification system based on lesion location and further analyze these cavernoma types with respect to the surgical approach used and visual outcome. A 30-year-old lady had presented with a 3-week history of progressive bilateral vision loss and headache. Based on imaging, she was suspected to have a cavernous angioma of the chiasma and left optic tract. Due to progressive vision deterioration, the lesion was surgically excised using pterional craniotomy. Postoperatively, her visual symptoms improved, but she developed diabetes insipidus. Clinical and radiological follow-up has been done for 18 months after surgery. A total of 81 cases have been described in the literature, including the present case. Chiasmal apoplexy is the most common presentation. Surgical excision is the standard of care. Our analysis based on lesion location shows the most appropriate surgical approach to be used for each cavernoma type. Visual outcome correlates with the preoperative visual status. Visual outcome is good in patients presenting with acute chiasmal apoplexy, and when complete surgical excision is performed. The endonasal endoscopic approach was found to provide the best visual outcome. In addition to preoperative visual status, complete surgical excision predicts favorable visual outcomes in OCC. Our proposed classification system guides the appropriate surgical approach required for a particular location of the cavernoma.
Asunto(s)
Hemangioma Cavernoso , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Cefalea , Hemangioma Cavernoso/diagnóstico , Hemangioma Cavernoso/cirugía , Hemangioma Cavernoso/patología , Quiasma Óptico/cirugía , Nervio Óptico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trastornos de la Visión/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach (TPA), minimally invasive compared with the sublabial transmaxillary and transcranial approaches, still accounts for morbidity in benign lateral recess of sphenoid sinus (LRSS) pathologies. Others have suggested an alternative route to the LRSS, the endoscopic contralateral medial transorbital approach (cMTO). However, no quantitative evidence exists to support the clinical application of this approach. This cadaveric study, in a controlled laboratory setting, provides a morphometric comparison of the TPA and cMTO for accessing the LRSS. The study also details the anatomy and technical nuances for optimizing the cMTO corridor. METHODS: Ten fresh preinjected human cadaveric specimens (20 sides) were dissected with neuronavigation, completing endoscopic cMTO and TPA on each side. Four parameters-working distance to lateral recess, surgical exposure area, angle of attack (AoA), and surgical freedom-were measured for each approach. Relevant osteological measurements in 10 dried human skulls were recorded. RESULTS: The mean distance from the superior margin of the lacrimal sac impression to the inferior margin of the trochlear fossa was 10.29 ± 1.13 mm, and that from the anterior ethmoidal artery foramina to the posterior lacrimal crest was 9.63 ± 1.23 mm. The mean exposure area around the LRSS was significantly higher in TPA (614.09 ± 40.38 mm2) than in cMTO (391.19 ± 59.01 mm2, P = .001). The mean AoA was 9.83° and 10.24° in the cMTO and TPA, respectively, in the craniocaudal direction (P = .529). In the horizontal plane, it was 9.29° and 10.76° (P = .012). There was no significant difference in surgical freedom between the cMTO and TPA (804.61 and 806.05 mm3, respectively; P = .993). CONCLUSION: Although comparatively limited exposure area, the cMTO approach has a similar AoA and surgical freedom as TPA and offers better visualization and ergonomic advantages. cMTO provides a feasible, less morbid, multiport technique for benign sphenoid sinus lateral recess pathologies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of government institutes offering affordable super specialty and tertiary healthcare in India has traditionally not been able to keep pace with the growth in population, most of whom are too poor to be able to afford private healthcare services. To meet this mandate, 6 new institutes built on the template of the premier institute of the country-the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-were founded and began operations in 2012. Using the progress of our department as an example, the aim of this report is to outline the principles that were followed to set up the department of neurosurgery. METHODS: The Department of Neurosurgery at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, began providing services in August 2017. Data related to the inception and development of the department were collected. RESULTS: The department has grown during the past 5 years from 400 outpatients and 79 inpatients in 2017 to 11,144 outpatients and 1624 inpatients in 2022. Only 59 surgeries were performed in 2017 compared with 597 routine and 311 emergency procedures performed in 2022. Currently, the department has 7 faculty members performing all forms of complex skull base, craniovertebral junction, vascular, endovascular, epilepsy, and functional surgeries. A total of 134 studies have been reported in national and international journals, and 8 patents have been granted. CONCLUSIONS: We report the unique experiences of one department that could be useful as a template and as guidelines for the establishment process of a new department.