Plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma: effectiveness in cases with very low circulating CD34+ cell levels and preemptive intervention vs remobilization.

This retrospective study presents data from 105 consecutive multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients who had PB CD34+ cell counts <10/µL on day 4 of steady-state G-CSF mobilization for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Our results confirm the capacity of plerixafor to improve mobilization outcomes in this clinical setting. In addition, they show that the effectiveness of plerixafor, compared with G-CSF only, translates to patients with very low (<3.5/µL) circulating CD34+ cell counts: overnight CD34+ cell count expansion (5.3- vs 1.7-fold), overall CD34+ cell yield (2.29 vs 0.15 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg) and patients yielding ⩾2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (63% vs 3%). Furthermore, our data also show that preemptive plerixafor is significantly more effective and more efficient than in remobilization: CD34+ cell yield in the first apheresis (3.28 vs 2.0 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg) and overall (3.73 vs 2.44 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg), patients yielding ⩾2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg in the first apheresis (85% vs 44%) and overall (92% vs 64%), all this requiring less days and doses of plerixafor treatment (1.08 vs 1.48). These data would advocate using plerixafor as an early preemptive intervention based on day 4 circulating CD34+ counts, including very high-risk patients with very low circulating levels.

Detection of hepatitis C virus antibodies in oral fluid specimens for prevalence studies.

Within the framework of hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence monitoring, we evaluated oral fluid (OF), which is richer in IgG than whole saliva, as a possible alternative to serum for the detection of HCV antibodies. Paired OF and serum samples were collected from 90 individuals, including 45 HCV-positives and 45 HCV-negatives. The detection of HCV antibodies in both serum and OF was performed using the Ortho HCV 3.0 SAVe enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc., Raritan, NJ), but a modified, more sensitive protocol was used to process OF. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay were 86.67% (95% confidence interval (CI): 72.51-94.46%) and 100% (95% CI: 90.20-99.80%) in OF and 100% in serum. The correlation obtained between both types of clinical specimens was excellent (k: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.66-1.07). However, the negative predictive value (NPV) of the assay in OF decreased with the prevalence of HCV infection in the population studied. Our results suggest that the modified Ortho HCV 3.0 SAVe ELISA is suitable for the detection of HCV antibodies in OF for epidemiological studies. Using this assay, we observed an unadjusted anti-HCV prevalence of 78.6% among a population of intravenous drug users; when adjusted to account for assay sensitivity, this prevalence may be closer to 90%.