Dermatology Journal Advisory Boards and editorial independence.

Background: Dermatology journals play an essential role in the distribution and promotion of scientific and medical information. Despite this, there are little data on governance structure with respect to its editors, owners, and journal boards that oversee the day-to-day operations for these entities. Objective: This study aimed to explore the current governance structure of dermatology journals and best practice recommendations. Methods: The editors-in-chief of the major dermatology journals participated in an online survey of 29 questions to examine general statistics of each journal, open access model, governance structure, and process for editor selection or dismissal. Results: Of the 52 journal responses, 29 (55.8%) are society-owned journals with 19 (65.5%) primarily governed by a society board, while 18 (34.6%) have an advisory committee or alternative body. Most editor(s)-in-chief (56.9%) serve between 3- and 5-year terms, while 84.6% have the option of at least one renewal. Even though the selection, evaluation, and dismissal processes differed between the journals, generalized best practice recommendations were developed to help improve their overall organization and management. Conclusions: The oversight structure of dermatology journals varies, and some do not follow current best practice recommendations. Transparency regarding leadership, governance, and due process is needed to maintain editorial independence and integrity.

Did pediatric drug development advance epilepsy treatment in young patients? It is time for new research goals.

Modern drugs have changed epilepsy, which affects people of all ages. However, for young people with epilepsy, the framework of drug development has stalled. In the wake of the thalidomide catastrophe, the misconception emerged that for people < 18 years of age drugs, including antiseizure medications (ASMs), need separate proof of efficacy and safety, overall called "pediatric drug development". For ASMs, this has changed to some degree. Authorities now accept that ASMs are effective in < 18 years as well, but they still require "extrapolation of efficacy," as if minors were another species. As a result, some of the pediatric clinical epilepsy research over the past decades was unnecessary. Even more importantly, this has hampered research on meaningful research goals. We do not need to confirm that ASMs work before as they do after the 18th birthday. Instead, we need to learn how to prevent brain damage in young patients by preventing seizures and optimize ASMs' uses. Herein we discuss how to proceed in this endeavor.

Ethics of Residency Programs and Fellowships that Electively Withdraw from the NRMP Match.

The National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), known as "The Match (TM)," facilitates the placement of medical graduates into residency and fellowship programs in the United States. Programs may opt out of TM for various reasons. The selective and intermittent withdrawal of programs from TM raises ethical concerns surrounding fairness, transparency, beneficence, autonomy, and justice for applicants. We discuss these issues, present the history behind TM, and offer suggestions to promote fairness.

Antisemitism and Dermatology in Nazi Germany and Beyond.

Antisemitism, the hatred of or prejudice against Jews, was a core component of the Nazi regime's ideology. We review the chronology of events against the Jews and Jewish physicians in Germany and their conquered territories from 1933 to 1945. The complicit role that German physicians played in these events and the devastating impact on Jewish dermatologists and our specialty will be recounted. Finally, we will address the antisemitism in the United States during that same approximate period and now.

Screened Out: Ethically Managing Sunscreen Misinformation by Social Media Influencers.

Rampant social media use allows individuals and organizations to broadcast their views to scoping audiences with minimal requirements for vetting or validating shared information. We discuss the impact of disinformation transmitted via social media and use the recent example of false information broadcast concerning sunscreens recently reported in the Wall Street Journal. We also highlight the ethical consequences of social media influencers who disseminate unchecked information and the need for healthcare professionals to be involved to enhance accountability, goodwill, and truthfulness.

A call for action: Formalin exposure and broader occupational hazards and assessing the risk of glioblastoma in clinician scientists.

Physicians and surgeons have a threefold increased risk of glioblastoma compared with population controls. We discuss the potential role of dermatology neurotoxin and carcinogenic occupational exposure, particularly to formalin/formaldehyde; how to reduce those exposures; and the ethical imperative for dermatologists to protect themselves, their staff, and their patients.