No effect of acidification or freezing on urinary metanephrine levels.

BACKGROUND: Urinary metanephrine is a reliable method to estimate catecholamine secretion. Traditionally, urinary metanephrines are collected into chilled containers containing hydrochloric acid (HCl) and most laboratories freeze urinary samples before analysis. It is uncertain if these pre-analytic procedures alter metanephrine values. AIM: To evaluate if acidifying and freezing urine samples affect the accuracy of urinary metanephrine measurements. METHODS: Random urine samples from healthy individuals were collected. Urine samples were distributed into two containers: with HCl 50% homogenized with urine to obtain pH < 2, and without HCl. Each container was divided again into aliquots for immediate measurement or freezing. One aliquot with acid (group 1) and another without acid (group 2) were sent immediately to the laboratory for testing (HPLC), while the other two aliquots, one with acid (group 3) and another without it (group 4) were frozen for 3 months at - 20 °C. Bland-Altman's test was used to analyze inter-assay agreement between measurements. RESULTS: A total of 15 individuals were included (mean age 27.5 ± 5.9 years, 8 male and 14 white). No difference was observed on mean urinary metanephrine/creatinine ratio between groups: group 1: 0.23 ± 0.11, group 2: 0.22 ± 0.07, group 3: 0.25 ± 0.13, group 4: 0.25 ± 0.15 mg/g creatinine; P > 0.05 for all the comparisons). Bland-Altman's analysis showed agreement between the standard method (group 1) and the experimental method (group 4). CONCLUSION: Measurement of urinary metanephrines by HPLC method is not influenced by sample acidification nor freezing at - 20 °C for 3 months.

Comparison of insulin degludec with insulin detemir in type 1 diabetes: a 1-year treat-to-target trial.

The long-term safety and tolerability of insulin degludec (IDeg) was compared with that of insulin detemir (IDet), as basal treatment in participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). In the present multinational, 26-week core + 26-week extension, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial, adults with T1DM were randomized to IDeg or IDet as basal insulin treatment combined with meal-time bolus insulin aspart. IDeg was administered once daily, whilst IDet was administered once or twice daily depending on patients' glycaemic control. After 1 year, IDeg provided a 33% lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with IDet: estimated rate ratio (IDeg : IDet) 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51; 0.88]; p < 0.05. IDeg improved glycated haemoglobin after 1 year of treatment, similarly to IDet, but IDeg also provided a significantly greater reduction in fasting plasma glucose compared with IDet: estimated difference (IDeg - IDet) -1.11 (95% CI -1.83; -0.40) mmol/l; p < 0.05. The present study confirmed the long-term safety and tolerability profile of IDeg in patients with T1DM. IDeg provided a lower risk of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia than IDet.

Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given as part of basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes: a 26-week randomized, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial.

AIMS: The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) was compared with insulin detemir (IDet), both administered once daily (OD) as basal treatment in participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The primary outcome was non-inferiority of IDeg to IDet in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction after 26 weeks. METHODS: This multinational, 26-week, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial randomized adults with T1DM to IDeg or IDet as OD basal insulin treatment combined with mealtime bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Participants with T1DM treated with any basal-bolus insulin regimen for ≥ 12 months prior to the trial, a mean HbA1c ≤ 10.0% (85.8 mmol/mol) and body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35.0 kg/m(2) at screening participated in the trial (IDeg: N = 302; IDet: N = 153). RESULTS: After 26 weeks, HbA1c decreased 0.73% (8.0 mmol/mol) (IDeg) and 0.65% (7.1 mmol/mol) (IDet) [estimated treatment difference (ETD) IDeg-IDet: -0.09% (-0.23; 0.05)95% CI (-10.0 mmol/mol [-2.6; 0.6]95% CI ); confirming non-inferiority]. Mean fasting plasma glucose improved in both groups, and was lower with IDeg than IDet [ETD IDeg-IDet: -1.66 mmol/l (-2.37; -0.95)95% CI , p < 0.0001]. The rate of confirmed hypoglycaemia was similar with IDeg and IDet [45.83 vs. 45.69 episodes per patient-year of exposure (PYE); estimated rate ratio (RR) IDeg/IDet: 0.98 (0.80; 1.20)95% CI , p = 0.86]. The rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia was lower with IDeg than IDet [4.14 vs. 5.93 episodes per PYE; RR IDeg/IDet: 0.66 (0.49; 0.88)95% CI , p = 0.0049]. Adverse event profiles were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: IDeg administered OD in basal-bolus therapy effectively improved long-term glycaemic control in participants with T1DM with a lower risk of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia than IDet.

Insulin lispro low mixture twice daily versus basal insulin glargine once daily and prandial insulin lispro once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin intensification: a randomized phase IV trial.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of two insulin intensification strategies in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin glargine with metformin and/or pioglitazone. METHODS: A multinational, randomized, open-label trial that compared insulin lispro low mixture (LM25; n = 236) twice daily with a basal-prandial regimen of insulin glargine once daily and insulin lispro once daily (IGL; n = 240) over 24 weeks in patients with HbA1c 7.5-10.5% and fasting plasma glucose ≤ 6.7 mmol/l. The primary objective was to assess non-inferiority [per-protocol (PP) population], and then superiority [intention-to-treat (ITT) population], of LM25 versus IGL according to change in HbA1c after 24 weeks (non-inferiority margin 0.4%, two-sided significance level 0.05). RESULTS: Estimated change [least squares (LS) mean (95% CI)] in HbA1c after 24 weeks: -1.30 (-1.44, -1.16)% with LM25 and -1.08 (-1.22, -0.94)% with IGL. Non-inferiority was shown [LS mean (95% CI) HbA1c treatment difference -0.21 (-0.38, -0.04) (PP population)]; gated superiority assessment showed a statistically significant advantage for LM25 (p = 0.010; ITT population). Mean blood glucose, glycaemic variability, overall tolerability and hypoglycaemic episodes per patient-year did not show significant differences between treatments during the study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on once-daily basal insulin glargine and metformin and/or pioglitazone, intensification with LM25 was superior to a basal-prandial approach in terms of reduction in HbA1c after 24 weeks and did not increase hypoglycaemia episodes.

Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety of saxagliptin ± metformin over 4 years in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Drug-naive (n = 401; study 11) or metformin-treated (n = 743; study 14) adults with HbA(1c) of 53-86 mmol/mol (7.0-10%) were enrolled in two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of saxagliptin 2.5, 5 or 10 mg/day. Patients rescued during or completing 24 weeks of treatment could continue in a 42-month long-term blinded phase, for which the primary goal was assessment of safety and tolerability. Between-group efficacy was not evaluated in the long-term phase of study 11. Time to rescue or discontinuation because of inadequate glycaemic control, change from baseline in HbA(1c) and percentages of patients achieving HbA(1c) < 53 mmol/mol (< 7.0%) were assessed in study 14. RESULTS: No new safety findings were noted during the long-term phase. Most adverse events were mild or moderate, with slightly greater frequency of upper respiratory infections with saxagliptin. Hypoglycaemic event rates were similar with saxagliptin and placebo. In study 14, time to rescue or discontinuation because of inadequate glycaemic control was longer with saxagliptin plus metformin than for placebo plus metformin. From baseline to week 154, HbA(1c) decreased with saxagliptin but increased with placebo. CONCLUSION: Saxagliptin monotherapy or add-on to metformin is generally safe and well tolerated, with no increased risk of hypoglycaemia, for up to 4 years.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: Outcome of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NCSLC) is generally poor, with five-year survival rate of only 23%, when patients are treated with surgery only. The presentation of positive adjuvant therapy trials in NSCLC has changed clinical practice, doubling the number of patients with completely resected NSCLC referred for adjuvant chemotherapy since 2004. Furthermore, few large studies described a large number of stage III patients in non-Asiatic patients and they showed controversial results about survival in completely resected stage IIIA NSCLC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA NCSLC, administered on a routine basis, outside clinical trials. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with stage IIIA NCSLC treated between 1990 and 2008, and included in a continuous, consecutive database. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years, complete surgical resection, and pathologically confirmed as stage IIIA. The following clinical data were obtained: age, gender, performance status, histological type, chemotherapy regimens, status at last follow-up and hospital where the treatment occurred. Kaplan-Meier's method was used to determine actuarial survival. Differences in survival were determined by Breslow and log rank analyses. RESULTS: According to these inclusion criteria, 415 patients were considered for the present study. The median follow-up time of all patients was 38.2 months. The adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment affected survival significantly (P <0.001). Also the type of chemotherapeutic treatment affected survival (P ≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in patients who had a completed resected stage IIIA carcinoma.

Clinical features of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hepatitis C infection

The objective of the present cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence and the clinical and laboratory features of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) attending either an outpatient clinic or hemodialysis units. Serologic-HCV testing was performed in 489 type 2 DM patients (303 outpatients and 186 on dialysis). A structured assessment of clinical, laboratory and DM-related complications was performed and the patients were then compared according to HCV infection status. Mean patient age was 60 years; HCV positivity (HCV+) was observed in 39 of 303 (12.9 percent) outpatients and in 34 of 186 (18.7 percent) dialysis patients. Among HCV+ patients, 32 were men (43.8 percent). HCV+ patients had higher serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (0.90 ± 0.83 vs 0.35 ± 0.13 µKat/L), alanine aminotransferase (0.88 ± 0.93 vs 0.38 ± 0.19 µKat/L), gamma-glutamyl transferase (1.57 ± 2.52 vs 0.62 ± 0.87 µKat/L; P < 0.001), and serum iron (17.65 ± 6.68 vs 14.96 ± 4.72 µM; P = 0.011), and lower leukocyte and platelet counts (P = 0.010 and P < 0.001, respectively) than HCV-negative (HCV-) patients. HCV+ dialysis patients had higher diastolic blood pressure than HCV- patients (87.5 ± 6.7 vs 81.5 ± 6.0 mmHg; P = 0.005) and a lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (75 vs 92.7 percent; P = 0.007). In conclusion, our study showed that HCV is common among subjects with type 2 DM but is not associated with a higher prevalence of chronic diabetic complications.

Clinical features of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hepatitis C infection.

The objective of the present cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence and the clinical and laboratory features of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) attending either an outpatient clinic or hemodialysis units. Serologic-HCV testing was performed in 489 type 2 DM patients (303 outpatients and 186 on dialysis). A structured assessment of clinical, laboratory and DM-related complications was performed and the patients were then compared according to HCV infection status. Mean patient age was 60 years; HCV positivity (HCV+) was observed in 39 of 303 (12.9%) outpatients and in 34 of 186 (18.7%) dialysis patients. Among HCV+ patients, 32 were men (43.8%). HCV+ patients had higher serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (0.90 ± 0.83 vs 0.35 ± 0.13 µKat/L), alanine aminotransferase (0.88 ± 0.93 vs 0.38 ± 0.19 µKat/L), gamma-glutamyl transferase (1.57 ± 2.52 vs 0.62 ± 0.87 µKat/L; P < 0.001), and serum iron (17.65 ± 6.68 vs 14.96 ± 4.72 µM; P = 0.011), and lower leukocyte and platelet counts (P = 0.010 and P < 0.001, respectively) than HCV-negative (HCV-) patients. HCV+ dialysis patients had higher diastolic blood pressure than HCV- patients (87.5 ± 6.7 vs 81.5 ± 6.0 mmHg; P = 0.005) and a lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (75 vs 92.7%; P = 0.007). In conclusion, our study showed that HCV is common among subjects with type 2 DM but is not associated with a higher prevalence of chronic diabetic complications.

Humidification of inspired gases during mechanical ventilation.

Humidification of inspired gas is mandatory for all mechanically ventilated patients to prevent secretion retention, tracheal tube blockage and adverse changes occurring to the respiratory tract epithelium. However, the debate over "ideal" humidification continues. Several devices are available that include active and passive heat and moisture exchangers and hot water humidifiers Each have their advantages and disadvantages in mechanically ventilated patients. This review explores each device in turn and defines their role in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of topiramate on weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Topiramate was associated with weight loss in clinical trials. We summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of topiramate in the treatment of overweight/obesity. The databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched. Randomized controlled studies with at least 16 weeks of duration that report the effect of topiramate on weight loss and adverse events were eligible for inclusion. Ten studies were included (3320 individuals). Patients treated with topiramate lost an average of 5.34 kg (95% confidence interval [95%CI]-6.12 to -4.56) of additional weight as compared with placebo. According to meta-regression analysis, treatment duration and dosage were associated with the efficacy of topiramate treatment. Evaluating trials using topiramate 96-200 mg day(-1) , the weight loss was higher in trials with >28 weeks of duration (-6.58 kg [95%CI -7.48 to -5.68]) than in trials with ≤28 weeks (-4.11 kg [95%CI -4.92 to -3.30]). Data of 6620 individuals were available for adverse events evaluation and those more frequently observed were paraesthesia, taste impairment and psychomotor disturbances. The odds ratio for adverse events leading to topiramate withdrawal was 1.94 (95%CI 1.64-2.29) compared with the control group. In conclusion, topiramate might be a useful adjunctive therapeutic tool in the treatment of obesity as long as proper warnings about side effects are considered.

HbA(1c) measurement for the diagnosis of diabetes: is it enough?

AIM: To analyse the performance of HbA(1c) in diagnosing Type 2 diabetes based on fasting plasma glucose and/or 2-h plasma glucose measurements after a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. METHODS: This is a study of diagnostic test accuracy in individuals referred to the Clinical Pathology Department for oral glucose tolerance testing. After fasting overnight, HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose and 2-h plasma glucose were measured. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HbA(1c). RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-eight subjects (195 male, mean age 56 years) were enrolled and 115 (23.1%) were diagnosed with diabetes according to glucose-based methods and only 56 (11.2%) individuals were identified by HbA(1c) ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) (sensitivity 20.9%, specificity 95.3%). There is poor agreement between the newly recommended criterion and the current glucose-based diagnostic criteria (κ = 0.217; P < 0.001), probably because the diagnostic methods identify different populations of patients. Adding a glucose-based method into an algorithm, as proposed by the UK Department of Health, improved HbA(1c) performance. CONCLUSIONS: HbA(1c) ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) showed limited sensitivity to diabetes diagnosis, although with high specificity. The results suggest that this cut-off point would not be enough to diagnose diabetes. Its use as the sole diabetes diagnostic test should be interpreted with caution to assure the correct classification of diabetic individuals.

Hypertension is the metabolic syndrome component most strongly associated with microvascular complications and coronary artery calcification in Type 1 diabetes.

AIM: To evaluate the association of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its individual components with microvascular complications and coronary artery calcification (CAC) in patients with Type 1 diabetes. MATERIAL/SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study included 261 patients with Type 1 diabetes. Patients were assessed regarding the presence of MetS according to National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria. CAC score was measured in a subset of 100 patients without known cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 13.4% according to the NCEP criteria. Microvascular complications and CAC were more frequent in patients with MetS. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, MetS remained associated with nephropathy [OR: 6.33 (95% CI 2.54-15.77), p<0.001], but not with retinopathy and CAC. Among the MetS components, hypertension was associated with presence of retinopathy [OR: 4.04 (95% CI 1.65- 9.90), p=0.002], nephropathy [OR: 5.92 (95% CI 2.42-14.4), p<0.001] and CAC [OR: 2.97 (95% CI 1.06-8.30), p=0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension was the only MetS component associated with retinopathy, nephropathy and the presence of CAC. Hypertension was better associated with CAC than MetS itself.

Coronary artery calcification is associated with insulin resistance index in patients with type 1 diabetes.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with the presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 consecutive T1D patients without coronary artery disease, with at least 5 years of diabetes and absence of end-stage renal disease. Mean age was 38 ± 10 years and 57% were males. CAC score was measured by multidetector computed tomography (Siemens Sensation 64 Cardiac). The insulin resistance index was measured using the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR). The eGDR was lower among CAC-positive patients than among CAC-negative patients, suggesting an increased insulin resistance. In a logistic regression model adjusted for age (at 10-year intervals), eGDR, diabetic nephropathy and gender, CAC was associated with age [OR = 2.73 (95%CI = 1.53-4.86), P = 0.001] and with eGDR [OR = 0.08 (95%CI = 0.02-0.21), P = 0.004]. In T1D subjects, insulin resistance is one of the most important risk factors for subclinical atherosclerosis.

Coronary artery calcification is associated with insulin resistance index in patients with type 1 diabetes

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with the presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 consecutive T1D patients without coronary artery disease, with at least 5 years of diabetes and absence of end-stage renal disease. Mean age was 38 ± 10 years and 57 percent were males. CAC score was measured by multidetector computed tomography (Siemens Sensation 64 Cardiac). The insulin resistance index was measured using the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR). The eGDR was lower among CAC-positive patients than among CAC-negative patients, suggesting an increased insulin resistance. In a logistic regression model adjusted for age (at 10-year intervals), eGDR, diabetic nephropathy and gender, CAC was associated with age [OR = 2.73 (95 percentCI = 1.53-4.86), P = 0.001] and with eGDR [OR = 0.08 (95 percentCI = 0.02-0.21), P = 0.004]. In T1D subjects, insulin resistance is one of the most important risk factors for subclinical atherosclerosis.

Effect of metabolic syndrome and of its individual components on renal function of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its individual components on the renal function of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). A cross-sectional study was performed in 842 type 2 DM patients. A clinical and laboratory evaluation, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated by the modification of diet in renal disease formula, was performed. MetS was defined according to National Cholesterol Education Program - Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Mean patient age was 57.9 ± 10.1 years and 313 (37.2 percent) patients were males. MetS was detected in 662 (78.6 percent) patients. A progressive reduction in eGFR was observed as the number of individual MetS components increased (one: 98.2 ± 30.8; two: 92.9 ± 28.1; three: 84.0 ± 25.1; four: 83.8 ± 28.5, and five: 79.0 ± 23.0; P < 0.001). MetS increased the risk for low eGFR (<60 mL·min-1·1.73 (m²)-1) 2.82-fold (95 percentCI = 1.55-5.12, P < 0.001). Hypertension (OR = 2.2, 95 percentCI = 1.39-3.49, P = 0.001) and hypertriglyceridemia (OR = 1.62, 95 percentCI = 1.19-2.20, P = 0.002) were the individual components with the strongest associations with low eGFR. In conclusion, there is an association between MetS and the reduction of eGFR in patients with type 2 DM, with hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia being the most important contributors in this sample. Interventional studies should be conducted to determine if treatment of MetS can prevent renal failure in type 2 DM patients.

Effect of metabolic syndrome and of its individual components on renal function of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its individual components on the renal function of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). A cross-sectional study was performed in 842 type 2 DM patients. A clinical and laboratory evaluation, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated by the modification of diet in renal disease formula, was performed. MetS was defined according to National Cholesterol Education Program - Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Mean patient age was 57.9 +/- 10.1 years and 313 (37.2%) patients were males. MetS was detected in 662 (78.6%) patients. A progressive reduction in eGFR was observed as the number of individual MetS components increased (one: 98.2 +/- 30.8; two: 92.9 +/- 28.1; three: 84.0 +/- 25.1; four: 83.8 +/- 28.5, and five: 79.0 +/- 23.0; P < 0.001). MetS increased the risk for low eGFR (<60 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 (m2)(-1)) 2.82-fold (95%CI = 1.55-5.12, P < 0.001). Hypertension (OR = 2.2, 95%CI = 1.39-3.49, P = 0.001) and hypertriglyceridemia (OR = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.19-2.20, P = 0.002) were the individual components with the strongest associations with low eGFR. In conclusion, there is an association between MetS and the reduction of eGFR in patients with type 2 DM, with hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia being the most important contributors in this sample. Interventional studies should be conducted to determine if treatment of MetS can prevent renal failure in type 2 DM patients.

Alogliptin added to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes reduces HbA(1C) without causing weight gain or increased hypoglycaemia.

AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin alone or combined with metformin. METHODS: In this 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 390 patients were randomized to receive alogliptin 12.5 mg (n = 131), alogliptin 25 mg (n = 129) or placebo (n = 130) once daily, as add-on to stable insulin therapy with or without metformin. The primary endpoint was change in haemoglobin A(1C) (HbA(1C)) at week 26. RESULTS: At week 26, mean HbA(1C) changes from the mean baseline value of 9.3% were significantly greater for alogliptin 12.5 mg (-0.63 +/- 0.08%) and alogliptin 25 mg (-0.71 +/- 0.08%) than placebo (-0.13 +/- 0.08%; p < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg than placebo had HbA(1C) decreases of > or =0.5, > or =1.0 and > or =1.5%. Insulin doses remained unchanged, and there were no differences in the proportions of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia among placebo (24%), alogliptin 12.5 mg (27%) and alogliptin 25 mg (27%). Mean weight increases from baseline at week 26 were similar for placebo (0.6 +/- 0.2 kg), alogliptin 12.5 mg (0.7 +/- 0.2 kg) and alogliptin 25 mg (0.6 +/- 0.2 kg). Incidences of overall adverse events, and of gastrointestinal, dermatological and infection-related events, were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding alogliptin to previous insulin therapy (with or without metformin) significantly improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on insulin, without causing weight gain or increasing the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Further studies are warranted to explore the role of alogliptin added to optimized basal insulin regimens.

A strategy to avoid missed cases in a Brazilian neonatal TSH screening program for congenital hypothyroidism.

BACKGROUND: There have been reports of patients with primary hypothyroidism not identified by TSH measurement due to a presumably delayed rise in serum TSH. However, there are no data on the incidence of false negative results in neonatal screening programs employing primary TSH assay for diagnosis. AIM: To investigate the incidence of false negative results in a neonatal screening program using the primary TSH approach and evaluate a strategy to avoid misdiagnosis. INFANTS AND METHODS: 190 newborns, with initial TSH > 15.0 IU/l and < 20.0 IU/l (screening cutoff). These infants were submitted to a second TSH measurement around 30 days after the first screening. RESULTS: Thirty days after the first screening, four of the 190 infants (2.1%) remained with TSH levels around the cut-off screening level or higher. Of these four patients, three had an absence of thyroid gland on ultrasonography, with a final diagnosis of dysgenesis. The fourth patient had a normal shaped gland in its usual location by ultrasonography, with an outcome of transitory congenital hypothyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of missed congenital hypothyroidism diagnoses in this neonatal screening program based on the TSH approach was low and acceptable. Nevertheless, with the proposed strategy, the risk of false negative results can be reduced without significant impact on the overall cost of the screening program.