The effects of untreated reflux on the incidence of dysphagia, oral aversion, and feeding difficulty in the NICU population.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether late-preterm and full-term neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with diagnosed gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) have an increased incidence of feeding difficulties, dysphagia, and oral aversion. To determine the incidence of reflux medication use in late-preterm and full-term neonates in the NICU. METHODS: Neonates greater than 34 weeks gestational age (GA) diagnosed with reflux, who were hospitalized for at least five days, were included in the study. Neonates with anatomical anomalies that interfere with feeding are excluded. The control group included neonates greater than 34 weeks GA not diagnosed with reflux. The key outcome variables were subjective ease of feeding, oral aversion, and placement on nasogastric (NG), orogastric (OG), or requirement of total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared and t-test to compare incidence of feeding difficulties between the groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In neonates with a diagnosis of reflux, 42.02% had feeding difficulties (66 patients). In the control group, 30.49% of neonates had feeding difficulties (218 patients). Feeding difficulties in neonates with reflux was 11.55% higher than in the control group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Late-preterm and full-term neonates diagnosed with reflux have a higher incidence of feeding difficulties than those who did not have reflux. Only 0.86% of neonates diagnosed with reflux were treated with anti-reflux medications at this large tertiary care children's hospital.

Outcomes Associated with Nasal Reconstruction Post-Rhinectomy: A Narrative Review.

The face and the external nose define an individual's physical appearance. Nasal deformities can cause facial disfigurement along with unwanted psychological repercussions. Nasal deformities range in severity, with the most severe cases being indications for a rhinectomy, due to the complexity of the nasal defect. According to published literature, there is no consensus among otolaryngologists and plastic surgeons on which technique or flap use is preferred in terms of complications, aesthetic outcome, or patient satisfaction. The goal of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of published studies on nasal reconstruction following rhinectomy. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines for writing systematic reviews, a systematic review was conducted. Four databases were searched using a search strategy. These articles were then imported into the COVIDENCE software and went screening and thorough article review. After screening 2,237 articles, 23 studies were then extracted for data collection analysis. We collected data from 12 case series, 4 case studies, 1 prospective case series, and 4 retrospective chart review studies. The most commonly reported flaps were forehead flaps, superior extended nasal myocutaneous island, forearm free flaps, anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap, medial femoral condyle free flap ( n = 8), and zygomaticus implants ( n = 6), and retained nasal prosthesis. Although not specifically indicated by a certain number, the most common indication for the rhinectomy was malignancy, followed by traumas, postsurgical complications, radionecrosis, and congenital nasal malformations. Although several donor flaps can be used after rhinectomy, we conclude that there is no preference over what flap has superior patient outcomes after analysis. As of current, there are no prospective studies that exist. Therefore, more research is necessary to determine the results of each flap.