Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; : 1-6, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747278

RESUMEN

Infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality among patients receiving care in outpatient hemodialysis facilities. We describe comprehensive infection prevention assessments by US public health departments using standardized interview and observation tools. Results demonstrated how facility layouts can undermine infection prevention and that clinical practices often fall short of policies.

2.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 84(1): 18-27, 2024 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447708

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Infection prevention efforts in dialysis centers can avert patient morbidity and mortality but are challenging to implement. The objective of this study was to better understand how the design of the work system might contribute to infection prevention in outpatient dialysis centers. STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods, observational study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Six dialysis facilities across the United States visited by a multidisciplinary team over 8 months. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: At each facility, structured macroergonomic observations were undertaken by a multidisciplinary team using the SEIPS 1.0 model. Ethnographic observations were collected about staff encounters with dialysis patients including the content of staff conversations. Selective and axial coding were used for qualitative analysis and quantitative data were reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Organizational and sociotechnical barriers and facilitators to infection prevention in the outpatient dialysis setting were identified. Features related to human performance, (eg, alarms, interruptions, and task stacking), work system design (eg, physical space, scheduling, leadership, and culture), and extrinsic factors (eg, patient-related characteristics) were identified. LIMITATIONS: This was an exploratory evaluation with a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This study used a systematic macroergonomic approach in multiple outpatient dialysis facilities to identify infection prevention barriers and facilitators related to human performance. Several features common across facilities were identified that may influence infection prevention in outpatient care and warrant further exploration.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Control de Infecciones , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Ergonomía/métodos
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(11): 1554-1562, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34487450

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candida auris, a multidrug-resistant yeast, can spread rapidly in ventilator-capable skilled-nursing facilities (vSNFs) and long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). In 2018, a laboratory serving LTACHs in southern California began identifying species of Candida that were detected in urine specimens to enhance surveillance of C auris, and C auris was identified in February 2019 in a patient in an Orange County (OC), California, LTACH. Further investigation identified C auris at 3 associated facilities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of C auris and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in LTACHs and vSNFs in OC. DESIGN: Point prevalence surveys (PPSs), postdischarge testing for C auris detection, and assessments of IPC were done from March to October 2019. SETTING: All LTACHs (n = 3) and vSNFs (n = 14) serving adult patients in OC. PARTICIPANTS: Current or recent patients in LTACHs and vSNFs in OC. INTERVENTION: In facilities where C auris was detected, PPSs were repeated every 2 weeks. Ongoing IPC support was provided. MEASUREMENTS: Antifungal susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing to assess isolate relatedness. RESULTS: Initial PPSs at 17 facilities identified 44 additional patients with C auris in 3 (100%) LTACHs and 6 (43%) vSNFs, with the first bloodstream infection reported in May 2019. By October 2019, a total of 182 patients with C auris were identified by serial PPSs and discharge testing. Of 81 isolates that were sequenced, all were clade III and highly related. Assessments of IPC identified gaps in hand hygiene, transmission-based precautions, and environmental cleaning. The outbreak was contained to 2 facilities by October 2019. LIMITATION: Acute care hospitals were not assessed, and IPC improvements over time could not be rigorously evaluated. CONCLUSION: Enhanced laboratory surveillance and prompt investigation with IPC support enabled swift identification and containment of C auris. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Asunto(s)
Candidiasis/diagnóstico , Candidiasis/prevención & control , Atención Subaguda , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California/epidemiología , Candida auris/genética , Candidiasis/transmisión , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 49(10): 1318-1321, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34375701

RESUMEN

Facility-wide testing performed at 4 outpatient hemodialysis facilities in the absence of an outbreak or escalating community incidence did not identify new SARS-CoV-2 infections and illustrated key logistical considerations essential to successful implementation of SARS-CoV-2 screening. Facilities could consider prioritizing facility-wide SARS-CoV-2 testing during suspicion of an outbreak in the facility or escalating community spread without robust infection control strategies in place. Being prepared to address operational considerations will enhance implementation of facility-wide testing in the outpatient dialysis setting.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fallo Renal Crónico , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Kidney Int ; 99(5): 1045-1053, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33667504

RESUMEN

Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Patients on maintenance hemodialysis are 2 to 2.5 times more likely to develop CDI, with mortality rates 2-fold higher than the general population. Hospitalizations due to CDI among the maintenance hemodialysis population are high, and the frequency of antibiotic exposures and hospitalizations may contribute to CDI risk. In this report, a panel of experts in clinical nephrology, infectious diseases, and infection prevention provide guidance, based on expert opinion and published literature, aimed at preventing the spread of CDI in outpatient hemodialysis facilities.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Clostridioides , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/prevención & control , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos
7.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 74(5): 610-619, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375298

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Contaminated water and other fluids are increasingly recognized to be associated with health care-associated infections. We investigated an outbreak of Gram-negative bloodstream infections at 3 outpatient hemodialysis facilities. STUDY DESIGN: Matched case-control investigations. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients who received hemodialysis at Facility A, B, or C from July 2015 to November 2016. EXPOSURES: Infection control practices, sources of water, dialyzer reuse, injection medication handling, dialysis circuit priming, water and dialysate test findings, environmental reservoirs such as wall boxes, vascular access care practices, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and whole-genome sequencing of bacterial isolates. OUTCOMES: Cases were defined by a positive blood culture for any Gram-negative bacteria drawn July 1, 2015 to November 30, 2016 from a patient who had received hemodialysis at Facility A, B, or C. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Exposures in cases and controls were compared using matched univariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: 58 cases of Gram-negative bloodstream infection occurred; 48 (83%) required hospitalization. The predominant organisms were Serratia marcescens (n=21) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=12). Compared with controls, cases had higher odds of using a central venous catheter for dialysis (matched odds ratio, 54.32; lower bound of the 95% CI, 12.19). Facility staff reported pooling and regurgitation of waste fluid at recessed wall boxes that house connections for dialysate components and the effluent drain within dialysis treatment stations. Environmental samples yielded S marcescens and P aeruginosa from wall boxes. S marcescens isolated from wall boxes and case-patients from the same facilities were closely related by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing. We identified opportunities for health care workers' hands to contaminate central venous catheters with contaminated fluid from the wall boxes. LIMITATIONS: Limited patient isolates for testing, on-site investigation occurred after peak of infections. CONCLUSIONS: This large outbreak was linked to wall boxes, a previously undescribed source of contaminated fluid and biofilms in the immediate patient care environment.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Anciano , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 66(8): 1581-1586, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30094828

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology and incidence of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in nursing home (NH) residents, which has previously not been well characterized. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of public health surveillance data. SETTING: Healthcare facilities in 33 U.S. counties. PARTICIPANTS: Residents of the surveillance area. MEASUREMENTS: Counts of NH-onset and hospital-onset (HO) invasive MRSA infections (cultured from sterile body sites) identified from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emerging Infections Program (EIP) population-based surveillance from 2009 to 2013 were compared. Demographic characteristics and risk factors of NH-onset cases were analyzed. Using NH resident-day denominators from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Skilled Nursing Facility Cost Reports, incidence of NH-onset invasive MRSA infections from facilities in the EIP area was determined. RESULTS: A total of 4,607 NH-onset and 4,344 HO invasive MRSA cases were reported. Of NH-onset cases, median age was 74, most infections were bloodstream infections, and known risk factors for infection were common: 1,455 (32%) had previous MRSA infection or colonization, 1,014 (22%) had decubitus ulcers, 1,098 (24%) had recent central venous catheters, and 1,103 (24%) were undergoing chronic dialysis; 2,499 (54%) had been discharged from a hospital in the previous 100 days. The in-hospital case-fatality rate was 19%. The 2013 pooled mean incidence of NH-onset invasive MRSA infections in the surveillance area was 2.4 per 100,000 patient-days. CONCLUSION: More NH-onset than HO cases occurred, primarily in individuals with known MRSA risk factors. These data reinforce the importance of infection prevention practices during wound and device care in NH residents, especially those with a history of MRSA infection or colonization.


Asunto(s)
Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(8): 1175-1181, 2018 09 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29659728

RESUMEN

Background: Despite substantial attention to the individual topics, little is known about the relationship between racial disparities and antimicrobial-resistant and/or healthcare-associated infection trends, such as for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: We analyzed Emerging Infections Program 2005-2014 surveillance data (9 US states) to determine whether reductions in invasive MRSA incidence (isolated from normally sterile body sites) affected racial disparities in rates. Case classification included hospital-onset (HO, culture >3 days after admission), healthcare-associated community onset (HACO, culture ≤3 days after admission and dialysis, hospitalization, surgery, or long-term care residence within 1 year prior), or community-associated (CA, all others). Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate the adjusted rate ratio (aRR) of MRSA in black patients (vs in white patients) controlling for age, sex, and temporal trends. Results: During 2005-2014, invasive HO and HACO (but not CA) MRSA rates decreased. Despite this, blacks had higher rates for HO (aRR, 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-4.35), HACO (aRR, 3.84; 95% CI, 2.94-5.01), and CA (aRR, 2.78; 95% CI, 2.30-3.37) MRSA. Limiting the analysis to chronic dialysis patients reduced, but did not eliminate, the higher HACO MRSA rates among blacks (aRR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.72-1.96), even though invasive MRSA rates among dialysis patients decreased during 2005-2014. These racial differences did not change over time. Conclusions: Previous reductions in healthcare-associated MRSA infections have not affected racial disparities in MRSA rates. Improved understanding of the underlying causes of these differences is needed to develop effective prevention interventions that reduce racial disparities in MRSA infections.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Factores Raciales , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/etnología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etnología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(5): 597-604, 2017 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28362911

RESUMEN

Background: Invasive community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) incidence in the United States is higher among black persons than white persons. We explored the extent to which socioeconomic factors might explain this racial disparity. Methods: A retrospective cohort was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program surveillance data for invasive community-associated MRSA cases (isolated from a normally sterile site of an outpatient or on hospital admission day ≤3 in a patient without specified major healthcare exposures) from 2009 to 2011 in 33 counties of 9 states. We used generalized estimating equations to determine census tract-level factors associated with differences in MRSA incidence and inverse odds ratio-weighted mediation analysis to determine the proportion of racial disparity mediated by socioeconomic factors. Results: Annual invasive community-associated MRSA incidence was 4.59 per 100000 among whites and 7.60 per 100000 among blacks (rate ratio [RR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-1.80). In the mediation analysis, after accounting for census tract-level measures of federally designated medically underserved areas, education, income, housing value, and rural status, 91% of the original racial disparity was explained; no significant association of black race with community-associated MRSA remained (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, .92-1.20). Conclusions: The racial disparity in invasive community-associated MRSA rates was largely explained by socioeconomic factors. The specific factors that underlie the association between census tract-level socioeconomic measures and MRSA incidence, which may include modifiable social (eg, poverty, crowding) and biological factors (not explored in this analysis), should be elucidated to define strategies for reducing racial disparities in community-associated MRSA rates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(7): 818-24, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27072043

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical diagnoses associated with the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) pneumonia (PNEU) or lower respiratory infection (LRI) surveillance events DESIGN Retrospective chart review SETTING A convenience sample of 8 acute-care hospitals in Pennsylvania PATIENTS All patients hospitalized during 2011-2012 METHODS Medical records were reviewed from a random sample of patients reported to the NHSN to have PNEU or LRI, excluding adults with ventilator-associated PNEU. Documented clinical diagnoses corresponding temporally to the PNEU and LRI events were recorded. RESULTS We reviewed 250 (30%) of 838 eligible PNEU and LRI events reported to the NHSN; 29 reported events (12%) fulfilled neither PNEU nor LRI case criteria. Differences interpreting radiology reports accounted for most misclassifications. Of 81 PNEU events in adults not on mechanical ventilation, 84% had clinician-diagnosed pneumonia; of these, 25% were attributed to aspiration. Of 43 adult LRI, 88% were in mechanically ventilated patients and 35% had no corresponding clinical diagnosis (infectious or noninfectious) documented at the time of LRI. Of 36 pediatric PNEU events, 72% were ventilator associated, and 70% corresponded to a clinical pneumonia diagnosis. Of 61 pediatric LRI patients, 84% were mechanically ventilated and 21% had no corresponding clinical diagnosis documented. CONCLUSIONS In adults not on mechanical ventilation and in children, most NHSN-defined PNEU events corresponded with compatible clinical conditions documented in the medical record. In contrast, NHSN LRI events often did not. As a result, substantial modifications to the LRI definitions were implemented in 2015. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:818-824.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/prevención & control , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(2): 205-7, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26554448

RESUMEN

Reports of bloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among chronic hemodialysis patients to 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance systems (National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event and Emerging Infections Program) were compared to evaluate completeness of reporting. Many methicillin-resistant S. aureus bloodstream infections identified in hospitals were not reported to National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Diálisis Renal , Vigilancia de Guardia , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA