External validation of the ability of the mRENAL nephrometry score to identify patients at risk for major adverse events or local tumor recurrence after percutaneous renal cryoablation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the mRENAL score to identify patients at risk of either major adverse events (AEs) and/or local tumor recurrence (LR) after percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in an external patient population. METHODS: Patient demographic data were recorded. The RENAL and mRENAL nephrometry scores were calculated. Clinical outcomes such as AEs, LR, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were collected. AEs were classified according to SIR criteria. Continuous variables and categorical variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square test, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with major AEs or LR. RESULTS: The study included 207 patients (Males: n = 117 (56.5%)) with a mean age of 65.8 (± 11.2) years (range:27-90). Overall, the mean tumor diameter, RENAL score, and mean mRENAL score were 30.1 mm (± 11.4), 6.3 (± 1.7), and 6.8 (± 1.9), respectively. 14 patients (6.8%) and 13 patients (6.3%) experienced a major AE or LR after PCA, respectively. CSS and OS were 98.6% and 90.3%, respectively. For patients with major AEs after PCA, the mean tumor diameter (p < 0.0001), mean RENAL score (p = 0.03), and mean mRENAL score (p = 0.009) were all higher than those for patients without a major AE. Multi-variate regression analysis showed that only mean tumor diameter (p = 0.005) was predictive of a major AE. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with LR and patients without LR after PCA with regards to tumor size (p = 0.07), mean RENAL score (p = 0.32), or mean mRENAL score (p = 0.07). Multi-variate regression analysis showed that only mean tumor diameter (p = 0.01) was predictive of LR. CONCLUSION: The mRENAL score did not accurately identify patients at risk for either major AEs or LR. Maximum tumor diameter alone was predictive of both major AEs and LR, and should be the primary focus during patient selection.

Percutaneous Ablation of T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Overview.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is increasing incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with multiple treatment options currently available. The purpose of this review is to outline patient selection and technical approaches and present the current literature for percutaneous ablation of T1b (4.1-7 cm) RCC. RECENT FINDINGS: An increasing number of retrospective studies and meta-analyses have evaluated the use of percutaneous ablation for T1b RCC. Overall, these studies tend to show that percutaneous ablation in this patient population is feasible. However, rates of major adverse events and local recurrence after percutaneous ablation for T1b RCC are both higher than when ablation is used for smaller tumors. As such, a multi-disciplinary, patient-centered approach is required. Due to the increasing literature in this area, the most recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines include percutaneous ablation as an option for non-surgical patients with T1b RCC.

Same-day discharge after percutaneous renal cryoablation and its effect on 30 day hospital re-admission rates and post-procedural complications.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify if the local institutional shift from routine overnight observation to same-day discharge following percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) of renal tumors increases 30 day re-admission rates or serious adverse events (AEs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 133 adult patients. PCA patients in calendar years 2018-2019 were routinely observed overnight in the hospital, comprising the control group (Group A). PCA patients in calendar years 2021-2022 were routinely discharged the same day, comprising the test group (Group B). Relevant demographic information, tumor characteristics, technical outcomes, and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: 15 patients (11.3 %) from the total cohort were re-admitted to the hospital within 30 days of PCA for any reason. Seven patients (10.4 %) and eight patients (12.1 %) were re-admitted for any reason within 30 days in Group A and Group B, respectively, with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.76). Nine patients (6.8 %) from the total cohort were re-admitted to the hospital within 30 days for a diagnosis secondary to the procedure. Four patients (6 %) and five patients (7.6 %) were re-admitted within 30 days for reasons related to PCA in Group A and Group B, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.71). Eight patients (12 %) and four patients (6 %) had major AEs following PCA in Group A and Group B, respectively, with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.43). CONCLUSION: Overall, the change in post-procedural care after PCA did not have a deleterious effect on 30 day re-admission rates or rates of major AEs.

Non-operating room anesthesia workflow (NORA) implementation to improve start times in interventional radiology.

BACKGROUND: Non-OR Anesthesia (NORA) is rapidly becoming standard in many high-volume institutions and efficiency in these spaces has yet to be optimized. On-time first start percentage has been suggested to correlate with more efficient flow, and this correlation is established within the surgical space. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of timetable targets on first case on-time first start percentage within a NORA setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of anesthesia-supported first start cases from October 2022 to April 2023 was performed to analyze the effect of timetable targets on on-time first-case starts for planned cases. Statistical analysis was calculated using Student's t-tests with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. Additionally, analysis of variance was used to compare three or more groups, and Tukey Kramer was used to evaluate groups pairwise. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four first start cases were included in the evaluation. After intervention with timetable targets, average patient arrival to the room time improved from 7:49 AM to 7:40 AM (p < 0.05) and procedure start time improved from 8:31 AM to 8:20 AM (p < 0.01). The percentage of procedure start times occurring prior to the goal time increased from 35 % to 58 % after the implementation (p < 0.05). With exception of Tuesdays (Anesthesia Late Start Day), on-time starts improved from 17 % to 48 % (p < 0.01) and sustained this improvement throughout the post-implementation period. CONCLUSION: Implementation of novel timetable targets yielded statistically significant improvement in first case start times. This improvement in efficiency and throughput results in increased room utilization, improved case throughput, and decreased block overrun times, all of which contribute toward increased revenues, decreased costs, and thus improved return on investment.

Safety and Technical Feasibility of Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation of Central Tumors without Pyeloperfusion.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and technical success of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) without pyeloperfusion in 94 patients with central renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all central renal tumors treated by PCA without pyeloperfusion was performed. Central tumors were defined as those involving the renal sinus fat on preprocedural cross-sectional imaging. Patient demographics and baseline tumor characteristics were recorded. The details of the PCA procedure, primary and secondary technical success, rates of local recurrence, adverse events (AEs), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were compiled. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (48 females [51%]; mean age, 68.2 years [range, 38-87 years]) with 94 central renal tumors were included. The mean maximal tumor diameter and mean RENAL nephrometry score were 37 mm (range, 15-67 mm) and 8 (range, 4-11), respectively. Primary technical success was achieved in 94% (n = 88) of procedures. Of the patients who did not achieve primary technical success, 3 underwent successful repeat PCA (secondary technical success, 97%; n = 91/94). The other 3 patients were surveilled for residual disease. Twenty-four patients (26%) required hydrodissection during PCA. Six patients (6%) experienced major AEs after PCA including hemorrhage requiring embolization (n = 3), hemorrhage requiring transfusions with admission (n = 2), and perinephric abscess necessitating drain placement (n = 1). Twenty-two patients (23%) experienced minor AEs. Nine patients (10%) experienced local recurrence during the follow-up period. OS was 94% (n = 88/94), whereas CSS was 98% (n = 92/94) during the study follow-up period (mean, 16 months [range, 1-102 months]). CONCLUSIONS: PCA of central renal tumors appears to be safe with high rates of technical success, even without the use of pyeloperfusion.

Percutaneous cryoablation of 100 anterior renal tumors: safety and technical success.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety, technical success, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in patients with anterior renal tumors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with anterior renal tumors, defined as tumors at or anterior to the level of the renal pelvis, treated with CT-guided PCA from 2008 to 2022. Summary statistics included demographics and baseline tumor attributes. Treatment and follow-up metrics included primary and secondary technical success, adverse events (AEs) according to the SIR classification, local recurrence, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS)). 100 patients (60 males; mean age: 63, mean BMI: 33, mean Charlson comorbidity index:6) with 100 anterior renal tumors were included. RESULTS: 78% of tumors were T1a and 22% T1b with mean maximal tumoral dimension of 29 mm (range: 6-62 mm) and mean distance to nearest critical structure 9 mm (range: 0-40 mm). Mean follow-up was 20.9 months (range: 3-103). 28% of PCAs required hydrodissection. Technical success was achieved in 92% of patients; with six remaining patients undergoing successful repeat PCA (secondary technical success: 98%). The remaining two patients without primary technical success were either surveilled or had a benign pathology on resulted concomitant biopsy. Four patients (4%) had major AEs (hemorrhage requiring prolonged admission, transfusion, or embolization (n = 3), perinephric abscess requiring drainage (n = 1)) and 27% had minor AEs. Eight patients (8%) had recurrence with a one-year OS of 94% and CSS of 100%. All recurrences underwent repeat ablation without additional recurrence and 3/8 (38%) were T1b and 5/8 (63%) were T1a tumors. CONCLUSION: PCA of anterior renal tumors can be performed safely with high rates of technical and oncologic success.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass, Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: 2023 Update.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is defined as abnormal dilation of the infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter to 3.0 cm or greater. The natural history of AAA consists of progressive expansion and potential rupture. Although most AAAs are clinically silent, a pulsatile abdominal mass identified on physical examination may indicate the presence of an AAA. When an AAA is suspected, an imaging study is essential to confirm the diagnosis. This document reviews the relative appropriateness of various imaging procedures for the initial evaluation of suspected AAA. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Sudden Onset of Cold, Painful Leg: 2023 Update.

Acute onset of a cold, painful leg, also known as acute limb ischemia, describes the sudden loss of perfusion to the lower extremity and carries significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Acute limb ischemia requires rapid identification and the management of suspected vascular compromise and is inherently driven by clinical considerations. The objectives of initial imaging include confirmation of diagnosis, identifying the location and extent of vascular occlusion, and preprocedural/presurgical planning. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection: Treatment Planning and Follow-Up.

As the incidence of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology (aneurysm and dissection) rises and the complexity of endovascular and surgical treatment options increases, imaging follow-up of patients remains crucial. Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic pathology without intervention should be monitored carefully for changes in aortic size or morphology that could portend rupture or other complication. Patients who are post endovascular or open surgical aortic repair should undergo follow-up imaging to evaluate for complications, endoleak, or recurrent pathology. Considering the quality of diagnostic data, CT angiography and MR angiography are the preferred imaging modalities for follow-up of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology for most patients. The extent of thoracoabdominal aortic pathology and its potential complications involve multiple regions of the body requiring imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in most patients. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Limited ability of the renal ablation-specific (MC)2 risk scoring system to predict major adverse events from percutaneous renal microwave ablation.

PURPOSE: To access if the (MC)2 scoring system can identify patients at risk for major adverse events following percutaneous microwave ablation of renal tumors. METHODS: Retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent percutaneous renal microwave ablation at two centers. Patient demographics, medical histories, laboratory work, technical details of the procedure, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. The (MC)2 score was calculated for each patient. Patients were assigned to low-risk (<5), moderate-risk (5-8) and high-risk (>8) groups. Adverse events were graded according to the criteria from the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (mean age = 67.8 [95%CI 65.5-69.9], 66 men) were included. 10 (8.6%) and 22 (19.0%) experienced major or minor adverse events, respectively. The mean (MC)2 score for patients with major adverse events (4.6 [95%CI 3.3-5.8]) was not higher than those with either minor adverse events (4.1 [95%CI 3.4-4.8], p = 0.49) or no adverse events (3.7 [95%CI 3.4-4.1], p = 0.25). However, mean tumor size was greater in those with major adverse events (3.1 cm [95%CI 2.0-4.1]) than minor adverse events (2.0 cm [95%CI 1.8-2.3], p = 0.01). Patients with central tumors were also more likely to experience major adverse events compared to those without central tumors (p = 0.02). The area under the receiver operator curve to predict major adverse events was 0.61 (p = 0.15), indicating a poor ability of the (MC)2 score to predict major adverse events. CONCLUSION: The (MC)2 risk scoring system does not accurately identify patients at risk for major adverse events from percutaneous microwave ablation of renal tumors. The mean tumor size and central tumor location may serve as a better indicator for risk assessment of major adverse events.

Short-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization for urgent or emergent abnormal uterine bleeding.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of uterine artery embolization (UAE) for patients with urgent or emergent abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients from 1/2009-12/2020 who were treated urgently or emergently with UAE for AUB. Urgent and emergent cases were defined as those requiring inpatient admissions. Demographic data were collected for each patient including hospitalizations related to bleeding and length of stay (LOS) for each hospitalization. Hemostatic interventions other than UAE were collected. Hematologic data were collected before and after UAE including hemoglobin, hematocrit, and transfusion products. Data specific to the UAE procedure included complication rates, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, embolic agent, site of embolization, radiation dose, and procedure time. RESULTS: 52 patients (median age: 39) underwent 54 urgent or emergent UAE procedures. The most common indications for UAE were malignancy (28.8%), post-partum hemorrhage (21.2%), fibroids (15.4%), vascular anomalies (15.4%), and post-operative bleeding (9.6%). There were no procedure-related complications. Following UAE, 44 patients (84.6%) achieved clinical success and required no additional intervention. Packed red blood cell transfusion decreased from a mean of 5.7 to 1.7 units (p < 0.0001). Fresh frozen plasma transfusion decreased from a mean of 1.8 to 0.48 units (p = 0.012). 50% of patients received a transfusion prior to UAE, while only 15.4% were transfused post-procedure (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Emergent or urgent UAE is a safe and effective procedure to control AUB hemorrhage secondary to a variety of etiologies.

Transarterial embolization of T1b and T2a renal cell carcinoma prior to percutaneous cryoablation: a retrospective comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes in patients with T1b and T2a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) who underwent transarterial embolization (TAE) of the RCC prior to PCA (TAE + PCA) to patients who were treated with PCA alone. METHODS: Retrospective review of all adult patients with T1b (4.1-7 cm) and T2a (7.1-10 cm) RCC treated with PCA from 2008 to 2021. Data collected included age, sex, tumor diameter, RENAL nephrometry score, technical success, adverse events (AEs), changes in serum creatinine, local control, and recurrence rates. A p value of 0.05 was considered the threshold for statistical significance. RESULTS: 13 patients with 13 RCCs (mean age: 72.7 ± 10.4; 54% male) and 35 patients with 37 RCCs (mean age: 66.7 ± 10.6; 60% male) were included in the TAE + PCA and PCA groups, respectively. The TAE + PCA group had larger mean tumor diameter (5.7 ± 1.1 cm vs. 4.7 ± 0.6 cm; p < 0.0001) and higher mean RENAL nephrometry score (8.9 ± 1.1 vs. 7.8 ± 1.5; p = 0.02). There were no differences between the groups with respect to technical success of PCA (p = 0.46), local tumor control (p = 0.3), or mean number of procedures to achieve local tumor control (p = 0.85). Mean increase in serum creatinine was not significantly different between the two groups (p = .63). Major AEs were similar between the groups (p = 1); however, the TAE + PCA group had no major hemorrhagic AEs while the PCA alone group had three (8.3%). CONCLUSION: TAE + PCA in patients with T1b or T2 RCC is technically feasible without significant added detriment to renal function. This combined approach may help to reduce hemorrhagic AEs but larger patient cohorts are needed.

Patient Engagement with Online Portals and Online Radiology Results.

The purpose of this study was to examine patient portal enrollment and the usage with a specific focus on the utilization of on-line radiology reports by patients. Oracle SQL (Austin, TX, USA) queries were used to extract portal enrollment data over a 13-month period from March 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018 from the hospital system's EMR. Patient enrollment was collected as was patient information including basic demographics and utilization patterns. For enrolled patients, interaction within the portal with the "Radiology" work tab (RADTAB) was used as a surrogate for review of radiology results. As a comparator, interaction within the portal with the "Laboratory" work tab (LABTAB) was used as a surrogate for review of laboratory results. Statistical analysis on the data was performed using Chi-squared, Student's t-test, Logistic regression and multivariate analysis where appropriate. The population for analysis included 424,422 patients. Overall, 138,783 patients (32.7%) were enrolled in the portal. Patients enrolled in the portal were older (P < 0.0001), female (P < 0.0001) and Caucasian (P < 0.0001). Patients enrolled in the portal had higher levels of educational attainment (p < 0.0001), higher annual household income (P < 0.0001), and more outpatient clinic visits (P < 0.0001). The proportion of enrolled patients that interacted with the LABTAB (47.2%) was significantly higher than those that interacted with the RADTAB (27.1%) (P < 0.0001; Table 2). Patients that utilize the portal are more likely to utilize the Laboratory tab than the Radiology tab, and demographic differences do not account for this difference in usage. Further investigation is needed to better understand the reasons for the differing usage trends of Laboratory and Radiology tabs.

Antibiotics Tubes and Lines.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in interventional radiology (IR) is widely used; however, such practice is based on data from the surgical literature. Although published guidelines can help determine the need for prophylactic antibiotic use in the patient undergoing percutaneous procedures, local practice patterns often dictate when such medications are given. In this article, the current state of periprocedural antibiotic use in commonly performed IR procedures (i.e., tube and catheter placements) is presented.

Erratum: Basivertebral Nerve Ablation.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1745794.].

Safety and Effectiveness of Transhepatic Access for Percutaneous Renal Mass Cryoablation: A Multicenter Cohort.

PURPOSE: To establish transhepatic percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses as a safe and effective approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of records from 3 separate medical centers was performed identifying 23 patients (median age, 63 years [range 41-84 years]; 12 female [52.2%]) who underwent percutaneous transhepatic cryoablation for right-sided renal masses (median diameter, 2.4 cm [1.5-4.6 cm]) between 2008 and 2021. The median radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines (RENAL) nephrometry score was 5 (4-10). Adverse events (AEs) were classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) and Clavien-Dindo (CD) classifications. Primary and secondary technical success of each procedure were recorded. RESULTS: Renal cell carcinoma (of any subtype) was found in 10 (71.5%) of the 14 masses that were biopsied. Tract cautery was used for transhepatic probes in 14 (63.6%) of 22 procedures. Three (13%) of 23 patients had postprocedural AEs. Two cases (8.6%) were hemorrhages related to transhepatic access (SIR moderate-2, CD 2; SIR severe-3, CD 1), and 1 case (4.4%) was related to bowel injury (SIR severe-3, CD 3a). There were no instances of pneumothorax. Tract cautery was used in the procedures that resulted in an AE. Primary technical success was achieved in 84.2% (16/19) of procedures, whereas secondary technical success was achieved in 2 additional patients. The secondary technical success rate was 94.7% (18/19). Four patients did not have imaging follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The transhepatic approach to cryoablation of renal masses appears to have an acceptable safety profile and technical success rate. Larger studies, preferably comparative to nontranshepatic approach, are recommended.

External Validation of the Percutaneous Renal Ablation Complexity Scoring System in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Cryoablation or Microwave Ablation of Renal Tumors.

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of the Percutaneous Renal Ablation Complexity (P-RAC) scoring system to predict procedural complexity or adverse events (AEs) in adult patients undergoing percutaneous thermal ablation of renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 240 consecutive adult patients who underwent percutaneous thermal renal ablation from 2004 to 2018 was conducted. The P-RAC score was calculated for each renal tumor and procedural complexity recorded. A correlation coefficient was calculated for the P-RAC score and both the number of probes used and procedural duration. Receiver operating characteristic curves assessed the score's ability to predict the use of adjunctive techniques and/or major AEs, classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, there was a weak correlation between P-RAC scores and both the number of probes used (r = 0.31; P < .001) and procedural duration (r = 0.18; P = .03). When evaluating only patients treated with microwave ablation (MWA), no correlation between P-RAC scores and either the number of probes (P = .7) used or procedural duration (P = .4) was found. The area under the curve (AUC) for the P-RAC score to predict the use of adjunctive techniques was 0.55 and 0.53 for the entire cohort and MWA group, respectively. The AUC for the P-RAC score to predict major AEs was 0.70, 0.71, and 0.73 for the entire cohort, MWA group, and cryoablation group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The P-RAC scoring system is limited in its ability to predict percutaneous thermal renal tumor ablation procedural complexity, especially in patients treated with MWA. The scoring system may have a role in identifying patients at risk of major AEs.