RESUMEN
Despite extensive research, the mechanism by which glass ionomer cements take up fluoride ions from solution remains unclear. To date, the majority of studies have concentrated on measuring the removal of ions from solution. In this study, we demonstrate the application of X-ray photoemission spectroscopy and secondary ion mass spectrometry to the surface analysis of the cements, after the introduction of fluoride either by doping or by immersion. Fluoride ion uptake from potassium fluoride solution is correlated with the formation of a surface layer which is rich in calcium as well as fluoride.
Asunto(s)
Fluoruros/análisis , Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo/química , Técnicas In Vitro , Ensayo de Materiales , Soluciones , Espectrometría de Masa de Ion Secundario , Espectrometría por Rayos X , Propiedades de SuperficieRESUMEN
This study examines the effect of different cations in equimolar alkali metal fluoride solutions on their interactions with glass ionomer cements. Uptake of both fluoride and cation were measured together with change in solution pH and morphological changes in the cement surface. Two cements were used; AH2, a dental restorative cement containing both fluorine and alkali metal (Na) as glass components and LG30, which contained neither. Discs of cement 1 x 10 mm were set in moulds at 37 degrees C for 1 h then, stored in water for 3 days at 37 degrees C. Discs in each test group (N = 5) were immersed in 10 ml of solutions of either NaF, KF, or RbF, all containing 900ppm F, control discs were stored in water, all at 37 degrees C for 24h. Solutions were analysed for F- by ISE potentiometry, Na+ by the same technique and K+ and Rb+ were analysed by atomic absorption spectrometry. Uptake was obtained by difference between solution used for immersion and the control solution. Solution pH was measured potentiometrically. The surface roughness of the discs was measured by linear stylus profilometry. Fluoride ion uptakes for AH2 were 451 micromol/g NaF, 378 KF, and 318 RbF. The comparable figures for LG30 were 202, 161, and 159. Differences between cements were all statistically significant and also between solutions pairings except for the KF/LG30 vs. RbF/LG30. Uptake of cations was equimolar for AH2/ NaF, AH2/RbF and LG30/KF but M+:F- ratios were significantly above unity for AH2/KF and LG30/NaF and significantly below unity for LG30/RbF. The pH changes were all positive and were significantly higher for AH2 than LG30 and for RbF compared to the other fluoride solutions for each cement (probably because of its lower initial pH). The final pH of all solutions were less than I pH unit from neutral (pH7). The AH2 cement test discs all showed significant increase in roughness (Ra) compared to control discs stored in water whereas the LG30 discs showed no such difference. Regression analysis showed a significant positive correlation between fluoride uptake and Ra. It was concluded that changing the alkali metal cation influenced all four variables examined (F- uptake, M+ uptake, pH change and extent of cement surface roughening).
Asunto(s)
Cementos Dentales , Fluoruros , Vidrio , Cationes , Soluciones , Espectrofotometría AtómicaRESUMEN
Considerable attention has been given to the release of the cariostatic fluoride ion from glass-based dental cements (dental silicate and glass ionomer). In these, the total available fluoride content is not precisely known since fluorine is distributed between the cross-linked aqueous salt matrix, partially dissolved glass, and undissolved glass. In analogous cements based on zinc oxide the fluoride is added as highly soluble SnF2. The object of this study is to compare the F- ion release profiles of commercial zinc polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate containing 4.4 and 3.6% SnF2, respectively. Mixed cements were clamped in split ring moulds to produce discs of 10 mm x 1 mm after storage at 37 degrees C for 1 h. Each was weighed and immersed in 10 ml of deionised water. When this changed, at 13 time intervals up to 98 days, the fluoride content was measured using an ion selective electrode. The mean (N = 3) values obtained were expressed cumulatively [F] in micromol F ion/g cement. The total [F] released was 111 for the zinc polycarboxylate and 286 for zinc phosphate compared with total F in the cements of 561 and 464, respectively. When the cumulative [F] was plotted versus t(1/2) close associations were found for both cements. For the polycarboxylate the regression line [F] = 10.6t(1/2) + 9.9 fitted well over the whole 98 days (R = 0.997). For the phosphate a better fit regression line was obtained using results up to 32 days only; [F] = 36.8t(1/2) - 8.4 (R = 0.999). For t > 32 days results increasingly deviated from this line. These results fitted a regression line of the form [F] = 81.7log(e) t - 87.3 (R = 0.9997). Comparisons are made with data from previous authors both for zinc phosphate cement and glass-based cements and with diffusion theory of F ion release. It is concluded that zinc-based cements provide some indications of how glass-based cements may behave over long periods of release and that zinc phosphate is the material of clinical choice for orthodontic cementation if maximal fluoride release is the prime criterion.
Asunto(s)
Cariostáticos/farmacocinética , Cementos Dentales/química , Fluoruros/farmacocinética , Óxido de Zinc/química , Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo/química , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Cinética , Ensayo de Materiales , Ortodoncia , Fosfatos/química , Cemento de Policarboxilato/química , Compuestos de Zinc/químicaRESUMEN
The uptake by glass ionomer cement of ions (particularly fluoride) from solutions in which the cements have been immersed has been extensively reported. The concentrations within the cement often greatly exceed those in the immersing solution. The distribution of these ions has not been determined. The aim of this study is to use SIMS to investigate the levels of ions within the cement at different depths below the immersed surface of the cement. K+ and F were the ions studied and uptake was into a cement containing neither K nor F (LG30) and one containing F (AH2). The surface was analysed using a Cameca ims4f instrument employing a 14.5 keV Cs+ primary ion beam. This was calibrated on cements made from a series of glasses in which fluorine content was systematically substituted for oxygen (without other elemental changes). XPS, which is very much a surface technique, was used in confirmatory role with respect to the SIMS analysis. Cement discs were made from LG30- and AH2-based cements. After maturation for 72 h these were immersed in 0.275% KF solution for 24 h. SIMS analysis indicated appreciable surface F concentration on LG30 and on AH2 an enhanced F concentration. In contrast, K was not detected on the LG30 surface and only at a low level on AH2. These results were confirmed by XPS. Using the ion beam of the SIMS to sputter away cement enabled the F depth profile on LG30 to be measured to 10 microm. Over this distance the F content drops from 6.2 mmol/g at 0.2 microm from the surface to 0.2 mmol/g at 10 microm. No K was detected down to 13 microm from the surface. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that SIMS is an appropriate tool for further investigation of the distribution of ions uptaken by glass ionomer cements.
Asunto(s)
Fluoruros/análisis , Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo/química , Aniones/análisis , Calibración , Cationes Monovalentes/análisis , Fluoruros/química , Potasio/análisis , Compuestos de Potasio/química , Fluoruro de Sodio/química , Espectrometría de Masa por Ionización de Electrospray/métodos , TermodinámicaRESUMEN
This investigates the effects of the addition of Na and F ions to a glass ionomer cement in which those ions are not inherently present on its interactions with dilute (0.2%) NaF solution. Both the effect of the solution on the cement's surface morphology and the effect of the cement on the solution in terms of take up of Na+ and F- and of change in pH are to be investigated. These results are to be compared to previous results obtained with glasses which contained both, one, or neither of the ions as components of their glasses. NaF (1.3% by weight in the mixed cement) was added to the powder components of a glass ionomer based on LG30 glass (which contains Al, Si, Ca, P, and O only). Discs of cement were set in moulds at 37 degrees C for 1 h then stored in water at 37 degrees C for 3 days. Each test disc was then immersed in 10 ml 0.2% NaF solution whereas controls remained immersed in water (N = 3 for test and control). Test and control disc surfaces were assessed both qualitatively by electron microscopy and quantitatively by linear profilometry (Ra values). Potentiometry was used to measure solution pH and Na and F concentrations using a pH electrode and suitable ion selective electrodes both before and after cement immersion. The surface of test specimens was subject considerable disruption with the polysalt cement matrix being removed and residual glass particles being disclosed. The controls showed no such disruption. This effect was reflected in a significant difference of Ra. Such an effect was not shown by test and control surfaces of LG30 but a similar effect was to that shown by LG26 (which contains F as a glass component). Solution pH changed by 1 unit which was much more than the change shown by LG30 or LG26 but is similar to that of AH2 and MP4 cements which both contain Na. The Na and F uptake was much lower than for LG30 whereas that of LG26 was higher than LG30. The Na:F ratio was 0.29:1 compared to 1.26:1 for LG30 (LG26 = 1.01:1, AH2 = 1.02:1, MP4 = 1.04:1). Fluoride addition to a F-free glass ionomer renders it vulnerable to surface disruption by NaF solution showing that fluoride complexes produced in glass dissolution are not necessarily involved in this process. Sodium addition to a Na-free glass ionomer confirms the role of this cement in enhancing pH change in NaF solution. The level of uptake of F- from a NaF solution in much lower than that for the F-free glass ionomer which shows there is no direct relationship between F- uptake and surface disruption. The ratio of Na:F uptake is below 0.3:1, but the pH change is similar to cements where the ratio is close to unity which indicates that F-/OH- interchange is not a significant mechanism even when anion/cation uptake is not balanced.
Asunto(s)
Fluoruros/química , Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo/química , Fluoruro de Sodio/química , Sodio/química , Aniones , Cationes Monovalentes , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Microscopía Electrónica , Soluciones , Propiedades de SuperficieRESUMEN
The effects on surface morphology of glass ionomer cements following exposure to 0.2% NaF solution were studied. The effect of cement on the solution was also evaluated. The four cements were chosen to contain Na and F, Na alone, F alone and neither Na nor F to show any interactions produced by having the same ion in both the cement and solution. Four glass ionomer cements were formulated so that they differed only in respect of the glass component. AH2 (a glass used in dental restorative cement) contained both Na and F, MP4 (a glass used in orthopaedic cement) contained Na only, LG26 (a glass used in surgical cement) contained F only and LG30 (an experimental control glass) contained neither F nor Na. Discs of cement were set in moulds at 37 degrees C for 1 h, then matured in water for 3 d. Each test disc was then immersed in 10 ml 0.2% NaF for 24 h at 37 degrees C whereas control discs remained in water. The test and control disc surfaces were assessed qualitatively using electron microscopy and quantitatively by linear profilometry generating roughness values (Ra). Test solution pH was measured before and after cement immersion. Inspection of the electron micrographs showed considerable disruption of AH2 and LG26 test surfaces compared to their controls whereas MP4 and LG30 showed similar surfaces for test and control. Statistical analysis of the Ra values showed that AH2 and LG26 test surfaces were significantly rougher than their controls as well as LG30 and MP4 test surfaces, which were not significantly different from their controls. All NaF solutions show pH increases; those for AH2 and MP4 were significantly higher than those for LG26 and LG30. The F-containing cements were subject to surface disruption whereas F-free cements were not. The Ra values of test surfaces correlated strongly (r = 0.998) with the F uptake of the cements (data from a previous study) but it was not possible to ascribe the causality to this association. The pH changes appear to be influenced by whether or not Na is present in the cement. The resultant pH values are too near to neutral for pH alone to explain the surface disruption observed. In addition, it is concluded that the changes in OH ion concentration are too low to permit F-/OH- interchange as a possible explanation for F uptake by these cements.
Asunto(s)
Fluoruros Tópicos/química , Cementos de Ionómero Vítreo/química , Fluoruro de Sodio/química , Aniones , Cationes Monovalentes , Fluoruros/química , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Óptica y Fotónica , Sodio/química , Soluciones , Propiedades de SuperficieRESUMEN
AIMS: The study aims to directly measure uptake of Na and F ions by glass ionomer cement from dilute NaF solution and compare this with the subsequent re-release of these ions into water. In addition, the effect of the presence or absence of Na and/or F as a component of the glass is evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The four glass ionomers used differed only in glass composition; AH2 contained both Na and F, LG26 contained F, MP4 contained Na and LG30 contained neither Na nor F. Discs of cement were set in moulds at 37 degrees C for 1 h and matured in water at 37 degrees C for 3 days. Test discs were immersed in 0.2% NaF solution for 24 h, control discs in water. Discs were subsequently immersed in water which was changed regularly. Ion-selective electrode measurements (F and Na) and atomic absorption spectrometry (Na) were used to determine uptake (change in immersion solution concentration) and re-release into water. RESULTS: All cements took up large quantities of Na and F ions (range 95-336 mumol g-1). This resulted in internal ion concentrations from 16 to 56 times higher than the immersing solution. All re-release was complete within 97 days. No cement re-released more ion than taken up. Glass ionomers containing fluoride took up more Na and F than fluoride-free ones and then re-released a lower percentage of these ions. The cements all took up Na and F ions in equimolar proportions, but initially re-released more F than Na with F-free cement results tending to unity by 97 days. CONCLUSIONS: Glass ionomer cements take up Na and F ions from NaF solution in large quantities and in equimolar proportion. This is re-released either wholly or in part in 97 days by which time the release does not differ from the controls. The presence or absence of F in the cement composition markedly influences both uptake and re-release. Fluoride/hydroxyl interchange does not appear to play an important role in uptake.