RESUMEN
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) are essentially different manifestations of the same disease that are similarly managed. A number of molecular and cytogenetic variables with prognostic implications have been identified. Undetectable minimal residual disease at the end of treatment with chemoimmunotherapy or venetoclax-based combination regimens is an independent predictor of improved survival among patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. The selection of treatment is based on the disease stage, presence or absence of del(17p) or TP53 mutation, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region mutation status, patient age, performance status, comorbid conditions, and the agent's toxicity profile. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with CLL/SLL.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/diagnóstico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/genética , Pronóstico , InmunoterapiaRESUMEN
Novel targeted therapies (small molecule inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and CD19-directed therapies) have changed the treatment landscape of relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors continue to evolve in the management of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), in both the relapsed/refractory and the frontline setting. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapies are now effective and approved treatment options for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and MCL. Bispecific T-cell engagers represent a novel immunotherapeutic approach for relapsed FL and DLBCL after multiple lines of therapies, including prior CAR T-cell therapy. These NCCN Guideline Insights highlight the significant updates to the NCCN Guidelines for B-Cell Lymphomas for the treatment of FL, DLBCL, and MCL.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma Folicular , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Linfoma de Células del Manto , Humanos , Adulto , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células del Manto/patología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Linfocitos TRESUMEN
The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has significantly evolved in recent years. Targeted therapy with Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors has emerged as an effective chemotherapy-free option for patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. Undetectable minimal residual disease after the end of treatment is emerging as an important predictor of progression-free and overall survival for patients treated with fixed-duration BCL-2 inhibitor-based treatment. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the updates to the NCCN Guidelines for CLL/SLL specific to the use of chemotherapy-free treatment options for patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory disease.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Linfoma de Células B , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/diagnóstico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasia Residual , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-bcl-2/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The utility of dose escalation after positive positron emission tomography following 2 cycles of ABVD (PET2) for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) remains controversial. We describe the United States real-world practice patterns for PET2 positive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data was collected from 15 sites on PET2 positive HL patients after receiving frontline treatment between January, 2015 and June, 2019. Descriptive analyses between those with therapy change and those continuing initial therapy were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were identified; 111 (86%) were treated with ABVD therapy and 18 (14%) with an alternate regimen. At PET2 assessment, 74.4% (96/129) had Deauville score (DS) 4 and 25.6% (33/129) had DS 5. Of the 66 limited stage (LS) patients with PET2 DS score of 4/5, 77.3% (51/66) continued initial therapy and 22.7% (15/66) changed to escalated therapy. The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) for DS 4/5 LS patients was 67.0% (95% CI; 54.9-81.7) for patients without escalation compared with 51.4% (95% CI; 30.8-85.8) for those who escalated. Of the 63 DS 4/5 patients with advanced stage (AS) disease, 76.2% (48/63) continued initial therapy and 23.8% (15/63) changed to escalated therapy. The 12-month PFS for DS 4/5 AS patients was 38.3% (95% CI: 26.3%-55.7%) for patients without escalation compared with 57.1% (95% CI: 36.3-89.9) for those with escalation. CONCLUSION: A minority of PET2 positive HL patients undergo therapy escalation and outcomes remain overall suboptimal. Improved prognostics markers and better therapeutics are required to improve outcomes for high-risk PET2 positive HL patients.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bleomicina/uso terapéutico , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Vinblastina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIM: To study the efficacy and safety of abiraterone in patients with and without prior chemotherapy. METHODS: The databases including PubMed and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to April 2014 were systematically searched. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which abiraterone plus prednisone was compared to placebo plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. The summary incidence, relative risk, hazard ratio and 95%CI were calculated using random or fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity test was performed to test between-study differences in efficacy and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of two phase III RCTs were included in our analysis, with metastatic CPRC patients before (n = 1088) and after chemotherapy (n = 1195). Prior chemotherapy did not significantly alter the effect of abiraterone on overall survival (P = 0.92) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (P = 0.13), but reduced its effect on radiographic-progression-free survival (P = 0.04), objective response rate (P < 0.001), and PSA response rate (P < 0.001). Prior chemotherapy significantly increased the specific risk of fluid retention and edema (P < 0.001) and hypokalemia (P < 0.001), but decreased the risk of all-grade hypertension (P < 0.001) attributable to abiraterone. There was no significant difference of cardiac disorders associated with abiraterone between the two settings (P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Prior chemotherapy may reduce the effectiveness of abiraterone in patients with metastatic CRPC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Everolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) used for the treatment of various solid tumors, is associated with anemia, which can lead to morbidity and treatment interruption or discontinuation. Because the underlying causes of anemia can be multifactorial, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the overall risk of anemia specifically attributable to everolimus in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the PubMed database and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings up to May 2014 for relevant studies. Eligible studies included RCTs in which everolimus alone or in combination with other agents was compared to placebo alone or with other agents in patients with cancer. Summary incidences, relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random- or fixed-effects model depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. The attributable risk was determined by the incidence with everolimus minus that without everolimus in controls. RESULTS: A total of nine RCTs with 3,678 patients (everolimus, n=2,162; controls, n=1,516) were included in our analysis. In comparison with controls, everolimus significantly increased the risk of all-grade (RR=2.18, 95% CI=1.56-3.04, p<0.001) and high-grade anemia (RR=2.63, 95% CI=1.35-5.15, p<0.001). The summary incidences of all-grade (grades 1-4) and high-grade (grades 3-4) anemia in patients treated with everolimus were 32.1% (95% CI=17.5-51.3%) and 6.9% (95% CI=4.1-11.3%) respectively, with 13.3% (95% CI=10.0-17.5%) and 4.7% (95% CI=2.8-7.7%) specifically attributable to everolimus. Risk factors of high-grade anemia attributable to everolimus included tumor type (p=0.012), with the highest seen in renal cell carcinoma (8.0%, 95% CI=5.3-11.9%), and chemotherapy (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a substantial risk of all-grade and high-grade anemia attributable to everolimus therapy for cancer.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/patología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Everolimus , Humanos , Neoplasias/patología , PubMed , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
Background. The objective of our study was to ascertain racial/ethnic disparities in Asian/Pacific Islanders (API) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes based on various tumor characteristics and treatment modalities. Method. SEER database identified invasive NSCLC cases from 2004 to 2010. Variables included American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 7, tumor grade, tumor size, histology, age, marital status, radiation, surgery, and reason for no surgery. The Kruskall-Wallis test and the Z test were used to examine differences between races/ethnicities and the referent, non-Hispanic white (NHW). Multivariate Cox proportional analyses were used to establish the weight of the prognostic significance contributing to disease-specific survival (DSS) in each AJCC stage. Result. Improved DSS was seen in API across stage I (HR: 0.78), stage II (HR: 0.79), and stage IV (HR: 0.86), respectively, compared to the referent NHW (P < 0.01). Prognosis was improved by being married, being female gender, AIS histology, and birth outside the US (P < 0.01). Conclusion. We have demonstrated improved survival among API in early stage and stage IV NSCLC. Further research is necessary to clarify the role of lifestyle and tumor biology for these differences.