Experience and perspective with intravascular imaging and invasive coronary physiology: Insights from allied health professionals.

BACKGROUND: Although intravascular imaging (IVI) and invasive coronary physiology (ICP) are utilized in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with robust positive clinical evidence, their adoption in cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCLs) is still limited. AIMS: The aim of our survey was to assess the perspectives on the experiences of allied health professionals in CCLs' utility of IVI and ICP. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted through multiple channels, including the Cardiovascular Research Technologies (CRT) 2023 Nurses and Technologists Symposium, social media, Cath Lab Digest link, and field requests, leading to diverse representation of allied health professionals. RESULTS: A total of 101 CCL members participated in the survey. First, 59% of responders noted an increased use of IVI in their institutions over recent years. For those experiencing an increase, 49% credited training, 45% emerging evidence, and 34% attributed new CCL members. Barriers to IVI usage were perceived increased procedure time (58%), staff resistance (56%), procedural cost (48%), and difficulty interpreting findings (44%). Regarding ICP, 61% reported using it in approximately 25% to 75% of cases, while 10% utilized it in 75% to 100% of CCL procedures. Interpreting ICP results was mixed, with 56% confident in interpreting all ICP results and 6% unable to interpret any ICP results. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight opportunities for increasing routine utilization of IVI and ICP in the CCL through allied health professionals. By providing education and training, we can elevate familiarity with the equipment and subsequently build a CCL culture that advocates for both IVI and ICP.

High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with or without mechanical circulatory support: Will Impella show superiority in the PROTECT IV randomized trial?

BACKGROUND: PROTECT IV is a current enrolling randomized controlled trial evaluating high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) with prophylactic Impella versus no Impella to reduce the composite primary endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or cardiovascular hospitalization. In a PROTECT IV-like cohort of patients who underwent HR-PCI without Impella, we aimed to report the rate of major adverse events to determine whether the trial is adequately powered. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 700 patients meeting similar inclusion/exclusion criteria of PROTECT IV who underwent HR-PCI without Impella at a single tertiary center from 2008 to 2022 were included in the analysis. The composite rates of all-cause death, MI, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization at 1, 2, and 3 years were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the results were used to calculate the sample size under the constant hazard ratio assumption and expected number of events to be observed used in planning PROTECT IV. The primary endpoint occurred in 30.8 % of patients at 2 years. PROTECT IV assumes a hazard ratio of 0.75 using a multivariate Cox regression, which, under a 5 % level and 90 % power, yields 516 events. This implies a 2-year primary outcome rate of 50 % for the non-Impella arm. CONCLUSION: Therefore, PROTECT IV estimates that a sample size of 1252 patients is required for Impella to be declared superior to the non-Impella group. Using our observed 2-year outcome of 30.8 %, we estimate that PROTECT IV requires 1966 patients, demonstrating that PROTECT IV is probably underpowered.

Impella Versus Non-Impella for Nonemergent High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The benefit of mechanical circulatory support with Impella (Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts) for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) is uncertain. PROTECT III registry data showed improved outcomes with Impella compared with historical data (PROTECT II) but lack a direct comparison with the HR-PCI cohort without Impella support. We retrospectively identified patients meeting the PROTECT III inclusion criteria for HR-PCI and compared this group (non-Impella cohort [NonIMP]) with the outcomes data from the PROTECT III registry (Impella cohort). Baseline differences were balanced using inverse propensity weighting. The coprimary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in-hospital and at 90 days. A total of 283 patients at great risk did not receive Impella support; 200 patients had 90-day event ascertainment and were included in the inverse propensity weighting analysis and compared with 504 patients in the Impella cohort group. After calibration, few residual differences remained between groups. The primary outcome was not different in-hospital (3.0% vs 4.8%, p = 0.403) but less in NonIMP at 90 days (7.5% vs 13.8%, p = 0.033). Periprocedural vascular complications, bleeding, and transfusion rate did not differ between groups; however, acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in the NonIMP group (10.5% vs 5.4%, p = 0.023). In conclusion, under identical HR-PCI inclusion criteria for Impella use in PROTECT III, an institutional non-Impella-supported HR-PCI cohort showed similar MACE in-hospital but fewer MACE at 90 days, whereas there was no signal for periprocedural harm with Impella use. These results do not support routine usage of Impella for patients with HR-PCI.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Secondary to Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), predominantly affecting women. Because primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is reserved for a select group of patients, vulnerable and minority patients may experience delays in appropriate management and adverse outcomes. We examined the racial differences in the outcomes for patients with SCAD who underwent PPCI for STEMI. Records of patients aged ≥18 years who underwent PPCI for SCAD-related STEMI between 2016 and 2020 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database. Clinical, socioeconomic, and hospital characteristics were compared between non-White and White patients. Weighted multivariate analysis assessed the association of race with inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs. The total weighted estimate of patients with SCAD-STEMI who underwent PPCI was 4,945, constituting 25% non-White patients. Non-White patients were younger (56 vs 60.7 years, p <0.001); had a higher prevalence of diabetes, acute renal failure, and obesity; and were more likely to be uninsured and be in the lowest income group. Inpatient mortality (7.7% vs 8.4%, p = 0.74) and hospitalization costs ($34,213 vs $31,858, p = 0.27) were similar for non-White and White patients, and the adjusted analysis did not show any association between the patients' race and inpatient mortality (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 1.13, p = 0.11) or hospitalization costs (ß [ß coefficient]: 215, 95% CI -4,193 to 4,623, p >0.90). Similarly, there was no association between the patients' race and LOS (incident rate ratio 1.20, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.45, p = 0.054). The weighted multivariate analysis showed that age; clinical co-morbidities such as diabetes, acute renal failure, valvular dysfunction, and obesity; low-income status; and hospitalization in the western region were associated with adverse outcomes. In conclusion, our study does not show any differences in inpatient mortality, LOS, and hospitalization costs between non-White and White patients who underwent PPCI for SCAD-related STEMI.

Comparing planned versus ad hoc coronary microvascular assessment: Early findings from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an etiology for angina with non-obstructive coronary disease. However, the initial adoption of CMD assessment, whether planned or conducted ad hoc, is limited. We characterize planned and ad hoc CMD assessments and highlight evolving trends of a CMD referral center. METHODS: We analyzed outpatient data from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry from 2021 to 2023. Patients were categorized into planned or ad hoc CMD assessment groups, and baseline characteristics, hospital stay, medications, and physiological measurements were compared. Secondary analysis evaluated a CMD referral center's evolution. RESULTS: Of 101 included outpatients, 67.3 % underwent ad hoc procedures and 32.7 % planned procedures. Average age was 63.1 ± 10.1 years. The planned procedure group was 87.9 % female, and the ad hoc procedure group was 51.5 % female. There were no significant differences in index of microvascular resistance or coronary flow reserve between groups. Hospital stay duration was <1 day for both groups, and neither reported complications. Ad hoc patients were more frequently prescribed aspirin before (64.7 % vs. 36.4 %, p = 0.007) and after the procedure (66.2 % vs. 39.4 %, p = 0.01). CMD rates were higher for planned procedures (30.3 % vs. 10.3 %, p = 0.01). We observed that CMD referral centers have more planned procedures and a higher rate of positive results over time. CONCLUSION: CMD referral centers' planned procedures, and subsequent positive cases, increased over time. This emphasizes the importance of planned procedures, appropriate patient selection, and increased awareness of CMD among healthcare providers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Coronary Microvascular Disease (CMD) Registry, NCT05960474, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05960474.

Exploring the interplay between coronary microvascular dysfunction and mental health.

BACKGROUND: The intricate relationship between mental health disorders, notably anxiety and depression, and chest pain associated with non-obstructive coronary artery disease has become a focus of investigation. METHODS: This study from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR) evaluated the association of mental health disorders and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) among patients with angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who had undergone comprehensive invasive physiological testing for CMD. Clinical data regarding baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and noninvasive cardiac testing were obtained from chart review. The primary outcome of interest was the potential relationship between mental health diagnoses and the presence of CMD. RESULTS: Of patients included in the CMDR, 27 % (41/152) had at least one documented mental health disorder diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes) and CMD. There was no difference in mental health diagnosis prevalence between CMD-positive and CMD-negative patients (21.1 % vs. 28.9 %, p = 0.34). The most common mental health diagnoses were depression (15.8 %) and anxiety (15.8 %). Furthermore, 46.3 % (19/41) of patients with mental health disorders were prescribed psychiatric medications, with the most common being benzodiazepines (26.8 %). CONCLUSION: Patients with chest pain not due to CMD did not have an increased prevalence of mental health disorders compared with patients with ANOCA due to CMD, challenging the notion of a psychosomatic component in the pathogenesis of ANOCA.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction and inflammation: Insights from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is associated with various inflammatory conditions that worsen endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CMD and inflammation using common inflammatory markers derived from complete blood count (CBC) analysis. METHODS: Information was gathered from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry to examine the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio (EMR), and monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) in a cohort of patients with angina who showed non-obstructive coronary arteries and underwent invasive physiological assessments for CMD. RESULTS: Of the 171 patients studied, 126 were CMD-negative and 45 were CMD-positive, constituting two groups of interest. The average age of all patients was 61.7 ± 11.1 years, and 63.7 % were female. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, or potential anti-inflammatory medications. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in NLR (2.54 ± 3.71 vs. 2.52 ± 2.28, p = 0.97), EMR (0.3 ± 0.21 vs. 0.34 ± 0.29, p = 0.31), or MHR (0.02 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01, p = 0.54) between CMD-positive and CMD-negative patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings did not show a noteworthy connection between CMD and inflammation, as suggested by various simple CBC-based biomarkers.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction and cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has been implicated as a potential mechanism in the pathophysiology of different clinical presentations, including ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA), myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), stress cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and myocarditis. There are limited data about the role of CMD in cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicities. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Four women with a diagnosis of active cancer receiving treatment who developed subsequent MINOCA or INOCA presented for cardiac catheterization. Upon coronary angiography showing no obstructive coronary arteries, coronary function testing was performed to evaluate for CMD. METHODS: Coronary physiology was assessed measuring non-hyperemic (resting full-cycle ratio [RFR]) and hyperemic (fractional flow reserve [FFR]) indices using a physiologic pressure wire. The wire also measured coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and RFR using thermodilution technology. CMD was confirmed if the CFR was <2.5 and the IMR was >25. RESULTS: Among 4 patients with diagnosis of active cancer presenting with chest pain, there was no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease, leading to separate diagnoses of INOCA, MINOCA, stress cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis. We found CMD in 2 patients (1 with INOCA and 1 with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis). CONCLUSIONS: CMD may play a role in cardiovascular toxicities. Further coronary physiology studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity and CMD, as well as optimal preventive and treatment options.

From chest pain to coronary functional testing: Clinical and economic impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Coronary functional testing to formally diagnose coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) reduces cardiovascular events and alleviates angina. This study aims to investigate the extensive and complex journey that patients with CMD undergo, from the onset of chest pain to eventual diagnosis. METHODS: Data from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR) were analyzed, including information on the date of first documentation of chest pain, number of non-invasive and invasive tests the patient underwent, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. In addition, we estimated the total cost per patient. A total of 61 patients with CMD diagnosis were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Most patients in our cohort were older than 50 years of age. The median time from initial chest pain symptoms to diagnosis was 0.62 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.06-2.96) years. During this period, patients visited the emergency department a median of 1.0 (IQR: 0.0-2.0) times. Diagnostic tests included 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-6.0) electrocardiograms, 3.0 (IQR: 0.0-6.0) high-sensitivity troponin tests, and 1.0 (IQR: 1.0-2.0) echocardiograms. Prior to diagnosis of CMD, 13 (21.3 %) patients had left heart catheterization without coronary functional testing. Non-invasive testing for ischemia was conducted in 43 (70.5 %) patients. Alternative non-cardiac diagnoses were given to 11 (18.0 %) patients during the diagnostic process, with referrals made to gastroenterology for 16 (26.2 %) and pulmonology for 10 (16.4 %) patients. The cost was almost $2000/patient. CONCLUSION: Timely identification of CMD offers promising opportunities for prompt symptom alleviation, accompanied by reduced visits to the emergency department, cardiovascular testing, invasive medical procedures, and consequently reduced healthcare expenses.

Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR): Study design and rationale.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a prevalent condition among patients with cardiovascular risk factors, leading to a reduced quality of life and an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Novel invasive techniques have emerged to more accurately diagnose CMD. However, CMD's natural history remains poorly understood due to limited data. To address this knowledge gap, the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR) was established with the primary aim of standardizing comprehensive coronary functional testing and understanding of CMD. DESIGN: CMDR is a prospective, multicenter registry enrolling an unlimited number of consecutive subjects who undergo comprehensive invasive hemodynamic assessment of the entire coronary arterial vasculature. Patients undergoing acetylcholine provocation test for coronary vasospasm will also be included. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 30 days and annually for up to 5 years. The primary endpoint is Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina grade over time. Secondary endpoints, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalizations, medication changes, and subsequent coronary interventions, will be analyzed to establish long-term safety and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing invasive CMD assessment. SUMMARY: CMDR aims to characterize the clinical and physiologic profile of patients undergoing comprehensive invasive coronary functional testing, simultaneously providing crucial longitudinal information on the natural history and outcomes of these patients. This will shed light on CMD's course and clinical implications, which, in turn, holds the potential to significantly improve diagnostic and treatment strategies for CMD patients, ultimately leading to the enhancement of their overall prognosis and quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05960474.

A novel approach to saline/contrast delivery in excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) to enhance efficacy: MAXCon ELCA technique.

The advent of excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) nearly four decades ago heralded a novel way to treat complex lesions, both coronary and peripheral, which were previously untraversable and thus untreatable. These complex lesions include heavily calcified lesions, ostial lesions, bifurcation lesions, chronic total occlusions, in-stent restenosis (including stent underexpansion), and degenerative saphenous vein grafts. We discuss the technology of ELCA, its indications, applications, and complications, and suggest the "MAXCon ELCA" technique for better outcomes without increased risk. Lastly, we present a case of MAXCon ELCA effectively treating a complex lesion.

Reasons for repeat urgent cardiac procedures within the same day.

BACKGROUND: With advances in technology and technique, the expectations are that patients undergoing procedures in the cardiac catheterization laboratory will not need to return for a repeat procedure within the same day. OBJECTIVES: Report why subjects undergoing cardiac procedures return urgently to the catheterization laboratory for a repeat procedure during the same day. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who were brought back to the cardiac catheterization laboratory within the same day for a repeat procedure. The reasons for index and repeat procedure were identified. Patients who were transferred from an outside center after an initial procedure at other centers were excluded. RESULTS: Between November 2013 and January 2022, 55,942 catheterization procedures were performed at our institution, of which 140 entries were included in our analysis. Common reasons for the index procedure were diagnostic angiography (35.0%), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, 29.2%), and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (15.0%). The most common reason for bringing these patients back to the cardiac catheterization laboratory within the same day was vascular complications (24.2%), followed by repeat PCI (20.7%), need for hemodynamic support (15.0%), heart team discussion and PCI (10%), and pacemaker implantation (10%). Acute limb ischemia was the most commonly identified vascular complication (7.1%), followed by pseudoaneurysm (5%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that a very small number of patients underwent repeat procedures within the same day. Special attention should be paid to vascular access and closure and assessment of recurrent chest pain postprocedure, as these are the main reasons for same-day repeat procedures.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction assessment: A comparative analysis of procedural aspects.

BACKGROUND: Full adoption of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) assessment faces challenges due to its invasive nature and concerns about prolonged procedure time and increased contrast and/or radiation exposure. We compared procedural aspects of CMD invasive assessment to diagnostic left heart catheterization (DLHC) in patients with chest pain who were not found to have obstructive coronary artery disease. METHODS: A total of 227 patients in the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry were compared to 1592 patients who underwent DLHC from August 2021 to November 2023. The two cohorts were compared using propensity-score matching; primary outcomes were fluoroscopy time and total contrast use. RESULTS: The participants' mean age was 64.1 ± 12.6 years. CMD-assessed patients were more likely to be female (66.5% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) and have hypertension (80.2% vs. 44.5%, p < 0.001), history of stroke (11.9% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.002), and history of myocardial infarction (20.3% vs. 7.7%, p < 0.001). CMD assessment was safe, without any reported adverse outcomes. A propensity-matched analysis showed that patients who underwent CMD assessment had slightly higher median contrast exposure (50 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and slightly longer fluoroscopy time (6.9 vs. 4.7 min, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in radiation dose (209.3 vs. 219 mGy, p = 0.58) and overall procedure time (31 vs. 29 min, p = 0.37). CONCLUSION: Compared to DLHC, CMD assessment is safe and requires only slightly additional contrast use (10 mL) and slightly longer fluoroscopy time (2 min) without clinical implications. These findings emphasize the favorable safety and feasibility of invasive CMD assessment.

Understanding Patient Characteristics and Coronary Microvasculature: Early Insights from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry.

Coronary angiography has limitations in accurately assessing the coronary microcirculation. A new comprehensive invasive hemodynamic assessment method utilizing coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) offers improved diagnostic capabilities. This study aimed to present early real-world experience with invasive hemodynamic assessment of the coronary microvasculature in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry, which is a prospective, multi-center registry that standardized the evaluation of patients with angina and nonobstructive CAD who underwent invasive hemodynamic assessment of the coronary microvasculature using the Coroventis CoroFlow Cardiovascular System. All patients underwent comprehensive invasive hemodynamic assessment. Analysis was performed on the first 154 patients enrolled in the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry; their mean age was 62.4 years and 65.6% were female. A notable proportion of patients (31.8%) presented with a Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Score of 3 or 4. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was diagnosed in 39 of 154 patients (25.3%), with mean fractional flow reserve of 0.89 ± 0.43, mean resting full cycle ratio of 0.93 ± 0.08, mean CFR of 1.8 ± 0.9, and mean IMR of 36.26 ± 19.23. No in-hospital adverse events were reported in the patients. This study demonstrates the potential of invasive hemodynamic assessment using CFR and IMR to accurately evaluate the coronary microvasculature in patients with nonobstructive CAD. These findings have important implications for improving the diagnosis and management of coronary microvascular dysfunction, leading to more targeted and effective therapies for patients with microvascular angina.

Nursing role model for computed tomography contrast injection decreases extravasation rates.

Extravasation of intravenous contrast administered for computed tomography remains of concern in pediatric patients. It is of great interest to any pediatric radiology department to decrease extravasation events in an effort to reduce even small adverse outcomes and improve the overall patient experience in the radiology department. Here, a total of 17 extravasation events, as reported and documented in departmental quality assurance at our institution over 4 years, were retrospectively reviewed for factors contributing to the number of adverse extravasation events. We found that pediatric nursing plays a central role in both achieving and maintaining a low extravasation rate at our institution.