Case series of Li-Fraumeni syndrome: carcinogenic mechanisms in breast cancer with TP53 pathogenic variant carriers.

BACKGROUND: Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a hereditary condition attributed to TP53 pathogenic variants,(PV), is associated with high risks for various malignant tumors, including breast cancer. Notably, individuals harboring TP53 PVs are more likely (67-83%) to develop HER2 + breast cancer than noncarriers (16-25%). In this retrospective study, we evaluated the associations between TP53 variants and breast cancer phenotype. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of patients with LFS treated at a single institution and reviewed the literature on TP53 functions and the mechanisms underlying HER2 + breast cancer development in LFS. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 10 patients with LFS from 8 families. The median age at the onset of the first tumor was 35.5 years. Only case 2 met the classic criteria; this patient harbored a nonsense variant, whereas the other patients carried missense variants. We observed that 9 of 10 patients developed breast cancer. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that 40% of breast cancers in patients with LFS were HR - /HER2 + . The median age at the onset of breast cancer was slightly younger in HR - /HER2 + tumors than in HR + /HER2 - tumors (31 years and 35.5 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of HER2 + breast cancer subtype was 40% in our LFS case series, which is greater than that in the general population (16-25%). Some TP53 PVs may facilitate HER2-derived oncogenesis in breast cancer. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to clarify the oncogenic mechanisms underlying each subtype of breast cancer in TP53 PV carriers.

Availability of genome-matched therapy based on clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) provides new opportunities for patients with advanced cancer to receive genome-matched therapies, but the availability rate of these remains low. We reviewed our CGP cases and suggested possible strategies to improve the current status from a clinical perspective. METHODS: Druggable genomic alterations and barriers to accessing genome-matched therapies were investigated in 653 patients with 30 various types of cancers who underwent CGP. RESULTS: While the availability rate of genome-matched therapies as a whole was 9.5%, CGP was useful in some cancer types. Patients with thyroid cancer and lung cancer harbored druggable genomic alterations at high rates, while sarcoma rarely harbored these alterations (100%, 76%, and 15.2%, respectively). In contrast, the availability rate of genome-matched therapies was highest in patients with sarcoma and head and neck cancer (HNC) (60% and 40%, respectively). One hundred thirteen patients (63.5%) had multiple barriers to accessing genome-matched therapy. Of 178 patients, 21 patients (11.8%) could not be considered for genome-matched therapies solely because of the deterioration of their performance status. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the usefulness of CGP for patients with sarcoma and HNC in addition to lung cancer in clinical practice. Performing CGP at the front line has the potential to improve the availability of genome-matched therapy.

Current prospects of hereditary adrenal tumors: towards better clinical management.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) are two rare types of adrenal gland malignancies. Regarding hereditary tumors, some patients with ACC are associated with with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), and those with PPGL with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Recent studies have expanded this spectrum to include other types of hereditary tumors, such as Lynch syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis. Individuals harboring germline TP53 pathogenic variants that cause LFS have heterogeneous phenotypes depending on the respective variant type. As an example, R337H variant found in Brazilian is known as low penetrant. While 50-80% of pediatric ACC patients harbored a LFS, such a strong causal relationship is not observed in adult patients, which suggests different pathophysiologies between the two populations. As for PPGL, because multiple driver genes, such as succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-related genes, RET, NF1, and VHL have been identified, universal multi-gene germline panel testing is warranted as a comprehensive and cost-effective approach. PPGL pathogenesis is divided into three molecular pathways (pseudohypoxia, Wnt signaling, and kinase signaling), and this classification is expected to result in personalized medicine based on genomic profiles. It remains unknown whether clinical characteristics differ between cases derived from genetic predisposition syndromes and sporadic cases, or whether the surveillance strategy should be changed depending on the genetic background or whether it should be uniform. Close cooperation among medical genomics experts, endocrinologists, oncologists, and early investigators is indispensable for improving the clinical management for multifaceted ACC and PPGL.

Prognostic impact of cancer genomic profile testing for advanced or metastatic solid tumors in clinical practice.

Cancer genomic profile (CGP) testing, which is covered by the national health insurance system in Japan, has been introduced as a routine clinical practice. However, the effects of CGP testing on prognoses remain unclear. Drug accessibility rates and prognoses after CGP testing were retrospectively investigated in 713 patients who underwent CGP testing examined by our molecular tumor board between November 2019 and October 2022,. Overall survival (OS) was examined using the log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age of patients (326 males and 387 females) was 58 years (12-85 years). CGP testing revealed one or more gene mutations in 681 cases (95.5%), among which actionable gene mutations were detected in 439 (61.6%). Although treatment options were recommended for 285 cases (40.0%) by the molecular tumor board, only 45 received treatment based on their gene mutations. During the median observation period of 8.6 months, 351 (49.2%) patients died of the exacerbation of existing diseases. No significant differences were observed in OS between patients treated with and without genomically matched therapy (p = 0.285). According to clinical responses to treatment based on gene mutations, median OS was significantly longer in patients who achieved partial response and stable disease (26.5 months; 95% CI 14.4-38.6) than in those with progressive disease and not evaluated (9.8 months; 95% CI 5.8-13.8, p = 0.013). Responses to treatment based on gene mutations may improve prognoses, and it is important to increase the drug accessibility rate after CGP testing.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors, third edition.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have reported the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors. The accumulated evidence of tumor agnostic agent has been made since PD-1 inhibitor was approved and used in clinical practice. Therefore, we have revised the guideline "Japan Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion for the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair tumors, cooperated by Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, First Edition". METHODS: Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with dMMR advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO), Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), and Japanese society of pediatric hematology/oncology (JSPHO) voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO and the public comments among all societies' members were done. RESULTS: The current guideline describes two clinical questions and eight recommendations for whom, when, and how MMR status should be tested. CONCLUSION: In this guideline, the committee proposed eight recommendations for performing MMR testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with high tumor mutational burden tumors.

The development of novel antitumor agents and accompanying biomarkers has improved survival across several tumor types. Previously, we developed recommendations for tumor-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumors with DNA mismatch repair deficient or neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusions. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in patient with tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H) solid tumors and have been established as a third tumor-agnostic agent, making it necessary to develop the guideline prioritized for these patients. Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with TMB-H advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO), Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), and Japanese society of pediatric hematology/oncology (JSPHO) voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done. The current guideline describes three clinical questions and seven recommendations for whom, when, and how TMB should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with TMB-H advanced solid tumors. In this guideline, the committee proposed seven recommendations for performing TMB testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic factor in older adult patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy with tri-weekly cisplatin.

INTRODUCTION: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) in the definitive setting. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a screening tool to predict the risk of morbidity and mortality in the older adult. Nutritional management is key during CCRT but the association between prognosis and initial nutritional status in older adults with LAHNC undergoing CCRT remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients ≥65 years old with LAHNC who received definitive CCRT with cisplatin (80 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2, every three weeks, three times) between 2012 and 2018 were included. Patients without completion of radiotherapy were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the GNRI (≦98 or > 98). Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was adopted to identify prognostic factors. GNRI, sex, T and N categories were prespecified as variables for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The median age of 111 patients (88 male, 79%) was 69 years (interquartile range: 67-71), among which 23 patients had low GNRI (20 male, 87%) and 88 patients had high GNRI (68 male, 77%). Baseline clinical characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups. OS was significantly worse in the low GNRI group than in the high GNRI group (p = 0.048). There was no statistical difference in EFS between the two groups (p = 0.12). Multivariable analysis revealed that low GNRI (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.17, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.12-8.96, p = 0.029) and higher N category (HR: 4.37, 95% CI: 1.58-12.06, p = 0.004) were associated with worse OS. For EFS, the higher N category was significantly associated with a worse outcome (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.16-5.59, p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: Poorer nutritional status before initiation of CCRT was associated with worse OS in older adults with LAHNC in the definitive setting. The GNRI is a convenient tool for predicting OS in older adult patients with LAHNC treated with CCRT.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have reported the efficacy of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors against neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion gene-positive advanced solid tumors. The accumulated evidence of tumor-agnostic agent has made since TRK inhibitors were approved and used in clinical practice. Therefore, we have revised the 'Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO)/Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO)-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors, cooperated by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO)'. METHODS: Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done. RESULTS: The current guideline describes 3 clinical questions and 14 recommendations for whom, when, and how NTRK fusion should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. CONCLUSION: The committee proposed 14 recommendations for performing NTRK testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from TRK inhibitors.

Clinical characteristics of sarcoma cases in which long-term disease control was achieved with trabectedin treatment: A retrospective study.

Trabectedin is a therapeutic option for patients with advanced sarcoma. While a randomized trial demonstrated its prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), the reported PFS was <6 months. Some patients can achieve long-term disease control with this treatment. However, the reference information is insufficient. Herein, we retrospectively reviewed 51 sarcoma patients who received trabectedin. We analyzed the clinicopathological features, trabectedin dose, administration schedule, and clinical outcomes, including the overall response rate (ORR) and PFS. Among them, we assessed the detailed data of patients who achieved long-term disease control (PFS >1 year). The ORR in the 49 evaluable patients was 8%, and the median PFS in 51 patients was 7.5 months. Six patients (12%) achieved PFS of >1 year. Five of the six patients had metastatic lesions at trabectedin initiation. The pathological subtypes were myxoid liposarcoma (n = 2), leiomyosarcoma (n = 2), synovial sarcoma (n = 1), and Ewing sarcoma (n = 1). The final administration dose was the minimum dose (0.8 mg/m2) in two patients who continued the treatment over 20 cycles. The best radiological response was partial response (PR) in two myxoid liposarcoma patients and stable disease in four. The durations from trabectedin initiation to the first response in the two PR cases were 163 and 176 days, respectively. Our results support the validity of continuing trabectedin at a sustainable dose and interval in patients who can tolerate it. These results may be useful when considering the clinical application of trabectedin.

Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling.

Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 263 patients were scored using the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) from 0 to 2 based on the combination of serum albumin and c-reactive protein (CRP): 0, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl and CRP ≤ 0.5 mg/dl; 1, albumin < 3.5 g/dl or CRP > 0.5 mg/dl; and 2, albumin < 3.5 g/dl and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl. Overall survival was compared between mGPS 0-1 and mGPS 2 groups. The prognosis of patients with PS 0-1 and mGPS 2 was also evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) were mGPS 2. Patients with mGPS 2 had significant shorter survival (14.7 months vs 4.6 months, p < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients were PS 0-1 and mGPS 2, and their survival was also short (5.6 months). Evaluation of mGPS is a simple and useful method for identifying patients with adequate prognosis using CGP.

Druggable gene alterations in Japanese patients with rare malignancy.

Without a current standard of care, patients with rare malignancy are subjected to precision oncology with next-generation sequencing to identify a course of treatment. We sought to establish the clinical relevance of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) among patients with rare malignancy. Rare malignancy was defined using the Rare Cancers in Europe definition (<6 cases per 100,000 individuals). We analyzed gene mutations, fusions, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Level A gene alterations, categorized using Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer and MD Anderson Knowledge Base for Precision Oncology, were considered druggable. Rare malignancy accounted for 149 (45%) cases, with female genital cancers (32%) most common. Among the rare malignancy cases, we identified a lower frequency of mutation in TP53 (41% vs. 60%, P<0.001), KRAS (13% vs. 43%, P<0.001) and APC (3% vs. 25%, P<0.001), and a higher frequency of ARID1A mutation (14% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as compared with common malignancies. TMB-high and MSI-high cases were found in 8% and 2% of cases, respectively. Druggable alterations were detected in 37 patients with rare malignancy; this percentage tended to be higher than that for patients with common malignancies (25% vs. 17%, P=0.08). Common druggable alterations were BRAF V600E, ERBB2 amplification, PIK3CA E542K, and BRCA1/2 variant. Five of the 37 patients with druggable alterations received genome-driven treatment. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the rare and common malignancy groups. Our results provide clues for future clinical development and treatment success among Japanese patients with rare cancers.

Assessment of a cancer genomic profile test for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Comprehensive cancer genomic profile (CGP) tests are being implemented under Japanese universal health insurance system. However, the clinical usefulness of CGP test for breast cancer patients has not been evaluated. Of the 310 patients who underwent CGP testing at our institution between November 2019 and April 2021, 35 patients with metastatic breast cancer whose treatment strategy was discussed by our molecular tumor board within the study period were investigated after exclusion of 2 cases that could not be analyzed. The turn-around time, drug accessibility, and germline identification detection were evaluated. The subtype was luminal in 20 patients (57.1%), triple-negative in 12 patients (34.3%), and luminal-HER2 in 3 patients (8.6%). Actionable gene mutations were detected in 30 patients (85.7%), and 7 patients (20.0%) were recommended for clinical trial participation, with the drug administered to 2 patients (5.7%). Three patients (8.6%) died due to disease progression before the test results were disclosed. We report the results of an initial assessment of the utility of CGP testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer under Japanese universal health insurance system. Conducting CGP tests at a more appropriate time could provide patients with greater benefit from treatments based on their specific gene mutations.

Post-Systemic Chemotherapy Prognoses of Recurrent/Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients with Retroperitoneal/Intra-Abdominal Origin versus Those with Extremities/Trunk Origin.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of systemic chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) compared to its benefits for other primary lesions has not been known or sufficiently evaluated. METHODS AND PATIENTS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of the STS patients who consulted a department of medical oncology in Tokyo between June 2011 and March 2018, and we extracted the cases of patients with primary sites at the retroperitoneum/intra-abdomen (cohort R) or extremities/trunk (cohort E) who received systemic chemotherapy in a recurrent/metastatic setting, comparing the cohorts' characteristics, chemotherapy details, and prognoses. RESULTS: Of all 337 STS patients, we enrolled 49 patients in cohort R and 75 patients in cohort E. Liposarcoma was more frequently observed in cohort R (51.0%) than cohort E (22.7%). The median chemotherapy treatment line was two lines (range: 1-6) in cohort R and three lines (range: 1-9) in cohort E. The doxorubicin usage rates differed in recurrent/metastatic settings (90.0% in cohort R and 55.0% in cohort E), due mainly to the higher rate of a perioperative chemotherapy treatment history in cohort E (52.0% vs. 6.1% in cohort R). The median overall survival from the start of salvage chemotherapy was 31.9 months (cohort R; 95% CI: 20.9-42.8) and 27.1 months (cohort E; 95% CI: 21.6-32.5) (p = 0.549). CONCLUSION: There were differences in the distributions of pathology and antitumor drugs used in a salvage setting between retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal and extremities/trunk STS patients in recurrent/metastatic settings, but the prognoses with salvage chemotherapy were similar in the two cohorts.

A proposed clinical scoring system for initiation of lenvatinib treatment in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The optimal timing for starting lenvatinib treatment in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) has long been controversial because of the relatively slow-growing nature of differentiated thyroid cancer. The aim of this study was to establish a scoring system using known clinical factors to simplify decision-making in when to start lenvatinib in RR-DTC patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed RR-DTC patients treated with lenvatinib. We developed the clinical indication scoring algorithm on the basis of age, tumor-related symptoms, histology, metastatic sites, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, size of lung metastases, baseline sum of tumor diameters, and tumor-volume doubling time that was used to categorize patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were analyzed; 13 low-risk, 36 intermediate-risk, and 10 high-risk. The respective median progression-free survival from the initiation of lenvatinib was 93.7 months in the low-risk group, 20.3 months in the intermediate-risk group, and 6.2 months in the high-risk group (p < 0.02). Patients in the high-risk group had significantly worse overall survival compared with those in the low-risk (hazard ratio [HR] 6.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-34.90, p < 0.03) or intermediate-risk (HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.03-8.63, p < 0.05) group. Using our proposed algorithm, patients in the intermediate-risk group showed treatment outcomes similar to that were observed in the pivotal trial of lenvatinib, and were the optimal patients to start lenvatinib. CONCLUSION: Our proposed scoring system can separate treatment outcomes and prognosis of RR-DTC patients treated with lenvatinib. This simple algorithm can be helpful for oncologists in deciding whether to start lenvatinib treatment in patients with RR-DTC.

Pre-Treatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as a Predictive Marker of Pazopanib Treatment for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma.

Pazopanib with trabectedin and eribulin is widely used to treat soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). We have shown that baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may predict the efficacy and patient prognosis of eribulin. Changes in NLR, but not baseline NLR, can predict patient prognosis of trabectedin. However, prognostic factors of pazopanib for STS have not been identified. We present a retrospective analysis of 141 patients treated with pazopanib for recurrent or metastatic non-round cell STS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors of durable clinical benefit (DCB), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival. L-sarcoma histology (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.12-0.79; p = 0.014) and pre-treatment NLR < 3.0 (OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.02-6.67; p = 0.045) were independent predictive factors of DCB. Pre-treatment NLR < 3.0 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.36-0.84; p = 0.0057), liposarcoma histology (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.09-2.91; p = 0.022), primary extremity site (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.31-0.75; p = 0.0010), ECOG PS ≥ 1 (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.08-2.42; p = 0.019), and CRP < 0.3 (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.33-0.82; p = 0.0050) were independent predictive factors of OS. These findings indicate that baseline NLR predicts the efficacy and patient prognosis of pazopanib for STS.

Clinical Impact of Cachexia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Received Chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: There have been few reports on the evaluation of cancer cachexia based on skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) in patients with head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two head and neck cancer patients were enrolled. In definitive and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy settings, clinical outcomes were compared between cachexia and non-cachexia patients. RESULTS: Forty patients were diagnosed with cachexia (20.8%). In the definitive setting, overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in the cachexia group (3-year OS: 50.0% vs 88.5%; p < 0.01), and multivariate analysis identified UICC stage IV, baseline albumin of <4 and cachexia as poor prognostic factors. However, cachexia was not significant in the adjuvant setting. CONCLUSION: Cancer cachexia was negatively associated with prognosis in patients with HNC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy. Nutritional intervention during chemoradiotherapy may improve survival in these patients.

Short daytime napping reduces the risk of cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults: a 5-year longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of napping on cognition have been suggested in cross-sectional studies. This study aimed to clarify longitudinal associations between cognitive decline and sleep characteristics, particularly daytime napping, over a 5-year period in older adults. METHODS: Study participants were 389 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥65 years living in Ojiya City, Niigata, Japan. Baseline and follow-up examinations were conducted in 2011-2013 and 2016-2018, respectively. Trained nurses visited and interviewed participants to collect the following information at baseline and follow-up: demographic characteristics, disease history, lifestyle habits including bedtime, sleeping hours, and daytime nap duration, and cognitive function. The assessment of cognitive function was performed using the revised Hasegawa's dementia scale (HDS-R), with cognitive decline defined as a change in the HDS-R of ≤ - 3 over 5 years. Odds ratios (ORs) for cognitive decline were calculated using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 74.6 years (SD 6.4), and the cumulative incidence of cognitive decline was 106/389 (27.3%). The adjusted OR for 1-29 min daytime napping was significantly lower compared to that for no napping (OR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.23-0.96). Earlier bedtime was associated with cognitive decline (adjusted P for trend = 0.0480). CONCLUSION: Short daytime napping (< 30 min) reduces the risk of cognitive decline over 5 years for community-dwelling older people. A future study will be necessary to confirm the effect of short napping on the reduction of risk for clinically diagnosed dementia.

Clinicopathological and genomic features in patients with head and neck neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the head and neck is a rare type of malignancy, accounting for only 0.3% of all head and neck cancers, and its clinicopathological and genomic features have not been fully characterized. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 27 patients with poorly differentiated NEC of the head and neck seen at our institution over a period of 15 years. Patient characteristics, adopted therapies, and clinical outcomes were reviewed based on the medical records. Pathological analysis and targeted sequencing of 523 cancer-related genes were performed using evaluable biopsied/resected specimens based on the clinical data. The most common tumor locations were the paranasal sinus (33%) and the oropharynx (19%). Eighty-one percent of the patients had locally advanced disease. The 3-year overall survival rates in all patients and in the 17 patients with locally advanced disease who received multimodal curative treatments were 39% and 53%, respectively. Histologically, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was the predominant subtype (58% of evaluable cases), and the Ki-67 labeling index ranged from 59 to 99% (median: 85%). Next-generation sequencing in 14 patients identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in TP53, RB1, PIK3CA-related genes (PREX2, PIK3CA, and PTEN), NOTCH1, and SMARCA4 in six (43%), three (21%), two (14%), two (14%), and one (7%) patients, respectively. Sequencing also detected the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion gene in one patient. The median value of the total mutational burden (TMB) was 7.1/Mb, and three patients had TMB ≥ 10. Regardless of the aggressive pathological features, our data revealed favorable clinical characteristics in the patients with locally advanced disease who received curative treatment. The lower TP53 and RB1 mutation prevalence rates compared to those described for small cell lung cancer suggests the biological heterogeneity of NEC in different parts of the body. Furthermore, the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion gene and mutations in genes encoding the components of the NOTCH and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways found in our study may be promising targets for NEC of the head and neck.

Japanese single-institution analysis of mitotane for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. While mitotane is the only agent approved for ACC, clinical data are scarce, especially in the Asian population. We reviewed 10 patients with ACC who received mitotane as a single agent or in combination with other agents in our institution. Patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and toxicities were analyzed. Mitotane was administered to 2 patients as an adjuvant therapy and to 8 patients for systemic control. In the latter 8 patients, 1 patient had locally advanced disease and 1 had metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis, whereas the other 6 patients experienced metastatic relapse at mitotane initiation. The administered regimen was mitotane alone in 7 patients, and mitotane plus cytotoxic chemotherapy in 3 patients. The initial daily mitotane dose was 3.0 g in 2 patients, 1.5 g in 7 patients, and 1.0 g in 1 patient. The median duration of treatment was 3.7 (range, 0.7-22.1) months. In 8 systemic cases, the median overall survival from chemotherapy initiation was 7.2 months, and only 1 patient survived over 1 year. The median interval from mitotane termination to death in systemic cases was 2.8 months, and the cause was progressive disease in 4 patients and toxicity (hallucination, mycobacteriosis, or liver injury) in 3 patients. As a second-line regimen, 2 systemic cases and 1 adjuvant case were enrolled in clinical trials. Our analysis exhibited extremely poor prognosis under mitotane-based regimens, and further treatment strategies are warranted to improve outcomes.