Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
APMIS ; 126(2): 171-173, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29700913

RESUMEN

We report a case of aortic native valve endocarditis due to Actinotignum schaalii in an 89-year-old man with prostatism history but no signs of urinary infection. Actinotignum schaalii was isolated not only from positive blood culture but also from cardiac valve culture using mass spectrometry and 16S rDNA sequencing. Actinotignum schaalii is recognized as commensal of genitourinary tract, but it was underdiagnosed. The advances in bacterial identification such as MALDI-TOF MS probably explain the increasing described cases of infections due to A. schaalii these last years.


Asunto(s)
Actinomycetaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Válvula Aórtica/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/microbiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Endocarditis Bacteriana/etiología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción
2.
Presse Med ; 43(11): e365-8, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25201601

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Evaluate the impact of distribution of antimicrobial guidelines (AG) on anti-infectious prescriptions (AIP) in patients presenting a bacteraemia. Cost evaluation of AIP with and without intervention of an infectious disease specialist. METHODS: The first evaluation of AIP was performed from January to May 2008 in Douai hospital, France, at day 4 after the initial blood sample using French guidelines (FG). An AG based on FG was distributed in June 2008 to all Medical Doctors. A second evaluation of AIP was performed from July 2009 to October 2010 after AG distribution. In May 2009, an infectious disease specialist arrived. He re-evaluated at day 4 the initial AIP and modified it if necessary based on the bacteriologic results and the AG. In the second period of the study, we evaluated the cost of the AIP after day 4. RESULTS: Anti-infectious at day 1 was suitable in 37/50 (74%) cases before vs. 148/206 (72%) cases after distribution of the AG (P = 0.76). At day 4, anti-infectious was suitable in 26/50 (52%) before vs. 103/206 (50%) cases after distribution of the AG (P = 0.80). In the second period, the overall cost of AIP was estimated at 44,000 Euros with the infectious disease specialist intervention and at 51,000 Euros without. CONCLUSION: Distribution of AG did not significantly improve AIP in patients with bacteraemia. Re-evaluation by an infectious disease specialist could lead to a better anti-infectious usage and potential reduction in costs.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Francia , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA