Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Saudi J Anaesth ; 18(1): 108-110, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38313730

RESUMEN

Spinal anesthesia usually lasts up to two hours, but an infusion of IV dexmedetomidine can prolong it to three to four hours. We report two cases where single spinal anesthesia with IV dexmedetomidine was maintained for more than six hours during tibia fracture surgery. The spinal anesthesia was maintained for 350 and 390 minutes without another medication, and the sensory level confirmed after the surgery was T10 and L1. Dexmedetomidine can very-prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia beyond what has been reported. However, longer infusion times can also result in longer recovery times.

2.
Minerva Cardioangiol ; 67(6): 477-486, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31625706

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Several high quality randomized controlled studies were recently published on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with or at risk for coronary artery (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD). While a reduction on cardiovascular event is known and an increase in moderate bleeding is expected, the effect of this strategy on survival is currently unknown. Accordingly, we performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effect of NOAC on survival. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and Clinicaltrials.gov (last updated March 31st 2019). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at the longest reported follow-up. Coprimary endpoint was major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criterion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included ten randomized controlled trials comparing NOACs versus control treatment (placebo, single platelet or dual antiplatelet therapy) enrolling 66665 patients with or at risk for CAD or PAD. NOACs were associated with a decreased risk of mortality (825/41655 [4.4%] versus 405/25010 [5.6%] RR 0.93 [95% CI: 0.87-1.00], P=0.04), and an increased risk for major bleeding (RR 1.62 [95% CI: 1.23-2.13], P=0.0005) when compared to control. Findings were robust to trial sequential, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses. Low doses NOACs were associated with a reduced mortality when compared to standard dose NOACs. CONCLUSIONS: NOACs reduced all-cause mortality in patients with or at risk for CAD or PAD, even though they increased the risk of major bleeding. Future studies regarding the best doses of NOACs are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA