Cannabis Use in Inpatients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders at a Community Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Cannabis is the second most used recreational drug in the United States and one of the most used substances in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD). Unfortunately, the increased use is likely to continue as more states legalize recreational use of cannabis. Although the association between cannabis and schizophrenia has been studied extensively, the understanding of the relationship is still evolving. In this study, we sought to determine the prevalence and potential factors associated with cannabis use (CU) among inpatients with SSD at a community teaching hospital. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic medical charts of patients discharged from the psychiatric unit of our hospital from July 1, 2017 through October 31, 2017. Patients were included in this study if: 1) They were ≥ 18 years old; 2) They had discharge diagnosis of SSD; and 3) They had urine drug testing performed. Pertinent sociodemographic and clinical variables, including substance use status and hospital length of stay (LOS), were abstracted. Univariate frequencies and summary statistics were performed. Odds ratios (ORs) were determined by logistic regression analysis of bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-five (52.2%) patients had a discharge diagnosis of SSD, and only 322 had urine toxicology result for cannabinoids and were included in analysis. Of the 322 patients, 41.5% (n = 133) screened positive for cannabinoids. Of the 133 patients, 78% were African American, 15% were Hispanic and 5% were White; 77% were male and the median age was 36 years. Bivariate analyses showed tobacco use (OR: 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7 - 4.6), alcohol use (OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 2.9 - 7.0), younger age (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.8 - 4.5), male gender (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 2.2 - 3.2), unemployment (OR: 3.91, 95% CI: 3.49 - 7.35), homelessness (OR: 3.18, 95% CI: 2.76 - 3.84) and LOS (OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.93 - 4.31) were significantly associated with CU. Result of multivariate analysis was similar to that found in bivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: CU appears to be prevalent among patients with SSD. Clinicians and public health professionals are encouraged to understand the health implications of its use in patients with mental illness especially against the backdrop of current marijuana laws.

Savings on High-Cost Drugs Such as Atypical Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: Switching to Billing Under the Pharmacy Benefit in Outpatient Settings.

OBJECTIVE: Access to health care can be improved by controlling and optimizing expenditures, specifically the high-cost drugs such as atypical long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. This type of LAI is usually covered under the medical benefit and/or pharmacy benefit. We sought to compare financial outcomes of the medical benefit billing option with the pharmacy benefit billing option for atypical LAIs in an adult outpatient psychiatric clinic and to determine insurance companies' reasons for nonpayment when the medical benefit billing model was utilized. METHODS: A retrospective chart review with patients 18 years of age and older who were receiving atypical LAI antipsychotics in the outpatient psychiatric department during two time periods--January 7 through February 6, 2016 and August 15 through September 14, 2016--to evaluate medical (N = 31) and pharmacy (N = 23) benefit study periods, respectively. RESULTS: The estimated loss when using the medical benefit billing option was $14,520 per month. Switching to billing under the pharmacy benefit resulted in a monthly gain of $2,100. The net savings from the switch were estimated at $16,620 per month. No patient lost access to treatment or was switched to another medication solely because of the change in billing option. The reasons for nonpayment (N = 10) provided by medical insurance companies were prior authorization/step therapy required (40%), insurance terminated (30%), and coverage through Medicaid Rx only (30%). CONCLUSION: This study revealed a significant financial loss related to atypical LAI antipsychotics when the medical benefit model was utilized. By switching to billing under the pharmacy benefit, potential savings for high-cost drugs such as LAIs can be realized.

Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic in an Inpatient Unit of a Community Teaching Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSD) often experience significant impairment in educational, occupational, and psychosocial functioning. The clinical benefit of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) in the management of patients with SSD is well established. SSD patients who are nonadherent to treatment have lower disease relapse and readmission rates when prescribed a LAI, compared to oral antipsychotics. Despite the reported advantages of LAIs, their prescription rates in clinical settings remain low. This pilot study aimed to determine the pattern of LAI prescription in psychiatric inpatients of a teaching community hospital in Brooklyn, New York. METHODS: A retrospective review of the charts of patients discharged from the psychiatric units of the hospital from September 1, 2017, through September 30, 2017, was conducted. Frequencies and proportions for demographic and disease-related characteristics were calculated. Pertinent continuous variables were recoded into categorical variables. Chi-square-tests or Fisher's exact tests were performed for categorical variables. The one-sample Shapiro-Wilk test (for sample size < 50) was used to check for the normality of distribution of continuous variables. Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-three (70%) of the patients discharged from the inpatient unit during the study period had SSD and were eligible for a LAI. Their ages ranged from 20 to 71 years (mean = 41 years), and more than two-thirds were male. Less than half of the eligible patients (n = 19; 44%) were prescribed a LAI, most of whom were male (n=16; 84%). An association between age group (patients aged 41 years or younger) and LAI use was observed (p < 0.05), while gender, employment status, living arrangement, length of hospital stay, recent hospitalization, and cooccurring substance use disorder were not. CONCLUSION: LAI prescription rate at the inpatient psychiatric unit of the hospital was marginally higher than those reported in most studies. Age appears to influence LAI use during the study period. Initiatives that increase LAI prescription rate for all eligible patients admitted to inpatient psychiatric unit should be encouraged.

Rate of community methadone treatment reporting at jail reentry following a methadone increased dose quality improvement effort.

The Rikers Island Key Extended Entry Program (KEEP) has offered methadone treatment for opioid dependent inmates incarcerated in New York City's jails since 1986. In response to a trend toward low-dose methadone maintenance prescribing, a quality improvement (QI) protocol trained KEEP counselors, physicians, and pharmacists in the evidence base supporting moderate-to-high methadone maintenance doses in order to maximize therapeutic effects and rates of successful reporting to community methadone treatment programs (MTPs) post release. Discharge dose level and length of incarceration data were analyzed for 2 groups of KEEP patients discharged pre/post-QI. Among patients incarcerated for 21 or more days, the proportion of those on moderate-to-high doses of methadone increased significantly. Patients who reached a moderate-to-high methadone dose demonstrated higher rates of reporting to community MTP versus lower doses, both pre- and post-QI. Overall, a higher proportion of all patients reported to community MTP post-QI.

Buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in jail and post-release: a randomized clinical trial.

Buprenorphine has rarely been administered as an opioid agonist maintenance therapy in a correctional setting. This study introduced buprenorphine maintenance in a large urban jail, Rikers Island in New York City. Heroin-dependent men not enrolled in community methadone treatment and sentenced to 10-90 days in jail (N=116) were voluntarily randomly assigned either to buprenorphine or methadone maintenance, the latter being the standard of care for eligible inmates at Rikers. Buprenorphine and methadone maintenance completion rates in jail were equally high, but the buprenorphine group reported for their designated post-release treatment in the community significantly more often than did the methadone group (48% vs. 14%, p<.001). Consistent with this result, prior to release from Rikers, buprenorphine patients stated an intention to continue treatment after release more often than did methadone patients (93% vs. 44%, p<.001). Buprenorphine patients were also less likely than methadone patients to withdraw voluntarily from medication while in jail (3% vs. 16%, p<.05). There were no post-release differences between the buprenorphine and methadone groups in self-reported relapse to illicit opioid use, self-reported re-arrests, self-reported severity of crime or re-incarceration in jail. After initiating opioid agonist treatment in jail, continuing buprenorphine maintenance in the community appears to be more acceptable to offenders than continuing methadone maintenance.