Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up With the Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Device IrisFIT (Lifetech) in Patients With Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, or Other Thromboembolic Events.

BACKGROUND: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with embolic strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). Catheter closure of PFO is effective in preventing recurrent events. Residual shunts and procedure or device related complications can occur, including atrial fibrillation and thrombus formation. This study examines the initial experience with a new PFO closure device, the IrisFIT PFO-Occluder (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China). METHODS: 95 patients with indications for PFO closure underwent percutaneous closure with the IrisFIT PFO-Occluder. The primary endpoint was the rate of accurate device placement with no/small residual shunt at 3 or 6 months follow-up. All patients underwent transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after 1 to 6 months. In case of a residual shunt, an additional TEE was performed after 12 months. Clinical follow-up was performed up to a mean of 33.1 ± 3.6 months. RESULTS: The device was successfully implanted in 95 (100%) patients with no relevant procedural complications. At final TEE follow-up (7.6 ± 3.9 months) the effective closure rate was 96.8% with 1 moderate and 2 large residual shunts. There were 8 cases of new onset atrial fibrillation and 2 TIAs. There were no cases of device embolization or erosion. CONCLUSION: The IrisFIT occluder is a new PFO closure device with several advantages compared to other devices. In this small study cohort, technical success rate, closure rate and adverse event rate were comparable to other devices. The rate of new onset atrial fibrillation was higher in comparison to other studies and warrants further investigation.

Permanent Pacemaker Lead Insertion Connected to an External Pacemaker Generator for Temporary Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have been demonstrated to be at least equivalent in the short term compared to surgical valve implantation (SAVI). However, Conduction abnormalities are more common after TAVI than SAVI and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation is more common after TAVI with the currently commercially available self-expanding valves than after SAVI. Temporary pacemaker implantation may be associated with inability to ambulate, lead migration or perforation and infection. Depending on the monitoring system, some arrhythmias may not be detected. We examined the feasibility and safety of permanent pacemaker lead implantation connected to an external generator in patients undergoing TAVI at our institution. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (between April 1st 2014 and April 30th 2016) at a single center without permanent pacemaker at the time of TAVI who underwent implantation of a permanent pacemaker lead after TAVI connected to an external generator. Focus was the examination of feasibility and safety of our aforementioned approach. In addition, data analysis was performed separating patients into two groups depending on whether (group 1) or not (group 2) permanent pacemaker implantation was ultimately needed. RESULTS: Per our institutional protocol, all consecutive 114 patients underwent insertion of a permanent pacemaker lead after TAVI connected to an external generator. There was one pericardial effusion on postoperative day one that may have been related to the left ventricular wire for TAVI valve delivery. However, perforation due to the pacemaker lead cannot be excluded. Specifically, no access site complications, lead dislodgments or infections occurred. All patients were able to ambulate after the procedure without delay. The permanent pacemaker lead remained in place on average for 4.3 days in group 1 (n = 10) and 4.4 days in group 2 (n = 104) (variance of 3.8 and 3.4 days respectively, [minimum/maximum 0/11 days and 1 and 12 days]). Of the ten patients (9%) who required permanent pacemaker implantation, 8 had a complete atrioventricular block and two had tachy-brady arrhythmias in the context of atrial fibrillation. None of the baseline characteristics including baseline conduction abnormalities were predictors for PPI. CONCLUSION: Implantation of a permanent pacemaker lead connected to an external generator is feasible and safe and could be a better option than implantation of a temporary lead connected to an external generator. It may allow earlier ambulation and facilitate monitoring.

The IrisFIT Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Device in Patients With History of Cryptogenic Embolization.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess safety, efficacy, and clinical outcome of the IrisFIT PFO Closure System (Lifetech Scientific) for transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or peripheral embolization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the results of 60 consecutive patients undergoing PFO closure with the IrisFIT occluder for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolization. All cases were analyzed for periprocedural and device-related adverse events up to 12 months after implantation. In addition, the patients were evaluated for complete defect closure with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after 1 month, 6 months, and (if indicated) 12 months. Mean patient age was 53 ± 14 years and 37 patients (62%) were males. All patients had a history of at least 1 cryptogenic stroke, TIA, or peripheral embolization. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all 60 procedures. The mean procedure time was 28 ± 11 minutes. There were no periprocedural or device-related complications up to 12 months after the implant. Successful defect closure at 6 months post device implantation was achieved in 56 cases (93.3%). Within 12 months of follow-up, 2 patients had recurrent TIAs, both with complete PFO sealing at the last TEE prior to the event. CONCLUSION: The IrisFIT PFO Closure System can be used safely and with high technical success for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke or peripheral embolization.

Acute Stroke Interventions Performed by Cardiologists: Initial Experience in a Single Center.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical and clinical success of acute stroke interventions performed in our interventional cardiology center. BACKGROUND: Dedicated interventional stroke centers remain limited. Interventional cardiologists have established networks of catheterization laboratories and the necessary infrastructure to provide around the clock interventional therapy. These networks may also provide the currently lacking universal rapid access to prompt stroke intervention. METHODS: Between July 2012 and July 2018, 70 consecutive patients underwent acute stroke intervention for large-vessel occlusions. Seventeen patients (24%) had tandem or multiple vessel occlusions. The majority (n = 63, 90%) were admitted via our local stroke unit, and 7 (10%) patients were transferred from other regional referral centers. RESULTS: In 43 (61%) patients, systemic fibrinolytic therapy was started after baseline imaging. Mean time between symptom onset and arrival to the cath lab was 138 min; mean door-to-vascular access time was 64 min; mean time between cath lab activation and its operational readiness was 13 min. In all cases, access to supra-aortic vessels was achieved. Mean time between femoral arterial puncture and lesion crossing was 26 min. Stent implantation for extracranial stenosis or dissection was performed in 14 (20%) cases. Thrombectomy of intracranial occlusions was done with a stent retriever (n = 64, 91%) or an aspiration system (n = 14, 20%). In 20 (28%) cases, a combination of techniques was used. Recanalization was technically successful (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction flow grade 2b or 3) in 65 (93%) patients. The 30-day mortality was 18% (n = 13). Favorable clinical outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2, was achieved in 61% at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Acute stroke interventions can be performed safely and with high technical and clinical success by experienced interventional cardiologists.

A case of mislabeled textbooks: misnomer of the traditional "bicaval" view.

Since the early beginning of the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) era, standardized tomographic views describing cardiac key structures have been provided. They have become the basis of TEE and have not been modified for decades. During our recent structural interventional cases, it has come to our attention that the structure frequently labeled "inferior vena cava" in textbooks and journal articles illustrating the bicaval TEE view is, in fact, the coronary sinus. Our manuscript illustrates our observation.

Coronary sinus-based percutaneous annuloplasty as treatment for functional mitral regurgitation: the TITAN II trial.

OBJECTIVE: Functional (or secondary) mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with greater morbidity and worse outcomes in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and cardiomyopathy. The Carillon® Mitral Contour System® is a coronary sinus-based percutaneous therapy to reduce FMR. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a modified version of the Carillon device in the treatment of patients with cardiomyopathy and FMR. METHODS: 36 patients with CHF, depressed left ventricular function (ejection fraction <40%) and at least moderate FMR underwent the Carillon device implant. RESULTS: There was 1 major adverse event within 30 days-a death (not device related)-occurring 17 days after the implant. Reductions in FMR and improvements in functional class and 6 min walk tests were seen, similar to prior studies. Device fractures in the high strain region of the proximal anchor (seen in prior studies) were not seen in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Carillon device was associated with improvements in clinical and echocardiographic parameters in treating patients with FMR, while successfully addressing the issue of anchor fracture. This version of the Carillon device will be used in a blinded randomised trial of symptomatic patients with FMR.

Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip(®) can be performed without general anesthesia and without conscious sedation.

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia is known to be associated with an increased risk for complications, especially in elderly and multi-morbid patients, the primary target population of the MitraClip(®) technique. The aim is to assess whether general anesthesia and even conscious sedation can be avoided during the MitraClip(®) procedure. METHODS: A total of 91 consecutive patients who underwent MitraClip(®) implantation [median 77 years, (IQR 72-83), 40 % female] were retrospectively analyzed. The first 26 patients were treated in general anesthesia. Afterwards, local anesthesia was chosen as primary anesthetic approach. Altogether, 28 (31 %) patients received general anesthesia, local anesthesia was performed in 35 (38 %) patients with sedation and in 28 (31 %) patients without sedation. RESULTS: The respective patient groups were similar regarding their baseline characteristics. Procedural success (successful implantation of at least one clip and post-procedure MR grade ≤2) was achieved in 89 % with no difference between the groups (93 % in general anesthesia, 89 % in local anesthesia with sedation, 86 % in local anesthesia without sedation, p = ns). No difference regarding hospital complications was noted. Local anesthesia with and without sedation was associated with less necessity for ICU/IMC stay (100 % in general anesthesia, 14 % in local anesthesia with sedation, 14 % in local anesthesia without sedation; p < 0.0001). One-year estimated survival was not significantly different among the groups (63, 82 and 75 %; p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip(®) can be performed without general anesthesia and even without conscious sedation with similar procedural success and complication rates.

Catheter-based closure of residual leaks after percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of catheter-based occlusion of residual leaks after percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA). METHODS: All cases of LAA closure at our center were reviewed to identify secondary interventions for residual leaks. Leaks with a width of more than 3 mm by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were considered relevant. In a case-specific approach, depending on the respective morphology of the defect, either an LAA occlusion device or an Amplatzer Vascular Plug was implanted under TEE and fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Between June 2003 and December 2013, 12 patients underwent residual leak closure. All procedures were technically successful and without complications. In 10 cases (83%), complete sealing was confirmed at TEE follow-up. In 2 patients, minimal gaps (2-3 mm) persisted and anticoagulation was continued. None of the patients had strokes during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous residual leak closure after attempted LAA occlusion can be done safely and with high procedural success rates. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Left atrial appendage closure: First in man with the 4th generation WATCHMAN device.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the fourth generation WATCHMAN device. BACKGROUND: The WATCHMAN left atrial appendage (LAA) closure device has been shown to be non-inferior to conventional oral anticoagulation with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. A new (fourth) generation of the WATCHMAN device was designed to facilitate easier delivery and improve safety. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized study of LAA closure with use of the 4(th) generation WATCHMAN device in 36 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Follow-up was performed at 45 days, 6 months and 12 months following implantation. RESULTS: The mean age of the population was 73 ± 6 years and 67% were male. The mean CHADS2 and CHA2 DS2-VASc Score were 2.5 and 4.5, respectively. The device was implanted successfully in 34/36 (94%). No serious hospital complications related to the device or procedure occurred. During 12 month follow-up, three ischemic strokes (8%), one hemorrhagic stroke (3%), one TIA (3%) and three deaths (9%) occurred. Device-associated thrombus formation was detected in one patient (3%) during six-month follow-up and was treated successfully with low molecular weight heparin. CONCLUSIONS: LAA closure with the 4(th) generation WATCHMAN device is feasible and safe. New technical features may contribute to a better performance of the occluder, particularly regarding the risk of pericardial effusions.

Predictors of blood pressure response: Obesity is associated with a less pronounced treatment response after renal denervation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of BP response. BACKGROUND: Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) causes significant blood pressure (BP) reductions in a large number of patients with resistant hypertension. METHODS: One hundred one consecutive patients with resistant hypertension who underwent RDN with the Symplicity™ catheter were included in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint was the change in office systolic BP after 6 months. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to detect baseline predictors of a significant BP response 6 months after RDN (age, gender, office and ambulatory BP, renal function, body mass index [BMI], diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive medication, number of ablations). RESULTS: The procedure was technically uneventful in all patients. Mean BP at baseline was 166.6/90.2 ± 22.5/16.4 mmHg and decreased by -14.7 (P < 0.0001)/-5.3 (P < 0.001) ± 22.8/14.1 mm Hg at 6-month follow-up. Similarly, paired analysis of 24-hr-ambulatory BP measurement (n = 71) showed a significant reduction of mean systolic BP by 6.8 ± 14.4 mm Hg (P < 0.0002). Upon univariate analyses, a higher baseline office systolic BP (P < 0.0001) and lower BMI (P = 0.014) were identified as significant predictors of the magnitude of BP response after 6 months. Importantly, on multivariate analysis, baseline office systolic BP (standardized ß = -0.46; r = -0.47; P < 0.0001) and BMI (standardized ß = 0.21; r = 0.95; P = 0.019) remained significant. CONCLUSION: Blood pressure reductions after RDN were more pronounced in patients with higher baseline blood pressure and lower BMI. These findings may have implications regarding patient selection for renal denervation. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

True First-Line Local-Anesthesia Only Protocol for Transfemoral TAVI.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via femoral access under local anesthesia only (without concomitant sedation) as the initial strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing planned transfemoral TAVI without routine general anesthesia between May 2005 and December 2013 were identified. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and a 30-day clinical follow-up were obtained. A total of 215 patients underwent TAVI with local anesthesia only as the initial strategy (LA group). Of these patients, 40 (18.6%) received additional sedation (LAS group) during the procedure due to inadequate pain control or agitation and 7 patients (3.3%) underwent conversion to general anesthesia (GA group). TAVI was successfully performed in 211 cases (98.2%). When 30-day outcomes for patients requiring only local anesthesia were compared with patients requiring additional sedation, there was a significantly longer duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay in the group with additional sedation (LAS, 5.0 days [range, 3.0-6.0 days] vs LA 3 days [range, 2.0-5.0 days]; P=.02) and general anesthesia (GA 7.0 days [range, 2.5-18.0 days] vs LA 3 days [range, 2.0-5.0]; P=.04). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that TAVI with LA only as the initial strategy is a feasible alternative to GA, with potential benefit of this strategy over using routine concomitant sedation. LA only may be considered a primary option in many patients.

Long-term outcomes of percutaneous paravalvular regurgitation closure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter experience.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate acute and long-term outcomes of percutaneous paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) closure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Severe symptomatic PVR is a predictor of all-cause mortality after TAVR. The current use of devices for transcatheter closure of PVR has been adapted from other indications without known long-term outcomes. METHODS: The study population consisted of a series of cases pooled together from an international multicenter experience. Patients underwent transcatheter implantation of a closure device for the treatment of clinically relevant PVR after TAVR with balloon-expandable or self-expandable prostheses. Procedural success was defined by successful deployment of a device with immediate reduction of PVR to a final grade ≤2 as assessed by echocardiography. RESULTS: Twenty-seven procedures were performed in 24 patients with clinically relevant PVR after the index TAVR procedure (54.2% Edwards Sapien [Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California], 45.8% CoreValve [Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota]). The study population included 75% men with a mean age of 80.6 ± 7.1 years and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeon score of 6.6%. The most frequently used device was Amplatzer Vascular Plug (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota) in 80% of the cases. Overall, 88.9% (24 of 27) of the procedures were technically successful and the results assessed by echocardiography were durable. However, cumulative survival rates at 1, 6, and 12 months were 83.3%, 66.7%, and 61.5%. Most of the deaths (8 of 11) were due to noncardiac causes. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter closure of PVR after TAVR can be performed with a high procedural success rate; however, the long-term mortality remains high mainly due to noncardiac causes.

"A bend in time": Shaping the sheath facilitates left atrial appendage closure.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of the "shape-the-sheath" method in left atrial appendage closure. BACKGROUND: LAA occlusion is often a difficult procedure, due to not just the learning curve but also the three-dimensional variable nature of the left atrial appendage. Multiple sheaths have been created for various takeoffs. The purpose of this article is to show the feasibility of the "shape-the-sheath" method in left atrial appendage closure. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients undergoing LAA occlusion without the "shape-the-sheath" method were compared to 10 consecutive patients undergoing LAA occlusion with the "shape-the-sheath" method using the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) system and the Amplatzer TorqVue 45×45 sheath. RESULTS: The "shape-the-sheath" method resulted in significant decreases in fluoroscopy time (7.2±3.0 min vs. 13.7±6.7 min, P<0.05), number of partial recaptures (0% vs. 50%, P<0.05), with a trend toward decrease in the number of complete recaptures (0 vs. 40%, P=0.09) compared to conventional sheath use. CONCLUSIONS: Shaping-the-sheath is a simple, elegant way to help conform delivery systems to better access the LAA and ensure stable position. Further experience with this procedure optimization step is warranted.

Devices in heart failure--the new revolution.

Heart failure is a growing epidemic, with more patients living longer and suffering from this disease. There is a growing segment of patients who have persistent symptoms despite pharmacologic therapy. In an era when transplants are rare, the need for devices and interventions that can assist ventricular function is paramount. This review goes through the devices used in heart failure, including left ventricular reconstruction, aortic counterpulsation, short-term mechanical circulatory support, long-term mechanical circulatory support, and right heart interventions.

Use of EchoNavigator, a novel echocardiography-fluoroscopy overlay system, for transseptal puncture and left atrial appendage occlusion.

Structural heart disease requires a coordinated effort to join echocardiographic and fluoroscopic data. Various methods have been used, including echocardiography, CT, and MRI. We report on the use of EchoNavigator (Philips Inc., Amsterdam, Netherlands), a novel echocardiographic-fluoroscopic fusion system. This new system allows real-time integration and marking of important structures that track on fluoroscopy even with movement of the C-arm. In this article, we describe potential uses for this system in respect to transseptal puncture and left atrial appendage closure.

Safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a hospital with visiting on-site cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the feasibility and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with a visiting on-site cardiac surgery program for surgical back-up. BACKGROUND: Both European and American guidelines recommend institutional cardiac surgery back-up for TAVI. However, the conversion to cardiac surgery is very rare, many complications of TAVI can be managed by catheter techniques and a visiting team can also provide surgical stand-by. Therefore, the need for institutional cardiac surgery (by a surgeon who routinely performs conventional surgical valve replacement at the institution performing TAVI) has been questioned. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive TAVI cases with visiting on-site cardiac surgery was performed. Key demographic, echocardiographic, and procedural data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients (81.9 ± 6.3 years) with high-risk criteria (log Euroscore 21.6 ± 14.4, chronic renal failure 39.2%, severe systolic dysfunction 24.7%) underwent TAVI with visiting on-site cardiac surgery at our institution. Local anesthesia with or without conscious sedation was used in 94.8% of patients. Procedural technical success was 100%, with 2 episodes of tamponade (both treated with pericardiocentesis) and a 16.5% vascular complication rate (all treated conservatively or percutaneously). Thirty-day mortality was 3.1%, with 5.2% rate of stroke and 8.2% rate of major bleeding. There were no conversions to surgery. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI can be done safely in the setting of a hospital with visiting on-site cardiac surgery. This requires careful patient selection, experienced operators and surgeons in experienced centers with well-established criteria and processes of care. In this setting, it may be an option for hospitals without institutional cardiac surgery.

A Quick Guide to Paravalvular Leak Closure.

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a seldomly covered aspect of structural heart disease. However, this is a condition that frequently presents after valvular replacement. This article will cover the diagnosising and treating PVL (i.e. imaging, access, and device selection). In addition, specific aspects of aortic and mitral PVL closure will be covered in this review.

Left atrial appendage closure using the Amulet device: an initial experience with the second generation amplatzer cardiac plug.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with a new generation LAA closure device. BACKGROUND: The Amulet device (AGA, St Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) is a new generation of the amplatzer cardiac plug (ACP), specifically designed for LAA closure. This new version is designed to facilitate the implantation process and minimize procedural or device-related complications. METHODS: The device was implanted in 17 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Clinical data were obtained at baseline, during the procedure, at discharge, at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: All devices were implanted successfully. Device sizes ranged from 20 mm to 31 mm. A 12 French (Fr) or 14 Fr delivery sheath was used depending on the selected device size. Full and partial recapture was performed in 1 case and 3 cases, respectively. There was 1 procedure-related pericardial effusion successfully managed with pericardiocentesis. There was no device embolization. The mean length of stay was 2.1 ± 0.3 days. At 90 days, there were no deaths, strokes, systemic thromboembolism, or bleeding complications. There was no device-related thrombus or pericardial effusion at 90-day TEE. In 2 of the 17 patients minimal peridevice flow (smaller than 2 mm) was present. CONCLUSIONS: The Amulet device, which has new novel features as compared with the first generation ACP, is a feasible option for LAA closure. From our initial experience, implantation of the Amulet is associated with high success rate and good short-term outcome.