The inciting factor for bradycardia in COVID-19 patients: a potential harm of steroid treatment.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a condition caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although several papers have reported the presence bradycardia in patients with COVID-19, the pathophysiology behind this remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the presence of bradycardia in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a total of 153 patients with COVID-19 and 90 patients with influenza who were hospitalized in our hospital from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 and from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2021, respectively. Data were collected from patient medical records, which included sex, age, duration of hospitalization, pneumonia complications, supplemental oxygen therapy, antiviral treatment, past history, and vital signs. Results: After adjustment, the incidence of bradycardia and steroid use in patients with COVID-19 were significantly higher than those in patients with influenza (P=0.007 and P<0.001, respectively). We then compared the detailed characteristics of patients with COVID-19 to evaluate risk factors for bradycardia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that steroid use was significantly related to bradycardia [P=0.031; odds ratio (OR): 3.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-11.96]. Overall, results showed a higher incidence of bradycardia in patients with COVID-19 who received steroid treatment. Conclusions: Our results showed that steroid treatment in patients with COVID-19 may be associated with the incidence of bradycardia.

Expression of thymidylate synthase predicts clinical outcomes of S-1-based chemotherapy in squamous cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) histology have limited chemotherapeutic options. Treatment with S-1 combined with carboplatin (CBDCA) has been shown to provide a significant survival benefit in SCC patients compared with treatment with combined CBDCA and paclitaxel. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the expression of molecular markers related to the pharmacological action of S-1, including thymidylate synthase (TS), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and the clinical efficacy of S-1-based chemotherapy in SCC patients. The immunohistochemical expression of TS, OPRT and DPD were retrospectively analyzed in tumor biopsy and resection specimens from patients with advanced SCC (n=32). Immunohistochemical H-scores were calculated and their association with S-1/CBDCA response was evaluated. Median progression-free survival time was significantly longer in patients with low TS H-scores than in those with high TS H-scores (162.5 vs. 97 days; P=0.004); by contrast, overall survival time was not observed to differ significantly between these groups (P=0.185). In the multivariate analysis, low TS expression was a significant positive factor for progression-free survival rate (hazard ratio, 0.40; P=0.021). A low TS H-score was also associated with an increased response to S-1-based chemotherapy compared with a high TS H-score (P=0.002). This indicates that SCC patients with low TS expression can benefit significantly from S-1-based chemotherapy, and that H-score measurement of intratumoral TS expression may represent a useful predictive biomarker for response to S-1-based chemotherapy by patients with SCC-type NSCLC.

Cerebral infarction in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients often develop thromboembolic events, including cerebral infarction (CI). However, the relationship between advanced NSCLC and CI has not been thoroughly investigated. We examined the association between advanced NSCLC and CI and risk factors for CI in advanced or post-operative recurrent NSCLC patients. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 515 patients diagnosed with advanced or post-operative recurrent NSCLC at Juntendo University Hospital between April 2009 and March 2014. RESULTS: Among the 515 patients evaluated, 15 patients (2.9%) developed CI after diagnosis of advanced or post-operative recurrent NSCLC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted, and brain metastasis was the only significant independent risk factor for CI (odds ratio 5.24, 95% confidence interval 1.72-16.10, p = 0.004). The incidence was 6.3% in these patients. The median survival time was 36 days, and 1-year survival rate was 6.7% after development of CI. Overall survival from diagnosis of advanced NSCLC or post-operative recurrence was significantly shorter in patients with CI than in patients without CI (223 days versus 895 days; HR, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.04-6.02; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CI is high in advanced or post-operative recurrent NSCLC, and is especially higher in patients with brain metastasis than in those without brain metastasis. Moreover, CI may affect patient's prognosis. Careful monitoring for the development of CI in patients with advanced or post-operative recurrent NSCLC is needed, especially for patients with brain metastasis.

Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer patients who are recommended to receive single-agent chemotherapy (docetaxel or pemetrexed) as a second- or third-line chemotherapy: in the era of oncogenic drivers and molecular-targeted agents.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel or pemetrexed monotherapy is recommended either as a second-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without EGFR mutation or ALK fusion genes or as a third-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation or ALK fusion. However, efficacy and survival for these two settings have not been compared, leaving it unclear whether these two populations can be included in the same clinical trials. Moreover, prognostic factors for patients who are recommended to receive docetaxel/pemetrexed monotherapy are largely unknown. METHODS: Docetaxel or pemetrexed was administered to 67 EGFR wild-type patients as a second-line treatment following one platinum-based combination chemotherapy and to 17 EGFR mutant patients as a third-line treatment following EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and one platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Docetaxel and pemetrexed were administered at 60 and 500 mg/m(2), respectively, every 3 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient refusal. Overall survivals (OSs) between the two groups were compared using the log-rank test, and prognostic factors were evaluated via Cox's proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The median OS was 345.5 days in the EGFR wild-type second-line group and 616 days in the EGFR mutant third-line group. Multivariate analyses revealed that the stage before first-line treatment, performance status, and EGFR status were significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: When planning clinical studies of NSCLC patients recommended to receive docetaxel or pemetrexed as single-agent chemotherapy, the EGFR status and stage before first-line treatment should be considered as stratification factors of randomized clinical studies.

Pemetrexed for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) need to be approached carefully given the high incidence of pulmonary toxicity. Pemetrexed (PEM) is the key drug for the treatment of NSCLC. However, its safety, especially with respect to the exacerbation of ILD, and efficacy in NSCLC patients with ILD have yet to be established. METHOD: We investigated the safety and efficacy of PEM monotherapy in NSCLC patients with or without idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIPs). The medical charts of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients diagnosed as having IIPs (IIPs group) and 88 patients without ILD (non-ILD group) were treated with PEM monotherapy at Juntendo University Hospital between 2009 and 2013. In the IIPs group, 12 patients were found to have usual interstitial pneumonitis (UIP) on chest computed tomography (CT) (UIP group) and the other 13 patients showed a non-UIP pattern on chest CT (non-UIP IIPs group). Three patients in the IIPs group (2 in the UIP group and 1 in the non-UIP IIPs group) and 1 in the non-ILD group developed pulmonary toxicity during treatment (3.5% overall, 12.0% in the IIPs group versus 1.1% in the non-ILD group). Moreover, all 3 patients in the IIPs group died of pulmonary toxicity. Overall survival tended to be longer in the non-ILD group than in the IIPs group (p = 0.08). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that IIPs was the only significant independent risk factor for PEM-related pulmonary toxicity. CONCLUSION: We found that the incidence of PEM-related pulmonary toxicity was significantly higher amongst NSCLC patients with IIPs than among those without IIPs. Particular care must be taken when administering PEM to treat NSCLC patients with IIPs.

Hydration with magnesium and mannitol without furosemide prevents the nephrotoxicity induced by cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of hydration with magnesium and mannitol without furosemide on the nephrotoxocity accompanying combination chemotherapy using cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Fifty patients with NSCLC who received cisplatin plus pemetrexed, using either old hydration protocol including normal saline with mannitol and furosemide, or a new one including normal saline with magnesium and mannitol without furosemide were retrospectively analyzed. Nephrotoxicity was compared between patients treated using the old protocol and those treated with the new protocol. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent factors associated with protection against nephrotoxicity in patients with NSCLC who received cisplatin plus pemetrexed. RESULTS: Thirty patients received the old hydration protocol, while 20 patients were treated using the new hydration protocol. The patients treated using the new hydration protocol showed a significantly greater increase in creatinine clearance (P=0.0004) and a decrease in the serum creatinine level (P=0.0148) after one course of chemotherapy compared with those treated using the old hydration protocol. There were no differences in the chemotherapeutic response or overall survival between the groups (P=0.572). The new hydration protocol with supplemented magnesium with mannitol without furosemide was an independent factor for the protection against nephrotoxicity induced by cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced NSCLC [HR 0.232 (95% CI: 0.055-0.986), P=0.039]. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the new hydration protocol comprising supplementation with magnesium without furosemide could prevent the nephrotoxicity induced by cisplatin and pemetrexed without affecting the treatment outcome.