Programmed Death Ligand-1 and Tumor Burden Score Dictate Treatment Responses in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The significance of tumor burden for survival is unknown for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and tumor burden score (TBS) in patients with R/M HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: R/M HNSCC patients who were treated with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil plus cetuximab (EPF) or pembrolizumab (PPF) as first-line treatment were included in our study. PD-L1 and TBS were estimated and correlated with treatment responses. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for outcomes estimation. RESULTS: A total of 252 R/M HNSCC patients were included, with 126 high tumor burden (HTB) and 126 low tumor burden (LTB) patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.1 months in LTB and 3.9 months in HTB (p < 0.001) and median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months in LTB and 9.2 months in HTB (p = 0.001). Patients with LTB had better PFS and OS than those with HTB independent of PD-L1 status. Subgroup analysis showed HTB patients treated with EPF had better survival than those treated with PPF, regardless of PD-L1 expression. For LTB PD-L1 positive patients, there was a longer survival with PPF than EPF, while for LTB PD-L1 negative patients, survival was similar between PPF and EPF. Multivariate analysis exhibited that tumor burden was significantly correlated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor burden is significantly correlated with survival in patients with R/M HNSCC. PD-L1 and TBS should be taken into consideration to determine first-line treatment.

Assessing the effectiveness of targeted agents in adjuvant therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing surgical resection: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Primary tumor resection and metastasectomy may be beneficial for many patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Objective: To assess the differences in postoperative survival outcomes between adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus targeted agents (TAs). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Patients with mCRC who underwent surgical resection for primary colorectal tumor and distant metastases and received adjuvant therapy from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2017 were enrolled in the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We analyzed the overall survival of patients with resectable or initially unresectable mCRC who received adjuvant chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy plus TAs. Results: We enrolled 1124 and 542 patients with resectable and initially unresectable mCRC, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus TAs and chemotherapy alone resulted in similar mortality rates among patients with resectable mCRC [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-1.36]; however, it marginally reduced the mortality rate among patients with initially unresectable mCRC who underwent conversion surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (aHR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-1.06). The subgroup analysis of patients who received more than nine cycles of TAs preoperatively and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents revealed aHRs of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.27-0.87) and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.18-0.60), respectively. Conclusion: Adjuvant chemotherapy plus TAs may improve survival in patients with initially unresectable tumors who underwent conversion surgery following neoadjuvant therapy with TAs, especially in those who respond well to the targeted therapy. Our study underscores the importance of stratifying patients with mCRC based on tumor resectability when selecting the adjuvant therapy regimen.

Clinical outcomes of cetuximab-based treatment for distant metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A real-world study using Taiwan Head Neck Society registry database.

BACKGROUND: For R/M HNSCC, the differences in prognosis and treatment options between distant metastasis (DM) and locoregional recurrence, especially in the DM group, remain unclear. METHODS: From the Taiwan Head Neck Society registry database, patients who were diagnosed with R/M HNSCC and received cetuximab-based frontline therapy were collected for analysis. RESULTS: Among the enrolled patients, 59.3% (491/827) belonged to the DM group. The DM group had less primary site of oral cavity, less betel nut chewing, higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and higher LDH/albumin ratio compared with the non-DM group. For the patients with primary site of oral cavity and current smokers, DM coexisted with poorer outcomes. In the DM group, EXTREME-like regimen was more suitable for older patients, those with elevated LDH, and those with higher LDH/albumin ratio than TPExtreme-like regimen. CONCLUSION: DM coexisted with poorer prognosis in certain groups. LDH-associated biomarkers may aid treatment options for DM patients.

Improvement of clinical wound microcirculation diagnosis using an object tracking-based laser speckle contrast imaging system.

Wound monitoring is crucial for effective healing, as nonhealing wounds can lead to tissue ulceration and necrosis. Evaluating wound recovery involves observing changes in angiogenesis. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is vital for wound assessment due to its rapid imaging, high resolution, wide coverage, and noncontact properties. When using LSCI equipment, regions of interest (ROIs) must be delineated in lesion areas in images for quantitative analysis. However, patients with serious wounds cannot maintain constant postures because the affected areas are often associated with discomfort and pain. This leads to deviations between the drawn ROI and actual wound position when using LSCI for wound assessment, affecting the reliability of relevant assessments. To address these issues, we used the channel and spatial reliability tracker object tracking algorithm to develop an automatic ROI tracking function for LSCI systems. This algorithm is used to track and correct artificial movements in blood flow images, address the ROI position offset caused by the movement of the affected body part, increase the blood flow analysis accuracy, and improve the clinical applicability of LSCI systems. ROI tracking experiments were performed by simulating wounds, and the results showed that the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.134 to 0.976. Furthermore, the object within the ROI affected tracking performance. Clinical assessments across wound types showed ICCs ranging from 0.798 to 0.917 for acute wounds and 0.628-0.849 for chronic wounds. We also discuss factors affecting tracking performance and propose strategies to enhance implementation effectiveness.

Cetuximab Treatment beyond Progression in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study (THNS-2021-08).

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the association of cetuximab treatment beyond progression (TBP) with survival among patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now considered as first-line treatment, not all patients are suitable for ICIs. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the role of cetuximab TBP in patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with R/M HNSCC who had tumor progression after first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy were included into our study. Oncologic outcomes were estimated including time to cetuximab treatment discontinuation (TTD), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Multivariate cox regression analysis with survival were conducted. Subgroup analysis with P16 and programmed death ligand 1 expression were performed. RESULTS: A total of 498 patients were eligible with 259 patients in the TBP group and 239 patients in the non-TBP group. The most common first-line chemotherapy was the EXTREME regimen in both groups. As for second-line treatment, the most common regimen were TPEx in the TBP group and taxane-based chemotherapy in the non-TBP group. Median TTD was 8.7 months in TBP and 5.5 months in non-TBP (p < 0.001). In terms of survival, median OS1 was significant longer in the TBP group than in the non-TBP group [14.1 months versus 10.9 months (p = 0.016)]. Multivariate analysis demonstrated cetuximab TBP was a factor independently associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study suggests cetuximab TBP to be effective and to provide better survival for patients with R/M HNSCC after failure of first-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate the role of cetuximab TBP in R/M HNSCC.

A Novel Prognostic Model Using Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and Programmed Death Ligand 1 in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the prognostication of the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of PIV in patients with R/M HNSCC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed to have R/M HNSCC and treated with ICI were reviewed retrospectively. The cutoff value of PIV was set at the median. Patients were stratified into high PIV and low PIV. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included in our study for oncologic outcomes evaluation. For the total population, the median PFS was 5.5 months and OS was 18.2 months. After stratification by PIV, median PFS was 11.7 months in the low PIV and 2.8 months in the high PIV groups (p < 0.001). The median OS was 21.8 months in the low PIV and 11.5 months in the high PIV groups (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PIV and PD-L1 were independent predictors associated with survival. A prognostic model using both PIV and PD-L1 was constructed. The median PFS was 12.2, 6.4, and 3.0 months for patients with risk scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). The median OS was 23.7, 18.1, and 11.4 months for patients with risk scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PIV is a prognostic biomarker in patients with R/M HNSCC treated with ICI. A prognostic model using PIV and PD-L1 could provide outcome prediction and risk stratification.

Prognostic impact of cortactin in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer and its role for tegafur-uracil maintenance after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

The prognosis of patients with hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC) remains poor. Our study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of cortactin in patients with HPC and its role for tegafur-uracil (UFUR) maintenance after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients who were diagnosed to have HPC and underwent laryngopharyngectomy followed by adjuvant CRT were enrolled into our study. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for cortactin evaluation. Kaplan-Meier curves were depicted for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 157 patients were enrolled into our study. After stratified by cortactin, 53 patients were cortactin (+) and 104 patients were cortactin (-). The median RFS was 86.7 months in cortactin (-) and 10.2 months in cortactin (+) (P < 0.001). The median OS was 93.4 months in cortactin (-) and 16.9 months in cortactin (+) (P < 0.001). Patients were further classified according to UFUR maintenance or not after adjuvant CRT. In cortactin (+) patients, the median RFS and OS were 13.6 months versus 7.0 months (P = 0.006) and 24.0 months versus 10.0 months (P < 0.001) in UFUR (+) and UFUR (-), respectively. In cortactin (-) patients, the median RFS and OS were 96.0 months versus 72.2 months (P = 0.262) and 98.5 months versus 105.0 months (P = 0.665) in UFUR (+) and UFUR (-), respectively. Cortactin has a significantly impact in HPC patients. UFUR maintenance provided survival benefits in patients with cortactin (+) after adjuvant CRT.

Comparative Effectiveness of Cetuximab Versus Panitumumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Database Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of cetuximab and panitumumab on the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer or those who had undergone conversion surgery and to identify their prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received cetuximab or panitumumab as first-line targeted agent-based therapy. Overall survival and conversion surgery rates were evaluated, and the prognostic factors were determined. RESULTS: A total of 1,749 and 318 patients received cetuximab or panitumumab with chemotherapy, respectively. Overall survival and conversion surgery rates were similar between the cetuximab [hazard ratio (HR)=0.96] and panitumumab groups (HR=1.00). The prognostic factors associated with metastasectomy significantly lowered mortality among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (HR=0.61). Older age (≥70 years), tumor stage 4B and 4C, right-sided tumors, mucinous adenocarcinoma, primary tumor resection, and the number of positive lymph nodes were associated with higher mortality and lower conversion surgery rates. CONCLUSION: Though panitumumab- and cetuximab-based therapies showed no differences, several factors, such as age over 70 years old, tumor stage 4B and 4C, undifferentiated carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, right-sided tumor, number of positive lymph nodes, obstruction, and primary tumor resection increased the mortality risk of patients. This study underscores the importance of metastasectomy in current treatment guidelines and future clinical trials.

Efficacy and Safety of a Parenteral Nutrition Program for Patients with RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Administered First-Line Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Malnutrition is a common problem in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving targeted therapy plus chemotherapy, resulting in severe toxicity and decreased survival rates. This retrospective study employing propensity score matching (PSM) examined the efficacy and safety of a supplemental home parenteral nutrition (HPN) program for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy. This retrospective nationwide registry study included data from 14 medical centers/hospitals across Taiwan, and the data period ranged from November 2016 to December 2020. Patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving cetuximab plus chemotherapy as their first-line therapy were included and divided into HPN and non-HPN program groups. HPN was initiated based on patient-specific factors, such as baseline nutritional status, treatment-related toxicities, and comorbidities. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using response to therapy, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). This study recruited 758 patients, of whom 110 and 648 were included in the HPN and non-HPN program groups, respectively. After 1:3 PSM, the data of 109 and 327 patients from the HPN and non-HPN program groups were analyzed, respectively. The HPN program group had a higher metastasectomy rate (33.9% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.005), and longer duration of treatment and DoR than the non-HPN program group (13.6 vs. 10.3 and 13.6 vs. 9.9 months, p = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). The HPN program group tended to have a longer median PFS (18.2 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.102). Moreover, we noted a significant improvement in the median OS in the same group (53.4 vs. 34.6 months, p = 0.002). Supplemental HPN programs may be recommended for select patients with mCRC receiving targeted therapy plus chemotherapy to improve oncological outcomes.

Medium-term surgical outcomes and health-related quality of life after laparoscopic vs open colorectal cancer resection: SF-36 health survey questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies that compared the postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes after receiving laparoscopic resection (LR) or open resection (OR) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have different conclusions. AIM: To explore the medium-term effect of postoperative HRQoL in such patients. METHODS: This study randomized 567 patients undergoing non-metastatic CRC surgery managed by one surgeon to the LR or OR groups. HRQoL was assessed during the preoperative period and 3, 6, and 12 mo postoperative using a modified version of the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire, emphasizing eight specific items. RESULTS: This cohort randomly assigned 541 patients to receive LR (n = 296) or OR (n = 245) surgical procedures. More episodes of postoperative urinary tract infection (P < 0.001), wound infection (P < 0.001), and pneumonia (P = 0.048) were encountered in the OR group. The results demonstrated that the LR group subjectively gained mildly better general health (P = 0.045), moderately better physical activity (P = 0.006), and significantly better social function recovery (P = 0.0001) 3 mo postoperatively. Only the aspect of social function recovery was claimed at 6 mo, with a significant advantage in the LR group (P = 0.001). No clinical difference was found in HRQoL during the 12 mo. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that LR resulted in better outcomes, including intra-operative blood loss, surgery-related complications, course of recovery, and especially some health domains of HRQoL at least within 6 mo postoperatively. Patients should undergo LR if there is no contraindication.

Mortality of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received elective or emergent operation after exposure to bevacizumab: A nationwide database study.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate that surgical intervention within 4 weeks or 8 weeks after bevacizumab therapy might increase the risk of postoperative complications and mortality, especially in patients who received emergent operation. Therefore, we aimed to assess the association between different surgical timings, emergent or elective surgery, and the risk of postoperative mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry, we identified patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who underwent surgery within 1 year of receiving bevacizumab between January 2010 and December 2017. The primary outcomes were 30-day, 60-day, and in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcomes were hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, and surgical complications. Multivariate analysis was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: This study included 2,047 patients. In the multivariate analysis, patients who underwent emergent operation and had higher Charlson scores had a significantly higher mortality rate. Patients with a longer interval to surgery, more cycles of bevacizumab treatment, and distal metastectomy had the opposite result. In subgroup analysis, patients who received emergent operation within 28 days had the highest surgical mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The interval to operation among mCRC patients who receive bevacizumab treatment should exceed 4 weeks to avoid additional risk of mortality whether patients receiving elective or emergent operation. Patients who received emergent operation within 28 days of bevcizumab infusion had the highest risk of mortality.

Inhibition of lncRNA RPPH1 activity decreases tumor proliferation and metastasis through down-regulation of inflammation-related oncogenes.

OBJECTIVE: Ribonuclease P RNA component H1 (RPPH1) is a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) associated with cancer progression. Higher RPPH1 expression in breast and cervical cancer samples than that in normal tissues were observed through the lncRNASNP2 database; therefore, silencing RPPH1 expression might be a potential strategy for cancer treatments, even though RPPH1 is also an RNA subunit of ribonuclease P involved in processing transfer RNA (tRNA) precursors and the effect of RPPH1 knockdown is not yet fully understood. METHODS: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified through RNA sequencing in each shRNA-transfected RPPH1 knockdown MDA-MB-231, RPPH1 knockdown HeLa cell, and respective control cells, then the gene ontology enrichment analysis was performed by IPA and MetaCore database according to these DEGs, with further in vitro experiments validating the effect of RPPH1 silencing in MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cells. RESULTS: Hundreds of down-regulated DEGs were identified in RPPH1 knockdown MDA-MB-231 and HeLa cells while bioinformatics analysis revealed that these genes were involved in pathways related to immune response and cancerogenesis. Compared to mock- and vector-transfected cells, the production of mature tRNAs, cell proliferation and migration capacity were inhibited in RPPH1-silenced HeLa and MDA-MB-231 cells. Additionally, RPPH1 knockdown promoted G1 cell cycle arrest mainly through the down-regulation of cyclin D1, although glycolytic pathways were only affected in RPPH1 knockdown HeLa cells but not MDA-MB-231 cells. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that knockdown RPPH1 affected tRNA production, cell proliferation and metabolism. Our findings might provide insight into the role of RPPH1 in tumor development.

Survival benefit of metastasectomy in first-line cetuximab therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a nationwide registry.

This multicenter study aimed to explore the survival benefit of metastasectomy by first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy in real-world patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and metastasectomy rate. The exploratory endpoint was the optimal treatment cycle for better OS and PFS. Receiver operating characteristic curve with the area under curve (AUC) was used to identify the optimal cut-off cycle for survival outcomes. A total of 758 mCRC patients were enrolled in this study, with a median OS of 35.1 months, median PFS of 14.6 months, and metastasectomy rate of 21.4%. Left-sided mCRC had a significantly higher DCR (88.9% vs. 73.1%, P<0.001) and better OS (36.4 vs. 19.6 months, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in PFS and metastasectomy rate between left-sided and right-sided mCRC. However, mCRC patients who underwent metastasectomy over the course of treatment had better OS (54.9 vs. 28.6 months, P<0.001) and PFS (21.0 vs. 13.1 months, P<0.001) than those who did not. Notably, right-sided mCRC who benefited from first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy to underwent metastasectomy also had favorable outcomes, on a par with left-sided mCRC. The optimal treatment cycle was 14 cycles (AUC: 0.779, P<0.001). Patients who received ≥14 cycles had higher metastasectomy rates (27.5% vs. 13.5%, P<0.001), favorable OS (42.6 vs. 23.4 months, P<0.001) and PFS (18.1 vs. 8.6 months, P<0.001), and, importantly, had comparable adverse events compared with patients who received <14 cycles of treatment. Patients who underwent metastasectomy after or during first-line cetuximab therapy have an improved OS in both left-sided and right-sided mCRC. Furthermore, patients receive ≥14 cycles of treatment whenever possible to achieve a higher likelihood of metastasectomy was associated with favorable survival outcomes.

Platinum Plus Tegafur-Uracil versus Platinum Alone during Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity-Score-Matching Analysis.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with a cisplatin-based regimen is the standard treatment for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Our study was a propensity-score-matching analysis and it aimed to investigate the oncologic outcomes of platinum plus tegafur−uracil versus platinum alone during CCRT in patient with nonmetastatic NPC. Patients with pathologic confirmed NPC in 2018−2022 were reviewed. Patients treated with platinum plus tegafur−uracil (CCRT-UP) or platinum alone (CCRT-P) during CCRT were recruited into this study. A propensity-score-matching analysis was conducted to diminish the selection bias. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were presented with Kaplan−Meier curves. The treatment-related adverse effects (AEs) were recorded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria V3.0. A total of 44 patients with CCRT-UP and 44 patients with CCRT-P were identified after propensity score matching. The median RFS was not reached (NR) in the CCRT-UP group, and it was 12.5 months in the CCRT-P group (p < 0.001). The median OS was NR in the CCRT-UP group, and it was 15.9 months in the CCRT-P group (p < 0.001). The overall response rate and disease-control rate were insignificant between the CCRT-UP and CCRT-P groups. A subgroup analysis showed that the median OS was significantly longer in the CCRT-UP group than in the CCRT-P group, regardless of the clinical stage. A multivariate analysis exhibited that CCRT-UP was independently correlated with survival. The grade 3−4 AEs were insignificant between the CCRT-UP and CCRT-P arms. CCRT-UP had better RFS and OS in nonmetastatic NPC patients with similar toxic profiles. Further larger-scaled prospective randomized control trials are warranted to validate our conclusions.

An Observational Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil-Containing Regimen Versus Regorafenib-Containing Regimen in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Background: There are no randomized control trials comparing the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Herein, we conducted an observational study to compare the oncologic outcomes of trifluridine/tipiracil-containing regimen (TAS-102) and regorafenib-containing regimen (REG) in patients with mCRC. Material and method: Patients who were diagnosed to have mCRC in 2015 to 2021 and treated with TAS-102-containing regimen or REG-containing regimen were recruited. Monotherapy or combination therapy were all allowed in this study. Oncologic outcomes were presented with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: A total of 125 patients were enrolled into our study, accounting for 50 patients with TAS-102 and 75 patients with REG. Of these patients, 64% were treated with TAS-102 or REG monotherapy, while the remaining were treated with TAS-102 combination or REG combination. In general, the median PFS and OS were 3.7 versus 2.0 months (P = 0.006) and 9.2 versus 6.8 months (P = 0.048) in TAS-102 and REG, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 44% versus 20% (P < 0.001) and 72% versus 43% (P < 0.001) in TAS-102 and REG, respectively. As for treatment strategies, the survival were significantly longer in combination than in monotherapy, no matter in TAS-102 or REG group. Multivariate analysis showed TAS-102 and combination therapy were independent predictor associated with better survival. Conclusions: Our results suggested that TAS-102 had better oncologic outcomes than REG in patients with mCRC, especially in combination. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm our results.

Treatment Sequences in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Cetuximab Followed by Immunotherapy or Vice Versa.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis was poor when patients had recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Herein, we conducted an observational study of cetuximab followed by immunotherapy (Cet-IO) versus immunotherapy followed by cetuximab (IO-Cet) in patients with R/M HNSCC. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with R/M HNSCC and treated with a sequential cetuximab-containing regimen and immunotherapy-containing regimen were enrolled in our study. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were enrolled in our study for oncologic outcomes evaluation, with 40 patients in Cet-IO and 35 patients in IO-Cet. The median PFS1 was 5.1 months in Cet-IO and 4.5 months in IO-Cet (p = 0.777) and the median PFS2 was 16.5 months in Cet-IO and 11.4 months in IO-Cet (p = 0.566). The median OS was 23.7 months versus 22.8 months in Cet-IO and IO-Cet, respectively (p = 0.484). The overall response rate (ORR) were 73% in Cet-IO versus 37% in IO-Cet (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the treatment sequences, Cet-IO or IO-Cet, were insignificantly different with survival. CONCLUSION: Both Cet-IO and IO-Cet are effective in R/M HNSCC patients with insignificant survival differences. The higher ORR of Cet-IO might render it to be considered in patients with large tumor burdens and urgent needs for treatment responses. Further prospective studies are merited to validate our conclusions.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bevacizumab versus Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients without Primary Tumor Resection.

Primary tumor resection may be unfeasible in metastatic colorectal cancer. We determined the effects of bevacizumab and cetuximab therapies on survival or conversion surgery in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who did not undergo primary tumor resection. This retrospective cohort study enrolled 8466 patients who underwent first-line bevacizumab- or cetuximab-based therapy. We analyzed the data of both therapies in patients who did not undergo primary tumor resection. Overall survival after targeted therapy plus chemotherapy was assessed. The groups were matched using propensity score matching and weighting. Cetuximab resulted in lower mortality than bevacizumab (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75); however, it did not have the same effect in patients that underwent primary tumor resection (HR = 0.95) after propensity score weighting. Among patients treated with targeted agents, primary tumor resection was associated with lower mortality among those who received both bevacizumab (HR = 0.60) and cetuximab (HR = 0.75). Among patients that did not undergo primary tumor resection, multivariable analysis for conversion surgery showed that the cetuximab group (HR = 1.82) had a significantly higher metastasectomy rate. In these patients, cetuximab-based therapy was associated with significantly better survival compared with bevacizumab-based therapy. Cetuximab also yielded a higher conversion surgery rate. These findings demonstrate the importance of stratification by primary tumor resection in the application of current treatment guidelines and initiation of future clinical trials.

The role of induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide population-based matched study.

INTRODUCTION: Induction chemotherapy (IC) has a proven role in organ preservation and reducing distant failure. However, its ability to prolong survival remains controversy. Herein, our study aimed to investigate the impact of primary tumor location on survival in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) treated with IC. METHODS: Patients who were older than 18 years and diagnosed with LA-HNSCC between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized into two group: IC group and CCRT group. In order to reduce the selection bias, IC patients were individually matched with the CCRT patients. The oncologic outcomes were presented with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 5547 patients were identified. After matching, 2208 patients were analyzed for outcomes comparison, including 1104 patients in each group. In general, median OS were 27.3 months versus 28.5 months in IC and CCRT group, respectively (p = 0.6151). Patients were stratified by primary tumor location. For patients with oral cavity cancers, the median OS was significantly inferior in IC group than those in CCRT group, while for patients with non-oral cavity cancer, the median OS was superior in IC group than those in CCRT group. CONCLUSIONS: Primary tumor location has a significant impact on survival in patients with LA-HNSCC treated with IC. Our study provides a strong evidence that primary tumor location should be taken into consideration during multidisciplinary approach.

Impact of Parenteral Glutamine Supplement on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common toxic side effect in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) that has a negative impact on treatment outcomes and patients' survival. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of parenteral glutamine supplement (dipeptiven) on oncologic outcomes in patients with NPC treated with CCRT. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with pathologically proved NPC and treated with CCRT were enrolled into our study. Patients were classified as dipeptiven (+) and dipeptiven (−). Oncologic outcomes were measured, and multivariate regression analysis was performed. Grade 3−4 treatment related toxicities were also documented. Results: A total of 144 patients with NPC were recruited in this study to evaluate oncologic outcomes, with 41 dipeptiven (+) and 103 dipeptiven (−). CCRT interruption rate and severe adverse effect (SAE) rate were significant lower in the dipeptiven (+) group than in the dipeptiven (−) group. The median overall survival (OS) was not mature yet in the dipeptiven (+) group and 30 months in the dipeptiven (−) group (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that dipeptiven supplementation and CCRT interruption were independent predictors associated with better survival. The OS was longest in patients with a dipeptiven supplement and patients who had CCRT interruption had significantly worst OS. As for safety profiles, grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were fewer in dipeptiven (+) than in dipeptiven (−). Conclusion: Dipeptiven supplementation is crucial in NPC patients treated with CCRT, which can ameliorate treatment-related toxicity and augment treatment efficacy. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate our results.