AB015. Efficacy and safety of boron neutron capture therapy in managing metastatic spinal tumors: experimental findings.

BACKGROUND: Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a unique cancer treatment modality that enables precise targeting of tumors at the cellular level. Based on the success observed in nuclear reactors, BNCT now holds promise as a therapeutic approach for treating invasive brain tumors or head and neck cancers. Metastatic spinal tumors have been treated with multidisciplinary interventions such as surgical resection and radiation therapy. Despite recent advantages of radiation therapy, it remains challenging to achieve better quality of life and activity of daily living. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BNCT in metastatic spinal tumor using a mouse model. METHODS: For the in vitro, neutron and photon irradiation was applied to A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. The cells were irradiated neutrons with or without p-boronophenylalanine (BPA) 10 µg Boron/mL for a 24-h exposure before neutron irradiation. The difference of biological effect between neutrons and photons was evaluated by colony forming assay. For in vivo, the tumor-bearing mice were intravenously administered BPA (250 mg/kg), followed by measuring biodistribution of boron using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). For in vivo BNCT, the mice were randomly assigned to untreated (n=10), neutron irradiation only (n=9), and BNCT groups (n=10). Overall survival and hindlimb function were analyzed. Histopathological examination was also performed to assess the influences of neutron irradiation. RESULTS: Neutron irradiation showed a stronger cell-killing effect than that exhibited by photon irradiation in vitro. For in vivo biodistribution, the highest boron accumulation in the tumor was seen at 2.5-h time point (10.5 µg B/g), with a tumor to normal spinal cord and blood ratios were 3.6 and 2.9, respectively. For the in vivo BNCT, BNCT had significantly prolonged survival (vs. untreated, P=0.002; vs. neutron only, P=0.01, respectively, log-rank test) and preserved mice hindlimb function compared to the other groups (vs. untreated, P<0.001; vs. neutron only, P=0.005, respectively, MANOVA). No adverse events and apparent histopathological changes were observed among three groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that BNCT may represent a novel therapeutic option in the management of metastatic spinal tumors.

Implementation of optically simulated luminescent dosimeter for quality control of gamma ray dose of an accelerator-based neutron source.

BACKGROUND: Neutron beams utilized for performing BNCT are composed of a mixture of neutrons and gamma rays. Although much of the dose delivered to the cancer cells comes from the high LET particles produced by the boron neutron capture reaction, the dose delivered to the healthy tissues from unwanted gamma rays cannot be ignored. With the increase in the number of accelerators for BNCT, a detector system that is capable of measuring gamma ray dose in a mixed neutron/gamma irradiation field is crucial. Currently, BeO TLDs encased in quartz glass are used to measure gamma ray dose in a BNCT irradiation field. However, this type of TLD is no longer commercially available. A replacement dosimetry system is required to perform the recommended ongoing quality assurance of gamma ray measurement for a clinical BNCT system. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the characteristics of a BeO OSLD detector system under a mixed neutron and gamma ray irradiation field and to assess the suitability of the system for routine quality assurance measurements of an accelerator-based BNCT facility. METHODS: The myOSLD system by RadPro International GmbH was evaluated using the accelerator-based neutron source designed for clinical BNCT (NeuCure BNCT system). The readout constancy, linearity, dose rate effect, and fading effect of the OSLD were evaluated. Free-in-air and water phantom measurements were performed and compared with the TLD results and Monte Carlo simulation results. The PHITS Monte Carlo code was used for this study. RESULTS: The readout constancy was found to be stable over a month-long period and similar to the TLD results. The OSLD readout signal was found to be linear, with a high coefficient of determination (R2 ≥ 0.999) up to a proton charge of 3.6 C. There was no significant signal fading or dose rate dependency. The central axis depth dose and off-axis dose profile measurements agreed with both the TLD and Monte Carlo simulation results, within one standard deviation. CONCLUSION: The myOSLD system was characterized using an accelerator system designed for clinical BNCT. The experimental measurements confirmed the OSLD achieved similar, if not superior to, the currently utilized dosimetry system for routine QA of an accelerator-based BNCT system. The OSLD system would be a suitable replacement for the current TLD system for performing routine QA of gamma ray dose measurement in a BNCT irradiation field.

Preliminary outcomes of boron neutron capture therapy for head and neck cancers as a treatment covered by public health insurance system in Japan: Real-world experiences over a 2-year period.

PURPOSE: Since June 2020, boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has been a health care service covered by health insurance in Japan to treat locally advanced or recurrent unresectable head and neck cancers. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of BNCT as a health insurance treatment and explore its role among the standard treatment modalities for head and neck cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who were treated using BNCT at Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, between June 2020 and May 2022. We assessed objective response rates based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Additionally, we conducted a survival analysis and explored the factors that contributed to the treatment results. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (72 treatments) were included in the study, with a median observation period of 15 months. The objective response rate was 80.5%, and the 1-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.9%-68.3%), 42.2% (95% CI: 30.1%-53.8%), and 75.4% (95% CI: 62.5%-84.5%), respectively. Locoregional control was significantly longer in patients with earlier TNM staging and no history of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: BNCT may be an effective treatment option for locally advanced or recurrent unresectable head and neck cancers with no other definitive therapies. If definitive surgery or radiation therapy are not feasible, BNCT should be considered at early disease stages.

Boron neutron capture therapy delays the decline in neurological function in a mouse model of metastatic spinal tumors.

Metastatic spinal tumors are increasingly prevalent due to advancements in cancer treatment, leading to prolonged survival rates. This rising prevalence highlights the need for developing more effective therapeutic approaches to address this malignancy. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) offers a promising solution by delivering targeted doses to tumors while minimizing damage to normal tissue. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of BNCT as a potential therapeutic option for spine metastases in mouse models induced by A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. The animal models were randomly allocated into three groups: untreated (n = 10), neutron irradiation only (n = 9), and BNCT (n = 10). Each mouse was administered 4-borono-L-phenylalanine (250 mg/kg) intravenously, followed by measurement of boron concentrations 2.5 h later. Overall survival, neurological function of the hindlimb, and any adverse events were assessed post irradiation. The tumor-to-normal spinal cord and blood boron concentration ratios were 3.6 and 2.9, respectively, with no significant difference observed between the normal and compressed spinal cord tissues. The BNCT group exhibited significantly prolonged survival rates compared with the other groups (vs. untreated, p = 0.0015; vs. neutron-only, p = 0.0104, log-rank test). Furthermore, the BNCT group demonstrated preserved neurological function relative to the other groups (vs. untreated, p = 0.0004; vs. neutron-only, p = 0.0051, multivariate analysis of variance). No adverse events were observed post irradiation. These findings indicate that BNCT holds promise as a novel treatment modality for metastatic spinal tumors.

Nonclinical pharmacodynamics of boron neutron capture therapy using direct intratumoral administration of a folate receptor targeting novel boron carrier.

Background: Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a precise particle radiation therapy known for its unique cellular targeting ability. The development of innovative boron carriers is crucial for the advancement of BNCT technologies. Our previous study demonstrated the potential of PBC-IP administered via convection-enhanced delivery (CED) in an F98 rat glioma model. This approach significantly extended rat survival in neutron irradiation experiments, with half achieving long-term survival, akin to a cure, in a rat brain tumor model. Our commitment to clinical applicability has spurred additional nonclinical pharmacodynamic research, including an investigation into the effects of cannula position and the time elapsed post-CED administration. Methods: In comprehensive in vivo experiments conducted on an F98 rat brain tumor model, we meticulously examined the boron distribution and neutron irradiation experiments at various sites and multiple time intervals following CED administration. Results: The PBC-IP showed substantial efficacy for BNCT, revealing minimal differences in tumor boron concentration between central and peripheral CED administration, although a gradual decline in intratumoral boron concentration post-administration was observed. Therapeutic efficacy remained robust, particularly when employing cannula insertion at the tumor margin, compared to central injections. Even delayed neutron irradiation showed notable effectiveness, albeit with a slightly reduced survival period. These findings underscore the robust clinical potential of CED-administered PBC-IP in the treatment of malignant gliomas, offering adaptability across an array of treatment protocols. Conclusions: This study represents a significant leap forward in the quest to enhance BNCT for the management of malignant gliomas, opening promising avenues for clinical translation.

Application of stoichiometric CT number calibration method for dose calculation of tissue heterogeneous volumes in boron neutron capture therapy.

BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo simulation code is commonly used for the dose calculation of boron neutron capture therapy. In the past, dose calculation was performed assuming a homogeneous mass density and elemental composition inside the tissue, regardless of the patient's age or sex. Studies have shown that the mass density varies with patient to patient, particularly for those that have undergone surgery or radiotherapy. A method to convert computed tomography numbers into mass density and elemental weights of tissues has been developed and applied in the dose calculation process using Monte Carlo codes. A recent study has shown the variation in the computed tomography number between different scanners for low- and high-density materials. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the elemental composition inside each calculation voxel on the dose calculation and the application of the stoichiometric CT number calibration method for boron neutron capture therapy planning. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulation package Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System was used for the dose calculation. Firstly, a homogeneous cubic phantom with the material set to ICRU soft tissue (four component), muscle, fat, and brain was modelled and the NeuCure BNCT system accelerator-based neutron source was used. The central axis depth dose distribution was simulated and compared between the four materials. Secondly, a treatment plan of the brain and the head and neck region was simulated using a dummy patient dataset. Three models were generated; (1) a model where only the fundamental materials were considered (simple model), a model where each voxel was assigned a mass density and elemental weight using (2) the Nakao20 model, and (3) the Schneider00 model. The irradiation conditions were kept the same between the different models (irradiation time and irradiation field size) and the near maximum (D1%) and mean dose to the organs at risk were calculated and compared. RESULTS: A maximum percentage difference of approximately 5% was observed between the different materials for the homogeneous phantom. With the dummy patient plan, a large dose difference in the bone (greater than 12%) and region near the low-density material (mucosal membrane, 7%-11%) was found between the different models. CONCLUSIONS: A stoichiometric CT number calibration method using the newly developed Nakao20 model was applied to BNCT dose calculation. The results indicate the importance of calibrating the CT number to elemental composition for each individual CT scanner for the purpose of BNCT dose calculation along with the consideration of heterogeneity of the material composition inside the defined region of interest.

Translational research of boron neutron capture therapy for spinal cord gliomas using rat model.

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a type of targeted particle radiation therapy with potential applications at the cellular level. Spinal cord gliomas (SCGs) present a substantial challenge owing to their poor prognosis and the lack of effective postoperative treatments. This study evaluated the efficacy of BNCT in a rat SCGs model employing the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scale to assess postoperative locomotor activity. We confirmed the presence of adequate in vitro boron concentrations in F98 rat glioma and 9L rat gliosarcoma cells exposed to boronophenylalanine (BPA) and in vivo tumor boron concentration 2.5 h after intravenous BPA administration. In vivo neutron irradiation significantly enhanced survival in the BNCT group when compared with that in the untreated group, with a minimal BBB scale reduction in all sham-operated groups. These findings highlight the potential of BNCT as a promising treatment option for SCGs.

Neutron flux evaluation algorithm with a combination of Monte Carlo and removal-diffusion calculation methods for boron neutron capture therapy.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, the clinical treatment of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has been applied to unresectable, locally advanced, and recurrent head and neck carcinomas using an accelerator-based neutron source since June of 2020. Considering the increase in the number of patients receiving BNCT, efficiency of the treatment planning procedure is becoming increasingly important. Therefore, novel and rapid dose calculation algorithms must be developed. We developed a novel algorithm for calculating neutron flux, which comprises of a combination of a Monte Carlo (MC) method and a method based on the removal-diffusion (RD) theory (RD calculation method) for the purpose of dose calculation of BNCT. PURPOSE: We present the details of our novel algorithm and the verification results of the calculation accuracy based on the MC calculation result. METHODS: In this study, the "MC-RD" calculation method was developed, wherein the RD calculation method was used to calculate the thermalization process of neutrons and the MC method was used to calculate the moderation process. The RD parameters were determined by MC calculations in advance. The MC-RD calculation accuracy was verified by comparing the results of the MC-RD and MC calculations with respect to the neutron flux distributions in each of the cubic and head phantoms filled with water. RESULTS: Comparing the MC-RD calculation results with those of MC calculations, it was found that the MC-RD calculation accurately reproduced the thermal neutron flux distribution inside the phantom, with the exception of the region near the surface of the phantom. CONCLUSIONS: The MC-RD calculation method is useful for the evaluation of the neutron flux distribution for the purpose of BNCT dose calculation, except for the region near the surface.

Feasibility study of optical imaging of the boron-dose distribution by a liquid scintillator in a clinical boron neutron capture therapy field.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the boron dose is essential for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Nevertheless, a direct evaluation method for the boron-dose distribution has not yet been established in the clinical BNCT field. To date, even in quality assurance (QA) measurements, the boron dose has been indirectly evaluated from the thermal neutron flux measured using the activation method with gold foil or wire and an assumed boron concentration in the QA procedure. Recently, we successfully conducted optical imaging of the boron-dose distribution using a cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera and a boron-added liquid scintillator at the E-3 port facility of the Kyoto University Research Reactor (KUR), which supplies an almost pure thermal neutron beam with very low gamma-ray contamination. However, in a clinical accelerator-based BNCT facility, there is a concern that the boron-dose distribution may not be accurately extracted because the unwanted luminescence intensity, which is irrelevant to the boron dose is expected to increase owing to the contamination of fast neutrons and gamma rays. PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to study the validity of a newly proposed method using a boron-added liquid scintillator and a cooled CCD camera to directly observe the boron-dose distribution in a clinical accelerator-based BNCT field. METHOD: A liquid scintillator phantom with 10 B was prepared by filling a small quartz glass container with a commercial liquid scintillator and boron-containing material (trimethyl borate); its natural boron concentration was 1 wt%. Luminescence images of the boron-neutron capture reaction were obtained in a water tank at several different depths using a CCD camera. The contribution of background luminescence, mainly due to gamma rays, was removed by subtracting the luminescence images obtained using another sole liquid scintillator phantom (natural boron concentration of 0 wt%) at each corresponding depth, and a depth profile of the boron dose with several discrete points was obtained. The obtained depth profile was compared with that of calculated boron dose, and those of thermal neutron flux which were experimentally measured or calculated using a Monte Carlo code. RESULTS: The depth profile evaluated from the subtracted images indicated reasonable agreement with the calculated boron-dose profile and thermal neutron flux profiles, except for the shallow region. This discrepancy is thought to be due to the contribution of light reflected from the tank wall. The simulation results also demonstrated that the thermal neutron flux would be severely perturbed by the 10 B-containing phantom if a relatively larger container was used to evaluate a wide range of boron-dose distributions in a single shot. This indicates a trade-off between the luminescence intensity of the 10 B-added phantom and its perturbation effect on the thermal neutron flux. CONCLUSIONS: Although a partial discrepancy was observed, the validity of the newly proposed boron-dose evaluation method using liquid-scintillator phantoms with and without 10 B was experimentally confirmed in the neutron field of an accelerator-based clinical BNCT facility. However, this study has some limitations, including the trade-off problem stated above. Therefore, further studies are required to address these limitations.

Out-of-field dosimetry using a validated PHITS model and computational phantom in clinical BNCT.

BACKGROUND: The out-of-field radiation dose for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), which results from both neutrons and γ-rays, has not been extensively evaluated. To safely perform BNCT, the neutron and γ-ray distributions inside the treatment room and the whole-body dose should be evaluated during commissioning. Although, certain previous studies have evaluated the whole-body dose in the clinical research phase, no institution providing BNCT covered by health insurance has yet validated the neutron distribution inside the room and the whole-body dose. PURPOSE: To validate the Monte Carlo model of the BNCT irradiation room extended for the whole-body region and evaluate organ-at-risk (OAR) doses using the validated model with a human-body phantom. METHODS: First, thermal neutron distribution inside the entire treatment room was measured by placing Au samples on the walls of the treatment room. Second, neutron and gamma-ray dose-rate distributions inside a human-body water phantom were measured. Both lying and sitting positions were considered. Bare Au, Au covered by Cd (Au+Cd), In, Al, and thermoluminescent dosimeters were arranged at 11 points corresponding to locations of the OARs inside the phantom. After the irradiation, γ-ray peaks emitted from the samples were measured by a high-purity germanium detector. The measured counts were converted to the reaction rate per unit charge of the sample. These measurements were compared with results of simulations performed with the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS). A male adult mesh-type reference computational phantom was used to evaluate OAR doses in the whole-body region. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted doses and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for each OAR were evaluated. The median dose (D50% ) and near-maximum dose (D2% ) were evaluated for 14 OARs in a 1-h-irradiation process. The evaluated RBE-weighted doses were converted to equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions. RESULTS: Experimental results within 60 cm from the irradiation center agreed with simulation results within the error bars except at ±20, 30 cm, and those over 70 cm corresponded within one digit. The experimental results of reaction rates or γ-ray dose rate for lying and sitting positions agreed well with the simulation results within the error bars at 8, 4, 11, 7 and 7, 4, 7, 6, 5, 6 out of 11 points, respectively, for Au, Au+Cd, In, Al, and TLD. Among the detectors, the discrepancies in reaction rates between experiment and simulation were most common for Au+Cd, but were observed randomly for measurement points (brain, lung, etc.). The experimental results of γ-ray dose rates were systematically lower than simulation results at abdomen and waist regions for both positions. Extending the PHITS model to the whole-body region resulted in higher doses for all OARs, especially 0.13 Gy-eq increase for D50% of the left salivary gland. CONCLUSION: The PHITS model for clinical BNCT for the whole-body region was validated, and the OAR doses were then evaluated. Clinicians and medical physicists should know that the out-of-field radiation increases the OAR dose in the whole-body region.