Effectiveness and safety of brucea javanica oil assisted TACE versus TACE in the treatment of liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: The effectiveness and safety of using Brucea javanica oil (BJO) in combination with Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) for liver cancer treatment are subjects of debate. This study aims to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of BJO-assisted TACE versus TACE alone and quantifies the differences between these two treatment methods. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases including PubMed, Cochrane, CNKI, and Wanfang, until 1 July 2023. Meta-analysis was conducted, and the results were presented as mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The search yielded 11 RCTs, with a combined sample size of 1054 patients. Meta-analysis revealed that BJO-assisted TACE exhibited superior outcomes compared to standalone TACE. Specific data revealed that BJO-assisted TACE improves clinical benefit rate by 22% [RR = 1.22, 95% CI (1.15, 1.30)], increases the number of people with improved quality of life by 32%, resulting in an average score improvement of 9.53 points [RR = 1.32, 95% CI (1.22, 1.43); MD = 9.53, 95% CI (6.95, 12.10)]. Furthermore, AFP improvement rate improved significantly by approximately 134% [RR = 2.34, 95% CI (1.58, 3.46)], accompanied by notable improvements in liver function indicators, with an average reduction of 27.19 U/L in AST [MD = -27.19, 95% CI (-40.36, -14.02)], 20.77 U/L in ALT [MD = -20.77, 95% CI (-39.46, -2.08)], 12.17 µmol/L in TBIL [MD = -12.17, 95% CI (-19.38, -4.97)], and a decrease of 43.72 pg/mL in VEGF [MD = -43.72, 95% CI (-63.29, -24.15)]. Most importantly, there was a 29% reduction in the occurrence of adverse reactions [RR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.60, 0.84)]. Conclusion: These findings indicate that BJO-assisted TACE may be considered as a potentially beneficial treatment option for liver cancer patients when compared to standalone TACE. It appears to contribute to improved treatment outcomes, enhanced quality of life, and potentially reduced adverse reactions, suggesting it warrants further investigation as a promising approach for liver cancer treatment. Systematic Review Registration: identifier CRD42023428948.

[The functional differences of macrophages derived from murine bone marrow and peritoneal cavity].

Objective To compare the functional differences between bone marrow derived macrophages and peritoneal macrophages, which may provide the basis for the selection of macrophages in immunological research and immunoregulatory drug evaluation. Methods Marophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) was used to induce the differentiation of bone marrow monocytes into macrophages, and thioglycolate medium was used to induce peritonitis to obtain peritoneal macrophages. After both macrophages being stimulated by zymosan, LPS, R848 and CpG respectively, mRNA levels of tumor necrosis factor α(TNF-α), interleukin 6(IL-6), macrophage inflammatory protein 1α(MIP-1α), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1(MCP-1) were measured by Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR and the concentrations of secreted TNF-α, IL-6, MIP-1α and MCP-1 were detected by ELISA. In addition, the expression of costimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, CD40 and histocompatibility complex II (MHC II) on the cell surface was analyzed by flow cytometry. Results After inducing by different TLR ligands, mRNA expression levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines were increased in both macrophages. The secretion of TNF-α, IL-6, MIP-1α and MCP-1 in peritoneal macrophages and the expression of CD86 and MHC II on the surface of peritoneal macrophages were significantly higher than those of bone marrow derived macrophages. Conclusion There are significant differences in the expression of inflammatory factors, chemokines, costimulatory molecules, and histocompatibility complex between bone marrow derived macrophages and peritoneal macrophages. Peritoneal macrophages have more complete macrophage function and is more suitable for immunological research and immunomodulatory drug evaluation.

Icaritin Sensitizes Thrombin- and TxA2-Induced Platelet Activation and Promotes Hemostasis via Enhancing PLCγ2-PKC Signaling Pathways.

BACKGROUND: Vascular injury results in uncontrollable hemorrhage in hemorrhagic diseases and excessive antithrombotic therapy. Safe and efficient hemostatic agents which can be orally administered are urgently needed. Platelets play indispensable roles in hemostasis, but there is no drug exerting hemostatic effects through enhancing platelet function. METHODS: The regulatory effects of icaritin, a natural compound isolated from Herba Epimedii, on the dense granule release, thromboxane A2 (TxA2) synthesis, α-granule release, activation of integrin αIIbß3, and aggregation of platelets induced by multiple agonists were investigated. The effects of icaritin on tail vein bleeding times of warfarin-treated mice were also evaluated. Furthermore, we investigated the underlying mechanisms by which icaritin exerted its pharmacological effects. RESULTS: Icaritin alone did not activate platelets, but significantly potentiated the dense granule release, α-granule release, activation of integrin αIIbß3, and aggregation of platelets induced by thrombin and U46619. Icaritin also shortened tail vein bleeding times of mice treated with warfarin. In addition, phosphorylated proteome analysis, immunoblotting analysis, and pharmacological research revealed that icaritin sensitized the activation of phospholipase Cγ2 (PLCγ2)-protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways, which play important roles in platelet activation. CONCLUSION: Icaritin can sensitize platelet activation induced by thrombin and TxA2 through enhancing the activation of PLCγ2-PKC signaling pathways and promote hemostasis, and has potential to be developed into a novel orally deliverable therapeutic agent for hemorrhages.