Benefit of cyclosporine modulation of drug resistance in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Cyclosporine A (CsA) inhibits P-glycoprotein (Pgp)-mediated cellular export of anthracyclines at clinically achievable concentrations. This randomized controlled trial was performed to test the benefit of CsA addition to treatment with cytarabine and daunorubicin (DNR) in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A total of 226 patients were randomly assigned to sequential treatment with cytarabine and infusional DNR with or without intravenous CsA. Remitting patients received one course of consolidation chemotherapy that included DNR with or without CsA as assigned during induction. Addition of CsA significantly reduced the frequency of resistance to induction chemotherapy (31% versus 47%, P =.0077). Whereas the rate of complete remission was not significantly improved (39% versus 33%, P =.14), relapse-free survival (34% versus 9% at 2 years, P =.031) and overall survival (22% versus 12%, P =.046) were significantly increased with CsA. The effect of CsA on survival was greatest in patients with moderate or bright Pgp expression (median 12 months with CsA versus 4 months for controls) compared to patients with absent or low Pgp expression (median 6 months in both arms). The frequency of induction deaths was 15% with CsA and 18% in controls. Steady-state serum concentrations of DNR (P =.0089) and daunorubicinol (P <.0001) were significantly higher in CsA-treated patients. Survival (P =.0003) and induction response (P =.028) improved with increasing DNR concentration in CsA-treated patients but not in controls, suggesting a targeted interaction by CsA to enhance anthracycline cytotoxicity. These results indicate that addition of CsA to an induction and consolidation regimen containing infusional DNR significantly reduces resistance to DNR, prolongs the duration of remission, and improves overall survival in patients with poor-risk AML.

Oral clonidine in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer experiencing tamoxifen-induced hot flashes: a University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program study.

BACKGROUND: Hot flashes are the most frequently reported side effect of tamoxifen treatment. Although hormones are an effective treatment, their safety is questionable in women with breast cancer. It is therefore important to evaluate nonhormonal treatments for hot flashes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of oral clonidine for control of hot flashes associated with tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program. PATIENTS: 194 postmenopausal women with breast cancer who were receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. INTERVENTION: Oral clonidine hydrochloride, 0.1 mg/d, or placebo for 8 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: In a daily diary, patients recorded number, duration, and severity of hot flashes and overall quality-of-life score (on a 10-point scale) during a 1-week baseline period and during the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks of the study. RESULTS: Patients in the placebo and treatment groups were similar in age, duration of tamoxifen use, reported frequency and duration of hot flashes at baseline, and dropout rates. One hundred forty-nine patients completed 12 weeks of follow-up. The mean decrease in hot flash frequency was greater in the clonidine group than in the placebo group after 4 weeks of treatment (37% compared with 20% [95% CI for difference, 7% to 27%]) and 8 weeks of treatment (38% compared with 24% [CI for difference, 3% to 27%]). Patients receiving clonidine were more likely than patients receiving placebo to report difficulty sleeping (41% compared with 21%; P = 0.02). A significant difference was seen in the mean change in quality-of-life scores (0.3 points in the clonidine group compared with -0.2 points in the placebo group; P = 0.02) at 8 weeks, although the median difference was 0 in both groups. CONCLUSION: Oral clonidine, 0.1 mg/d, is effective against tamoxifen-induced hot flashes in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Treatment of poor-prognosis extensive disease small-cell lung cancer with an all-oral regimen of etoposide and cyclophosphamide - a Southwest Oncology Group clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

PURPOSE: An all-oral regimen of etoposide and cyclophosphamide was developed for use in poor-prognosis extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. Limited pharmacokinetic sampling was used to derive a pharmacodynamic model predictive of myelosuppression early in the course of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were chemotherapy-naive and had extensive disease small-cell lung cancer with either SWOG performance status 2 or serum albumin <3.5 g/dl. The first cohort (n = 18) received etoposide orally at 50 mg daily and cyclophosphamide orally at 50 mg daily days 1-14 every 28 days. Due to good hematologic tolerance, the second cohort (n = 39) received both agents orally at 50 mg twice daily days 1-14 every 28 days. Plasma etoposide levels were determined in samples drawn at baseline, and at 1 h, 2 h, and 23.5 h (trough) after the first dose. Linear regression analysis was used to determine pharmacokinetic and demographic parameters predictive of myelosuppression. RESULTS: A total of 173 treatment cycles were delivered. Patients on the daily regimen had a 22% response rate (complete and partial), a 22% unconfirmed response rate, and a 5-month median survival, while patients on the twice-daily regimen had a 28% response rate (complete and partial), a 13% unconfirmed response rate, and a 7-month median survival. Granulocytopenia and alopecia were the most common toxicities seen. Significant granulocytopenia could be predicted for the twice-daily regimen according to the formula ln(AGC nadir)=7.80 - 1.88(trough), with an increased incidence of granulocytopenia if the etoposide trough value was >/=1.49 microg/ml. CONCLUSION: Oral etoposide and oral cyclophosphamide given days 1-14 every 28 days is well tolerated and results in an acceptable response rate and median survival in poor-prognosis (poor performance status or low serum albumin) extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. A trough etoposide level obtained within 24 h of starting therapy can predict severe granulocytopenia.

A phase III comparison of high dose ARA-C (HIDAC) versus HIDAC plus mitoxantrone in the treatment of first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia Southwest Oncology Group Study.

The aim of this study is to determine whether the addition of mitoxantrone to high dose cytarabine improves the outcome of treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One hundred and sixty-two eligible patients, 14-76 years of age, with AML either in first relapse or that failed to respond to initial remission induction therapy, with no CNS involvement were randomized to receive therapy with cytarabine 3 gm/M2 i.v. over 2 h every 12 h for 12 doses on days 1-6 (Arm I) (HIDAC); or HIDAC plus mitoxantrone 10 mg/M2 i.v. daily on days 7 9 (Arm II) (HIDAC + M). Patients achieving complete remission were treated with three courses of consolidation including HIDAC (Ara-C 3 gm/M2 i.v. 12 h days 1 3; 2 gm/M2 over age 50) alone (ARM I) or with mitoxantrone (10 mg/M2 i.v. day 1) (ARM II). Among 162 patients (81 HIDAC, 81 HIDAC + M) evaluated for induction toxicity, there were 10 (12%) induction deaths with HIDAC and 13 (17%) with HIDAC + M (2-tailed P = 0.65). Most early deaths were due to infection and/or hemorrhage. Among 162 patients evaluated for responses to induction therapy, 26/81 (32%) HIDAC and 36/81 (44%) HIDAC + M patients achieved complete remission (two-tailed P = 0.15). Although this difference was not statistically significant in univariate analysis, it was after adjusting for the effects of WBC and PMN percentage in multivariate analysis (P=0.013). Median survivals from study entry were 8 months (HIDAC) and 6 months (HIDAC + M); 2-tailed logrank P = 0.58. Among 48 patients registered for consolidation, the median disease-free survivals from that registration were 8 months with HIDAC and 11 months with HIDAC + M (P = 0.60). There were three treatment-related deaths during consolidation (1 HIDAC, 2 HIDAC + M), all due to infections. In this randomized trial, the addition of mitoxantrone to high-dose cytarabine was associated with a trend toward a higher CR rate. There was less evidence for an advantage in disease-free or overall survival, although any such conclusion is limited by the size of the study.

Use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists to prevent nausea and emesis caused by chemotherapy for patients with breast carcinoma in community practice settings.

BACKGROUND: Although 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are clinically more effective in controlling emesis, particularly that caused by high dose cisplatin, than previously available agents, they appear to be less effective against nausea. This report focuses on the effectiveness of these agents against nausea and emesis in patients receiving two moderately emetogenic combination chemotherapy regimens as treatment for breast carcinoma in community practice settings. METHODS: Six hundred ninety-two breast carcinoma patients (688 female, 4 male; mean age, 51 years) enrolled in a nonrandomized study completed the Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis (MANE) following 4 consecutive chemotherapy treatments. The frequency, duration, and severity of postchemotherapy nausea (PN) and postchemotherapy emesis (PE) were compared by type of antiemetic (5-HT3 receptor antagonist vs. other) and chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin with or without 5-fluorouracil [CA/CAF] vs. cyclophosphamide, methrotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil [CMF]). RESULTS: Within each regimen, the mean duration of PN was significantly longer for patients who received a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist than for those who were not given an antiemetic of that type (CA: 40.3 hours vs. 29.6 hours, P < 0.05; CMF: 37.6 hours vs. 30.2 hours, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the frequency or severity of nausea or in the frequency, severity, or duration of emesis by type of antiemetic for patients receiving either regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study suggest that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are no more effective than other commonly used medications in controlling postchemotherapy nausea and emesis in women with breast carcinoma who are treated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in community practice settings. In fact, they may be associated with significant prolongation of the course of postchemotherapy nausea.

Anticipatory nausea and vomiting in the era of 5-HT3 antiemetics.

Cancer chemotherapy is known to lead to nausea and vomiting in a large proportion of cases. If emesis is severe it can lead in its turn to anticipatory nausea and vomiting (ANV), which cannot be controlled by antiemetic medication. The etiology of ANV and various methods that have been used to counteract the condition are discussed.

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest oncology group study (9031).

Older age is a poor prognosis factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This double-blind trial was designed to test the hypothesis that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used as supportive care could improve the treatment of elderly AML patients. Two hundred thirty-four patients 55 or more years of age with a morphologic diagnosis of de novo or secondary AML, French-American-British (FAB) M0-M7, excluding M3, were randomly assigned to a standard induction regimen (daunorubicin at 45 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] on days 1 through 3 and Ara-C at 200 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion on days 1 through 7) plus either placebo or G-CSF (400 microg/m2 IV over 30 minutes once daily). Results are reported here for 211 centrally confirmed cases of non-M3 AML. The two groups were well balanced in demographic, clinical, and hematological parameters, with median ages of 68 years in the G-CSF and 67 years in the placebo groups. The complete response (CR) rate was not significantly better in the G-CSF group: 50% in the placebo and 41% in the G-CSF group (one-tailed P = .89). Median overall survival was also similar, 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7 to 10 months) in the placebo and 6 months (95% CI, 3 to 8 months) in the G-CSF arms (P = .71). We found a significant 15% reduction in the time to neutrophil recovery in the G-CSF group (P = .014). G-CSF had no impact on recovery from thrombocytopenia (P = .80) or duration of first hospitalization (P = .27). When infection complications were evaluated, G-CSF had a beneficial effect on the duration but not on incidence of infection. G-CSF patients had fewer days with fever and shorter duration of antibiotic use. However, there was no difference in the frequency of total documented infections or in the number of fatal infections (19% placebo v 20% G-CSF). In this study of elderly AML patients, G-CSF improved clinical parameters of duration of neutropenia and antibiotic use, but did not change CR rate or survival or shorten hospitalization.

Progress in reducing anticipatory nausea and vomiting: a study of community practice.

Chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting (NV) in 300 consecutive patients treated in community practices prior to the availability of 5-HT3 antiemetics (9/87 to 1/91) were compared with NV in a second sample of 300 patients treated after their commercial introduction (9/93 to 2/95). Eighty-six percent of the later patients received 5-HT3 antiemetics, and significantly fewer (43.3%) reported one or more episodes of posttreatment vomiting during their first four cycles of chemotherapy compared with those in the previous sample (55.0%: P < .01). Identical numbers of both groups (79.3%) reported at least one episode of posttreatment nausea. A significant increase in the average duration of both posttreatment nausea (from 28.1 h to 37.2 h; P = 0.001) and posttreatment vomiting (from 10.9 h-16.5 h, P = .02) was found; no significant differences were seen in the reported severity of either symptom. The proportion of patients experiencing at least one episode of anticipatory nausea (31.0% vs 32.0%) or anticipatory vomiting (7.7% vs 6.3%) did not differ significantly (P > 0.5) between groups, nor were there significant differences in the duration or severity of anticipatory symptoms (P > 0.4 for all comparisons). The reduction in the frequency of posttreatment vomiting supports research findings of efficacy. Findings of an increase in duration of posttreatment nausea and emesis and no change in the frequency of posttreatment nausea or in anticipatory symptoms show a continuing need for progress in control of posttreatment emesis and emphasize the need for further research on the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea.

Megestrol acetate and aminoglutethimide/hydrocortisone in sequence or in combination as second-line endocrine therapy of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group phase III trial.

PURPOSE: A phase III randomized trial was performed to determine whether combination hormonal therapy with aminoglutethimide (AG) and hydrocortisone (HC) plus megestrol acetate (MA) improved response rates, response duration, or increased survival over the sequential use of each hormone in women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had maintained stable disease for at least 6 months or responded to tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eighty-eight postmenopausal women with progressive estrogen receptor-positive MBC were randomly selected to receive MA 40 mg four times daily (arm I), AG 250 mg four times daily with HC 40 mg daily in divided doses (arm II), versus the combination of MA plus AG given at the same dosages (arm III). Patients on arms I and II who progressed after an adequate trial were crossed over to the other treatment arm. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five eligible patients were evaluated for response, time to treatment failure, and survival. Response was only reported for patients with measurable disease and was not statistically different among the three arms. There were two partial responses (PRs) on MA (6%), four complete responses (CRs) and six PRs on AG (24%), and eight PRs and three CRs on MA plus AG (23%) in 32, 42, and 48 measurable patients, respectively. Median times to treatment failure were also similar at 5, 4, and 7 months. Survival was also not statistically different among the three arms at 26, 27, and 26 months for arms I, II, and III, respectively. Toxicity was greater in the two AG arms with respect to fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and rash. CONCLUSION: With the exception of toxicity, there is no response, time to treatment failure, or survival benefit for any one group when comparing MA, AG, or the combination at their stated doses in women with estrogen receptor-positive MBC who had previously responded to or stabilized with tamoxifen.

A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Interest in high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) for both induction and postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prompted the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to initiate a randomized trial comparing HDAC with standard-dose cytarabine (SDAC) for remission induction of previously untreated AML and to compare high-dose treatment versus conventional doses for consolidation therapy. Patients less than 65 years of age with de novo or secondary AML were randomized for induction between SDAC 200 mg/ m2/d for 7 days by continuous infusion or HDAC at 2 g/ m2 intravenously every 12 hours for 12 doses; both groups received daunorubicin (DNR) at 45 mg/m2/d intravenously for 3 days. Complete responders to SDAC were randomized to receive either two additional courses of SDAC plus DNR or one course of HDAC plus DNR. Complete responders to HDAC were nonrandomly assigned to receive one additional course of HDAC plus DNR. Of patients randomized between SDAC (n = 493) and HDAC (n = 172) induction, 361 achieved complete remission (CR). The CR rate was slightly poorer with HDAC: 55% versus 58% with SDAC for patients aged less than 50, and 45% (HDAC) versus 53% (SDAC) for patients aged 50 to 64 (age-adjusted one-tailed P = .96). With a median follow-up time of 51 months, survival was not significantly better with HDAC (P = .41); the estimated survival rate at 4 years was 32% (HDAC) versus 22% (SDAC) for those aged less than 50, and 13% (HDAC) versus 11% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. However, relapse-free survival was somewhat better following HDAC Induction (P = .049): 33% (HDAC) versus 21% (SDAC) at 4 years for those aged less than 50, and 21% (HDAC) versus 9% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. Induction with HDAC was associated with a significantly increased risk of fatal (P = .0033) and neurologic (P < .0001) toxicity. Among patients who achieved CR with SDAC, survival and disease-free survival (DFS) following consolidation randomization were not significantly better with HDAC compared with SDAC (P = .77 and .46, respectively). Patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had the best postremission outcomes; however, the proportion of CR patients who did not go on to protocol consolidation therapy was more than twice as high after HDAC induction compared with SDAC. Induction therapy with HDAC plus DNR was associated with greater toxicity than SDAC plus DNR, but with no improvement in CR rate or survival. Following CR induction with SDAC, consolidation with HDAC increased toxicity but not survival or DFS. In a nonrandomized comparison, patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had superior survival and DFS compared with those who received SDAC induction with either SDAC or HDAC consolidation.

Phase II evaluation of mitoxantrone plus cis-platinum in patients with advanced breast cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

The Southwest Oncology Group studied the response rate and toxicity of mitoxantrone (7.5 or 10 mg/m2 to 12.0 mg/m2) and cis-platinum (100 mg/m2) in 30 patients with advanced breast cancer as second-line therapy. There were 2 partial responses in 29 eligible patients. Toxicity was considerable, with 27 patients having grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Grade 3-4 toxicity included vomiting, thrombocytopenia, granulocytopenia, leukopenia and anemia. The combination of mitoxantrone plus cis-platinum has minimal activity as second-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer.

Evaluation of cisplatin and DTIC in inoperable stage III and IV melanoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

The Southwest Oncology Group entered 62 patients with Stage IV or inoperable Stage III (one patient) melanoma into SWOG protocol 8804 and treated them with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and DTIC 750 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 15-30 minutes. There were 18 patients with brain metastases and four ocular primaries. Five patients, all without bain metastases, were ineligible. Responses of 8 patients could not be determined, and 11 patients received only one course of treatment. Of the eligible patients, 46 (81%) had some hematologic toxicities, with 31 of these (67%) having grade III or worse. There were 23 patients (40%) with renal toxicities. The miscellaneous toxicities were muscle weakness, flu-like symptoms, and fatigue. Five patients died while on treatment. There were no complete responses. Eight patients had partial responses ranging from 1.5 to 10.5 months, although two patients were still alive at 30.4 and 30.9 months. The estimated response rate for patients with brain metastases was 11%. The estimated response rate for patients without brain metastases was 13%. If one unconfirmed partial response is included, the overall response rate is 14% with a 95% confidence interval of 6% to 26%. It is concluded that DTIC and cisplatin have definite activity in melanoma, but, at least in this population, the toxicity is treatment-limiting and requires close attention to patient care.

Phase II trial of echinomycin for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Forty-nine patients with metastatic or recurrent renal cell carcinoma were treated on a phase II trial of Echinomycin. Treatment consisted of Echinomycin 1.25 mg/m2 intravenously every 28 days. Among the 47 evaluable patients there were no complete responses and only one partial response for an overall response rate of 2% (95% confidence interval, 0-11%). Eighteen patients (38%) experienced toxicity of grade 3 or worse. The most common toxicities were nausea and vomiting. The results of this study indicate that Echinomycin is not sufficiently active to warrant further trials for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Phase II study of taxol in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Taxol, a complex plant product (a diterpene) extracted from the bark of Taxus brevifolia, has demonstrated substantial anticancer activity in ovarian and breast cancers, malignant melanoma, and acute myelogenous leukemia. Due to allergic reactions in phase I and early phase II studies, use of a 24-hour infusion of taxol with prophylactic dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine has been recommended. PURPOSE: In this phase II study, we attempted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of taxol in patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer who had never received chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were not excluded because of prior surgery or because of radiotherapy administered more than 4 weeks before study entry. Taxol was administered in the hospital at a dose of 200 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 24 hours and repeated every 3 weeks, provided that patients had recovered from any toxic effects. Dexamethasone, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine were given before chemotherapy to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Therapy was continued for at least two courses unless there was rapid disease progression and for at least three courses if no change was observed and no grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred. Treatment was continued for six more courses after maximum response or for two more courses after complete remission but was discontinued if disease progressed. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients entered in the study, 25 were assessable for toxic effects and response. One patient had an allergic reaction that was not life threatening. The overall response rate was 24% (one complete response and five partial responses). An additional seven patients (28%) had minor response. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect, and neutropenic fever occurred in eight of 118 courses. One additional patient developed neutropenic sepsis with hypotension but recovered with intensive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Taxol appears to have activity against non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. IMPLICATIONS: A phase II study combining taxol, etoposide, and cisplatin and using hematopoietic stimulating factors is now proposed. The optimal dose for combination chemotherapy has yet to be determined. An important consideration is potential cardiac effects of taxol with other drugs.

Phase II trial of amonafide in previously treated patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Twenty-three patients with metastatic or recurrent Stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer who were refractory to or relapsed following previous chemotherapy with cisplatin or a cisplatin analog were entered into a phase II study of amonafide. The starting dose of amonafide was 300 mg/m2 delivered daily over 1 hr by intravenous infusion. In the absence of myelosuppression, the dose of amonafide was escalated by increments of 75 mg/m2 to a maximum of 450 mg/m2. There were 19 eligible and 17 fully evaluable patients. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia occurred in 14 (74%) patients and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 6 (32%) patients. No objective complete or partial responses were observed. Four patients had stable disease for 3, 4, 4.5, and 6 months, respectively. Therefore, amonafide in the doses used in the present trial does not have significant activity in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer.

Combination cisplatin and dichloromethotrexate in patients with advanced bladder cancer. Phase 2. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

The combination of cisplatin and dichloromethotrexate is a pharmacologically rational strategy designed to avoid the nephrotoxicity associated with the systemic chemotherapy of bladder cancer. Of 97 patients with metastatic bladder cancer entered into this study 73 with good renal function received cisplatin and dichloromethotrexate, while 24 with impaired renal function received dichloromethotrexate alone. No responses were noted in the latter group. A 42% response rate (95% exact confidence interval 30.0 to 55.2%), including 9 patients (14%) who achieved a complete response, was observed in the combination group. The toxicity patterns in both groups of patients were consistent with the hypothesis that renal toxicity would be ameliorated with the use of the methotrexate analogue. However, the failure to achieve a higher overall response rate despite near maximum tolerated doses of dichloromethotrexate discourages future studies with this agent. New agents for metastatic bladder cancer should be tested as first line therapy.

Analysis of treatment failure in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia patients over fifty years of age. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Fourteen participating centers registered 33 patients on a Southwest Oncology Group Study of adults with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia (ANLL). Induction consisted of cytosine arabinoside 70 mg/m2 days 1-7 by continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion, VP-16 50 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 hour days 1-3, and daunomycin 30 mg/m2 i.v. bolus days 1-3. Twenty-five patients (median age 69 years) were evaluable for response. Eleven (44%) achieved a remission marrow but only 8 fulfilled both blood and marrow criteria for complete remission. Of the 11 patients with a remission marrow, there were no patients over 70 years of age. Major coexisting disease data were evaluated. Only 5 patients had no major coexisting disease and 4 of those 5 achieved a remission marrow. The study illustrates and underscores the following problems of remission induction in the elderly: (a) increased susceptibility to the stress of the induction period, with 6 patients (24%) dying before treatment day sixteen; (b) disease resistance to antileukemic therapy with persistent ANLL in 6 patients (24%), despite two induction courses; and (c) hematopoietic stem cell sensitivity in the elderly with marrow regeneration failure documented in 2 patients (8%) following induction. Acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in the elderly has a poor prognosis, and novel therapeutic approaches are warranted.

Alternating weekly doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin followed by weekly doxorubicin and daily cyclophosphamide in stage IV breast cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Twenty-seven women with metastatic breast cancer were treated with doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) every other week, alternating with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and high-dose calcium leucovorin, for a 12-week induction regimen, followed by weekly doxorubicin and oral daily cyclophosphamide. Twenty-five women were eligible and evaluable. Of these, complete response occurred in two patients (8%) and partial response in six patients (24%), for a total response rate of 32%. Toxicity was similar to that seen in previous Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trials in this patient population. Response rates in this study were inferior, with comparable median survivals to those of previous SWOG studies that are reviewed. Additional, more dose-intensive approaches incorporating newer approaches to the administration of cancer chemotherapeutic agents are planned.