Analysis of Extracellular Fluid Volume in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients before and after Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To examine the relationship of extracellular fluid (ECF) volume and osmotic excess with treatment modality, we retrospectively analyzed spontaneous body weight loss and osmotic excretion versus true body weight after kidney transplantation in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and preemptive transplant recipients compared with hemodialysis (HD) patients. We also examined maximum bladder volume in other transplant recipients on PD. METHODS: From 2005 to 2011, 42 PD patients underwent kidney transplantation at our institution. Patients aged <12 years and cadaveric transplantations were excluded; we enrolled 27 PD patients (PD group; age 35.7 ± 14.4 years at transplantation; dialysis duration 36.5 ± 31.2 months) and 14 adult preemptive kidney transplant patients (preemptive group; age 31.7 ± 15.7 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate 8.26 ± 1.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 at transplantation). From 2005 to 2006, 29 adult living-related donor kidney transplant recipients on HD support (HD group) were enrolled as controls (age 36.4 ± 11.3 years; dialysis duration 37.5 ± 55.2 months). RESULTS: Percentage body weight loss at 1 month after transplantation was 5% from ideal body weight for the PD group (51.2 ± 14.3 to 48.6 ± 13.0 kg, p = 0.002), 5.1% for the preemptive group (56.7 ± 17.4 to 53.8 ± 16.5 kg, p = 0.0005), and 1% for the HD group (52.9 ± 12.4 to 52.1 ± 12.5 kg, p = 0.079); post-transplantation 24-h osmotic excretion was greater in the PD and preemptive groups (387.3 ± 175.7 mOsm) groups than in HD (250 ± 124 mOsm; p = 0.006. Another 69 adult living-related donor kidney transplant recipients (PD and HD support) with dialysis duration ≤5 years were examined. Mean dialysis duration differed in the HD (17.5 ± 13.1 months) and PD (29.6 ± 20.4 months, p = 0.015) groups; mean urine volume and maximum desire to void (MDV) were similar. CONCLUSION: ECF volume and osmotic excess occurred in the PD and preemptive groups compared with the HD group pre-transplantation. Although PD maintains MDV and residual and total urine volume, ECF volume and osmotic excess should be monitored before transplant; pre-transplant HD support should always be considered in PD and preemptive transplant patients.

Living-Donor Kidney Transplant With Preformed Donor-Specific Antibodies.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated outcomes in living-donor kidney transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (detected with flow cytometry and specified with the LABScreen single antigen test) under desensitization pretransplant and immunosuppression posttransplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 15 recipients included, 8 had ABO-incompatible kidney transplant. Six patients had sensitization caused by pregnancy, 8 by blood transfusion, 5 by previous transplants, and 1 by unknown cause. Desensitization was initiated using calcineurin inhibitors, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil 30 days pretransplant, with rituximab administered 1 and 10 days pretransplant. Patients underwent plasmapheresis 1, 3, and 5 days pretransplant. Antithymocyte globulin was admi nistered for 5 days posttransplant as induction therapy. At 3 and 12 months posttransplant, all recipients underwent protocol renal allograft biopsies, with donor-specific antibodies simultaneously measured with the single antigen test. RESULTS: T-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative in all 15 recipients, but T-cell and B-cell flow cytometry was positive in 8 and 14 recipients, respectively. Anti-HLA class I antibodies became negative, except in 1 recipient 3 months posttransplant. Class II antibodies remained positive in 8 recipients 3 months posttransplant. No clinical or subclinical T-cell-mediated rejection occurred, but 1 recipient experienced clinical acute antibody-mediated rejection. At 3 and 12 months posttransplant, 8 and 5 recipients had subclinical acute antibody-mediated rejection. Cytomegalovirus test showed positivity in 14 recipients, but none developed cytomegalovirus disease. BK viremia was detected in 2 recipients, with 1 developing BK virus nephropathy, which was reversed by reducing immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients with preformed donor-specific antibodies showed good outcomes in terms of desensitization and immunosuppression. However, most anti-HLA class II donor-specific antibodies remained, and microvascular inflammation score could indicate long-term risk of renal allograft dysfunction.

Surgical Challenge in Pediatric Kidney Transplant: Lower Urinary Tract Abnormality.

Lower urinary tract abnormalities are difficult to resolve in pediatric kidney transplant patients. Measure of residual urine, voiding cystourethrography, retrograde urethrography, cystometry, electromyography of urethral external sphincter muscle, urethrometry, and uroflowmetry are the primary methods for evaluation of lower urinary tract abnormalities. Endoscopic resection or ablation of urethral valves is required in children with posterior urethral valve to treat obstruction, but bladder function does not always recover and may deteriorate to end-stage renal failure even after the obstruction is released. This bladder dysfunction in posterior urethral valve defines valve bladder syndrome. Vesicoureteral reflux caused by high vesical pressure can cause even worse renal graft function posttransplant. In our patient group, urinary diversion occurred with Mitrofanoff conduit using an appendix in 6 children, a Yang-Monti channel conduit using ileum in 1 patient, with cystostomy in 3 children, and with augmented cystoplasty in 9 children before or simultaneously with kidney transplant. These procedures should be selected based on the type of lower urinary tract abnormality including bladder function. Recently, we have preferred a continent diversion for self-catheterization in children with lower urinary tract abnormalities. We have conducted 9 augmented cystoplasty procedures using a portion of the sigmoid colon or ileum. Seventeen children retained their own bladders when the transplant ureter was implanted. Most patients needed clean intermittent catheterization, depending on the residual urine volume and a bladder function. Ten-year graft survival rate in kidney transplant in our department is 98% in 36 children with lower urinary tract abnormalities. Lower urinary tract abnormality is not always a risk factor for pediatric kidney transplant; however, a preoperative evaluation is important to choose the best option for urinary diversion.

[A case of ectopic ureterocele in a male adult found during examination of a traumatic injury].

We report a case of ectopic ureterocele in a male adult found during examination of a traumatic injury. A 26-year-old man sustained a blow to his left back during a football game and was admitted to the hospital with a complaint of abdominal pain. The computed tomographic scan showed a huge cystic mass in the retroperitoneum. A cystoscope revealed a large bulge from the left ureteral orifice to the bladder neck and another ureteral orifice distal to the bulge. Retrograde pyelography revealed an ectopic ureterocele showing a complete duplication, a lateral deviation of the left ureter and a bladder deviation to the right. An ectopic ureteral orifice was opening in the posterior urethra. An ureteral catheter inserted into this orifice revealed a dilated left ureter from the upper half of the kidney. Because the function of left upper of kidney was maintained, a transurethral incision was performed. Vesicoureteral reflux remained, but the postoperative course was uneventful. We discuss 11 cases of ectopic ureterocele in male adults including this case.