RESUMEN
Importance: Although early fluid administration has been shown to lower sepsis mortality, positive fluid balance has been associated with adverse outcomes. Little is known about associations in non-intensive care unit settings, with growing concern about readmission from excess fluid accumulation in patients with sepsis. Objective: To evaluate whether positive fluid balance among non-critically ill patients with sepsis was associated with increased readmission risk, including readmission for heart failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, among 57â¯032 non-critically ill adults hospitalized for sepsis at 21 hospitals across Northern California. Kaiser Permanente Northern California is an integrated health care system with a community-based population of more than 4.4 million members. Statistical analysis was performed from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Exposures: Intake and output net fluid balance (I/O) measured daily and cumulatively at discharge (positive vs negative). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. The secondary outcomes were readmission stratified by category and mortality after living discharge. Results: The cohort included 57â¯032 patients who were hospitalized for sepsis (28â¯779 women [50.5%]; mean [SD] age, 73.7 [15.5] years). Compared with patients with positive I/O (40â¯940 [71.8%]), those with negative I/O (16â¯092 [28.2%]) were older, with increased comorbidity, acute illness severity, preexisting heart failure or chronic kidney disease, diuretic use, and decreased fluid administration volume. During 30-day follow-up, 8719 patients (15.3%) were readmitted and 3639 patients (6.4%) died. There was no difference in readmission between patients with positive vs negative I/O (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.95-1.05). No association was detected between readmission and I/O using continuous, splined, and quadratic function transformations. Positive I/O was associated with decreased heart failure-related readmission (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71-0.91]) and increased 30-day mortality (HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.15-1.31]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large observational study of non-critically ill patients hospitalized with sepsis, there was no association between positive fluid balance at the time of discharge and readmission. However, these findings may have been limited by variable recording and documentation of fluid intake and output; additional studies are needed to examine the association of fluid status with outcomes in patients with sepsis to reduce readmission risk.
Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Equilibrio Hidroelectrolítico , Adulto , Anciano , California , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Hospitalized vascular surgery patients have multiple severe comorbidities, poor functional status, and high perioperative cardiac risk. Thus they may be ideal patients for a collaborative care model. However, there is little evidence for a comanagement model on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The two-year pre-post study consisted of a comanagement model where a hospitalist actively participated in the medical care of American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classification scale 3 or 4 vascular surgery patients. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, pain scores, and patient safety metrics. RESULTS: With comanagement, patient complications decreased from 3.5 to 2.2 events per 1000 patients. (p = 0.045). Mortality decreased from 2.01% to 1.00% (p = 0.049), corresponding to a decrease in the risk-adjusted observed to expected mortality rate ratio from 1.22 to 0.53 (p = 0.01). Patient reported pain scores improved; more patients in the comanagement cohort expressed no pain (72% vs 82.8%; p = 0.01) and there were reductions in reports of mild and moderate pain. There was no significant difference in the risk-adjusted length of stay (observed to expected ratio 0.83 to 0.88 for the pre-intervention and comanagement groups, respectively, p = 0.48). The 30-day readmission rate was unchanged (21.9 vs 20.6% p = 0.44). Patients in the intervention period were more clinically complex, as evidenced by the greater case mix index (2.21 vs 2.44). CONCLUSIONS: After two years of implementation, our comanagement service reduced complications, mortality, and pain scores among high-risk vascular surgery patients.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Médicos Hospitalarios/organización & administración , Médicos Hospitalarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Anciano , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Hospitales con más de 500 Camas , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
The advancement of focal therapy technology for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) is emerging as an option for a middle ground between radical therapies and active surveillance for individuals identified with localized, low-grade PCa. Two promising techniques are high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and focal cryoablation. Both focal cryoablation and HIFU show promise, but additional prospective trials are necessary before any definitive conclusions can be made on either method's viability.