Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nutr Clin Pract ; 37(5): 1172-1179, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34528297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Levocarnitine deficiency has been observed in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) and can cause or worsen hypertriglyceridemia. The objective was to characterize use of levocarnitine supplementation in PN and evaluate its effect on triglyceride levels in hospitalized adults. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with triglyceride levels ≥175 mg/dl while receiving PN who had a subsequent reduction in lipid injectable emulsion dose. A piecewise linear regression was used to evaluate trends in triglyceride levels before and after the intervention, defined as initiation of levocarnitine in PN for the levocarnitine group, or reduction in lipid injectable emulsion alone for the control group. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one patients who received PN had an elevated triglyceride level and lipid injectable emulsion dose reduction, of which 97 (37.2%) received levocarnitine in PN. The median (IQR) levocarnitine dose added to PN was 8.0 (5.7-9.9) mg/kg. Triglyceride levels at 30 days post-intervention did not differ between groups (125 vs 176 mg/dl, P = .345). The addition of levocarnitine to PN was associated with a significantly greater rate of reduction in triglyceride levels pre-intervention to post-intervention compared with a reduction in lipid injectable emulsion alone (-11 vs -3 mg/dl per day; 95% CI, -15 to -2; P = .012). CONCLUSION: In hospitalized adults with hypertriglyceridemia who had a lipid injectable emulsion dose reduction, the addition of levocarnitine in PN was not associated with a difference in triglyceride levels at 30 days; however, a greater rate of improvement in pre-intervention to post-intervention triglyceride levels was observed.


Asunto(s)
Emulsiones Grasas Intravenosas , Hipertrigliceridemia , Carnitina/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Emulsiones Grasas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipertrigliceridemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertrigliceridemia/etiología , Nutrición Parenteral/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Triglicéridos
2.
Pancreas ; 50(6): 834-840, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347733

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of postoperative glycemic control on postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients at The Johns Hopkins Hospital between April 2015 and April 2016. Data were collected on postoperative insulin regimens, blood glucose, rates of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and postoperative complications and were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 244 patients, 114 (46.7%) experienced at least 1 hyperglycemic (>180 mg/dL) episode and 16 (6.6%) experienced at least 1 hypoglycemic episode (<70 mg/dL) during the first postoperative 24 hours. Early postoperative hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) was associated with a significantly higher rate of surgical site infections (15.7% vs 7%; P = 0.031). Late postoperative hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) was associated with a significantly higher rate of fistulas (4.3% vs 14.6%; P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Early hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) is associated with a higher risk of surgical site infections while late hyperglycemia is associated with a higher risk of fistulas. Intensive glucose control (<150 mg/dL) was not demonstrated to decrease the risk of postoperative complications. Similar to other critically ill populations, targeting a glucose goal of <180 mg/dL may be an appropriate target to reduce morbidity without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , Control Glucémico/métodos , Hiperglucemia/sangre , Hipoglucemia/sangre , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/epidemiología , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(1): 101-106, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32379860

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optimal valganciclovir dosing for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in solid-organ transplant (SOT) patients on continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) is not known. Ganciclovir trough concentrations ≥0.60 µg/mL have been suggested for CMV prophylaxis. This study was conducted to determine if valganciclovir 450 mg enterally every 24 hours achieves ganciclovir trough concentrations ≥0.60 µg/mL in patients on CVVHD. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, open-label, pharmacokinetic study included adult SOT patients admitted to an intensive care unit from March 2018 to June 2019 on CVVHD. All patients were receiving valganciclovir 450 mg enterally every 24 hours for CMV prophylaxis prior to enrollment. Each patient had a peak and trough sample drawn at steady state. RESULTS: Ten SOT patients were included in the study (6 liver, 1 simultaneous liver-kidney, 2 bilateral lung, 1 heart). The mean ± SD age was 51.8 ± 14.0 years, and average body mass index was 27 ± 6.9 kg/m2. Ganciclovir trough concentrations ranged from 0.31 to 3.16 µg/mL, and 80% of participants have trough concentrations ≥0.60 µg/mL. No patients had documented neutropenia while on valganciclovir and CVVHD; 60% of patients had significant thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Valganciclovir 450 mg enterally every 24 hours achieved ganciclovir trough concentrations ≥0.60 µg/mL in most patients on CVVHD, similar to those reported with intravenous ganciclovir for prophylaxis in this population. Based on these data, valganciclovir may require dosing every 24 hours to achieve concentrations equivalent to ganciclovir. Neutropenia did not occur in the study period. Thrombocytopenia was common and likely multifactorial.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo Renal Continuo , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Órganos , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Citomegalovirus , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Ganciclovir/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Valganciclovir/uso terapéutico
4.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(11): 1361-1365, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32851920

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is variation in the treatment of patients with severe alcohol withdrawal and a need for effective protocols. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a symptom-triggered benzodiazepine protocol using the 5-item Brief Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (BAWS) for treatment of alcohol withdrawal in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: This retrospective study included admissions to ICUs of 2 hospitals over 6 months who had an alcohol withdrawal protocol ordered and experienced severe withdrawal. Records were reviewed to collect demographic data, benzodiazepine exposure, duration of treatment, and withdrawal severity. RESULTS: The protocol was ordered and implemented in 279 admissions; 48 (17.9%) had severe withdrawal defined as a BAWS of 6 or more. The majority of the 48 patients were from the emergency department (79.2%); mean hospital length of stay was 11.2 days and mean ICU stay 6.6 days; 31.3% required mechanical ventilation. A little more than half were treated only with the protocol (53.2%); 25.0% received additional benzodiazepines, 20.8% dexmedetomidine, 10.4% propofol, 25.0% antipsychotics and 2.0% phenobarbital. CONCLUSION: Among ICU patients treated for alcohol withdrawal with a symptom-triggered benzodiazepine protocol using a novel 5-item scale, most did not develop severe withdrawal, and of those who did, approximately half were treated with the protocol alone.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias , Alcoholismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 21(10): 859-864, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32302517

RESUMEN

Background: At a tertiary referral and Level I trauma center, current institutional guidelines suggest initial aminoglycoside doses of gentamicin or tobramycin 4 mg/kg and amikacin 16 mg/kg for patients admitted to surgical intensive care units (SICUs) with suspected gram-negative infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate initial aminoglycoside dosing and peak serum drug concentrations in critically ill surgery patients to characterize the aminoglycoside volume of distribution (Vd) and determine an optimal standardized dosing strategy. Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study included adult SICU patients who received an aminoglycoside for additional gram-negative coverage. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the patient population, aminoglycoside dosing, and Vd. Multivariable linear regression was applied to determine variables associated with greater aminoglycoside Vd. The mortality rate was compared in patients who achieved adequate initial peak concentrations versus those who did not. Results: One hundred seventeen patients received an aminoglycoside in the SICUs, of whom 58 had an appropriately timed peak concentration measurement. The mean Acute Physiology, Age, and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 27.8 ± 8.9. The Vd in patients receiving gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin was 0.49 ± 0.10, 0.41 ± 0.09, and 0.53 ± 0.13 L/kg, respectively. Together, the mean aminoglycoside Vd was 0.50 ± 0.12 L/kg. Gentamicin or tobramycin 5 mg/kg achieved goal peak concentrations in 24 patients (63.2%), and amikacin 20 mg/kg achieved the desired concentrations in nine patients (50.0%). Net fluid status, Body Mass Index, and vasopressor use were not predictive of Vd. There was no difference in the in-hospital mortality rate in patients who achieved adequate peak concentrations versus those who did not (26.8% versus 26.7%; p = 0.99). Conclusion: High aminoglycoside doses are needed in critically ill surgery patients to achieve adequate initial peak concentrations because of the high Vd. Goal peak concentrations were optimized at doses of gentamicin or tobramycin 5 mg/kg, and amikacin 20 mg/kg.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos , Enfermedad Crítica , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Gentamicinas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tobramicina
6.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 27(6): 884-892, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32337588

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Timely availability of intravenous infusion pumps is critical for high-quality care delivery. Pumps are shared among hospital units, often without central management of their distribution. This study seeks to characterize unit-to-unit pump sharing and its impact on shortages, and to evaluate a system-control tool that balances inventory across all care areas, enabling increased availability of pumps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 3832 pumps moving in a network of 5292 radiofrequency and infrared sensors from January to November 2017 at The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. We used network analysis to determine whether pump inventory in one unit was associated with inventory fluctuations in others. We used a quasi-experimental design and segmented regressions to evaluate the effect of the system-control tool on enabling safe inventory levels in all care areas. RESULTS: We found 93 care areas connected through 67,111 pump transactions and 4 discernible clusters of pump sharing. Up to 17% (95% confidence interval, 7%-27%) of a unit's pump inventory was explained by the inventory of other units within its cluster. The network analysis supported design and deployment of a hospital-wide inventory balancing system, which resulted in a 44% (95% confidence interval, 36%-53%) increase in the number of care areas above safe inventory levels. CONCLUSIONS: Network phenomena are essential inputs to hospital equipment fleet management. Consequently, benefits of improved inventory management in strategic unit(s) are capable of spreading safer inventory levels throughout the hospital.


Asunto(s)
Bombas de Infusión/provisión & distribución , Inventarios de Hospitales/organización & administración , Ocupación de Camas , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales , Unidades Hospitalarias , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
J Opioid Manag ; 16(6): 443-449, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33428191

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Over 80 percent of surgery patients experience acute post-operative pain and less than half feel their pain is adequately controlled. Patients receiving chronic opioids, including methadone, are at the highest risk of inadequate pain control. Guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for analgesia management in this population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between post-operative methadone use and respiratory depression. DESIGN: This study was a single center, retrospective, cohort study of adult patients. SETTING: Patients included were admitted to a single academic medical center from July 2016 to September 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Medical records of adult inpatients with an operative procedure who received perioperative methadone were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative methadone use was evaluated for all patients. Post-operative methadone dosing was compared to preoperative methadone dosing. Post-operative respiratory depression was evaluated. Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for respiratory depression. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-eight patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into groups based on pre-operative methadone use. Over 90 percent of patients were on preoperative methadone. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. In the initial seven post-operative days, 14.8 percent of patients had documented respiratory depression. Respiratory depression was more common among patients who were newly initiated on methadone post-operatively. Factors associated with respiratory depression included male sex, increased age, and new post-operative methadone initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who were administered post-operative methadone were on preoperative methadone. New post-operative methadone initiation was a risk factor for respiratory depression.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Metadona , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metadona/administración & dosificación , Metadona/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodo Perioperatorio , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Pancreas ; 48(8): 1050-1055, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31404027

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation can relieve pain associated with chronic pancreatitis while preserving islet function. Islet preparations are often contaminated by enteric flora. We assessed the impact of contaminated islet preparations on the prevalence of postoperative infection. METHODS: Electronic health records for patients who underwent total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation from August 1, 2011, to November 15, 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to compare the prevalence of postoperative infection in patients with a positive islet culture and islet culture negative patients. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included. Twenty-nine patients (47.5%) had a positive islet culture, and 23 (79.3%) of these patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis. The prevalence of postoperative infection did not differ between the islet culture positive and islet culture negative groups (41% vs 34%, P = 0.57). No infections occurred in the 6 islet culture positive patients who did not receive prophylaxis. No difference in intensive care unit or hospital length of stay or in 30-day or 90-day readmission rates were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the common use of postoperative systemic antimicrobials, we observed no difference in the prevalence of postoperative infection, length of stay, or hospital readmission in patients receiving a contaminated islet preparation. If prophylactic antimicrobials are used, the duration should be minimized.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/prevención & control , Adulto , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Islotes Pancreáticos/microbiología , Islotes Pancreáticos/fisiopatología , Islotes Pancreáticos/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis Crónica/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Crit Care ; 52: 180-185, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31078999

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study compared anti-Xa activity in critically ill patients receiving UFH for VTE prophylaxis between two weight groups (<100 kg vs ≥100 kg). METHODS: This prospective, observational study included critically ill patients on UFH 5000 or 7500 units every 8 h. A peak and trough anti-Xa activity assay was ordered for each patient at steady state. Goal peak anti-Xa activity was 0.1-0.3 units/mL. RESULTS: From March 2017 to June 2018, 75 patients were enrolled with 44 in the <100 kg group and 31 in the ≥100 kg group. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with peak anti-Xa activity within goal range between patients <100 kg and ≥ 100 kg (55.3% vs 35.7%, p = 0.12). The odds ratio for achieving peak anti-Xa activity within goal range as weight-based dose increased was 1.03 (95% CI 0.99-1.07). No differences were found in trough anti-Xa activity, VTE, bleeding, length of stay, or death. CONCLUSIONS: Though only one-third of patients ≥100 kg had peak anti-Xa activity within goal range, no significant difference was found between the weight groups. Additional prospective studies with adequate sample sizes are warranted to further investigate appropriate weight-based dosing of UFH in critically ill patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Peso Corporal , Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos
10.
Crit Care Med ; 47(4): 543-549, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30855330

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the point prevalence of medication errors at the time of transition of care from an ICU to non-ICU location and assess error types and risk factors for medication errors during transition of care. DESIGN: This was a multicenter, retrospective, 7-day point prevalence study. SETTING: Fifty-eight ICUs within 34 institutions in the United States and two in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: Nine-hundred eighty-five patients transferred from an ICU to non-ICU location. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 985 patients transferred, 450 (45.7%) had a medication error occur during transition of care. Among patients with a medication error, an average of 1.88 errors per patient (SD, 1.30; range, 1-9) occurred. The most common types of errors were continuation of medication with ICU-only indication (28.4%), untreated condition (19.4%), and pharmacotherapy without indication (11.9%). Seventy-five percent of errors reached the patient but did not cause harm. The occurrence of errors varied by type and size of institution and ICU. Renal replacement therapy during ICU stay and number of medications ordered following transfer were identified as factors associated with occurrence of error (odds ratio, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.42-6.05; odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI, 1.02-1.14, respectively). Orders for anti-infective (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.19-2.32), hematologic agents (1.75; 95% CI, 1.17-2.62), and IV fluids, electrolytes, or diuretics (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.21-2.48) at transition of care were associated with an increased odds of error. Factors associated with decreased odds of error included daily patient care rounds in the ICU (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07-0.34) and orders discontinued and rewritten at the time of transfer from the ICU (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of patients experienced medication errors at the time of transition of care from an ICU to non-ICU location. Most errors reached the patient but did not cause harm. This study identified risk factors upon which risk mitigation strategies should be focused.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Pase de Guardia/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gestión de Riesgos , Estados Unidos
11.
J Addict Med ; 13(5): 379-384, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30741834

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The standard of care for treatment of alcohol withdrawal is symptom-triggered dosing of benzodiazepines using a withdrawal scale. Abbreviated scales are desired for clinician efficiency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of the 5-item Brief Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (BAWS) protocol. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study assessed patients ordered the BAWS protocol between August 1, 2016 and July 31, 2017. Data were collected on benzodiazepine exposure, duration of treatment, withdrawal severity, agitation, over-sedation, and delirium while being treated for alcohol withdrawal. Comparisons were made to analyze predetermined patient subgroups. RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-nine patients were initiated on the BAWS protocol. Patients received a median (IQR) of 0 (0-4) lorazepam equivalents (LEs) and were on the BAWS protocol for a median (IQR) of 44.9 (22.4-77.2) hours. Of the patients that received benzodiazepines while on the BAWS protocol, a median (IQR) of 4 (2-11) LEs were given. Seventeen (2.1%) patients had severe withdrawal. Days of agitation, over-sedation, and delirium were minimal, with the median (IQR) of 0 (0-0). Few patients received adjunctive medications for symptom management. Intensive care unit (ICU) patients had more severe withdrawal than non-ICU patients, but received the same cumulative benzodiazepine dose. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients on the BAWS protocol received little-to-no benzodiazepines; severe withdrawal, agitation, delirium, or over-sedation were uncommon. This is the first evaluation of the BAWS protocol on a diverse population of hospitalized patients.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Tiempo de Internación , Lorazepam/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 19(5): 504-509, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29717917

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend a 2-g dose of cefotetan and cefoxitin for surgical prophylaxis. Pharmacokinetic data suggest benefit from higher cefotetan and cefoxitin dosing in obese patients. However, clinical studies examining higher dosing strategies in this at-risk population are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 3 g of cefotetan or cefoxitin administered pre-operatively for patients who weigh 120 kg or more is associated with a lower proportion of surgical site infection (SSI) compared with 2 g. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients weighing 120 kg or more who had received cefotetan or cefoxitin (2 or 3 g) as surgical prophylaxis for intra-abdominal procedures between July 2012 and August 2015 were reviewed for the development of an SSI (primary outcome), study drug-related adverse events, and re-admissions attributed to SSIs (secondary outcomes). Relative risk calculations were performed for analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: One-hundred seventy-five procedures in 169 patients were included in the study. Cefotetan was used in 81% (141/175) of procedures. Three grams of cefotetan or cefoxitin was used in 20% (35/175) of procedures. The median body mass index (BMI) in both dosing groups was 42 kg/m2 and patients who received 3 g more often weighed more than 130 kg (relative risk [RR] 1.36, 1.01-1.76; p = 0.04). Surgical site infections occurred in 20.7% within the 2-g group and 22.9% in the 3-g group (RR 1.10, 0.55-2.20; p = 0.78). There was no difference in the number of study drug-related adverse effects in the 3-g compared with the 2-g group. Thirty-day re-admissions because of SSI also did not differ between the 2-g and 3-g groups (7.9% vs. 17.1%, respectively; p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: This small retrospective study did not find a difference in SSI rates between 3-g and 2-g surgical prophylaxis dosing for patients 120 kg or more with a median BMI >40 kg/m2.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Cefotetán/administración & dosificación , Cefoxitina/administración & dosificación , Obesidad/complicaciones , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/efectos adversos , Cefotetán/efectos adversos , Cefoxitina/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Cuidados Preoperatorios/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 19(4): 388-396, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29688837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery recommend a cephamycin or cefazolin plus metronidazole for various abdominal surgeries. In February 2016, cephamycin drug shortages resulted in a change in The Johns Hopkins Hospital's (JHH) recommendation for peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in abdominal surgeries from cefotetan to cefazolin plus metronidazole. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the percentage of abdominal surgeries adherent to JHH peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. A sub-group analysis investigated whether prophylaxis with cefazolin plus metronidazole was associated with a lower rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) versus cefotetan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult inpatients who underwent an abdominal surgery at JHH in September 2015 (Study Period I: cefotetan) or February to March 2016 (Study Period II: cefazolin plus metronidazole). RESULTS: Two hundred abdominal surgery cases were included in the primary analysis. A subset of 156 surgical cases were included in the sub-group analysis. The overall adherence rate to JHH guidelines was 75% in Study Period I versus 17% in Study Period II (p < 0.001). The largest difference in adherence was attributed to pre-operative administration time (87% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), primarily because of the longer infusion time required for metronidazole. Surgical site infections occurred in 14% (12/83) of surgeries with cefotetan versus 8.2% (6/73) with cefazolin plus metronidazole for prophylaxis (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to an institution-specific peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis guideline for abdominal surgeries was limited primarily by the longer infusion time required for pre-operative metronidazole. A higher percentage of SSIs occurred among abdominal surgeries with cefotetan versus cefazolin plus metronidazole for prophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Cefotetán/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 23: 117-121, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29460786

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Current evidence and guidelines identify patient populations who may benefit from parenteral nutrition. Peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) may be indicated for a subset of patients; however, PPN therapy carries a risk of associated adverse effects. The purpose of this project was to assess appropriateness of current PPN prescribing practices at an academic medical center to determine whether additional guidance and oversight may be beneficial. METHODS: Adult patients admitted from August 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015 with at least one order of PPN administered were included. PPN use was evaluated for appropriateness using definitions derived from clinical practice guidelines and standard of practice. Adverse events, including phlebitis and bacteremia, were also examined. RESULTS: Of the 159 patients included, 51 (32.1%) received appropriate PPN therapy, in which all four criteria for appropriateness were met. In regards to the criteria for appropriateness, 128 (80.5%) had an appropriate indication, 85 (53.5%) had appropriate time to PPN initiation, 157 (98.7%) had an appropriate duration of therapy, and 112 (70.4%) achieved an appropriate percentage of goal daily calories. In terms of complications associated with PPN therapy, 69 (43.4%) patients had documented phlebitis and bacteremia occurred in 5 (3.1%) of the patients. CONCLUSION: During the study period, PPN was appropriately utilized in only one-third of patients and phlebitis occurred in almost half of all patients. Restrictions on PPN prescribing may allow nutrition support clinicians to prospectively evaluate patients to optimize nutrition therapy and minimize the incidence of inappropriate PPN use.


Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Nutrición Parenteral/efectos adversos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Desnutrición/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
J Crit Care ; 43: 321-326, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29239831

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infection increases risk of mortality, other complications, and costs. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of and identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality among critically ill surgical patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This case-control study included critically ill surgical patients from 2011 to 2014 who had a carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), MDR P. aeruginosa, or MDR Acinetobacter spp. infection. Characteristics of patients surviving to hospital discharge were compared to those of non-survivors. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included. Of these, 21 (33.9%) died prior to discharge. Vasopressors and mechanical ventilation prior to index culture were more common in non-survivors vs. survivors (76.2% vs. 46.3%, p=0.03; and 100% vs. 63.4%, p=0.001). ICU and hospital LOS prior to index culture was longer in non-survivors vs. survivors (median 19 vs. 4days, p=0.001; and median 25 vs. 7days, p=0.009). In multivariate logistic regression, achievement of source control was the only variable associated with decreased in-hospital mortality [0.04 (95% CI 0.003-0.52); p=0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: MDR Gram-negative infection is associated with significant in-hospital mortality among critically ill surgical patients. Source control, along with prior ICU LOS, mechanical ventilation status, vasopressor use, and definitive antibiotic choice, are important predictors of survival in this population.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo
17.
Crit Care Nurse ; 37(6): 24-34, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29196585

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines recommend the use of pain, agitation, and delirium protocols in the intensive care unit. The feasibility of nurse management of such protocols in the surgical intensive care unit has not been well assessed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the percentage of adherent medication interventions for patients assessed by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol. METHODS: Data on all adult patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit from January 2013 through September 2013 who were assessed at least once by using a pain, sedation, and delirium protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Protocol adherence was evaluated for interventions implemented after a nursing assessment. Patients were further divided into 2 groups on the basis of adherence, and achievement of pain and sedation goals was evaluated between groups. RESULTS: Data on 41 patients were included. Of the 603 pain assessments, 422 (70.0%) led to an intervention adherent to the protocol. Of the 249 sedation assessments, 192 (77.1%) led to an adherent intervention. Among patients with 75% or greater adherent pain interventions, all interventions met pain goals with significantly less fentanyl than that used in interventions that did not meet goals. Despite 75% or greater adherence with interventions for sedation assessments, only 8.7% of the interventions met sedation goals. CONCLUSIONS: A nurse-managed pain, agitation, and delirium protocol can be feasibly implemented in a surgical intensive care unit.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Delirio/enfermería , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Manejo del Dolor/enfermería , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Agitación Psicomotora/enfermería , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Agitación Psicomotora/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
18.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 79(4): 649-53, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26402541

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment duration for catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI) in critically ill patients is unclear. The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends up to 14 days of therapy; however, short-duration therapy (SDT) for 3 days to 5 days is often used in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) patients at our center. The efficacy of SDT for CA-UTI has not been studied in this population. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of SDT for CA-UTI in trauma ICU patients. METHODS: This retrospective study of patients with CA-UTI in a trauma ICU included patients with a urine culture growing bacteria of 100,000 CFU/mL or greater and definitive antibiotic treatment. Urine cultures were collected as part of standard workups for suspected sepsis. Duration of therapy was at the discretion of the trauma team. Exclusion criteria included concomitant infection, renal replacement therapy, or pregnancy. Clinical success and microbiologic success were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients were evaluated, and 77 patients with SDT were included. Mean (SD) age was 49 (22) years, median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 27 (interquartile range, 18-34), and median ICU stay was 17 days (interquartile range, 1-33 days). Mean (SD) duration of CA-UTI therapy was 4 (1) days (range, 3-5 days) with most patients (42%) receiving 5 days. The most common organisms were Escherichia coli, Enterococcus species, and Pseudomonas species. The clinical success rate was 82% (63 of 77), and the microbiologic success rate was 75% (36 of 48). Overall mortality was 4%, but no deaths were CA-UTI related. CONCLUSION: SDT provided an acceptable clinical success rate in critically ill trauma patients, which was similar to studies of CA-UTI in other populations. These results suggest that SDT could be considered an option for treating CA-UTIs in trauma ICU patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level V.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Crítica , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tennessee , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico
19.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 16(4): 375-9, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26207398

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial medications are beneficial when used appropriately, but adverse effects and resistance sometimes limit therapy. These effects may be more problematic with inappropriate antimicrobial use. Consideration of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these medications can help optimize drug use. METHODS: Review of the pertinent English-language literature. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic principles of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination determine whether an appropriate dose of medication reaches the intended pathogen. The pharmacodynamic properties of antimicrobial medications define the relation between the drug concentration and its observed effect on the target pathogen. Improvements in clinical outcomes have been observed when antimicrobial agents are dosed optimally according to these properties. In surgical patients, substantial changes in the volume of distribution and elimination necessitate a clear understanding of these principles. Additionally, less adverse drug effects and antimicrobial resistance may occur with optimal use of these drugs. CONCLUSION: Selecting and dosing antimicrobial medications with consideration of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may improve patient outcomes and avoid adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos
20.
Clin Pharmacol ; 6: 117-26, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25210478

RESUMEN

The Institute of Medicine has reported that medication errors are the single most common type of error in health care, representing 19% of all adverse events, while accounting for over 7,000 deaths annually. The frequency of medication errors in adult intensive care units can be as high as 947 per 1,000 patient-days, with a median of 105.9 per 1,000 patient-days. The formulation of drugs is a potential contributor to medication errors. Challenges related to drug formulation are specific to the various routes of medication administration, though errors associated with medication appearance and labeling occur among all drug formulations and routes of administration. Addressing these multifaceted challenges requires a multimodal approach. Changes in technology, training, systems, and safety culture are all strategies to potentially reduce medication errors related to drug formulation in the intensive care unit.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA