German, Austrian, and Swiss guidelines for systemic treatment of gastric cancer.

The updated edition of the German, Austrian and Swiss Guidelines for Systemic Treatment of Gastric Cancer was completed in August 2023, incorporating new evidence that emerged after publication of the previous edition. It consists of a text-based "Diagnosis" part and a "Therapy" part including recommendations and treatment algorithms. The treatment part includes a comprehensive description regarding perioperative and palliative systemic therapy for gastric cancer and summarizes recommended standard of care for surgery and endoscopic resection. The guidelines are based on a literature search and evaluation by a multidisciplinary panel of experts nominated by the hematology and oncology scientific societies of the three involved countries.

Vascular endothelial growth factor A amplification in colorectal cancer is associated with reduced M1 and M2 macrophages and diminished PD-1-expressing lymphocytes.

VEGFA is an angiogenic factor secreted by tumors, in particular those with VEGFA amplification, as well as by macrophages and lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment. Here we sought to define the presence of M1/M2 macrophages, PD-1-positive lymphocytes and PD-L1 tumoral and stromal expression in colorectal cancers harboring VEGFA amplification or chromosome 6 polysomy. 38 CRCs of which 13 harbored VEGFA amplification, 6 with Chr6 polysomy and 19 with neutral VEGFA copy number were assessed by immunohistochemistry for CD68 (marker for M1/M2 macrophages), CD163 (M2 macrophages), programmed death 1(PD-1)- tumor infiltrating and stromal lymphocytes as well as tumoral and stromal PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression. CRCs with VEGFA amplification or Chr6 polysomy were associated with decreased M1/M2 macrophages, reduced PD-1-expressing lymphocyte infiltration, as well as reduced stromal expression of PD-L1 at the tumor front. Compared to intermediate-grade CRCs, high-grade CRCs were associated with increased M1/M2 macrophages and increased tumoral expression of PD-L1. Our results suggest that VEGFA amplification or Chr6 polysomy is associated with an altered tumor immune microenvironment.

Current Treatment of Isolated Locoregional Breast Cancer Recurrences.

Patients with isolated locoregional breast cancer recurrences should be treated with curative intent. Mastectomy is regarded as the standard of care for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. In a selected group of patients, partial breast irradiation after second breast-conserving surgery is a viable alternative to mastectomy. If a second breast conservation is performed, additional irradiation should be mandatory, especially in patients who had not been irradiated previously. In case of re-irradiation, the largest experience exists for multi-catheter brachytherapy. Prospective clinical trials are needed to clearly define selection criteria, long-term local control, and toxicity. In patients with resectable locoregional breast cancer recurrences after mastectomy, multi-modal therapy comprising complete resection, radiation therapy in previously unirradiated patients, and systemic therapy results in 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates of 69% and 88%, respectively. In radiation-naive patients with unresectable, isolated locoregional recurrences, radiation therapy is mandatory. In selected patients with previous irradiations and unresectable locoregional recurrences, a second irradiation as part of an individual treatment concept can be applied. The increased risk of severe toxicity should always be weighed up against the potential clinical benefit. A combination therapy with hyperthermia can further improve the treatment results.

[Malignant hypoglycaemia]. / Maligne Hypoglykämie.

We describe the case of a 19-years old patient with seizure due to severe hypoglycaemia during general practitioner consultation. Because of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia and suspected liver metastasis a neuroendocrine hormone active tumor was suspected. After liver biopsy and CT scan a neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor could be diagnosed. Afterwards oncological therapy was induced.

Perioperative blood transfusions do not impact overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the putative impact of perioperative blood transfusions on overall and disease-free survival in patients undergoing curative resection of stage I-III rectal cancer by applying propensity-scoring methods. BACKGROUND: Whether perioperative blood transfusions negatively impact survival remains a matter of great debate. METHODS: In a single-center study, 401 patients undergoing open curative resection of stage I-III rectal cancer between 1996 and 2008 were assessed. The median follow-up was 34.2 months. Patients who did and did not receive perioperative blood transfusions were compared using Cox regression and propensity score analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 217 patients (54.1%) received blood transfusions. Patients' characteristics were highly biased concerning transfusions (propensity score 0.77±0.23 vs. 0.28±0.25; P<0.001). In unadjusted analysis, blood transfusions were associated with a 119% increased risk of mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 2.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-3.57, P=0.001]. In propensity score-adjusted Cox regression (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.65-1.58, P=0.970), blood transfusions did not increase the risk of overall survival. Similarly, in propensity score-adjusted Cox regression (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.23, P=0.672), blood transfusions were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first propensity score-based analysis providing compelling evidence that worse oncological outcomes after curative rectal cancer resection in patients receiving perioperative blood transfusions are caused by the clinical circumstances requiring transfusions, not due to the blood transfusions themselves. Therefore, concerns about overall and disease-free survival should be no issue in the decision-making regarding perioperative blood transfusions in patients undergoing curative rectal cancer resection.

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine (OCX) for first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I trial (SAKK 41/03).

BACKGROUND: A phase I multicentre trial was conducted to define the recommended dose of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and irinotecan (OCX) in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with performance status (PS) < 2 and adequate haematological, renal and liver function received oxaliplatin 70 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) on days 8 and 22 and one of five dose levels (DL 1-5, between 800 and 1,600 mg/ m(2)) of capecitabine on days 1-29 every 5 weeks. RESULTS: 23 patients received a median of 3 cycles. 3 dose-limiting toxicities occurred (DL 1: grade 3 (G3) elevated alkaline phosphatase; DL 5: 1 patient G4 hyperglycaemia/G3 diarrhoea and 1 sudden death). The most common severe adverse event was G3 diarrhoea (13%). Severe haematotoxicity was rare. Therapy was stopped mainly due to metastasectomy or tumour progression (7 patients each). 8 patients reached a partial response. Median time to progression and overall survival (OS) were 8.0 and 21.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended capecitabine dose in this schedule is 1,400 mg/m(2) daily. The OCX regimen is well tolerated. The response rate was surprisingly low with progression-free survival (PFS) and OS within the range of a triple combination. Further studies in combination with targeted agents are warranted.

Heated (37 degrees C) oxaliplatin infusion in combination with capecitabine for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: can it reduce neuropathy?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin-associated neuropathy remains a dose-limiting toxicity of the standard chemotherapy regimen of oxaliplatin and capecitabine for metastatic colorectal cancer. No preventive strategy has definitively been established. Because this neuropathy is triggered by cold, we hypothesized that infusing oxaliplatin at 37 degrees C might reduce neuropathy. METHODS: In this open-label pilot feasibility trial, patients with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer were included. Treatment consisted of capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) bid on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The oxaliplatin infusion was administered through a fluid-warming device at a constant temperature of 37 degrees C over 2 h. The primary endpoint was feasibility and drug reactions during the infusion. Secondary endpoints included acute and chronic neuropathy as well as response rate. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled, and a total of 95 cycles administered. Median cumulative oxaliplatin dose was 735 mg/m(2). Apart from one patient with laryngeal spasm, no other infusion-related adverse events were observed. Of the patients, 35% reported grade 3/4 acute dysesthesia or paresthesia according to a patients questionnaire. Chronic neuropathy according to NCI CTC v3.0 was observed in 85% (grade 1) and 15% (grade 2), respectively. The overall response rate was 45% (95% CI 23-67%; 5% complete remission; 40% partial remission) and stable disease was achieved in another 30% of patients. CONCLUSION: Administration of heated oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine is feasible and well tolerated without additional toxicity. While we have observed a relatively low rate of chronic cumulative neuropathy with heated oxaliplatin, this procedure appears not promising enough for us to recommend its further clinical evaluation.

Limited predictive value of FDG-PET for response assessment in the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer: results of a prospective multi-center trial (SAKK 75/02).

BACKGROUND: Only responding patients benefit from preoperative therapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. Early detection of non-responders may avoid futile treatment and delayed surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multi-center phase ll trial, patients with resectable, locally advanced esophageal carcinoma were treated with 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery. Positron emission tomography with 2[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG-PET) was performed at baseline and after induction chemotherapy. The metabolic response was correlated with tumor regression grade (TRG). A decrease in FDG tumor uptake of less than 40% was prospectively hypothesized as a predictor for histopathological non-response (TRG > 2) after CRT. RESULTS: 45 patients were included. The median decrease in FDG tumor uptake after chemotherapy correlated well with TRG after completion of CRT (p = 0.021). For an individual patient, less than 40% decrease in FDG tumor uptake after induction chemotherapy predicted histopathological non-response after completion of CRT, with a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 52% (positive predictive value 58%, negative predictive value 63%). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic response correlated with histopathology after preoperative therapy. However, FDG-PET did not predict non-response after induction chemotherapy with sufficient clinical accuracy to justify withdrawal of subsequent CRT and selection of patients to proceed directly to surgery.

Concordant colon tumors in monozygotic twins previously treated for prostate cancer.

This report describes the quasi-simultaneous occurrence of colon cancers in monozygotic twin brothers (age 63 years) who had undergone androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancers 4 years earlier. Concordance among male twins for both of these cancers has never been reported. Although the family history suggested possible genetic predispositions to both cancers, the twins have no evidence of the genetic alterations associated with hereditary colorectal tumors. We explore the possibility that colorectal tumorigenesis in these twins was fuelled by a combination of genetic and iatrogenic factors, in particular the androgen deprivation therapy used to treat their prostate cancers.

Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil; docetaxel and cisplatin; and epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil as systemic treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma: a randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial evaluated two docetaxel-based regimens to see which would be most promising according to overall response rate (ORR) for comparison in a phase III trial with epirubicin-cisplatin-fluorouracil (ECF) as first-line advanced gastric cancer therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma, a performance status

Combining chemotherapy and low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: results on clinical response, transforming growth factor-beta 1 and fibrin monomer in a phase II study.

Coagulation activation appears to play a role in tumor progression. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may influence tumor growth and LMWHs have been shown to beneficially influence tumor response to chemotherapy. In a phase II study using docetaxel plus enoxaparin in 25 patients with advanced breast cancer, fibrin monomer, transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta(1)) and response rates were evaluated. Enoxaparin was administered at a daily dose of 0, 5 or 1.0 mg/kg and docetaxel at 35-45 mg/m(2) once weekly. Nine patients achieved a partial response (36%) and nine patients (36%) had stable disease. The median time to progression was 11.5 weeks (range 5-51 weeks), and 16 weeks combining patients with partial remission and stable disease. One major bleed occurred. Patients with partial remission had a significant decrease of TGF-beta(1) and fibrin (P < 0.05). A significant correlation between TGF-beta(1) and fibrin monomer was also seen in all subgroups independent of clinical response. The most frequent toxicities were granulocytopenia, asthenia, transient peripheral edema and temporary hot flushes. In conclusion, docetaxel plus enoxaparin was quite active and well tolerated in patients with advanced breast cancer. These preliminary data suggest further clinical research using chemotherapy plus enoxaparin as an antitumor therapy in advanced breast cancer is warranted.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Tamoxifen has been the endocrine agent of choice for adjuvant hormonal therapy for early breast cancer since approval in 1986. Five years of tamoxifen treatment produced a significant reduction in recurrence and death over more than 10 years of follow-up in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. In large randomised trials, the standard of 5 years tamoxifen has been challenged by third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant setting. This review provides a synopsis of the most recent trial results and a discussion of remaining areas of uncertainties. Although currently tamoxifen still remains a valid option, increasing evidence from the new AI adjuvant trials suggests that optimised adjuvant endocrine treatment should incorporate an AI either as initial or as sequential therapy.

Neuropeptide chronomics in clinically healthy young adults: circaoctohoran and circadian patterns.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) undergoes an about 8-h (circaoctohoran) rather than a circadian variation in clinical health. Herein, 24 h plasma concentrations of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), substance P (SP), neuropeptide Y (NpY), and cortisol used as reference, were obtained from 20 healthy young adults starting at 07:00 or 19:00 h. Like ET-1, SP and NpY undergo a circaoctohoran variation, whereas VIP is circadian rhythmic, peaking during the night, some 8 h prior to the circadian acrophase of cortisol. Maps of circadian and extra-circadian patterns may serve for screening, diagnosis and a better understanding of mechanisms underlying the etiology of various diseases.

Anastrozole ('Arimidex') versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of the double-blind cross-over SAKK trial 21/95--a sub-study of the TARGET (Tamoxifen or 'Arimidex' Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability) trial.

It is desirable to identify the most effective sequence of endocrine therapies for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced, hormone-responsive breast cancer. In a retrospective analysis of two large, randomized, comparative Phase III trials in this patient population, the Tamoxifen or 'Arimidex' Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability (TARGET) trial and the North American trial, we ascertained that tumors responding to anastrozole as first-line therapy may subsequently respond to tamoxifen as second-line therapy. In a double-blind cross-over trial, the SAKK 21/95 sub-trial (including patients from the Swiss centres in the TARGET trial), we further investigated the clinical impact of anastrozole followed by tamoxifen compared with that of tamoxifen followed by anastrozole. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had continued on randomized treatment until objective disease progression and were still considered suitable for endocrine therapy, could continue on blinded therapy crossing-over to the alternative treatment. They were assessed for time to progression (TTP) from treatment randomization, TTP after crossing-over treatments, time from randomization to progression after crossing-over treatments and overall survival. Median TTP from randomization for patients receiving first-line treatment with anastrozole (n = 31) and tamoxifen (n = 29) was 11.3 and 8.3 months, respectively, p = 0.75. Median TTP from treatment cross-over was 6.7 months for tamoxifen after progression on anastrozole (n = 19) and 5.7 months for anastrozole after progression on tamoxifen (n = 18), while median time from randomization to second progression was 28.2 and 19.5 months, respectively. Overall survival from randomization for the anastrozole-tamoxifen sequence and the tamoxifen-anastrozole sequence was 69.7 versus 59.3 months, respectively, p = 0.10. The relative risk of death was higher for the tamoxifen followed by anastrozole sequence (1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-2.98). Tamoxifen is an effective second-line therapy after anastrozole. Our data, together with the better tolerability profile of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen, support the use of anastrozole as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive tumors. Treatment with tamoxifen may still be useful upon subsequent progression.