RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of faster recanalization in acute large vessel occlusion are well recognized, but the optimal procedure time remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to identify patient characteristics that necessitate puncture-to-recanalization (P-R) time within 30 min to achieve favorable outcome. METHODS: We evaluated the patients from a prospective, multicenter, observational registry of acute ischemic stroke patients. The study included patients who underwent endovascular therapy for ICA or MCA M1 occlusion and achieved successful recanalization. Patients were categorized into subgroups based on pre-treatment characteristics and the frequency of favorable outcomes was compared between P-R time < 30 min and ≥ 30 min. Interaction terms were incorporated into the models to assess the correlation between each patient characteristic and P-R time. RESULTS: A total of 1053 patients were included in the study. Univariate analysis within each subgroup revealed a significant association between P-R < 30 min and favorable outcomes in patients with DWI ASPECTS ≤6, age > 85 and NIHSS ≥16. In the multivariable analysis, NIHSS, age, time from symptom recognition to puncture, and DWI ASPECTS were significant independent predictors of favorable outcomes. Notably, only DWI ASPECTS exhibited interaction terms with P-R < 30 min. The multivariable analysis indicated that P-R < 30 min was an independent predictor for favorable outcome in DWI ASPECTS ≤6 group, whereas not in DWI ≥7. CONCLUSIONS: P-R time < 30 min is predictive of favorable outcomes; however, the effect depends on DWI ASPECTS. Target P-R time < 30 min is appropriate for patients with DWI ASPECTS ≤6.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Punciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: Old age and glucocorticoid (GC) use increase the susceptibility to infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Accordingly, we investigated whether GC discontinuation reduces the incidence of infection in older adults with RA and analyzed factors associated with GC discontinuation. METHODS: Medical records of patients with RA aged ≥60 years were retrieved, and the association between GC use and the incidence of infection was investigated. The participants were divided into three groups: GC-continued, GC-discontinued, and non-GC; the incidence of infection was statistically analyzed. Furthermore, patient treatments and comorbidities were examined. RESULTS: Among 389 patients with RA included in the study (n = 122, n = 126, and n = 141 in the GC-discontinued, GC-continued, and non-GC groups, respectively), 65 (16.7%) patients developed infection, and the incidence of infection was significantly higher in the GC-continued group than in the GC-discontinued (p = .021) and non-GC (p = .0003) groups; there was no significant difference between the non-GC and GC-discontinued groups (p = .659). The GC-discontinued group was more likely to require biologic use throughout the disease course than the other two groups. Comorbidities, especially malignancies (p = .004), were more common in the GC-continued group than in the GC-discontinued group (p = .007). CONCLUSION: In patients with RA aged ≥60 years receiving GCs, GC discontinuation reduced the incidence of infection. Therefore, a further analysis of factors that help reduce GC use is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Humanos , Anciano , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion has proven to be effective in randomized controlled trials. We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the real-world efficacy of EVT in a metropolitan area with a large number of comprehensive stroke centers and to compare it with the results of other registries and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We analyzed the Kanagawa Intravenous and Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke registry, a prospective, multicenter observational study of patients treated by EVT and/or intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). Of the 2488 patients enrolled from January 2018 to June 2020, 1764 patients treated with EVT were included. The primary outcome was a good outcome, which was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary analysis included predicting a good outcome using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The median age was 77 years, and the median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 18. Pretreatment mRS score 0-2 was 87%, and direct transport was 92%. The rate of occlusion in anterior circulation was 90.3%. Successful recanalization was observed in 88.7%. The median time from onset to recanalization was 193 min. Good outcomes at 90 days were 43.3% in anterior circulation and 41.9% in posterior circulation. Overall mortality was 12.6%. Significant predictors for a good outcome were as follows: age, male, direct transfer, NIHSS score, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, intravenous tPA, and successful recanalization. CONCLUSION: EVT in routine clinical use in a metropolitan area showed comparable good outcomes and lower mortality compared to previous studies, despite the high proportion of patients with older age, pretreatment mRS score of >2, posterior circulation occlusion, and higher NIHSS. Those results may have been associated with more direct transport and faster onset-to-recanalization times.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Trombectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etiología , Sistema de Registros , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) has not been established. We retrospectively examined the initial and long-term outcomes associated with restenosis of a combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic ICAS. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent balloon angioplasty and/or stenting for ≥ 70% ICAS between 2006 and 2020 were analyzed. Patients within 48 h of stroke onset were excluded. The following procedures were established as standards at our institution: (1) primary balloon angioplasty alone was initially performed; (2) stenting for insufficient dilatation, recoiling, or dissection was conducted; and (3) stenting was considered for restenosis. Intracranial ischemic and hemorrhagic complications within 30 days after treatment were used to evaluate periprocedural safety. Recurrent ischemic events, restenosis and restenosis related factors were used to be evaluate the long-term outcome. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were recruited. Initial treatment consisted of balloon angioplasty (n = 101) and stenting (n = 59). Intracranial complications within 30 days after treatment were ischemic in five (3.1%) and hemorrhagic in four patients (2.5%). The incidence of these complication was 3.1% in the stenting group and 2.5% in the balloon angioplasty group. The mean follow-up period was 53.9 months. Restenosis was found in 42 patients (26%). Recurrent ischemic events during follow-up were noted in 14 patients (8.8%), of which six patients had TIA and eight patients had ischemic stroke. Restenosis-associated factors included diabetes, coronary artery disease, percent stenosis after treatment, and balloon angioplasty in logistic univariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that diabetes (HR: 2.084, CI: 1.039-4.180, p = 0.0386), length of lesion (HR; 1.358, CI: 1.174-1.571, p < 0.0001), and balloon angioplasty (HR: 4.194, CI: 1.083-16.239, p = 0.0379) were independent predictors for restenosis. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic ICAS had a low perioperative stroke rate and may improve long-term outcome. Balloon angioplasty, diabetes, and length of lesion were significantly associated with restenosis.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Constricción Patológica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Stents/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal/cirugía , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal/complicaciones , Estudios de Seguimiento , Angioplastia/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There have been concerns that patients with chronic conditions may be avoiding in-person physician visits due to fear of COVID-19, leading to lower quality of care. We aimed to investigate changes in physician visits and medication prescriptions for chronic diseases before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at the population level. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide claims data in Japan, 2018-2020. PARTICIPANTS: Working-age population (aged 18-74 years) who visited physicians and received any prescriptions for major chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia) before the pandemic. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes were the monthly number of physician visits, the monthly proportion of physician visits and the monthly proportion of days covered by prescribed medication (PDC) during the pandemic (April-May 2020, as the first state of emergency over COVID-19 was declared on 7 April, and withdrawn nationally on 25 May). RESULTS: Among 10 346 patients who visited physicians for chronic diseases before the pandemic, we found a temporary decline in physician visits (mean number of visits was 1.9 in March vs 1.7 in April; p<0.001) and an increase in the proportion of patients who did not visit any physicians during the pandemic (15% in March vs 24% in April; p<0.001). Physician visits returned to the baseline in May (the mean number of visits: 1.8, and the proportion of patients who did not visit any physicians: 9%). We observed no clinically meaningful difference in PDC between before and during the pandemic (eg, 87% in March vs 87% in April; p=0.45). A temporary decline in physician visits was more salient in seven prefectures with a larger number of COVID-19 cases than in other areas. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of physician visits declined right after the COVID-19 outbreak, it returned to the baseline one month later; patients were not skipping medications during the pandemic.