Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic intramural hematoma.

BACKGROUND: Although type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) including classic double-channel aorta and intramural hematoma (IMH) is a life-threatening condition, the prognostic impact and predictors of IMH remain to be established. The present study evaluated the prevalence, baseline characteristics, and outcomes of IMH as compared with classic non-thrombosed type A AAD. METHODS: This multicenter registry in Japan retrospectively included 703 patients with type A AAD. IMH was defined as a crescentic or circular area along the ascending aortic wall without contrast enhancement on computed tomography (CT). Non-thrombosed type A AAD was defined as the classic double-channel ascending aorta on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 703 patients with type A AAD, 312 (44.3%) had IMH. Older age was an only baseline patient factor significantly associated with the presence of IMH in the multivariable analysis. The longitudinal extent of dissection was greater in patients with classic non-thrombosed AAD than those with IMH, resulting in an increased risk of end-organ malperfusion in the classic AAD group. During the hospitalization, 41 (13.1%) and 85 (21.7%) patients with and without IMH died (p < 0.001). IMH was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in a multivariable model, irrespective of age and the implementation of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that IMH on CT was frequent among patients with type A AAD. Although IMH was more likely to be present in the elderly, its effect on the better survival was independent of age and surgical treatment.

Clinical outcome of drug-coated balloons in patients with femoropopliteal chronic total occlusive lesions: results from the multicenter EAGLE study.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for simple femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. However, the effectiveness of DCB for FP chronic total occlusive lesions (CTO) is controversial. The present study investigated the clinical outcomes of DCB for FP-CTO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 359 limbs of 318 patients who underwent endovascular therapy with DCB for FP-CTO between July 2017 and February 2021 at seven cardiovascular centers. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency. The secondary endpoints were the 12-month rates of freedom from: (1) clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), and (2) re-occlusion. The association of baseline characteristics with the 12-month restenosis risk was investigated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: The 12-month rate of primary patency was 79.8% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 75.1% to 84.8%), whereas the corresponding rates of freedom from CD-TLR and re-occlusion were 86.4% (95%CI: 82.6% to 90.4%) and 88.5% (95%CI: 84.7% to 92.4%), respectively. The bailout stent rate was 8.9%. Independent risk factors for restenosis were hemodialysis (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.18 [1.39 to 3.45]; P = 0.001), chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) (2.02 [1.33 to 3.07]; P = 0.001), and restenosis lesion (2.02 [1.32 to 3.08]; P = 0.001). Use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was identified as a protective factor for restenosis (0.54 [0.35 to 0.82]; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low rate of bailout stent, DCB treatment for FP-CTO was effective in real-world clinical practice. Hemodialysis, CLTI, and restenosis lesion were independent risk factors for 12-month restenosis, and the use of DAPT significantly attenuated the risk of 12-month restenosis.

Optimal Intraluminal Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion of the Superficial Femoral Artery: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel-eluting technologies improve the clinical outcome of femoropopliteal (FP) occlusive disease. Several studies reported efficacy of the high-dose (nominal paclitaxel density of 3.5 µg/mm2) drug-coated balloon (DCB) for complex FP lesions. However, previous studies of DCB have shown a high rate of bailout stents, and few studies have compared the high-dose DCB with successful lesion pre-dilation without bailout stent and drug-eluting stent (DES) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the superficial femoral artery (SFA). This study aimed to compare the clinical outcome of high-dose DCB with successful lesion preparation and DES in CTO of the SFA. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. From June 2018 to November 2020, we compared 41 patients (43 lesions) treated with high-dose DCB and 36 patients (37 lesions) treated with DES. The study period was defined as the period after DCB and DES became available simultaneously at our hospital, when all surviving patients had at least 1 year of follow-up. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency. The secondary endpoints were 12-month freedom from: (1) clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), and (2) re-occlusion. RESULTS: Baseline clinical data were comparable between the two groups. Reference vessel diameter was smaller in the DCB group. The mean lesion and occlusion lengths were about the same in both groups. The subintimal angioplasty and bailout stent rate was 0% in the DCB group. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for 12-month primary patency was 92.0% in the DCB group and 87.2% in the DES group (p = 0.47). Freedom from CD-TLR also did not differ significantly between the two groups. The 12-month freedom from re-occlusion rate tended to be higher in the DCB group than in the DES group. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose DCB with successful lesion preparation showed 12-month clinical outcomes comparable with DES for CTO of the SFA, even without bailout stents.