Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Urol ; 41(11): 3135-3140, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37758934

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to identify the compliance rates of calcium-oxalate stone patients for metabolic evaluation, diet and medical treatment and also determine the factors that are associated with poor compliance rates. METHODS: This study was conducted by the EULIS eCORE working group prospectively. In the initial visit, demographic and stone-related characteristics were recorded. Patients were suggested metabolic evaluation, dietary advices and medical treatment. Follow-up visit was performed after 3 months and compliance rates were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with poor compliance to metabolic evaluation, diet and medical treatment. RESULTS: Data of 346 patients from nine centers were analyzed. Compliance rates were 71.7%, 65.3%, and 63.7% for metabolic evaluation, diet, and medical treatment, respectively. In multivariate analysis, level of education (p = 0.003), history of emergency department visit (p = 0.04), number of stone surgeries (p = 0.03), patient care in dedicated stone clinic (p = 0.03), and history of shock wave lithotripsy (p = 0.005) were detected as independent predictors of compliance to metabolic analysis. Level of education (p < 0.001) and history of emergency department visit (p = 0.01) were detected as independent predictors of patient compliance to diet. Number of stone episodes (p = 0.03), family history of stones (p = 0.02), and polypharmacy (p < 0.001) were detected as independent predictors of patient compliance to medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patient compliance to metabolic evaluation, diet, and medical therapy is important for successful management of urolithiasis. Dietary advices and medications should be personalized by taking in to account the factors associated with poor compliance.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Urolitiasis , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calcio , Oxalato de Calcio/análisis , Cooperación del Paciente
2.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 33(6): 542-548, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36827462

RESUMEN

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL), and standard-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (stPNL) for the treatment of 20-30 mm kidney stones. Methods: The records of 1197 patients (SWL = 149, RIRS = 205, mPNL = 525, and stPNL = 318) from 8 centers were reviewed retrospectively. Four procedures were compared for stone-free rates (SFRs), auxiliary treatment, and associated complications. Results: Initial SFRs were 43.6%, 54.6%, 86.7%, and 87.7% in SWL, RIRS, mPNL, and stPNL, respectively (P < .001), whereas the final SFRs were 71.8%, 80%, 90.5%, and 89.6% (P < .001). The rate of auxiliary treatment in the groups was 38.3%, 26.8%, 5%, and 4.4%, respectively (P < .001). The initial and final SFRs in the mPNL and stPNL groups were higher than those in SWL and RIRS groups (P < .001). The rate for auxiliary treatment was lower in the mPNL and stPNL groups (P < .001). The operation time was longer in the RIRS group (P = .005). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the complication rate in the SWL group was lower than that in the surgical approaches (P < .001); however, no statistical difference was detected between RIRS, mPNL, and stPNL groups. mPNL and stPNL had a higher success rate than RIRS or SWL for treating 20-30 mm kidney stones. Conclusion: In the treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones, RIRS and PNL were more effective than SWL to obtain a better SFR and less auxiliary treatment rate. Compared with RIRS, mPNL and stPNL provided a higher SFR with similar complication rates.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Litotricia , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Litotricia/efectos adversos , Nefrostomía Percutánea/métodos
3.
World J Urol ; 41(5): 1261-1268, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36786816

RESUMEN

Urinary stone disease continues to be a public health problem with growing incidence and recurrences. Recurrence is nearly detected in 50% of the patients within 5 years after the first episode. However, stone recurrence rates can be reduced to a certain extent. The American Urological Association (AUA) and the European Urological Association (EAU) guidelines advice dietary, fluid intake, and medical treatment to prevent or minimize stone recurrence. However, studies have shown that compliance to dietary and fluid intake recommendations is low. Beside this, nutritional evaluation of the patients is sufficient. Using food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), 24 h recall methods (short, individual-oriented, and easily applicable) or mobile apps can be used. In addition, cooperation with registered dietitians (RD) and planning tailored dietary programmes may have positive effect on compliance. Providers who give dietary advices should improve their knowledge about the topic and communication skills to create a patient-provider trust relationship. Simplifying the advices (shorter lists, applicable advices), spending more time, and giving education until being sure for patients' understanding with regular remindings may improve adherence. Moreover, patients increased awareness and knowledge about dietary advices are beneficial. Smart devices for fluid uptake or urine pH monitoring, mobile apps or web-based portals, and telemedicine applications can be used to maintain the compliance on dietary advices. Compliance with dietary modifications and fluid intake recommendations can be well achieved by individualized evaluation/close follow-up and the elimination of the problems limiting the patient compliance.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Cálculos Urinarios , Urolitiasis , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/terapia , Dieta , Urolitiasis/complicaciones , Cálculos Urinarios/complicaciones , Cooperación del Paciente
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(1-2): 90-97, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36330955

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of women among medical doctors and surgeons continues to rise. However, urology remains one of the least preferred specialties by female physicians, resulting in the inadequate academic representation of female urologists. In this study we examined changes in the representation of female urologists in the journals European Urology (EU) and Journal of Urology (JOU) and investigated in which urology subspecialties female urologists focus their academic studies. METHODS: Original articles, reviews and case reports published in EU and JOU were included in the study. The analysis was limited to 4 years, starting with 2004 and continuing at 5-year intervals until 2019.The publications were also classified according to urology subspecialty and geographic location. RESULTS: In total, 2708 articles were analysed. Overall, women accounted for 9.9% of first authors (267/2708) and 5.9% of senior authors (161/2708).The proportion of female first authors was 8.2% in 2004 and increased to 10.7% in 2009, 10.6% in 2014, and 11.6% in 2019 (P = 0.062). The proportion of female last authors was 7% in 2004 and 5.3%, 6.1%, and 2.5% in 2009, 2014, and 2019, respectively (P = 0.011). Women accounted for a significantly higher proportion of first authors than men in publications related to female and paediatric urology (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The increasing number of women urologists worldwide is not reflected in the scientific authorship of female urologists. Multicenter studies focusing on the elimination of gender disparity in academic representation are needed in surgical branches such as urology.


Asunto(s)
Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Médicos Mujeres , Urología , Masculino , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Urólogos , Factores Sexuales , Autoria , Factor de Impacto de la Revista , Bibliometría
5.
BMC Urol ; 22(1): 209, 2022 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36544109

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Day-surgery percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is being developed quickly but some potential factors are affecting the recovery process. This study is aim to analyze the reasons and risk factors for delayed discharge after day-surgery PCNL. METHODS: The data of 205 patients who accepted day-surgery PCNL in our institution between January 2018 and February 2020 were analyzed, retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors for delayed discharge. Besides, the nomogram prediction model was established by the multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The rate of delayed discharge was 14.6%. Independent risk factors for delayed discharge were larger stone burden (odds ratio [OR] = 3.814, P = 0.046), positive urine nitrite (OR = 1.001, P = 0.030), longer duration of surgery (OR = 1.020, P = 0.044), multiple nephrostomy tubes (OR = 4.282, P = 0.008). The five main reasons that caused delayed discharge included psychological reasons, pain, bleeding, urosepsis, and urine leakage. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified some independent risk factors for a hospital length of stay longer than 24 h. Patients with larger renal stones or positive urine nitrite may be at increased risk of delayed discharge after day-surgery PCNL. Reducing surgery time and nephrostomy tubes will help to facilitate recovery.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Humanos , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Nitritos , Alta del Paciente , Nefrostomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Cálculos Renales/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Urolithiasis ; 50(6): 711-720, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36169664

RESUMEN

Although stone disease is an important health problem with high incidence and recurrence rates, it is a preventable disease. Attitudes and practices of urologists regarding the prevention of recurrence continue to be a subject of debate. In this context, an online survey study was conducted involving 305 urologists from 57 different countries. The first 7 questions collected demographic data about the urologists and the remaining 23 questions were about the recurrence and metabolic evaluation, medical treatment, and follow-up of urinary stone disease. Most urologists (85.2%) thought that metabolic examination was important. Approximately one-third of the participants (34.1%) performed 24-hour urine analysis and stone analysis was ordered by 87.5% of the urologists. Metabolic analysis was performed for all patients by 14.7% of the participants. For pediatric patients this rate was 68.5%, and for adults with recurrence the rate was 81.6%. Reasons cited by the urologists for not performing metabolic analysis included not feeling confident doing so (18.3%), having limited facilities in their hospital (26.5%), having an excessive daily workload (31.8%), patient-related factors (27.5%), and referring patients to other departments for metabolic evaluation (20.9%). Although majority of the responding urologists do consider the metabolic analysis as vital important, they seemed not to be willing to perform these tests with the same degree of enthusiasm in their daily practice. Our results show that urologists need support in performing and interpreting 24-hour urine analysis, improving their knowledge levels, and communicating with patients. Urology residency training should focus more on the prevention of urinary stone recurrence in addition to the surgical training.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Urinarios , Urolitiasis , Humanos , Niño , Adulto , Urólogos , Urolitiasis/diagnóstico , Urolitiasis/prevención & control , Urolitiasis/etiología , Cálculos Urinarios/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 54(9): 2141-2148, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35763186

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients with renal stones sizing 2-3 cm. METHODS: A total of 566 patients from 6 institutions who underwent mPCNL (n = 440) and RIRS (n = 126) procedures were enrolled in our study. The retrospective patient cohort was reviewed and compared. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors predicting success in the RIRS group. RESULTS: The stone-free rates were 91.1 and 77% for the mPCNL and RIRS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The auxiliary procedure rates were 4.5 and 39.7% in the mPCNL and RIRS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean values of hemoglobin decrease, fluoroscopy time, and hospitalization time were significantly higher in the mPCNL group (p < 0.001). While the Clavien grade 1-2 complication rates were 10.9 and 34.1% (p < 0.001) in two groups, these values were 2.7 and 1.6% (p = 0.539), respectively, for Clavien grade 3-4 complication rates. Although three patients in the mPCNL group received blood transfusions, none of the patients in the RIRS groups were transfused. The stone location and stone density parameters were found to be the independent predictive factors for RIRS success. CONCLUSIONS: mPCNL provided a higher stone-free rate, less need for the auxiliary procedure, and lower complication rates compared to RIRS in patients with 2-3 cm stones. Blood loss, radiation exposure, and a hospital stay of mPCNL can be significantly reduced with the RIRS technique in selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/etiología , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/métodos , Nefrostomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Nefrostomía Percutánea/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Scott Med J ; 67(3): 121-125, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35535417

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) outcomes and to determine the effect of operative time on complications of RIRS. METHODS: Patients undergoing RIRS for renal stones were evaluated. These patients were divided into two groups according to the operation time (Group 1<60 minutes and Group 2>60 minutes). Peroperative outcomes such as fluoroscopy time, stone-free rates, complications and duration of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 264 patients and Group 2 consisted of 297 patients. SFR rates, duration of hospitalization, and postoperative urinary tract infection rates were similar in both groups. Fluoroscopy time was 7.8±7.3 (0-49) sec in group 1 and 13.1±9.8 (0-81) sec in group 2. Complications according to modified Clavien-Dindo classification system (MCDCS) were 13 and 32 patients (Grade 1), 31 and 63 patients (Grade 2), 1 and 1 patient (Grade 3) in group 1 and 2, respectively. There was statistical difference between the two groups in terms of duration of fluoroscopy time and the MCDCS. Although duration of hospitalization and UTI rates were higher in group 2, no statistical significance was observed among groups. CONCLUSION: Limiting the operation time to 60 minutes in RIRS seems to be important in reducing postoperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Riñón , Humanos , Riñón/cirugía , Cálculos Renales/complicaciones , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Endourol ; 35(9): 1333-1339, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33813867

RESUMEN

Background and Objective: Several positions have been described for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the traditional prone position PCNL (TP-PCNL) and the prone split-leg position PCNL (PSL-PCNL). Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was made of the data of 212 patients who underwent prone PCNL in PSL or TP between January 2017 and November 2019. The demographic and preoperative clinical data were used for propensity score-matching (PSM). Following the PSM based on a multivariable logistic regression model, the PSL-PCNL and TP-PCNL groups were compared in preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters. All surgical procedures were performed by an experienced endourologist. Results: After PSM, 51 patients from the PSL-PCNL group were matched to 51 TP-PCNL patients. The stone burden was not statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.388). The mean operation time of the two groups was significantly different (81.5 ± 32.4 minutes vs 93.1 ± 25.9 minutes, respectively, p = 0.026). The hemoglobin decrease in the PSL-PCNL group was greater than that in the TP-PCNL group (-17.7 ± 16.9 g/L vs 13.1 ± 10.9 g/L, p < 0.001). Both groups had similar stone-free rates after 2 weeks (p = 0.49). No significant difference was observed between the groups in the total complication rate (p = 1). Conclusions: The application of PSL in PCNL simplifies the surgical procedure and shortens the operating time. Another important advantage is that it allows retrograde intrarenal surgery and ureteroscopy to be performed simultaneously. We recommend the PSL to be applied in PCNL for renal stone patients.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Pierna , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Nefrostomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Posición Prona , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Int J Impot Res ; 33(8): 815-823, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33328620

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been continuing to affect the lives of all people globally. It has been shown that restrictions due to changes in lifestyles lead to mental health problems. This study aims to investigate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on couples' sexuality. A total of 245 volunteers (148 men and 97 women) were enrolled in the study. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale were administered to screen anxiety and depression symptoms. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) along with self-constructed sexual behavior questionnaire were administered to participants, in order to evaluate sexual functions and behavioral changes during the pandemic. Sexual function scores (IIEF erectile function domain and total FSFI) during pandemic (24.55 ± 5.79 and 24.87 ± 7.88, respectively) were lower compared to the prepandemic period (26.59 ± 4.51 and 26.02 ± 6.22, respectively) (p = 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively). During pandemic compared to prepandemic period, the frequency of sexual intercourse decreased in men (p = 0.001) and women (p = 0.001) while sexual avoidance and solitary sexual approach behaviors (masturbation or watching sexual content videos, etc.) increased in men (p = 0.001) and women (p = 0.022). However, the couples that spent more time together during the pandemic reported better sexual function scores (men; p = 0.001, women; p = 0.006). Although this is the first study evaluating couples from Turkey with a convenience sample, further studies with a greater number may better elucidate the effects of this pandemic on sexuality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Conducta Sexual , Sexualidad , Turquía/epidemiología
11.
Turk J Urol ; 46(6): 455-459, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32966206

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the opinions of urologists from different countries about uro-oncology education, fellowship programs, and approaches to different urological malignancies at different stages using a questionnaire. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 207 urologists from 22 countries were sent a questionnaire containing 18 items by email. The questions were related to urologic oncology training provided during residency, acceptance of uro-oncology as a sub-branch, the necessity of certification for treatment and follow-up, fellowship program preferences, adequateness of the programs, and approach differences to the different stages of urological malignancies among the urologists from different countries. RESULTS: In total, 111 (53.62%) urologists who completed the questionnaire were enrolled in the study, and 40.54% of the urologists reported that the uro-oncology training during the residency period was not sufficient. Furthermore, 79.27% of the urologists reported opinions about acceptance of uro-oncology as a sub-branch. The ratio of urologists who undertake the treatment of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (radical surgery and urinary diversion) and prostate cancer (radical prostatectomy, definitive radiation therapy, experimental local treatment, and hormonal therapy) is 27.92% and 37.83%, respectively. The urologists reported that they perform nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), radical nephrectomy (RN), and laparoscopic NSS/RN treatments in patients with localized renal cancer at the rates of 61.26%, 47.74%, and 25.22%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Uro-oncology training during the residency period seems to be inadequate in most of the countries, and a high number of the urologists tend to avoid high-volume operations and systemic treatments of uro-oncologic malignancies.

12.
Cent European J Urol ; 73(1): 49-54, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32395324

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) in the management of renal calculi larger than 20 mm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 92 cases with renal calculi were managed with fURS and divided into two groups depending on the size of the stones; <20 mm and >20 mm (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively). The groups were compared with respect to treatment-related parameters including success, complication rates, hospitalization period and need for auxiliary procedures with an emphasis on the rate of infections. Success rates were also compared in each group according to stone location. RESULTS: Overall success rates after 3 months showed that stone-free rates in both groups were 84.1% (< 20 mm) and 58.33% (>20 mm) respectively (p = 0.008). The success rates of upper/mid pole (100% vs. 80%) and pelvis stones (83.3% vs. 75%) showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.5, p = 0.51 respectively). Success rates for stones located in the lower pole were 75% vs. 14.28% respectively (p = 0.008). The rate of infectious complications was significantly higher in cases undergoing fURS for relatively larger stones (22.9%) as compared to smaller calculi (6.8%) (p = 0.032). No complications were recorded in Group 1, while 2 cases in Group 2 (4.1%) developed ureteral stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively low stone-free rates in lower pole stones, our current results indicate that fURS can be an effective and safe treatment alternative to PNL in larger renal stones (>20 mm) located in the pelvis and in the upper part of the calyceal system of the involved kidney.

13.
Urol J ; 17(2): 129-133, 2020 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31119720

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In this retrospective study, we aimed to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of RIRS procedure on an age-based manner in patients younger and above 65 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 165 patients undergoing RIRS procedure for renal stones were divided into two groups on an age-based manner namely; Group 1 (n=122) patients aging < 65 years and Group 2 (n=43) patients aging above 65 years. Demographic and clinical data regarding the stone free rates, complication rates and need for secondary procedures were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Of all the patients undergoing RIRS for kidney stones, 122 were below the age of 65 (73.9%) and 43 were above the age of 65 (26.1%). Mean age value for the patients aging more than 65 years was 74.16 ± 5.03 years and in addition to higher percentage of comorbidities, serum creatinine levels as well as ASA scores were also higher in this group when compared with younger counterparts. Although there was no statistically significant difference with respect to the operative duration, stone-free rates (SFR) and hospitalization period between the two groups, both complication rates and the need for additional interventions were higher in the older patient group (p = 0.038; p = 0.032). All complications noted in the both groups were minor (Grade I) complications according to the Clavien classification system. CONCLUSION: RIRS procedure can be applied as an effective and safe treatment alternative for the minimal invasive management of renal stones in relatively older patients (> 65 years) with similar hospitalization as well as stone free rates noted in the younger patients. No procedure related severe complication was noted in these cases.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Ureteroscopía , Urolitiasis , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Tempo Operativo , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ureteroscopía/efectos adversos , Ureteroscopía/instrumentación , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Urolitiasis/diagnóstico , Urolitiasis/cirugía
14.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(3): 617-622, May-June 2018. graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-954058

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the effect of papaverine and alprostadil on testicular torsion-detorsion injury in rats. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 male Wistar-Albino rats were used in this study. Four hours of right testicular torsion was applied to each group, excluding sham oper- ated group. The torsion-detorsion (T/D), T/D + papaverine and T/D + alprostadil groups received saline, papaverine and alprostadil at the same time as surgical detorsion, respectively. At 14 days after the surgical detorsion, ischaemic changes and the degree of damage were evaluated with Cosentino scoring and the Johnson tubular biopsy score (JTBS). Results: JTBS was determined as 8.8±2.7 in the Sham group, 5.08±1.9 in the T/D+papaverine group, 5.29±2.3 in the T/D +alprostadil group and 2.86±1.9 in the TD group. The JTBS was determined to be statistically significantly high in both the T/D + papaverine group and the T/D + alprostadil group compared to the T/D group (p=0.01, p=0.009). In the T/D + papaverine group, 3 (43%) testes were classified as Cosentino 2, 3 (43%) as Cosentino 3 and 1 (14%) as Cosentino 4. In the T/D +alprostadil group, 5 (50 %) testes were classified as Cosentino 2, 3 (30 %) as Cosentino 3 and 2 (20%) as Cosentino 4. Conclusion: The present study indicated that spermatic cord administration of alprostadil and papaverine showed a protective effect against ischemia/reperfusion injury after right-side testes torsion and histological changes were decreased after testicular ischemia reperfusion injury.


Asunto(s)
Animales , Masculino , Papaverina/uso terapéutico , Torsión del Cordón Espermático/prevención & control , Testículo/irrigación sanguínea , Vasodilatadores/farmacología , Alprostadil/farmacología , Isquemia/prevención & control , Papaverina/farmacología , Torsión del Cordón Espermático/patología , Testículo/patología , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Alprostadil/uso terapéutico , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Distribución Aleatoria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ratas Wistar , Sustancias Protectoras/uso terapéutico , Sustancias Protectoras/farmacología
15.
Int Braz J Urol ; 44(3): 617-622, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617080

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of papaverine and alprostadil on testicular torsion-detorsion injury in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 male Wistar-Albino rats were used in this study. Four hours of right testicular torsion was applied to each group, excluding sham operated group. The torsion-detorsion (T/D), T/D + papaverine and T/D + alprostadil groups received saline, papaverine and alprostadil at the same time as surgical detorsion, respectively. At 14 days after the surgical detorsion, ischaemic changes and the degree of damage were evaluated with Cosentino scoring and the Johnson tubular biopsy score (JTBS). RESULTS: JTBS was determined as 8.8±2.7 in the Sham group, 5.08±1.9 in the T/ D+papaverine group, 5.29±2.3 in the T/D +alprostadil group and 2.86±1.9 in the TD group. The JTBS was determined to be statistically significantly high in both the T/D + papaverine group and the T/D + alprostadil group compared to the T/D group (p=0.01, p=0.009). In the T/D + papaverine group, 3 (43 %) testes were classified as Cosentino 2, 3 (43%) as Cosentino 3 and 1 (14 %) as Cosentino 4. In the T/D +alprostadil group, 5 (50 %) testes were classified as Cosentino 2, 3 (30 %) as Cosentino 3 and 2 (20%) as Cosentino 4. CONCLUSION: The present study indicated that spermatic cord administration of alprostadil and papaverine showed a protective effect against ischemia/reperfusion injury after right-side testes torsion and histological changes were decreased after testicular ischemia reperfusion injury.


Asunto(s)
Alprostadil/farmacología , Papaverina/farmacología , Sustancias Protectoras/farmacología , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Torsión del Cordón Espermático/prevención & control , Testículo/irrigación sanguínea , Vasodilatadores/farmacología , Alprostadil/uso terapéutico , Animales , Biopsia , Isquemia/prevención & control , Masculino , Papaverina/uso terapéutico , Sustancias Protectoras/uso terapéutico , Distribución Aleatoria , Ratas Wistar , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Torsión del Cordón Espermático/patología , Testículo/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico
16.
BMC Urol ; 17(1): 84, 2017 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28915866

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It was aimed to investigate the efficiency and reliability of the manual detorsion (MD) procedure in patients diagnosed with testicular torsion (TT). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of the data of 57 patients diagnosed with TT, comprising 20 patients with successful MD (Group I), 28 patients who underwent emergency orchiopexy (Group II), and 9 patients applied with orchiectomy (Group III). The groups were compared in respect of age, and duration of pain. The success rate of MD, the time of testicular fixation (TF), any problems encountered in follow-up, and follow-up times were analyzed in Group I. Data were analyzed with P-P pilot, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis and Chi-square tests. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: MD was successful and detorsion could be achieved in 20 of 26 patients. The groups were similar in respect of age (p = 0.217). The median duration of pain was 3 (1-8), 4 (1-72), and 48 (12-144) hours in Groups I, II, and III, respectively, and determined as similar in Groups I and II (p = 0.257), although a statistically significant difference was determined between the 3 groups (p < 0.001). TF was applied to Group I after median 10 (0-45) days, and no parenchymal disorder was determined in the median follow-up period of 21.5 (2-40) months. CONCLUSION: MD that can be easily and immediately performed after the diagnosis of TT decreases ischemia time. This seems to be an efficient and reliable procedure when applied together with elective orchiopexy, as a part of the treatment.


Asunto(s)
Torsión del Cordón Espermático/terapia , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
17.
Arch Ital Urol Androl ; 89(4): 282-286, 2017 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29473373

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used as a first-line treatment for locally advanced and metastatic prostatic cancer (Pca). There is no consensus about which alternative treatment should be used after the failure of initial ADT. We aimed to investigate the effect of changes in treatment on PSA and testosterone levels. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with an established diagnosis of either locally advanced or metastatic Pca in two different centers. Depending on the type of medical and/or surgical management protocol planned at initial presentation, all cases were divided into three main groups as follows. Group 1 (n: 80) included the patients who underwent medical management during whole follow-up period in whom the initial management protocol was later on switched to another medical treatment with different agents, Group 2 (n: 20) included patients who were initially treated with a medical management protocol and switched to surgical castration during follow-up evaluation and lastly Group 3 (n: 20) included the patients undergoing treated surgical castration as initial treatment modality without any further medical management protocol. RESULTS: Evaluation of our data did clearly demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the initial and final PSA as well as testosterone levels in Group 1 cases. Mean PSA and testosterone levels increased significantly in these cases despite a change in hormonal therapy by using another agent for androgen deprivation. Cases in Group 2 and 3 cases did not show any statistically significant difference with respect to the mean PSA as well as testosterone values during the same follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our data clearly indicated that in case of a biochemical progression, switching into another alternative medical treatment was not effective enough in limiting the rising PSA levels in a statistically significant manner when compared with the approaches of switching to surgical castration after initial medical treatment or continuing with regular and close follow-up after initial surgical castration alone.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Testosterona/sangre , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Urolithiasis ; 45(2): 209-213, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27170277

RESUMEN

To compare the success and complications of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UPNL) and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SPNL) techniques. We prospectively analyzed 50 patients who underwent SPNL, and 47 patients who underwent UPNL. The patients with a stone size equal to or smaller than 25 mm and we used flipping a coin as the randomization technique. The mean stone size was 20.9 ± 3.6 mm in SPNL, and 20.3 ± 3.0 mm in ultra-mini PNL groups. Stone free rates were 88 % (44/50 patients) and 89.3 % (42/47 patients) in SPNL and UPNL groups, respectively, without any significant difference in between (p = 0.33). No major complications were seen in the UPNL group. PNL has been modified into micro PNL and UPNL parallel to the technological advances to decrease the complications of PNL. When performed as we do UPNL may be an alternative method to SPNL without any additional smaller-calibred nephroscope and with a similar high success rate.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Litotricia/instrumentación , Litotricia/métodos , Nefrostomía Percutánea/instrumentación , Nefrostomía Percutánea/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Litotricia/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrostomía Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Distribución Aleatoria , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
J Endourol ; 30(12): 1285-1289, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27706948

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Comparison of effectiveness and safety of ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treatment of moderate-sized renal stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients scheduled for surgery attributable to renal stones with the greatest diameter of 10 to 25 mm were prospectively analyzed. Patients were randomized into groups with tossing a coin method. The patients who had UMPNL and RIRS were defined as Group I and Group II, respectively. The groups were compared for demograhic data, stone characteristics, operative and postoperative data, stone-free status, and the complications. Student's t-test and Pearson's Chi square tests were used for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 30 patients in Group I, and 43 patients in Group II. The groups were similar for age, gender, side of the stone, and surface area characteristics of the stone (p = 0.194, p = 0.470, p = 0.990, and p = 0.487, respectively). Stone-free rate was 80% (n = 24) in UMPNL, and 74.4% (n = 32) in RIRS (p = 0.579). Modified Clavien Classification Grade 1 to 2 and 3A to 3B complications were similar in two groups (p = 0.959 and p = 0.192, respectively). Comparison of stone-free rates was 93.3% in UMPNL, and 42.9% in RIRS groups for lower pole stones (p = 0.009). Groups I and II were significantly different for visual analog scale scores for postoperative pain (4.73 ± 1.25 vs 2.30 ± 1.12), hospital stay (2.46 ± 3.02 vs 1.37 ± 1.48 days), and time to return to normal daily life (11.26 ± 5.55 vs 6.65 ± 4.30 days) (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both UMPNL and RIRS procedures are effective and safe methods in treatment of middle-sized renal stones. However, UMPNL is more effective than RIRS in treatment of lower pole stones. RIRS is more advantageous when loss from work is taken into consideration.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Riñón/cirugía , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Adulto , Anciano , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio , Seguridad del Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Turk J Urol ; 42(3): 190-6, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27635295

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to evaluate prognostic factors for the survival of patients with Fournier's gangrene (FG), and overview different validated scoring systems for outcome prediction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 39 patients treated for FG in our clinic. Data were collected on medical history, symptoms, physical examination findings, vital signs, laboratory parameters at admission and at the end of treatment, timing and extent of surgical debridement, and the antibiotic treatment used. The Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were used to predict outcome. The data were analyzed in relation with the survival of the patients. Mann-Whitney U test, chi -square test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and Cox regression analysis were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 39 patients analyzed, 8 (20.5%) died and 31 (79.5%) survived. The median FGSI score on admission was 2 (0-9) for the survivors and 6 (2-14) for the non-survivors (p=0.004). The median CCI scores of the survivors and non-survivors were 2 (0-10) and 6.5 (5-11), respectively (p=0.001). Except for urea, albumin and hematocrit levels, no significant differences were found between survivors and non-survivors for other laboratory parameters on admission. Lower albumin levels and advanced age were found to be associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: High blood urea, low albumin, and low hematocrit levels were associated with poor prognosis. High CCI and FGSI scores could be associated with a poor prognosis in patients with FG.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA