Predictive factors and prognostic value of candiduria in critically-ill patients with solid and hematological malignancies.

PURPOSE: To investigate the epidemiology of candiduria in critically-ill patients with solid/hematological malignancies and to assess its predictive factors and prognostic value. METHODS: All adult patients with confirmed solid/hematological malignancy admitted in the intensive care units (ICUs) for more than 48 h were retrospectively included. Urine cultures were sampled on admission and then whenever signs of sepsis were identified. Two groups were compared: (candiduria (+)) and (candiduria (-)). RESULTS: One-hundred-seventy-three patients were included. Solid cancer was the underlying oncological disease for 147 patients (85%) while 26 patients (15%) had hematological malignancies. Twenty-nine patients (16.8%) were diagnosed with candiduria, and 31 urinary samples grew Candida spp. Candida spp represented 55.8% of the total urinary isolates. Fourteen isolates (45.2%) of Candida albicans were identified. Among the 17 non-albicans isolates, Candida tropicalis was the most predominant (41.9%). Six patients (3.5%) had candidemia with no significant difference between candiduria(+) and candiduria(-) groups (respectively, 6.9% and 2.8%; p = 0.264). In multivariate analysis, previous exposure to quinolones (OR = 3.8, CI95% [1.4-8.3]; p = 0.008), mechanical ventilation (OR = 4.1, CI95% [1.1-14.7]; p = 0.034) and renal replacement therapy (OR = 3.5, 95%CI [1.2-9.7]; p = 0.017) were identified as independent factors predicting candiduria. Candiduria was associated with significantly higher ICU-mortality after adjusting for SAPSII score on admission (OR = 2.9 CI95% [1.3-6.8]; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Candiduria is common in cancer critically-ill patients. We reported an increased rate of non-albicans species, over albicans species. Patients with candiduria had higher ICU mortality, probably related to higher frailty and clinical severity.

Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Hypernatremia in Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single Centre Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Hypernatremia is a commonly associated electrolyte disturbance in sepsis and septic shock patients in the ICU. The objective of this study was to identify the prognostic value of hypernatremia in sepsis and septic shock. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study conducted on sepsis and septic shock patients diagnosed prior to admission in the ICU in King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain from January 1st 2017 to February 28th 2019. Data including age, sex, comorbidities, source of sepsis, sodium levels on days one, three, and seven. Data was correlated with the outcome (survival/death and the length of ICU stay). RESULTS: Patients included were 168, 110 survived, and 58 died. Hypernatraemia at day seven was associated with significantly higher mortality (P= 0.03). Hypernatraemia at Day1was associated with a significantly prolonged stay in the ICU (p= 0.039).Multivariate analysis to identify the independent predictors of mortality revealed that immunosuppression and hypernatraemia at Day7 proved to be independent predictors of mortality (P= 0.026 and 0.039 respectively). CONCLUSION: Hypernatremia can be an independent predictor of poor outcome in septic and septic shock patients in the ICU.

A Case of Oropharyngeal Angioedema Following Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) and Mechanical Thrombectomy.

A 72-year-old housewife presented with ischemic cerebrovascular stroke. Intravenous thrombolysis using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) followed by mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia were attempted. The patient developed stridor and tongue swelling, in addition to hypotension and bradycardia, 60 min after completion of the rt-PA infusion. The airway was intubated, and intramuscular adrenaline, together with intravenous hydrocortisone and diphenhydramine, were administered. On the second day, the tongue edema subsided, and the cuff leak test was negative. However, extubation was not attempted due to the development of brain edema. A tracheostomy was later performed, and the patient was weaned off mechanical ventilation.

Usefulness of ultrasound in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening disease. Different imaging techniques have been used to diagnose and guide the ventilatory management of patients with ARDS. Chest ultrasound is a reliable tool to identify interstitial syndrome, lung consolidation, lung collapse, and pleural effusion. In addition, echocardiography is essential in the diagnosis of diastolic left ventricle dysfunction and the estimation of elevated ventricle filling pressures, which is necessary before diagnosing ARDS. Therefore, combining chest and heart ultrasound assessment is useful to diagnose ARDS and guide the ventilatory management of the disease. Available data in the literature suggest that protocol-based approaches should be implemented for the purposes of diagnosis and management.

Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in brain injured patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background The onset of early and/or late seizures in brain injured patients is associated with worse outcome. So far, phenytoin is the most commonly used antiepileptic drug to prevent seizures in this group of patients. Objective In the current metaanalysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of phenytoin versus levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in brain injured patients. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane Library Database by 2 investigators. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included (295 patients). Data were extracted and the quality of each RCT was assessed. Results Levetiracetam was found to be more effective than phenytoin in seizure prophylaxis (OR = 0.23; CI 95% [0.09-0.56]; Q test p value = 0.18 and I2 = 38%). A trend toward less serious side effects was also found in patients treated with levetiracetam (OR = 0.27; CI 95% [0.07-1.07]; Q test p value = 0.72 and I2 = 0%). Conclusion Levetiracetam is more effective and safer than phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in brain injured patients.

Factors associated with increased pancreatic enzymes in septic patients: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The perfusion of splanchnic organs is deeply altered in patients with septic shock. The aim of the study is to identify the predictive factors of septic shock-induced increase of serum lipase and amylase and to assess and evaluate its prognostic impact. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study. All adult patients admitted with septic shock were eligible for our study. Serum lipase and amylase were measured on admission. Patients with and those without increased pancreatic enzymes were compared. Predictive factors of pancreatic insult identified by the univariate analysis were integrated in a stepwise multivariate analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated accordingly. Second, the sensitivity and the specificity of amylase and lipase to predict intensive care unit (ICU) mortality were identified through the Receiver Operator Curve. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. Median [quartiles] age was 68.5 [58-81] years. The APACHE II score was 26 [20-31]. Twenty-three patients (46%) had increased serum amylase and/or serum lipase. Diabetes mellitus (OR = 16; 95% CI [1.7-153.5]; p = 0.016), increased blood urea nitrogen (OR = 1.12; 95% CI [1.02-1.20], p = 0.016), and decreased C-reactive protein (OR = 0.97; 95% CI [0.96-0.99]; p = 0.027) were identified as independent factors predicting increased pancreatic enzymes. Twenty patients (40%) died in the ICU. Neither serum amylase level nor serum lipase level was significantly different between survivors and non-survivors (respectively 49 [27.7-106] versus 85.1 [20.1-165] UI/L; p = 0.7 and 165 [88-316] versus 120 [65.5-592] UI/L; p = 0.952). CONCLUSION: Increase of pancreatic enzymes is common in patients with septic shock. Diabetes and impaired renal function are predictive of increased pancreatic enzymes. Such finding does not carry any negative prognostic value.

Effectiveness of Systemic Fluconazole in Adult Patients With Asymptomatic Candiduria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Asymptomatic candiduria is a common finding in hospitalized patients. Its management modalities are still a matter of debate. Urinary catheter should be removed or replaced in all cases. In the current meta-analysis, we aimed to compare 2 different strategies in term of candida clearance from the urinary tract: Systemic fluconazole versus conservative management. A systematic search was performed in Pubmed, Web of science, and Cochrane Library database by 2 investigators. Three studies were included (421 patients). Data were extracted and the quality of each study was assessed. Systemic fluconazole was associated with a significantly higher short-term clearance of the funguria after 14 days of treatment [odds ratio = 0.43; confidence interval (CI) 95% (0.26-0.65)]. No significant heterogeneity was found among the included studies (Q statistic test = 0.38; I = 0). In conclusion, fluconazole significantly hasten short-term candida clearance from the urinary tract.

Pancreatic injury in patients with septic shock: A literature review.

Sepsis and septic shock are life threatening condition associated with high mortality rate in critically-ill patients. This high mortality is mainly related to the inadequacy between oxygen delivery and cellular demand leading to the onset of multiorgan dysfunction. Whether this multiorgan failure affect the pancreas is not fully investigated. In fact, pancreatic injury may occur because of ischemia, overwhelming inflammatory response, oxidative stress, cellular apoptosis and/or metabolic derangement. Increased serum amylase and/or lipase levels are common in patients with septic shock. However, imaging test rarely reveal significant pancreatic damage. Whether pancreatic dysfunction does affect the prognosis of patients with septic shock or not is still a matter of debate. In fact, only few studies with limited sample size assessed the clinical relevance of the pancreatic injury in this group of patients. In this review, we aimed to describe the epidemiology and the physiopathology of pancreatic injury in septic shock patients, to clarify whether it requires specific management and to assess its prognostic value. Our main finding is that pancreatic injury does not significantly affect the outcome in septic shock patients. Hence, increased serum pancreatic enzymes without clinical features of acute pancreatitis do not require further imaging investigations and specific therapeutic intervention.