Self-help management of patients undergoing chemotherapy: analysis of the online forum of the women's self-help association against cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine threads on chemotherapy in the largest German self-help forum regarding content and emotions. METHODS: All threads on the subject of chemotherapy that were published by February 6th, 2022 were included in the category "drug therapy". A total of 50 threads were analyzed. A quantitative analysis was carried out with regard to content, emotions, number of replies, number of hits, duration of the conversation, duration of access in days, number density of replies, and hits per day. RESULTS: 16 threads are about side effects and in 18 threads, the emotion is fear. Threads in which the emotion fear was expressed have the highest number of replies at 3367. Shared therapy successes are posted with pleasure and achieved a higher mean value for the duration of conversation with 1374.25 days. CONCLUSION: An online self-help forum is a very important source of psychosocial support for patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy in cancer care-the patient perspective.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-related polyneuropathy (CIPN) is a very common, often dose-limiting side effect that affects the patients' quality of life. Treatment usually consists of a combination of medicinal, medical, and individualized treatment approaches, although the effectiveness of these therapies is insufficient for many patients. The aim of this article is to review and evaluate the impact of CIPN on patients' daily lives and possible effective treatment approaches. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was developed based on ten anonymous telephone interviews with CIPN patients. The content of the questionnaire was divided into 5 categories: demographics, clinical presentation, everyday symptoms, treatment of CIPN symptoms, and medical care. Mostly closed questions were used but multiple choice and individual additions by free text answers were possible. RESULTS: CIPN limits patients' quality of life over a long period of time. In addition to diurnal and situational fluctuations, the emotional burden negatively affects patients' daily lives in many ways. From the patients' point of view, the individually implemented therapy measures were most effective in treating their complaints. But even the combination of different therapy methods insufficiently alleviates the symptoms of the patients. CONCLUSION: It is important and necessary to comprehensively inform patients about CIPN as a possible side effect, to point out prevention strategies, and to critically examine and evaluate different therapy approaches. In this way, misunderstandings of the doctor-patient relationship can be avoided. In addition, patient satisfaction and quality of life can be increased in the long term.

[Complementary or alternative medicine in oncology : Chances or risks?] / Komplementäre oder alternative Medizin in der Onkologie : Chancen oder Risiken?

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all cancer patients use complementary or alternative medicine. AIM: The results of the German S3 guidelines on complementary oncology are presented and placed into the context of patient consultation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The core recommendations of the S3 guidelines are summarized including an overview of the evidence. RESULTS: Selected methods of complementary medicine can be used with the aim of improving the quality of life and reducing side effects. Comprehensive data are available for physical activity with respect to survival, quality of life and supportive therapy. For most other methods the evidence is relatively low. Therefore, weighing up the benefits and risks more frequently resulted in negative recommendations in the guidelines, especially for methods based on substances. Exceptions to this are three micronutrients (vitamins B12, D and selenium), as even in the case of a well-balanced diet, deficiency symptoms are possible. Therefore, routine measurement of the blood levels of these micronutrients is recommended. CONCLUSION: The questions from patients on what they can do by themselves should be answered respectfully and based on evidence. The benefits and risks of complementary methods must be carefully considered. To do this, regular questioning of patients on the interest in complementary methods is recommended. The decisive benefit of complementary medicine is the chance for patients to become active themselves. Therefore, all recommendations refer to the discussion with the patient, which do not formulate a therapy but are consultation recommendations: should be recommended instead of should be done.

[Treatment decisions in oncology : Walking the tightrope between honesty and hope, lifetime, and quality of life]. / Therapieentscheidungen in der Onkologie : Gratwanderung zwischen Ehrlichkeit und Hoffnung, Lebenszeit und Lebensqualität.

BACKGROUND: A cancer diagnosis is always associated with a threat to life and therefore demands a great deal of the decision maker. For patients, this means making decisions under high emotional stress. On the other hand, medical facts can limit freedom of choice. For interactions with the patient in medical practice, this often means a balancing act between honesty and hope. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to present factors that influence medical decisions in the area of conflict between ethical and moral obligations towards the patient and the daily routine of oncological care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study is a narrative review. RESULTS: There are different decision models and decision principles, all of which are influenced by the physician-patient relationship. In oncology, informing patents with regard to lifetime and quality of life is particularly demanding. Sometimes a balancing act between honesty and hope must be made. CONCLUSION: In every treatment situation but particularly in the palliative situation, open and honest communication is absolutely necessary. It must be ensured that the patient receives all the necessary information, understands it, and includes it in the decision-making process. An emphatic but clear naming of the medical facts allows the patient to maintain his autonomy and dignity.

A Pilot Study of Side Effects of Cancer Therapies and their Impact on Satisfaction with Life.

This survey aimed at getting a first insight into diverse side effects and their association with satisfaction with life as well as the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in cancer patients. A total of 100 patients in a German University Hospital were included. General side effects like fatigue, fever, headache, limb pain and sleep disorders had a significant influence on the patients' satisfaction with life (p = .034 and p = .032, respectively). Concerning CAM, we could not detect any association between the frequency of side effects and the use of CAM. Improving the treatment of side effects may have a strong impact on patients' satisfaction with life.

Mistletoe in oncological treatment: a systematic review : Part 2: quality of life and toxicity of cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: One important goal of any cancer therapy is to improve or maintain quality of life. In this context, mistletoe treatment is discussed to be highly controversial. The aim of this systematic review is to give an extensive overview about the current state of evidence concerning mistletoe therapy of oncologic patients regarding quality of life and side effects of cancer treatments. METHODS: In September and October 2017, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, CINAHL and "Science Citation Index Expanded" (Web of Science) were systematically searched. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 3647 articles and 28 publications with 2639 patients were finally included in this review. Mistletoe was used in bladder cancer, breast cancer, other gynecological cancers (cervical cancer, corpus uteri cancer, and ovarian cancer), colorectal cancer, other gastrointestinal cancer (gastric cancer and pancreatic cancer), glioma, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and osteosarcoma. In nearly all studies, mistletoe was added to a conventional therapy. Regarding quality of life, 17 publications reported results. Studies with better methodological quality show less or no effects on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to quality of life or reduction of treatment-associated side effects, a thorough review of the literature does not provide any indication to prescribe mistletoe to patients with cancer.

Mistletoe in oncological treatment: a systematic review : Part 1: survival and safety.

PURPOSE: Mistletoe treatment of cancer patients is discussed highly controversial in the scientific literature. Aim of this systematic review is to give an extensive overview about current state of research concerning mistletoe therapy of oncologic patients regarding survival, quality of life and safety. METHODS: In September and October 2017 Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, CINAHL and "Science Citation Index Expanded" (Web of Science) were systematically searched. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 3647 hits and 28 publications with 2639 patients were finally included in this review. Mistletoe was used in bladder cancer, breast cancer, other gynecological cancers (cervical cancer, corpus uteri cancer, and ovarian cancer), colorectal cancer, other gastrointestinal cancer (gastric cancer and pancreatic cancer), glioma, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and osteosarcoma. In nearly all studies, mistletoe was added to a conventional therapy. Patient relevant endpoints were overall survival (14 studies, n = 1054), progression- or disease-free survival or tumor response (10 studies, n = 1091). Most studies did not show any effect of mistletoe on survival. Especially high quality studies do not show any benefit. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to survival, a thorough review of the literature does not provide any indication to prescribe mistletoe to patients with cancer.

Information Needs of Cancer Patients and Perception of Impact of the Disease, of Self-Efficacy, and Locus of Control.

The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between information needs and cancer patients' perceptions of the impact of the disease, self-efficacy, and locus of control. Using a standardized questionnaire, we obtained data from patients who attended a series of lectures. The questionnaire included questions on their information needs, sources of information, satisfaction with information, and short questionnaires on self-efficacy, perception of the disease, and locus of control of reinforcement. Data was obtained from 185 patients. Our results showed that the sources of information that were most often used were physicians (84 %), print media (68 %), and the Internet (59 %); online fora (7.5 %), non-medical practitioners (9.7 %), and telephone-based counseling (8.6 %) were only used by a minority. Patients with a high perception of their own control over the disease more often used any source of information available to them and were more often interested in acquiring additional information. Higher self-efficacy was significantly associated with the need for information on all topics. Patients with a higher external locus of control significantly more often used sources of information and had significantly more need for additional information. By contrast, there were no associations with an internal locus of control. Neither external nor internal locus of control showed any associations with satisfaction with information. Information needs seem to be higher in patients with a high external locus of control and low self-efficacy. Physicians, other professionals, and institutions that provide information may take these relationships into consideration for tailoring their services to patients.