RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of eczema among children in New Zealand. METHODS: Population-based retrospective observational study utilising national pharmaceutical dispensing records for topical corticosteroids and emollients for all New Zealand children aged 0-14 years from 1st January 2006 to 31st December 2019. Data are reported using descriptive statistics, with comparisons between ethnicities and socioeconomic quintiles undertaken with rate ratios. RESULTS: Based on dispensing data, the prevalence of eczema for New Zealand children aged 0-14 years in 2018 was 14.0% (95% CI 14.0%-14.1%), with prevalence decreasing in older age groups (children aged <1 year 26.0% (25.6%-26.4%); children aged 10-14 years 8.8% (8.7%-8.9%)). Prevalence was higher in Pacific children (23.6% (23.3%-24.0%)), but slightly lower in Maori children (13.2% (13.0%-13.3%)). CONCLUSION: Eczema is a common condition affecting a considerable proportion of children in New Zealand. This study provides nationwide paediatric prevalence data for New Zealand, and highlights the increased burden of eczema in Pacific children. Inequity in dispensing of topical corticosteroids is postulated to explain the reduced rates found for Maori children compared to previous studies. These results support the need for further research to determine factors contributing to differing eczema prevalence rates in New Zealand.
RESUMEN
The term 'hyperkeratotic flexural erythema' (HFE) has been used synonymously with granular parakeratosis (GP), to describe a scaly, typically intertriginous rash associated with contact factors such as benzalkonium chloride. However, clinical HFE can occur without the classical GP histological pattern. We reviewed skin biopsies from 10 patients with clinically diagnosed HFE. A progression of histopathological features is suggested. The absence of histological GP should not exclude the clinical diagnosis of HFE when there is a high index of suspicion.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The potential link between isotretinoin and sexual dysfunction has been reported in various studies. However, such an association has not been explored within the context of a literature review until now. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the methodology and quality of studies investigating this association, and to examine the definitions of sexual dysfunction used. METHODS: A scoping review approach was used to identify peer-reviewed research articles. The search terms used were: "isotretinoin", "sexual dysfunction", "erectile dysfunction", "ejaculatory disorders" "decreased libido", "female sexual interest", "female arousal disorder", "libido", "pelvic pain", "dyspareunia", "orgasmic disorder", "impotence", "ovaries", "fertility" and "menstrual irregularity". RESULTS: 54 peer-reviewed manuscripts consisting of 8 animal studies and 46 human studies consisting of 2,420 patients were included. Of the studies in humans, there were 18 case reports/case series, 2 case-controls, 4 cross-sectional studies, 6 longitudinal studies, 3 pharmacovigilance reports and 13 cohort studies. The most frequently observed dose range of isotretinoin was 0.5-1.0mg/kg/day usually for a duration of 1-6 months. More than half of the studies (54%, n=25) reported a beneficial or neutral effect of isotretinoin on sexual function. The majority of studies (89%, n = 41) were categorized as Oxford evidenced-based-medicine level 4. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review revealed very weak evidence supporting a link between isotretinoin and sexual dysfunction. Notably, the diverse definitions of sexual dysfunction pose a significant challenge for comparative analysis. The authors advocate for a standardized definition of sexual dysfunction and a framework for determining causality in order to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between isotretinoin and sexual dysfunction.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In the last 10 years methylisothiazolinone (MI) emerged as a global cause of preservative-related ACD. New Zealand has liberal regulations for the MI concentration limit in cosmetic products compared to Europe and Australia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of MI sensitisation in New Zealand, explore sources of MI exposure and make recommendations on New Zealand regulations for MI use. METHODS: This retrospective study included data from patients who underwent patch testing with MI from 2008 to 2021 in a tertiary hospital dermatology clinic and a private dermatology clinic in Auckland, New Zealand. Patient baseline characteristics were recorded along with results of patch testing. Sources of MI exposure were identified from medical records. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1049 patch tests were performed in 1044 patients. MI was only tested as a stand-alone allergen from 2015; positive reactions to MI increased from 5.3% in 2015 to a peak of 11.9% in 2017 and then decreased to 6.4% in 2021. The most common source of MI exposure was shampoo or conditioner (27.7% of all relevant reactions) followed by occupational exposures to paints, biocides or glue (19.1%). CONCLUSION: Both sensitisation and ACD to MI appear to be decreasing, likely secondary to changes in product compounding due to stricter concentration limits internationally. We recommend New Zealand adopt lower MI concentration limits for cosmetics to match the limits of Australia and Europe.