ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H) version 1.0.

BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) has been accepted as a robust tool to evaluate the magnitude of clinical benefit reported in trials for oncological therapies. However, the ESMO-MCBS hitherto has only been validated for solid tumours. With the rapid development of novel therapies for haematological malignancies, we aimed to develop an ESMO-MCBS version that is specifically designed and validated for haematological malignancies. METHODS: ESMO and the European Hematology Association (EHA) initiated a collaboration to develop a version for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H). The process incorporated five landmarks: field testing of the ESMO-MCBS version 1.1 (v1.1) to identify shortcomings specific to haematological diseases, drafting of the ESMO-MCBS:H forms, peer review and revision of the draft based on re-scoring (resulting in a second draft), assessment of reasonableness of the scores generated, final review and approval by ESMO and EHA including executive boards. RESULTS: Based on the field testing results of 80 haematological trials and extensive review for feasibility and reasonableness, five amendments to ESMO-MCBS were incorporated in the ESMO-MCBS:H addressing the identified shortcomings. These concerned mainly clinical trial endpoints that differ in haematology versus solid oncology and the very indolent nature of nevertheless incurable diseases such as follicular lymphoma, which hampers presentation of mature data. In addition, general changes incorporated in the draft version of the ESMO-MCBS v2 were included, and specific forms for haematological malignancies generated. Here we present the final approved forms of the ESMO-MCBS:H, including instructions. CONCLUSION: The haematology-specific version ESMO-MCBS:H allows now full applicability of the scale for evaluating the magnitude of clinical benefit derived from clinical studies in haematological malignancies.

Methodological and reporting standards for quality-of-life data eligible for European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) credit.

BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) has been developed to grade clinical benefit of cancer therapies. Improvement in quality of life (QoL) is considered relevant, especially in the non-curative setting. This is reflected by an upgrade of the preliminary ESMO-MCBS score if QoL is improved compared to the control arm or a downgrade if an improvement in progression-free survival is not paralleled by an improvement in QoL or overall survival. Given the importance of QoL for the final score, a need to ensure the robustness of QoL data was recognised. DESIGN: A checklist was created based on existing guidelines for QoL research. Field testing was carried out using clinical trials that either received an adjustment of the preliminary ESMO-MCBS score based on QoL or had QoL as the primary endpoint. Several rounds of revision and re-testing of the checklist were undertaken until a final consensus was reached. RESULTS: The final checklist consists of four items and can be applied if three prerequisites are met: (i) QoL is at least a secondary endpoint, (ii) evidence of reliability and validity of the instrument is provided, and (iii) a statistically and clinically significant improvement in QoL is observed. The four items on the checklist pertain to the (i) hypothesis, (ii) compliance and missing data, (iii) presentation of the results, and (iv) statistical and clinical relevance. Field testing revealed that a clear QoL hypothesis and correction for multiple testing were mostly lacking, while the main statistical method was always described. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ESMO-MCBS QoL checklist will facilitate objective and transparent decision making on QoL data within the ESMO-MCBS scoring process. Trials published until 1 January 2025 will have to meet the prerequisites and at least two items for crediting QoL benefit in the final ESMO-MCBS score. Trials published thereafter will have to meet all four items.

Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours and somatostatin receptor status: an assessment of unlicensed use of somatostatin analogues in the clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The use of somatostatin analogues (SSAs) has not been formally approved in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the absence of positive controlled trials, even though it is recommended as a potential therapeutic option in recent guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have assessed the use of SSA in the general practice in Austria by retrospectively analysing patients with pulmonary NETs referred to our European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society centre in Vienna for second opinion or further therapy. In addition, we have analysed the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression of those patients by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and SSTR imaging, e.g. 68Ga-DOTANOC-positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and whether such analyses had been carried out before referral at our centre. RESULTS: Out of 34 patients (19 atypical and 15 typical carcinoids) with metastatic or advanced disease, 10/34 (29%) had been prescribed SSA before referral. No IHC for SSTR had been carried out, and only 9/34 (27%) had undergone SSTR imaging by nuclear medicine. Sufficient material for IHC was available in 29/34 (85%) patients and SSTR-IHC was rated negative in 13/29 (45%), weakly positive in 4/29 (14%), moderately positive in 5/29 (17%) and strongly positive in 7/29 (24%) patients. On SSTR imaging, 8/34 patients (24%) were positive, 13/34 (38%) negative and 13/34 patients (38%) showed a mix of positive and negative NET lesions. In 11/29 (38%) patients with both IHC and imaging available, discordance of SSTR expression on imaging and histological assessment was detected. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that uncritical use of SSA should be discouraged, and assessment of SSTR, preferably by imaging, is mandatory before prescription of SSA in pulmonary NETs.

Managing hematological cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO-EHA Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created enormous challenges for the clinical management of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), raising questions about the optimal care of this patient group. METHODS: This consensus manuscript aims at discussing clinical evidence and providing expert advice on statements related to the management of HMs in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an international consortium was established including a steering committee, which prepared six working packages addressing significant clinical questions from the COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation strategies to specific HMs management in the pandemic. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Hematology Association, statements were discussed and voted upon. When a consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements to develop consensual clinical guidance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The expert panel agreed on 33 statements, reflecting a consensus, which will guide clinical decision making for patients with hematological neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

How I treat medullary thyroid cancer.

Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) represents a rare neuroendocrine neoplasm originating from neoplastic C-cells in the thyroid gland. While localized disease is potentially curable with an optimized surgical approach, the number of relapses is high, and a considerable number of patients present with primary metastatic disease. Multidisciplinary management including standardized surveillance following surgery, but also early involvement of medical oncologists, is therefore important. Several oncogenic pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of MTC including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, MET, and most importantly RET, and the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors vandetanib and cabozantinib have been approved for advanced MTC based on data from phase III studies. As activating RET mutations represent the most important driver, specific RET inhibitors were introduced and suggest high response rates with limited off-target toxicities. The current review provides a practical overview on clinical presentation and management from early to advanced MTC.

Biases in study design, implementation, and data analysis that distort the appraisal of clinical benefit and ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) scoring.

BACKGROUND: The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) is a validated, widely used tool developed to score the clinical benefit from cancer medicines reported in clinical trials. ESMO-MCBS scores assume valid research methodologies and quality trial implementation. Studies incorporating flawed design, implementation, or data analysis may generate outcomes that exaggerate true benefit and are not generalisable. Failure to either indicate or penalise studies with bias undermines the intention and diminishes the integrity of ESMO-MCBS scores. This review aimed to evaluate the adequacy of the ESMO-MCBS to address bias generated by flawed design, implementation, or data analysis and identify shortcomings in need of amendment. METHODS: As part of a refinement of the ESMO-MCBS, we reviewed trial design, implementation, and data analysis issues that could bias the results. For each issue of concern, we reviewed the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 approach against standards derived from Helsinki guidelines for ethical human research and guidelines from the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, the Food and Drugs Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and European Network for Health Technology Assessment. RESULTS: Six design, two implementation, and two data analysis and interpretation issues were evaluated and in three, the ESMO-MCBS provided adequate protections. Seven shortcomings in the ability of the ESMO-MCBS to identify and address bias were identified. These related to (i) evaluation of the control arm, (ii) crossover issues, (iii) criteria for non-inferiority, (iv) substandard post-progression treatment, (v) post hoc subgroup findings based on biomarkers, (vi) informative censoring, and (vii) publication bias against quality-of-life data. CONCLUSION: Interpretation of the ESMO-MCBS scores requires critical appraisal of trials to understand caveats in trial design, implementation, and data analysis that may have biased results and conclusions. These will be addressed in future iterations of the ESMO-MCBS.

High-dose clarithromycin is an active monotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT): the HD-K phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin displays immunomodulatory and antineoplastic properties. As single agent, this macrolide is associated with tumor responses in anecdotal cases of relapsed/refractory extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (rrEMZL), with a putative dose-dependent effect. Tolerability and activity of high-dose clarithromycin (HD-K) in patients with rrEMZL were addressed in a phase II trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01516606). METHODS: HIV-negative adults with rrEMZL and at least one measurable/parametrable lesion were enrolled and treated with four courses of oral clarithromycin 2 g/day, days 1-14, every 21 days. Activity (overall response rate, ORR) was the primary end point. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were registered (median age 70 years, range 47-88 years; M:F ratio: 0.27). HD-K was given at greater than or equal to second relapse in 11 patients. Ocular adnexae were the most commonly involved organs. Five patients had hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus (HBV/HCV) infections; Helicobacter pylori and Chlamydophila psittaci infections were excluded at the time of patient registration.Tolerability was excellent, even among HBV/HCV-positive patients; only two patients had grade >2 toxicity (nausea). Six patients achieved a complete remission and six a partial response (ORR = 52%; 95% confidence interval 32% to 72%). Age, previous treatment and stage did not influence activity. At a median follow-up of 24 (16-33) months, only two patients with responsive disease experienced relapse, with a 2-year progression-free survival of 56 ± 10%; all patients are alive. CONCLUSIONS: HD-K is a safe and active salvage treatment in EMZL patients. This macrolide deserves to be further investigated in EMZL and other lymphoma categories.

[Operative versus non operative treatment of odontoid non unions. How dangerous is it not to stabilize a non union of the dens?]. / Operative oder konservative Behandlung der Pseudarthrose des Dens axis. Wie gefährlich ist es, eine Denspseudarthrose nicht zu stabilisieren?

INTRODUCTION: Injuries precede the vast majority of all odontoid pseudarthroses. Because of specific anatomic conditions type II injuries lead more often than other types to non unions. For its development insufficient internal or external fixation and a persisting fracture gap are crucial. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 71 patients after operative stabilization of odontoid fractures with two anterior lag-screws we detected 8 non unions. In 3 patients the interval between accident and operation amounted to more than 5 weeks, seven times we did not succeed in closing the fracture gap. Technical mistakes like insufficient reduction (n = 1) or screw misplacement (n = 3) were additional reasons. According to the literature and own observations an os odontoideum must be considered in most instances as a pseudarthrosis after a lesion of the subdental synchondrosis in childhood. The most important diagnostic tool in odontoid non unions is a dynamic examination of the upper cervical spine under fluoroscopic control in maximum flexion and extension. We propose a classification of posttraumatic dens non unions into 4 types. Type I corresponds to a stable "non union" in approximate anatomical position of the dens and without signs of instability in the former fracture zone. Type II describes a relatively stable grossly displaced non union that is not to be reduced by simple, closed means. Type III means an unstable non union and Type IV a posttraumatic os odontoideum. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutical recommendations need to be differentiated. Unstable non unions are most often responsible for persistent pain, may result in acute or chronic myelopathy++ and therefore - as well as ossa odontoidea - need operative fixation. In considerably displaced non unions a closed reduction manoeuver with long term traction should be tried. The operative treatment of choice is the posterior transarticular screw fixation C1/C2 desirably in a percutaneous technique. Tight, "stable" pseudarthroses in the sense of a persisting fracture gap in painfree patients should first be controlled radiologically. If the odontoid position remains unchanged, non operative treatment may be continued.

[HIV infection caused by cold preserved bone transplants]. / HIV-Infektion durch kältekonservierte Knochentransplantate.

We reporting four cases of HIV infection caused by bone allografts from one donor. All transplantations were performed between November 1984 and January 1985. In all, 12 recipients had bone allografts from the HIV-infected donor, 7 of whom are now HIV-negative and 4, HIV-positive. One of the patients died a natural death in her 10th decade. The donor was not been tested before the grafts were harvested, as HIV-antibody detection was not possible at the time (October 1984); no HIV-antibody kits had yet been developed. Subsequent testing of the asservated serum for HIV antibodies gave a positive result. The chronological course of the case is described and the case is discussed in detail.