RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are only scant studies of predicting outcomes of pediatric resuscitation due to lack of population-based data. This study aimed to determine variable factors that may impact the survival of resuscitated children aged under 24 months. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 66 children under 24 months. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with pediatric advanced life support guideline was performed uniformly for all children. Linear regression analysis with variable factors was conducted to determine impacts on mortality. RESULT: Factors with statistically significant increases in mortality were the number of administered epinephrine (p value < 0.001), total CPR duration (p value < 0.001), in-hospital CPR duration of out-hospital cardiac arrest (p value < 0.001), and changes in cardiac rhythm (p value < 0.040). However, there is no statistically significant association between patient outcomes and remaining factors such as age, sex, underlying disease, etiology, time between last normal to CPR, initial CPR location, initial cardiac rhythm, venous access time, or inotropic usage. CONCLUSION: More than 10 times of epinephrine administration and CPR duration longer than 30 minutes were associated with a higher mortality rate, while each epinephrine administration and prolonged CPR time increased mortality. IMPACT STATEMENT: This study analyzed various factors influencing mortality after cardiac arrest in patients under 24 months. Increased number of administered epinephrine and prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration do not increase survival rate in patients under 24 months. In patients with electrocardiogram rhythm changes during CPR, mortality increased when the rhythm changed into asystole in comparison to no changes occurring in the rhythm.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , EpinefrinaRESUMEN
To identify a useful non-imaging tool to screen paediatric patients with traumatic brain injury for intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). We retrospectively analysed patients aged < 15 years who visited the emergency department with head trauma between January 2015 and September 2020. We divided patients into two groups (ICH and non-ICH) and compared their demographic and clinical factors. Among 85 patients, 21 and 64 were in the ICH and non-ICH groups, respectively. Age (p = 0.002), Pediatric trauma score (PTS; p < 0.001), seizure (p = 0.042), and fracture (p < 0.001) differed significantly between the two groups. Factors differing significantly between the groups were as follows: age (odds ratio, 0.84, p = 0.004), seizure (4.83, p = 0.013), PTS (0.15, p < 0.001), and fracture (69.3, p < 0.001). Factors with meaningful cut-off values were age (cut-off [sensitivity, specificity], 6.5 [0.688, 0.714], p = 0.003) and PTS [10.5 (0.906, 0.81), p < 0.001]. Based on the previously known value for critical injury (≤ 8 points) and the cut-off value of the PTS identified in this study (≤ 10 points), we divided patients into low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups; their probabilities of ICH (95% confidence intervals) were 0.16-12.74%, 35.86-89.14%, and 100%, respectively. PTS was the only factor that differed significantly between mild and severe ICH cases (p = 0.012). PTS is a useful screening tool with a high predictability for ICH and can help reduce radiation exposure when used to screen patient groups before performing imaging studies.