Initial sarcopenia and body composition changes as prognostic factors in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation: An artificial intelligence-based volumetric study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the influence of baseline sarcopenia and changes in body composition on survival during cervical cancer treatment. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage IB1-IVB cervical cancer who underwent primary concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) between 2002 and 2022 were included. The exclusion criteria were prior radical hysterectomy, lack of pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging, or significant comorbidities. An artificial intelligence-based automatic segmentation program assessed body composition by analyzing CT images, defining L3 sarcopenia (L3 skeletal muscle index [SMI] <39cm2/m2) and volumetric sarcopenia (volumetric SMI <180.4 cm3/m3). Comparative and multivariate analyses identified the prognostic factors. The impact of body component changes during CCRT was explored. RESULTS: Among 347 patients, there were 125 recurrences and 59 deaths (median follow-up, 50.5 months). Seven patients were excluded from the volumetric sarcopenia analysis because of incomplete baseline CT data, and 175 patients were included in the analysis of body composition changes. Patients with L3 sarcopenia had a lower 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate (55.6% vs. 66.2%, p = 0.027), while those with volumetric sarcopenia showed a poorer 5-year overall survival rate (76.5% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.036). Patients with total fat loss during CCRT had a worse 5-year PFS rate than those with total fat gain (61.9% vs. 73.8%, p = 0.029). Multivariate analyses revealed that total fat loss (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.172; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.066-4.424; p = 0.033) was a significant factor for recurrence, whereas L3 sarcopenia was not. Volumetric sarcopenia increased the risk of death by 1.75-fold (aHR, 1.750; 95% CI, 1.012-3.025; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with cervical cancer undergoing CCRT, initial volumetric sarcopenia and fat loss during treatment are survival risk factors. These findings suggest the potential importance of personalized supportive care, including tailored nutrition and exercise interventions.

Elevation of circulating neutrophil extracellular traps in endometrial cancer: Poor prognostic value of cell-free double-stranded DNA.

OBJECTIVE: Neutrophils produce neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) by releasing nuclear contents into the extracellular environment. NETs are associated with systemic inflammation and cancer development and progression. We aimed to investigate whether NET markers are associated with the prognosis of endometrial cancer. METHODS: Circulating levels of three NET markers (histone-DNA complex, cell-free double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), and neutrophil elastase) were measured in 98 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery as primary treatment between January 2015 and June 2018 and 45 healthy women. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses were conducted to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic utility of the markers for endometrial cancer. RESULTS: Patients with endometrial cancer showed significantly higher levels of the three NET markers than those in healthy controls. In discriminating endometrial cancer patients from healthy controls, the three NET markers showed AUC values in the following order: cell-free dsDNA (0.832; 95 % CI, 0.760-0.889), histone-DNA complex (0.740; 95 % CI, 0.660-0.809), and neutrophil elastase (0.689; 95 % CI, 0.607-0.764), comparable to those of CA-125 (0.741; 95 % CI, 0.659-0.813). Multivariate analysis adjusting for FIGO stage, histology, and lymphovascular space invasion, and lymph node involvement revealed that cell-free dsDNA level (cutoff: 95.2 ng/mL) was an independent prognostic marker for poor progression-free (adjusted HR, 2.75; 95 % CI, 1.096.92; P = 0.032) and overall survival (adjusted HR, 11.51; 95 % CI, 2.0664.22; P = 0.005) for patients with endometrial cancer. CONCLUSION: High levels of circulating NET markers were observed in patients with endometrial cancer. Cell-free dsDNA levels may play a role as prognostic markers for endometrial cancer.

Comparison of survival and complications between minimally invasive and open staging surgeries in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare survival and complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery and evaluate related risk factors in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. METHODS: Clinicopathologic characteristics; survival outcomes; complications; and prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival were compared among patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary staging surgery using laparoscopic, robotic, or open abdominal surgery (2004-2017). RESULTS: In total, 91 patients were included: 41 and 50 underwent minimally invasive surgery and open surgery, respectively. The minimally invasive surgery and open surgery groups showed similar progression-free survival (5-year progression-free survival rate, 58.7 % vs. 58.5 %; P = .925) and overall survival (5-year overall survival rate, 73.6 % vs. 80.3 %; P = .834). Intraoperative (7.2 % vs. 6.0 %; P = .111) and postoperative surgical complications (14.6 % vs. 26.0 %; P = .165) were similar between the groups. However, blood loss was lower (mean, 305.1 vs. 561.2 ml, P < .001) and hospital stay was shorter (mean, 8.2 vs. 15.4 days, P < .001) in the minimally invasive surgery group. Using multivariate analysis, lymphovascular space invasion was identified as poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 3.054; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.521-6.132; P = .002) and overall survival (adjusted HR, 3.918; 95 % CI, 1.455-10.551; P = .007), whereas age ≥ 60 years was poor prognostic factor for only overall survival (adjusted HR, 5.0953; 95 % CI, 1.660-15.378; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical outcomes did not differ between the minimally invasive and open surgery group in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Lymphovascular space invasion was a significant survival factor in this context.

Clinical research in endometrial cancer: consensus recommendations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup.

The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference on Clinical Research (ECCC) was held in Incheon, South Korea, Nov 2-3, 2023. The aims were to develop consensus statements for future trials in endometrial cancer to achieve harmonisation on design elements, select important questions, and identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and finalisation of 18 statements within four topic groups, addressing adjuvant treatment in high-risk disease; treatment for metastatic and recurrent disease; trial designs for rare endometrial cancer subgroups and special circumstances; and specific methodology and adaptation for trials in low-resource settings. In addition, eight areas of unmet need were identified. This was the first GCIG Consensus Conference to include patient advocates and an expert on inclusion, diversity, equity, and access to take part in all aspects of the process and output. Four early-career investigators were also selected for participation, ensuring that they represented different GCIG member groups and regions. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 16 of the 18 statements, with 97% concordance for the remaining two. Using the described methodology from previous Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conferences, this conference did not require even one minority statement. The high acceptance rate following active involvement in the preparation, discussion, and refinement of the statements by all representatives confirmed the consensus progress within a global academic setting, and the expectation that the ECCC will lead to greater harmonisation, actualisation, inclusion, and resolution of unmet needs in clinical research for individuals living with and beyond endometrial cancer worldwide.

Exploring metastasis and recurrence patterns in low-risk grade 3 endometrial cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Females with low-risk endometrial cancer typically have low lymph node metastasis risk and promising prognosis without lymphadenectomy. However, the impact of grade 3 endometrial cancer on nodal involvement, recurrence, and prognosis within this specific subgroup remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and recurrence in a subgroup of females with grade 3 early-stage low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer. METHODS: We identified patients from the endometrial cancer cohorts of seven institutional hospitals. The study included patients who underwent hysterectomy between January 2013 and December 2021 with preoperative endometrioid histological type, less than half myometrial invasion, no tumor spread outside the corpus on imaging, normal CA-125 level, and histological grade 3. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of the patients were collected. Recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. RESULTS: Overall, 36 patients were included in this analysis. Of the 33 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, 1 (1/33, 3.0 %) had lymph node metastasis and 27 (75.0 %) received adjuvant therapy. At a median follow-up of 58 months, three females (8 %) had recurrence and all cases involved lymph nodes. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 88.7 %. No significant difference was observed in the recurrence-free survival between females who did and did not undergo lymphadenectomy (p = 0.554). CONCLUSION: Females diagnosed with low-risk grade 3 endometrial cancer typically have favorable prognosis. However, lymph node metastasis and recurrence risks still exist, with all recorded instances of recurrence involving lymph nodes.

Prognostic Role of CA-125 Elimination Rate Constant (KELIM) in Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Who Received PARP Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) in EOC patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy followed by PARP inhibitors, in either upfront or interval treatment settings. METHODS: Between July 2019 and November 2022, we identified stage III-IV EOC patients who underwent primary or interval cytoreductive surgery and received olaparib or niraparib. Individual KELIM values were assessed based on validated kinetics and classified into favorable and unfavorable cohorts. RESULTS: In a study of 252 patients undergoing frontline maintenance therapy with olaparib or niraparib, favorable KELIM (≥1) scores were associated with a higher PFS benefit in the primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) cohort (hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death 3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.37-8.97, p = 0.009). Additionally, within the interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) cohort, a favorable KELIM score (≥1) significantly increased the likelihood of achieving complete resection following cytoreductive surgery, with 59.4% in the favorable KELIM group compared to 37.8% in those with unfavorable KELIM. CONCLUSIONS: A favorable KELIM score was associated with improved PFS in patients with advanced EOC undergoing PCS. Furthermore, in the ICS cohort, a favorable KELIM score increased the probability of complete cytoreduction.

Impact of Bevacizumab on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Platinum-resistant Relapsed Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Over the past several decades, new anti-cancer drugs have been developed for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. The development of drugs has led to changes in improving the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. One of these drugs, bevacizumab, is used for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate survival improvement in patients with platinum-resistant relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (PR-ROC) after introduction of bevacizumab in real world experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively divided patients with PR-ROC into two groups: bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (BEV-CT group) and chemotherapy alone (CT group). Progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint, between two groups was compared to evaluate whether survival outcomes were improved. In addition, overall survival (OS) was also compared. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in the study: 57 and 97 patients in the BEV-CT and CT groups, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the BEV-CT group than in the CT group. The use of bevacizumab was identified as a favorable prognostic factor for OS. In a subgroup analysis confined to second-line chemotherapy, PFS and OS were statistically different between groups. More patients in the CT group suffered hematologic adverse events of grade 3 or above than patients in the BEV-CT group. CONCLUSION: In a real-world clinical setting, introduction of bevacizumab led to improvement of OS in patients with PR-ROC with a tolerable toxicity.

Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 inhibition induces ER stress-mediated apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells.

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of death among gynecologic tumors, often detected at advanced stages. Metabolic reprogramming and increased lipid biosynthesis are key factors driving cancer cell growth. Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) is a crucial enzyme involved in de novo lipid synthesis, producing mono-unsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs). Here, we aimed to investigate the expression and significance of SCD1 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Comparative analysis of normal ovarian surface epithelial (NOSE) tissues and cell lines revealed elevated SCD1 expression in EOC tissues and cells. Inhibition of SCD1 significantly reduced the proliferation of EOC cells and patient-derived organoids and induced apoptotic cell death. Interestingly, SCD1 inhibition did not affect the viability of non-cancer cells, indicating selective cytotoxicity against EOC cells. SCD1 inhibition on EOC cells induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress by activating the unfolded protein response (UPR) sensors and resulted in apoptosis. The addition of exogenous oleic acid, a product of SCD1, rescued EOC cells from ER stress-mediated apoptosis induced by SCD1 inhibition, underscoring the importance of lipid desaturation for cancer cell survival. Taken together, our findings suggest that the inhibition of SCD1 is a promising biomarker as well as a novel therapeutic target for ovarian cancer by regulating ER stress and inducing cancer cell apoptosis.

Mitochondrial fission enhances IL-6-induced metastatic potential in ovarian cancer via ERK1/2 activation.

Ovarian cancer is a lethal gynecologic cancer mostly diagnosed in an advanced stage with an accumulation of ascites. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory cytokine is highly elevated in malignant ascites and plays a pleiotropic role in cancer progression. Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that undergo fission and fusion in response to external stimuli and dysregulation in their dynamics has been implicated in cancer progression and metastasis. Here, we investigate the effect of IL-6 on mitochondrial dynamics in ovarian cancer cells (OVCs) and its impact on metastatic potential. Treatment with IL-6 on ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV3 and PA-1) led to an elevation in the metastatic potential of OVCs. Interestingly, a positive association was observed between dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), a regulator of mitochondrial fission, and IL-6R in metastatic ovarian cancer tissues. Additionally, IL-6 treatment on OVCs was linked to the activation of Drp1, with a notable increase in the ratio of the inhibitory form p-Drp1(S637) to the active form p-Drp1(S616), indicating enhanced mitochondrial fission. Moreover, IL-6 treatment triggered the activation of ERK1/2, and inhibiting ERK1/2 mitigated IL-6-induced mitochondrial fission. Suppressing mitochondrial fission through siRNA transfection and a pharmacological inhibitor reduced the IL-6-induced migration and invasion of OVCs. This was further supported by 3D invasion assays using patient-derived spheroids. Altogether, our study suggests the role of mitochondrial fission in the metastatic potential of OVCs induced by IL-6. The inhibition of mitochondrial fission could be a potential therapeutic approach to suppress the metastasis of ovarian cancer.

Chemotherapy response score no longer predicts survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation and/or maintenance therapy.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to revalidate the chemotherapy response score (CRS) system as a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer patients with breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations or those receiving frontline poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or bevacizumab as maintenance therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery between January 2007 and December 2021 at 5 tertiary medical institutions in South Korea. At each hospital, pathologists independently assessed each slide of omental tissues obtained from surgery using the CRS system. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the effect of BRCA mutation, maintenance therapy, and CRS on survival time. RESULTS: Of 466 patients, BRCA mutations were detected in 156 (33.5%) and 131 (28.1%) were treated with maintenance therapy; 98 (21.0%) and 42 (9.0%) were treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab, respectively. Patients with CRS3 had significantly longer PFS than those with CRS1 or 2 (24.7 vs. 16.8 months, p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in PFS improvement between CRS3 patients and those with CRS1 or 2 with BRCA mutation (22.0 vs. 19.3 months, p=0.193). Moreover, no significant PFS prolongation was observed in CRS3 patients compared to CRS1 or 2 patients treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab (24.3 vs. 22.4 months, p=0.851; 27.5 vs. 15.7 months, p=0.347, respectively). CONCLUSION: CRS may not be a prognostic factor in patients with BRCA mutations and those receiving frontline maintenance therapy.

Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2023: a tumultuous year for endometrial cancer.

In the 2023 series, we summarized the major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology based on communications at the conference of Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology Review Course. The review consisted of 1) Endometrial cancer: immune checkpoint inhibitor, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), selective inhibitor of nuclear export, CDK4/6 inhibitors WEE1 inhibitor, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. 2) Cervical cancer: surgery in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer, therapy for locally advanced stage and advanced, metastatic, or recurrent setting; and 3) Ovarian cancer: immunotherapy, triplet therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors along with antiangiogenic agents and PARP inhibitors, and ADCs. In 2023, the field of endometrial cancer treatment witnessed a landmark year, marked by several practice-changing outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the reliable efficacy of PARP inhibitors and ADCs.

Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab plus chemotherapy in HRR non-mutated, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (KGOG 3045): A phase II umbrella trial.

AIM: We investigated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab (D) with or without tremelimumab (T) in addition to single-agent chemotherapy (CT) in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC) lacking homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: KGOG 3045 was an open-label, investigator-initiated phase II umbrella trial. Patients with PROC without HRR gene mutations who had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy were enrolled. Patients with high PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥25%) were assigned to arm A (D + CT), whereas those with low PD-L1 expression were assigned to arm B (D + T75 + CT). After completing arm B recruitment, patients were sequentially assigned to arms C (D + T300 + CT) and D (D + CT). RESULTS: Overall, 58 patients were enrolled (5, 18, 17, and 18 patients in arms A, B, C, and D, respectively). The objective response rates were 20.0, 33.3, 29.4, and 22.2%, respectively. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 20.0, 66.7, 47.1, and 66.7 of patients, respectively, but were effectively managed. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that adding T to D + CT improved progression-free survival (adjusted HR, 0.435; 95% CI, 0.229-0.824; P = 0.011). Favorable response to chemoimmunotherapy was associated with MUC16 mutation (P = 0.0214), high EPCAM expression (P = 0.020), high matrix remodeling gene signature score (P = 0.017), and low FOXP3 expression (P = 0.047). Patients showing favorable responses to D + T + CT exhibited significantly higher EPCAM expression levels (P = 0.008) and matrix remodeling gene signature scores (P = 0.031) than those receiving D + CT. CONCLUSIONS: Dual immunotherapy with chemotherapy showed acceptable response rates and tolerable safety in HRR non-mutated PROC, warranting continued clinical investigation.

Comparison of survival outcomes between olaparib and niraparib maintenance therapy in BRCA-mutated, newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to compare survival outcomes and adverse events between maintenance therapy with two poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, olaparib and niraparib, in patients with BRCA-mutated, newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who responded to platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: We enrolled stage III-IV EOC patients with germline and/or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations that had received maintenance therapy with olaparib or niraparib. A 3:1 propensity score matching was conducted using two variables: residual disease size and the presence of germline variants. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes were time to first subsequent therapy (TFST), overall survival (OS), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: In the propensity score-matched analysis, 80 patients who received olaparib and 31 patients who received niraparib were matched (3:1). In the propensity score-matched cohort, median PFS with olaparib vs. niraparib was not reached vs 31.5 months (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.47-2.52; p = 0.854). The median TFST was not reached vs 31.8 months (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.51-2.81; p = 0.682), and neither olaparib nor niraparib reached the median OS (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.01-17.61; p = 0.649). In terms of the incidence rates of any-grade hematologic or non-hematologic TEAEs, higher rates of thrombocytopenia (p = 0.021) and neutropenia (p = 0.011) were observed in the niraparib group. CONCLUSION: Advanced EOC patients with BRCA1/2 mutations exhibited no significant difference in OS between olaparib and niraparib, indicating the need to consider individualized strategies for selecting PARP inhibitors based on adverse event profiles.

Gestational choriocarcinoma.

Gestational choriocarcinoma accounts for 5% of gestational trophoblastic neoplasms. Approximately 50%, 25%, and 25% of gestational choriocarcinoma occur after molar pregnancies, term pregnancies, and other gestational events, respectively. The FIGO scoring system categorizes patients into low (score 0 to 6) and high risk (score 7 or more) choriocarcinoma. Single-agent and multi-agent chemotherapy are used in low- and high-risk patients, respectively. Chemotherapy for localized disease has a goal of eradication of disease without surgery and is associated with favorable prognosis and fertility preservation. Most patients with gestational choriocarcinoma are cured with chemotherapy; however, some (<5.0%) will die as a result of multi-drug resistance, underscoring the need for novel approaches in this group of patients. Although there are limited data due to its rarity, the treatment response with immunotherapy is high, ranging between 50-70%. Novel combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted therapies (including VEGFR-2 inhibitors) are under evaluation. PD-L1 inhibitors are considered a potential important opportunity for chemo-resistant patients, and to replace or de-escalate chemotherapy to avoid or minimize chemotherapy toxicity. In this review, the Rare Tumor Working Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer evaluated the current landscape and further perspective in the management of patients diagnosed with gestational choriocarcinoma.

Clinical implications of histologic subtypes on survival outcomes in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: In 2014, the World Health Organization introduced a new histologic classification by dividing primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PMOC) into two: expansile (ES) or infiltrative subtypes (IS). This study investigated the clinical implications of these histological subtypes on survival outcomes. METHODS: Data from 131 patients with PMOC who underwent primary surgery between 2003 and 2021 were analyzed. The patients baseline characteristics, surgical and pathological information were collected. Survival outcomes were calculated, while factors affecting them were also investigated. RESULTS: During 55.9 months of median follow-up, 27 (20.6%) patients experienced recurrence and 20 (15.3%) died. Among 131 patients, 113 patients were classified into 87 (77%) ES and 26 (23%) IS after a slide review. Advanced stage, lymph node involvement, and residual tumors after surgery were more common in the IS, showing poorer prognosis. In multivariate analyses, advanced stage and residual tumors after surgery were associated with worse survival, while the IS showed no statistical significance. In subgroup analysis for stage I disease, survival did not vary between subtypes. Nevertheless, patients in the IS group who underwent fertility-sparing surgeries demonstrated a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 83.3%, significantly lower than patients without fertility preservation, irrespective of histologic subtypes (5-year PFS rate: 97.9%; P = 0.002 for the ES, 5-year PFS rate: 100%; P = 0.001 for the IS). CONCLUSIONS: The IS of PMOC had poorer survival outcomes and a higher proportion of advanced-stage tumors. Although its independent prognostic significance remains uncertain, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for patients with fertility preservation in the IS group.

Tissue Expression and Prognostic Role of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The complex of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and its ligand, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), plays an essential role in cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. These are emerging therapeutic targets, and recent studies have reported that inhibition of CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling pathway enhances the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, we aimed to investigate tissue expression of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and to determine their potential as prognostic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used chemotherapy-naïve, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary ovarian cancer tissues obtained from patients with advanced-stage HGSOC at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery. After histological reassessment, we constructed a tissue microarray and performed immunohistochemical staining for CXCL12 and CXCR4. Thereafter, clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the high- and low-expression groups. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV HGSOC were included: 15 (15.5%), 66 (68.0%), and 13 (13.4%) patients showed high expression of CXCL12, CXCR4, and both, respectively. The expression level of each protein was not associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutational status, FIGO stage, or residual tumor after primary cytoreductive surgery. In multivariate analysis adjusted for confounders, high CXCL12 expression was identified as an independent poor prognostic biomarker for progression-free survival (adjusted hazards ratio, 1.990; 95% confidence interval=1.090-3.633; p=0.025). However, CXCR4 expression was not associated with patient survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: The CXCL12 expression level may represent a prognostic biomarker for HGSOC. Proteins related to the CXCL12/CXCR4 complex may serve as therapeutic targets in HGSOC treatment.

Prognostic significance of L1CAM expression in addition to ProMisE in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic significance of L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), ß-catenin, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in endometrial cancer (EC) patients, with a focus on p53 wild-type subgroup, for additional risk stratification. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included EC patients classified according to Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) who underwent primary surgical treatment at the single center between January 2014 and December 2018. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for four mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, p53, L1CAM, ß-catenin, and PD-L1. DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutation was detected by hot spot sequencing via droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Survival outcome of each subgroup of L1CAM, ß-catenin, and PD-L1 was measured according to their expression. RESULTS: A total of 162 EC patients were included. Endometrioid histologic type and early-stage disease were 140 (86.4%) and 109 (67.3%), respectively. ProMisE classification assigned 48 (29.6%), 16 (9.9%), 72 (44.4%), and 26 (16.0%) patients to MMR-deficient, POLE-mutated, p53 wild-type, and p53 abnormal subgroups, respectively. L1CAM was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.207; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.432-7.187; P = 0.005), whereas ß-catenin and PD-L1 positivity were not associated with recurrence (P = 0.462 and P = 0.152, respectively). In p53 wild-type subgroup, L1CAM positivity was associated with worse PFS (aHR, 4.906; 95% CI, 1.685-14.287; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: L1CAM positivity was associated with poor prognosis in EC and further stratified the risk of recurrence in p53 wild-type subgroup, whereas ß-catenin and PD-L1 were not informative for risk stratification.

Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: Previously, we suggested that patients with cervical cancer (CC) with tumors ≤2 cm on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are safe candidates for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH). Here, we aim to investigate whether LRH deteriorates the prognosis of patients with incidentally identified high-risk factors; lymph node metastasis (LNM) or parametrial invasion (PMI). METHODS: We identified patients with 2009 FIGO stage IB1 CC who underwent Type C LRH or open radical hysterectomy (ORH) at three tertiary hospitals between 2000 and 2019. Those with a tumor ≤2 cm on preoperative MRI who were not suspicious of LNM or PMI preoperatively were included, while those who were indicated to receive adjuvant treatment but did not actually receive it were excluded. Survival outcomes were compared between the LRH and ORH groups in the overall population, then narrowed down to those with LNM, and then to those with PMI. RESULTS: In total, 498 patients were included: 299 in the LRH group and 199 in the ORH group. The LRH and ORH groups showed similar 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) (94.0% vs. 93.6%; P = 0.615) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (97.2% vs. 96.8%; P = 0.439). On pathologic examination, 49 (9.8%) and 16 (3.2%) patients had LNM and PMI, respectively, and 10 (2.0%) had both. In the LNM subgroup, 5-year PFS rate was not significantly different between the LRH and ORH groups (73.2% vs. 91.7%; P = 0.169). In the PMI subgroup, no difference in PFS was observed between the two groups (P = 0.893). CONCLUSIONS: LRH might not deteriorate recurrence and mortality rates in CC patients with tumors ≤2 cm when adjuvant treatment is appropriately administered, even if pathologic LNM and PMI are incidentally identified.