Exercise-Induced Left Atrial Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction have no overt volume overload and normal resting left atrial (LA) pressure. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize patients with normal resting LA pressure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] <15 mm Hg) but exercise-induced left atrial hypertension (EILAH). METHODS: The REDUCE LAP-HF II (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure) trial randomized 626 patients with ejection fraction ≥40% and exercise PCWP ≥25 mm Hg to atrial shunt or sham procedure. The primary trial outcome, a hierarchical composite of death, heart failure hospitalization, intensification of diuretics, and change in health status was compared between patients with EILAH and those with heart failure and resting left atrial hypertension (RELAH). RESULTS: Patients with EILAH (29%) had similar symptom severity, but lower natriuretic peptide levels, higher 6-minute walk distance, less atrial fibrillation, lower left ventricular mass, smaller LA volumes, lower E/e', and better LA strain. PCWP was lower at rest, but had a larger increase with exercise in EILAH. Neither group as a whole had a significant effect from shunt therapy vs sham. Patients with EILAH were more likely to have characteristics associated with atrial shunt responsiveness (peak exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU) and no pacemaker (63% vs 46%; P < 0.001). The win ratio for the primary outcome was 1.56 (P = 0.08) in patients with EILAH and 1.51 (P = 0.04) in those with RELAH when responder characteristics were present. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EILAH had similar symptom severity but less advanced myocardial and pulmonary vascular disease. This important subgroup may be difficult to diagnose without invasive exercise hemodynamics, but it has characteristics associated with favorable response to atrial shunt therapy. (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure [REDUCE LAP-HF TRIAL II]; NCT03088033).

Transcatheter Left Ventricular Restoration in Patients With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) volume reshaping reduces myocardial wall stress and may induce reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The AccuCinch Transcatheter Left Ventricular Restoration system consists of a series of anchors connected by a cable implanted along the LV base that is cinched to the basal free wall radius. We evaluated the echocardiographic and clinical outcomes following transcatheter left ventricular restoration. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 51 heart failure patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction between 20% and 40%, with no more than 2+ mitral regurgitation treated with optimal medical therapy, who subsequently underwent transcatheter left ventricular restoration. Serial echocardiograms, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, and 6-minute walk test distances were measured at baseline through 12 months. Primary analysis end point was change in end-diastolic volume at 12 months compared with baseline. Patients (n = 51) were predominantly male (86%) with a mean age of 56.3 ± 13.1 years. Fluoroscopy showed LV free wall radius decreased by a median of 9.2 mm amounting to a 29.6% decrease in the free wall arc length. At 12 months, the LV end-diastolic volume decreased by 33.6 ± 34.8 mL (P < .01), with comparable decreases in the LV end-systolic volume. These decreases were associated with significant improvements in the overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score (16.4 ± 18.7 points; P < .01) and 6-minute hall walk test distance (45.9 ± 83.9 m; P < .01). There were no periprocedural deaths; through the 1-year follow-up, 1 patient died (day 280) and 1 patient received a left ventricular assist device (day 13). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction without significant mitral regurgitation receiving optimal medical therapy, the AccuCinch System resulted in decreases of LV volume, as well as improved quality of life and exercise endurance. A randomized trial is ongoing (NCT04331769).

Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group.

Although drug-eluting stents are still the default interventional treatment of coronary artery disease, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) represent a novel alternative therapeutic strategy in certain anatomic conditions. The effect of DCBs is based on the fast and homogenous transfer of antiproliferative drugs into the vessel wall during single balloon inflation by means of a lipophilic matrix without the use of permanent implants. Although their use is established for in-stent restenosis of both bare-metal and drug-eluting stents, recent randomized clinical data demonstrate a good efficacy and safety profile in de novo small-vessel disease and high bleeding risk. In addition, there are other emerging indications (e.g., bifurcation lesions, large-vessel disease, diabetes mellitus, acute coronary syndromes). Because the interaction among the different delivery balloon designs, doses, formulations, and release kinetics of the drugs used is important, there seems to be no "class effect" of DCBs. On the basis of the amount of recently published data, the International DCB Consensus Group provides this update of previous recommendations summarizing the historical background, technical considerations such as choice of device and implantation technique, possible indications, and future perspectives.

Survival After Coronary Revascularization With Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons.

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are accepted treatment strategies for coronary in-stent restenosis and are under clinical investigation for lesions without prior stent implantation. A recently published meta-analysis suggested an increased risk of death associated with the use of paclitaxel-coated devices in the superficial femoral artery. The reasons are incompletely understood as potential underlying pathomechanisms remain elusive, and no relationship to the administered dose has been documented. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the available data on survival after coronary intervention with paclitaxel-coated balloons from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: PubMed, Web of science, and the Cochrane library database were searched, and a meta-analysis from RCT was performed comparing DCB with non-DCB devices (such as conventional balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stents, or drug-eluting stents) for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis or de novo lesions. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The number of patients lost to follow-up was observed at different time points. Risk estimates are reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 4,590 patients enrolled in 26 RCTs published between 2006 and 2019 were analyzed. At follow-up of 6 to 12 months, no significant difference in all-cause mortality was found, however, with numerically lower rates after DCB treatment (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.08; p = 0.116). Risk of death at 2 years (n = 1,477, 8 RCTs) was similar between the 2 groups (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.37; p = 0.478). After 3 years of follow-up (n = 1,775, 9 RCTs), all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DCB group when compared with control treatment (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.00; p = 0.047) with a number needed to treat of 36 to prevent 1 death. A similar reduction was seen in cardiac mortality (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.85; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, the use of paclitaxel DCBs for treatment of coronary artery disease was not associated with increased mortality, as has been suggested for peripheral arteries. On the contrary, use of coronary paclitaxel-coated balloons was associated with a trend toward lower mortality when compared with control treatments.

Epidemiology of Myocardial Infarction Caused by Presumed Paradoxical Embolism via a Patent Foramen Ovale.

BACKGROUND: Despite several negative prospective randomized trials on the efficacy of patent foramen ovale (PFO) occlusion, the discussion on indications is ongoing. Because the incidence of paradoxical coronary embolism through a PFO is unknown, we investigated the risk of paradoxical embolic myocardial infarction over a period of 13 years.Methods and Results:We conducted a retrospective and a prospective study. In the former, we searched the hospital database of a tertiary referral center for cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during the past 10 years and screened them for possible paradoxical MIs. On this basis we started a prospective evaluation over 39 months in another tertiary referral center. All patients with AMI and normal coronary arteries were screened for PFO and if no other reason for the AMI could be found, the case was judged as presumed paradoxical embolism. In the retrospective analysis we found 22 cases (0.45%) of presumed paradoxical coronary artery embolism under 4,848 AMI. In the prospective study there were 11 presumed paradoxical coronary artery embolisms among 1,654 patients with AMI, representing an incidence of 0.67%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that well below 1% of AMIs are caused by paradoxical embolism via an interatrial communication. Although this percentage appears low, it is not a negligible number of patients based on the huge number of MIs occurring in the industrialized world.

Treatment of chronic total occlusions in native coronary arteries by drug-coated balloons without stenting - A feasibility and safety study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusions remain one of the biggest challenges for interventional cardiologists and the high risk of restenosis and stent thrombosis is still a major problem. Drug-coated balloons showed favorable results for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and other lesion types. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of a drug-coated balloon only approach for chronic total occlusion. METHODS: We included 34 patients with a native chronic total occlusion treated only by drug-coated balloons. A visual residual stenosis of 30% or less without major dissection was considered a satisfactory percutaneous intervention result according to the German Consensus Group recommendations for drug-coated balloon use. We collected clinical and procedural data. Angiograms were conducted during the procedure and at follow-up. Quantitative coronary analysis was performed and mean and minimal lumen diameter and late luminal changes were assessed. RESULTS: The recanalization was considered satisfactory in 79.4% (n=27). Restenosis occurred in 11.8% (n=4) and reocclusion in 5.9% (n=2). Out of the 27 patients with a satisfactory initial result, 3.7% (n=1) had reocclusion and 3.7% (n=1) had restenosis. In the subgroup without satisfactory result (n=7), restenosis occurred in 3 patients (42.9%) and reocclusion in 1 patient (14.3%). A luminal increase was found in 67.6% (n=23) and mean late luminal gain was 0.11±0.49mm. Angina class improved significantly (p<0.001). There was no death or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty without stenting is a feasible and well-tolerated treatment method for chronic total occlusions if the predilatation result is good.

Drug eluting balloons as stand alone procedure for coronary bifurcational lesions: results of the randomized multicenter PEPCAD-BIF trial.

OBJECTIVES: We set out to investigate the benefit of distal main or side branch treatment with a DCB compared to POBA in coronary bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of bifurcation lesions is application of a DES to the main branch with provisional side branch stenting. While this resulted in considerable improvement in overall MACE rate suboptimal side branch results remained a problem. METHODS: The study was performed from 2011 to 2013 in six German centers. Native bifurcation lesions were included if side branch vessel diameter was ≥2 and ≤3.5 mm and no proximal main branch lesions was found. After successful predilatation randomization was performed to either DCB application or no further treatment. Follow-up angiograms for QCA analysis were done after 9 months. Primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL). RESULTS: 64 patients were successfully randomized. Minimal lumen diameter and grade of stenosis were equal in both groups. Only five stents were used as bail out. Angiographic follow-up was achieved in 75 % of patients. No patient died. There was one NSTEMI in the POBA group. Restenosis rate was 6 % in the DCB group vs 26 % in the POBA group (p = 0.045). TLR was necessary in one patient of the DCB group vs three patients of the POBA. The primary endpoint LLL was 0.13 mm in the DCB vs 0.51 mm in the POBA group (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: In bifurcation lesions that show only class A or B dissection and recoil not beyond 30 % the use of DCBs is a sound strategy.

Fractional flow reserve-guided paclitaxel-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment for de novo coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND: There is limited data on PCB treatment for de novo lesions especially of major epicardial coronary arteries. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with 67 de novo lesions who underwent successful plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) were included. If POBA-FFR was favorable (≥ 0.85), PCB was applied and if POBA-FFR was <0.85, stent implantation was preferred over PCB. RESULTS: Forty-five lesions were treated with PCB (67.2%) and 22 lesions with stents (32.8%). Dual antiplatelet therapy duration was 6 weeks. Late luminal loss with PCB was significantly less than stent (0.05 ± 0.27 mm vs. 0.40 ± 0.54 mm, P = 0.022). The baseline FFR of target lesions was 0.69 ± 0.16 in PCB and 0.60 ± 0.11 in stent group (P = 0.015), however, the FFR at 9 months was not different between groups (0.85 ± 0.08 in PCB vs. 0.85 ± 0.05 in stent group, P = 0.973). At 1 year, one myocardial infarction and one target lesion revascularization related to in-stent restenosis were detected, both in the stent group. CONCLUSION: POBA-FFR-guided PCB treatment is safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions with good anatomical and physiological patency at mid-term follow-up. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter versus paclitaxel-coated stent for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: the three-year results of the PEPCAD II ISR study.

AIMS: Treatment of bare metal in-stent restenosis with the paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter based on the PACCOCATH® technology has yielded superior six-month angiographic and one-year clinical results compared to a paclitaxel-eluting stent. The three-year clinical follow-up is presented. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one patients with coronary bare metal in-stent restenosis (>70%, length: <22 mm, vessel diameter: 2.5-3.5 mm) were randomly treated with the paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (3 µg/mm²) or a paclitaxel-eluting stent (DES). Clinical follow-up information was requested from the patients and from their physicians. Quantitative angiographic and demographic baseline data were statistically not different between the groups. Per intention-to-treat analysis at 12 months, the lesion-related rates of major adverse cardiac events were 7.6% and 16.9% (p=0.11) while at 36 months the respective numbers were 9.1% and 18.5% (p=0.14). These differences were primarily due to reduced target lesion revascularisation (TLR) in DCB 4/66 (6.2%) compared to DES patients 10/65 (15.4%) (p=0.10). From 12 to 36 months, 1/65 (1.5%) DCB patients experienced a myocardial infarction while neither TLR nor death occurred in any study patient in either group during that period. CONCLUSIONS: The six-month superiority of the paclitaxel-coated balloon compared to the paclitaxel-eluting stent in the treatment of bare metal coronary in-stent restenosis persisted throughout the three-year clinical follow-up period indicating stability of the lesions treated. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00393315).

Local paclitaxel induces late lumen enlargement in coronary arteries after balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated p aclitaxel-induced luminal changes following drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty to treat coronary de novo lesions without additional stenting. DCB-mediated local drug delivery reduces late lumen loss in de novo coronary artery lesions. We performed a retrospective clinical assessment based on a pre-specified quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) protocol. METHODS: QCA was performed for each centre to assess the primary endpoint late lumen changes, i.e. the difference between in-lesion minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at the routine angiographic follow-up as compared to post-procedural in-lesion MLDs. These MLD changes were compared to corresponding reference vessel diameter changes as an intra-patient control. RESULTS: We evaluated 58 consecutive native coronary artery lesions directly after DCB angioplasty and at a routine target follow-up angiography of 4 months by QCA. Target lesion MLD increased significantly within the 4.1 ± 2.1 month observation period (1.75 ± 0.55 vs. 1.91 ± 0.55 mm, p < 0.001, diameter stenosis 33.8 ± 12.3 vs. 26.9 ± 13.8 %, p < 0.001), while there were no changes in non-target reference vessel diameters (2.33 ± 0.60 vs. 2.34 ± 0.61 mm, p = ns). A total of 69 % of patients showed luminal enlargement whereas 29 % had minor luminal loss. CONCLUSION: Local application of paclitaxel by DCB angioplasty to native coronary arteries after pre-dilatation without major dissection and recoil leads to late lumen increase.

Treatment of coronary de novo bifurcation lesions with DCB only strategy.

OBJECTIVES: This observational study investigated the value of drug-coated balloons (DCB) only strategy in bifurcation lesions in a consecutive series of all comer percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Local application of paclitaxcel by DCB has clinical benefits in various settings including coronary bifurcations. While so far most bifurcation studies investigated sequential application of DCBs to the main (MB) and side branch (SB) with stenting of the MB, we report first results after DCB intervention without additional stenting of the MB or SB. METHODS: We performed 39 consecutive DCB only interventions in de novo bifurcation lesions with SB ≥ 2 mm and scheduled follow-up angiography after 4 months. Patients refusing angiography had telephone follow-up. RESULTS: Follow-up angiograms were obtained in 30 out of 39 DCB only interventions. 33.3 % were located in the left main (LM) bifurcation, 28.2 % in left anterior descending (LAD), 20.5 % in left circumflex (LCX) and 17.9 % in the right coronary artery. Four months after index procedure no patient had died, experienced myocardial infarction or stroke. Follow-up angiograms showed restenosis in 3 out of 30 interventions (10 %), 2 developing in the distal main (6.7 %) and 1 in the SB (3.3 %). All three patients had been treated for LM/LAD/LCX bifurcations and suffered from most severe coronary artery disease, but had not been eligible for CABG for various reasons. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 3 out of 39 patients consistent with a MACE rate of 7.7 %. CONCLUSION: Treatment of de novo bifurcation lesions with DCB only intervention without additional stenting is a safe therapy with low rates of restenosis and TLR.

No indication for an unexpected high rate of coronary artery aneurysms after angioplasty with drug-coated balloons.

AIMS: Coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) are a rare complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are reported with an incidence of 0.6% to 3.9%. While in recent years the use of paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (DCB) has increased, so far no CAA formation after DCB intervention has been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: During the years 2010 and 2011 we used DCBs in 704 PCIs. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at four months in all patients and has so far been achieved in 380 PCIs. In three patients we found development of a CAA at the former PCI site within four months of observation. Aneurysm length varied between 8.4 mm and 13 mm and lumina increased 58% to 131%. Retrospectively all patients with CAA development showed small intimal dissection partially with tiny persisting contrast bands parallel to the lumen according to type B and type C of the NHLBI classification after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: CAA formation after DCB intervention was found in three out of 380 PCIs with DCB, consistent with an incidence of 0.8%. Thus, PCI with DCB does not cause an unexpectedly high rate of coronary artery aneurysms.

Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in the PEPCAD I study: are lesions clinically stable from 12 to 36 months?

AIMS: The one-year outcome of lesions in small coronary arteries by using a paclitaxel-iopromide-coated (3 µg/mm²) balloon catheter (DCB) has yielded good six-month angiographic and one-year clinical data. We now report the three-year clinical follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients with >70% stenoses <22 mm in length in small coronary vessels (vessel diameter: 2.25-2.8 mm) were treated with the DCB. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-segment late lumen loss. The secondary endpoints encompassed all other angiographic and clinical data up to three years post intervention. In total 82/120 (68.3%) patients with a vessel diameter of 2.35±0.19 mm were treated with the DCB only, and 32/120 (26.7%) patients required additional bare metal stent (BMS) deployment. Both the 12- and 36-month major adverse cardiac event rates were 5/82 (6.1%) for DCB only and 12/32 (37.5%) for DCB+BMS, primarily due to the need for target lesion revascularisation in 4/82 (4.9%) patients and 9/32 (28.1%) (p<0.001) patients, respectively. Total MACE rate after 36 months was 18/120 (15%; intention-to-treat). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease with a paclitaxel-iopromide-coated balloon exhibited good six-month angiographic and one-year clinical data that persisted during the three-year follow-up period. Randomised trials will clarify its role as an alternative to drug-eluting stents in the treatment of small vessel coronary artery disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00404144).

Drug-coated balloons for treatment of coronary artery disease: updated recommendations from a consensus group.

AIMS: Drug-coated balloon catheters (DCB) are a new clinical treatment modality for coronary and peripheral artery disease. The goal of the consensus group is to develop recommendations for the clinical use of DCB based on randomized clinical trials and the best available clinical evidence. The present paper gives an update on the recommendations against the background of a variety of new data published since the first paper was presented. METHODS AND RESULTS: The general concept of our recommendations for the coronary use of DCB includes the preparation of the lesion to facilitate drug delivery and to estimate the need for stent implantation, especially after relevant dissections. Lesion preparation includes conventional angioplasty. In more complex lesions, additional treatments and imaging or functional measurements are helpful. In case of no flow-limiting dissection and an acceptable but not stent-like primary result, DCB use without additional stent implantation may be considered. The proposed advantages of the DCB only concept over a direct stent approach include reduced restenosis rates in indications where DES show limited efficacy, the reduction of DAPT especially in patients with contraindications for prolonged DAPT, and the option of leaving no foreign object behind resulting in vascular restoration with potentially plaque regression instead of neo-atherosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: DCB allow for local drug delivery in endovascular therapy leaving no permanent implant behind.

Treatment of a coronary bifurcation lesion with drug-coated balloons: lumen enlargement and plaque modification after 6 months.

We report a male with a coronary bifurcation lesion in the mid circumflex artery (CX). After predilatation, the lesion was treated with two drug-coated balloons (DCB). Primary success in the posterolateral branch was good; however the CX lesion had a residual stenosis including a non-flow-limiting type A dissection. After 6 months, angiography showed slight lumen enlargement in both branches of the bifurcation. Intravascular ultrasound identified about 35 % atherosclerotic plaque load within the inner area of the bifurcation but more than 50 % concentric atherosclerotic plaque burden in the vessel areas proximal and distal to the DCB-treated area.