Effect on endometrial histology and pharmacokinetics of different dose regimens of progesterone vaginal pessaries, in comparison with progesterone vaginal gel and placebo.

STUDY QUESTION: Which progesterone vaginal pessary dose regimen induces adequate secretory transformation of the endometrium, in comparison with progesterone vaginal gel and placebo? SUMMARY ANSWER: The best secretory transformation of the endometrium was observed during treatment with 400 mg progesterone vaginal pessaries, administered twice daily. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Vaginally administered progesterone is widely used for luteal phase support (LPS) in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Although several vaginal formulations using various doses are available, little is known on the impact of formulation and doses at the endometrial level. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study had a randomised, observer-blind design and comprised two parts. The participants used study medication during two or three treatment periods, separated by washout periods. Subjects in Part 1 (n = 61 treated) received 200 mg progesterone vaginal pessaries twice daily (bid), 400 mg pessaries bid and the comparator 90 mg progesterone vaginal gel once daily (od) in a 3-way crossover design. Subjects in Part 2 (n = 64 treated) received 100 mg pessaries bid in one period and 400 mg pessaries od in the other period in a 2-way crossover design. A subgroup of these subjects (n = 22 treated) received placebo vaginal pessaries bid in a third period in a non-randomised manner. The study was performed from May 2012 until April 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study was performed at a clinical research centre in healthy female volunteers of reproductive age. The subjects used 2 mg estradiol bid for 24 days in each treatment cycle. Progesterone or placebo was administered vaginally from Day 15 onwards during 10 days. In each treatment period, an endometrial biopsy for histological evaluation was performed on Day 23 and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after the first progesterone dose on Day 15 and after the last dose on Day 24. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Frequencies of (early and late) secretory transformation of the endometrium, i.e. adequate responses, during treatment with 200 mg and 400 mg vaginal pessaries bid were comparable with those during 90 mg vaginal gel treatment (90-94%), whereas lower secretory transformation rates were observed during treatment with 100 mg bid and 400 mg od (64-75%). At the time of the endometrial biopsy in the cycle the late secretory state of the endometrium, which is characteristic of adequate luteal support, was observed more often with 400 mg pessaries bid (90%) than with vaginal gel (82%) and with lower pessary doses (64-78%). Pharmacokinetic parameters after repeated dosing of vaginal pessaries showed a dose-dependent, but not dose-proportional, increase of plasma progesterone levels. The lowest incidence of bleeding and spotting was reported during treatment with 400 mg pessaries bid. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The primary outcome parameter, rate of secretory transformation of the endometrium, is a surrogate for endometrial receptivity and for the actual clinical efficacy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Delivery of progestesterone through 400 mg pessaries bid is an effective alternative method for luteal support in ART. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by Actavis Group PTC ehf., Iceland, part of Teva Pharmaceuticals, and L.D. Collins. I.D. and C.K. are directors of Dinox, a contract research organisation. I.K. is Managing Director of Pharmaplex and M.W. is Managing Director of M.A.R.C.O., service organisations involved in organisation/supervision and evaluation/reporting of clinical trials. All received funding for the conduct of the study from Actavis. S.H. and Th.M. are employees of Actavis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number 2012-001726-95.

The Good Clinical Practice guideline and its interpretation - perceptions of clinical trial teams in sub-Saharan Africa.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the advantages and challenges of working with the Good Clinical Practice (GCP)-International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) E6 guideline and its interpretation from the perspective of clinical trial teams based in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We conducted 60 key informant interviews with clinical trial staff at different levels in clinical research centres in Kenya, Ghana, Burkina Faso and Senegal and thematically analysed the responses. RESULTS: Clinical trial teams perceived working with ICH-GCP as highly advantageous and regarded ICH-GCP as applicable to their setting and efficiently applied. Only for informed consent did some clinical trial staff (one-third) perceive the guideline as insufficiently applicable. Specific challenges included meeting the requirements for written and individual consent, conditions for impartial witnesses for illiterates or legally acceptable representatives for children, guaranteeing voluntary participation and ensuring full understanding of the consent given. It was deemed important to have ICH-GCP compliance monitored by relevant ethics committees and regulatory authorities, without having guidelines applied overcautiously. CONCLUSION: Clinical trial teams in sub-Saharan Africa perceived GCP as a helpful guideline, despite having been developed by northern organisations and despite the high administrative burden of implementing it. To mitigate consent challenges, we suggest adapting GCP and making use of the flexibility it offers.

The relationship between cardiovascular reactivity in the laboratory and heart rate response in real life: active coping and beta blockade.

Earlier studies suggest that cardiovascular responses in the laboratory and in the field are likely to be related when the laboratory tasks involve active coping, when the field measure is taken continuously, and when there is allowance for the effects of autocorrelation and physical activity on the ambulant cardiovascular measure. These studies lead to the hypothesis that the hyperreactivity common to the laboratory and to the field has a beta-adrenergic basis. We examined the heart rate variability of 16 hyperreactive and 16 hyporeactive subjects over an 8-hour period while they were receiving either a placebo or a cardio-selective beta-blocking drug (Bisoprolol) in a double-blind crossover design. Subjects were classified on the basis of their heart rate and systolic blood pressure responses to a complex self-paced, reaction-time task. Response in the field was assessed from the standard deviation of the raw heart rate series, after allowance for the serial dependency in the data using autoregressive methods and, when allowance was made for physical activity, assessed from the muscle activity of the thigh. As predicted, on placebo hyperreactive subjects had markedly more variable heart rates, particularly when allowance was made for physical activity. Although not confirmed by a significant interaction effect, this difference largely disappeared under beta-blockade.

[Comparison of the effect and tolerability of two glibenclamide preparations with different release rates]. / Vergleich der Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit zweier verschieden schnell freisetzender Glibenclamid-Zubereitungen.

In a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, two-way crossover study, efficacy and tolerability of two glibenclamide (CAS 1028-21-8) preparations with different rates of release were compared during a 28 day long-term treatment period for each preparation. It involved 80 patients with diabetes mellitus type II difficult to stabilize orally, who had received preliminary glibenclamide treatment. The switching from one treatment to the other in particular was strictly controlled: day profiles on glucose and insulin were prepared on the last day of the long-term therapy period and again on the first two days of the next long-term therapy period. Halfway through each treatment period and on the last day of each therapy period, the glucose content of the 24 h urine was determined in order to assess diabetes stabilization. The quality of diabetes stabilization and tolerability being comparable for both treatments, there were no statistically significant differences determined for AUC, Cmin, Cmax, tmin and tmax in the insulin day profile and glucose day profile on switching from treatment A (Glibenclamid-ratiopharm) to B (reference preparation) nor from B to A. The tolerability of both preparations was very good.

Effect of urapidil on steady-state serum digoxin concentration in healthy subjects.

In an open, randomized, two-period change-over study the effect of urapidil, an antihypertensive agent, on steady-state serum digoxin levels was investigated in 12 healthy male volunteers. The subjects were given digoxin 0.25 mg once daily for 4 days to produce a steady-state digoxin level in serum. At the end of that time the subjects received either digoxin monotherapy or digoxin and concomitant treatment with urapidil 60 mg b.d. for a further 4 days. Subsequently the treatments were changed over. The absorption characteristics Cmax and tmax of digoxin were not altered by concomitant urapidil treatment. The geometric mean and nonparametric 95% confidence limits of digoxin relative bioavailability were 97% (93%-103%). Therefore, concomitant administration of urapidil with digoxin treatments did not appear to alter the rate and extent of absorption of the glycoside.

[Studies of the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a new trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole preparation in healthy volunteers]. / Untersuchungen zur Pharmakokinetik und Bioverfügbarkeit einer neuen Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazol-Zubereitung an gesunden Freiwilligen.

The objective of this study was to determine both the pharmacokinetic parameters and the bioavailability of a newly developed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole preparation (cotrimoxazole, Kepinol forte, 160 mg of trimethoprim/800 mg of sulfamethoxazole) in comparison with a reference preparation customary in trade and registered according to the AMG 1976, after single oral administration. For this purpose the test and the reference preparation were examined in a randomized 2-way crossover design (Latin square) in 12 volunteers each. Both dosage forms led to maximum plasma levels of approx. 1250 ng/ml of trimethoprim and about 40 micrograms/ml of sulfamethoxazole 1.5-2 h after application; the plasma half-lives were about 9 h for trimethoprim and around 8.5 h for sulfamethoxazole. The statistical comparison (ANOVA, confidence intervals according to Westlake, Pratt-Wilcoxon test) of the pharmacokinetic parameters found in the study resulted in bioequivalence of the newly developed trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole preparation and the reference preparation. Furthermore, after the administration of both preparations no marked side effects worth mentioning were observed, suggesting a good and comparable clinical tolerability of the two preparations.

Interaction of bisoprolol with cimetidine and rifampicin.

In 6 healthy volunteers the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol under steady-state conditions was investigated over three consecutive phases: over 7 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol once daily per os, 7 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol once daily plus 400 mg of cimetidine t.i.d. and 14 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol and 600 mg of rifampicin once daily with adequate intervals free of medication. After therapy with bisoprolol alone peak plasma levels (Cssmax) of the beta-blocker were 55.5 +/- 6.4 ng/ml (means +/- SEM), area under the plasma level-time curve (AUC tau) was 597 +/- 70 ng/ml.h, total body clearance (CL) 15.8 +/- 1.8 l/h and elimination half-lives (t1/2 beta) 10.1 +/- 1.2 h. Cimetidine did not cause any significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol. Co-administration of rifampicin resulted in a decrease in Cssmax (43.0 +/- 6.9 ng/ml), AUC tau (397 +/- 54 ng/ml X h) and t1/2 beta (6.2 +/- 0.4 h). Accordingly, total body clearance increased to 23.8 +/- 2.5 l/h (p less than 0.05). In conclusion bisoprolol showed a statistically significant but probably clinically not important interaction with the enzyme-inducing drug rifampicin, but not with the enzyme inhibitor cimetidine.

[Comparative study of the central nervous system effect of the beta receptor blockaders pindolol and bisoprolol]. / Vergleichende Untersuchung zur zentralnervösen Wirkung der beta-Rezeptorenblocker Pindolol und Bisoprolol.

In a total of 36 volunteers with cardiac hyperreaction, investigations were carried out on the effect of bisoprolol (designated tradename: Concor), pindolol and placebo on central nervous functions with the aid of a reaction test, spiral aftereffect, tremor test and mood and sleep questionnaires. In the randomized double-blind study performed with 3 independent groups the volunteers received placebo, 2 X daily 10 mg of pindolol or 1 X daily 10 mg of bisoprolol for a period of 14 days. Bisoprolol is a new highly beta 1-selective adrenoceptor blocker with moderate lipophilia and without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). When compared to placebo neither of the beta-adrenoceptor blockers induced any significant changes in mood, vigilance, tremor and reaction times. Moreover, under bisoprolol no negative effect on sleep quality or feeling refreshed after sleep was determined. Under pindolol, on the other hand, a significant impairment of sleep quality was observed after acute dosage and a decrease in feeling refreshed after sleep, continuing up to day 14 of treatment. It is presumed that, as bisoprolol and pindolol have comparable lipophilia, the different intensity with which the two preparations act on the central nervous system is connected with the ISA of pindolol. In the selected doses bisoprolol had a stronger effect on diastolic blood pressure and heart rate than pindolol and placebo.