Third Report of the Japan Diabetes Society (JDS)/Japanese Cancer Association (JCA) Joint Committee on diabetes and cancer: summary of the results of a questionnaire survey of oncologists and diabetologists-secondary publication.

The Japan Diabetes Society (JDS) and the Japan Cancer Association (JCA) launched a joint committee and published their "First Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer" in 2013, compiling recommendations for physicians and healthcare providers as well as for the general population. In 2016, the "Second Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer" summarized the current evidence on glycemic control and cancer risk in patients with diabetes. The current "Third Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer", for which the joint committee also enlisted the assistance of the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), reports on the results from the questionnaire survey, "Diabetes Management in Patients Receiving Cancer Therapy," which targeted oncologists responsible for cancer management and diabetologists in charge of glycemic control in cancer patients. The results of the current survey demonstrated that there is a general consensus among oncologists and diabetologists with regard to the need for guidelines on glycemic control goals, the relevance of glycemic control, and glycemic control during cancer therapy in cancer patients.

Third Report of the Japan Diabetes Society/Japanese Cancer Association Joint Committee on Diabetes and Cancer: Summary of the results of a questionnaire survey of oncologists and diabetologists-Secondary publication.

The Japan Diabetes Society and the Japan Cancer Association launched a joint committee and published their "First Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer" in 2013, compiling recommendations for physicians and health-care providers as well as for the general population. In 2016, the "Second Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer" summarized the current evidence on glycemic control and cancer risk in patients with diabetes. The current "Third Joint Committee Report on Diabetes and Cancer", for which the joint committee also enlisted the assistance of the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, reports on the results from the questionnaire survey, "Diabetes Management in Patients Receiving Cancer Therapy," which targeted oncologists responsible for cancer management and diabetologists in charge of glycemic control in cancer patients. The results of the current survey indicated that there is a general consensus among oncologists and diabetologists with regard to the need for guidelines on glycemic control goals, the relevance of glycemic control, and glycemic control during cancer therapy in cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of bone management agents administered at 12 weeks vs. 4 weeks in patients with bone metastases: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Bone modifying agents (BMAs) have been used to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in cancer patients with bone metastases. In this meta-analysis, efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were studied based on a de-escalation strategy in which the BMA dosing interval was prolonged from 4 to 12 weeks. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, ICHUSHI, and CINAHL were searched for articles on BMA dosing intervals from outcomes measured were the incidence of SRE and related various AEs. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to calculate relative risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT: The meta-analysis included three randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of Zoledronic acid hydrate (ZA) (n = 2663) and six RCTs (n = 141) on BMA other than ZA. There was no difference in the incidence of SREs when comparing the dosing frequency of 12 versus 4 weeks for BMA (RR = 1.21, 95% CI [0.82-1.78], p = 0.33). Further, AEs related to treatment discontinuation were significantly less frequent with ZA given every 12 weeks than when given every 4 weeks (RR = 0.51 [0.30-0.89], p = 0.02). In particular, renal dysfunction leading to grade ≥3 or discontinuation of treatment with ZA occurred significantly less frequently with every 12-week dosing (RR = 0.33 [0.12-0.91], p = 0.33). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed no influence of BMA de-escalation on the incidence of SRE; nevertheless, AEs appeared to reduce with the de-escalated usage of ZA.

Bone marrow examination in patients with Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor without metastasis based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (ES/PNET) is an aggressive bone tumor. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) has been recognized as the gold standard for assessing bone marrow status. While the latest guideline suggests the need to omit bone marrow aspiration in patients with no findings on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) based on one retrospective report, there is no study using 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT). We retrospectively reviewed 26 consecutive, previously untreated, ES/PNET patients. We compare the results of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) and those of 18F-FDG PET/CT in ES/PNET patients. All of the 21 patients without metastases on 18F-FDG PET/CT had negative BMAB. The sensitivity of bone marrow involvement in bone metastases positive patients on 18F-FDG PET/CT was 75% (3/4), and the specificity was 100% (22/22). In addition to the metastatic findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT, tumor diameter, lactate dehydrogenase level at diagnosis, and the presence or absence of bone metastasis were factors related to bone marrow involvement. It may be a reasonable option to omit BMAB in ES/PNET patients with no distant metastasis based on 18F-FDG PET/CT findings.

The Incidence of Nonmalignant Diseases among Patients with Suspected Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site.

Objective Few reports have analyzed the diagnostic process of carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) or have focused on the frequency of nonmalignant lesions among patients with suspected malignant diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of nonmalignant diseases that tend to be mistaken for malignant diseases. Patients We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with suspected CUP who were referred to the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) between April 2007 and December 2014. All patients underwent a thorough history and physical examination as well as radiological and ultrasonography imaging tests for the CUP diagnostic work up. Results Among 830 patients with suspected CUP, 46 were diagnosed with nonmalignant diseases, and 780 were diagnosed with a malignant neoplasm (409 neoplasms with detected primary site and 371 CUP neoplasms). Four patients discontinued the diagnostic workup because they refused further examinations or had a poor general status. The final diagnosis of the 46 patients with nonmalignant disease comprised 10 benign tumors, 10 benign diseases, and 26 with no evidence of disease. The nonmalignant tumors comprised three hemangiomas, two schwannomas, two uterine myomas, two pseudomyxoma peritonei, one lymphangioma, one meningioma, and one poroma. Conclusion The incidence of nonmalignant diseases among patients with suspected CUP was 46 out of 830 patients in our institution. It is important to perform a thorough pathological examination in the CUP diagnostic workup. To confirm a diagnosis, some patients may need to visit specialized institutions, especially those with liver and bone lesions.

Phase 1 study of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in Japanese patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.

Olaratumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting human platelet-derived growth factor receptor α, plus doxorubicin significantly improved overall survival in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in a prior phase 1b/2 randomized trial. Subsequent exposure-response analysis suggested that higher olaratumab exposures earlier might improve outcomes in patients at risk of early disease progression. This phase 1 study (3 treatment cohorts; minimum 6 patients each) investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in Japanese patients with STS. Patients received olaratumab 15 mg/kg on Days 1 and 8 during each 21-day cycle until disease progression. Patients in Cohort 3 received a 20 mg/kg loading dose of olaratumab in Cycle 1. Doxorubicin was administered for up to 6 cycles. Patients in Cohort 1 received doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 on Days 1, 2 and 3. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 on Day 1. One patient in Cohort 2 experienced a dose-limiting toxicity of Grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were of mild and moderate severity, and were known doxorubicin toxicities. Olaratumab serum concentrations in Cohort 3 reached a steady-state exceeding the target level in Cycle 1. Partial response was confirmed in 4 patients (2 each in Cohorts 2 and 3). Olaratumab plus doxorubicin had an acceptable safety profile in patients with STS. A loading dose of olaratumab 20 mg/kg was effective for achieving minimum serum concentrations above the target trough level in Cycle 1.

Phase I study of taselisib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors or hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

Taselisib is a potent and selective phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor. The present article reports the first study of taselisib administration in Japanese patients. The aim of this 2-stage, phase I, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of taselisib as monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (stage 1), and as part of combination therapy in Japanese patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive locally advanced or recurrent breast cancer (stage 2). In stage 1, oral taselisib tablets 2, 4, and 6 mg/d were given in 28-day cycles. In stage 2, successive cohorts of patients received oral taselisib tablets (2 or 4 mg/d) with i.m. fulvestrant 500 mg. Nine and 6 patients were enrolled in stage 1 and stage 2, respectively. Taselisib was well tolerated. No dose-limiting toxicities were experienced in any cohort of patients and no deaths were observed. The most common treatment-related adverse events in stage 1 and stage 2, respectively, were rash (55.6%, 66.7%), diarrhea (44.4%, 66.7%), and stomatitis (44.4%, 66.7%). Taselisib was rapidly absorbed after dosage; its half-life was 12.9-32.0 hours in stage 1 and 16.1-26.5 hours in stage 2. Two patients achieved partial response (PR), 5 patients had stable disease (SD) and 2 patients had progressive disease (PD) in stage 1, and 1 patient had PR and 3 patients had SD in stage 2. All patients with PR were positive for PIK3CA gene mutations. These preliminary data suggest that taselisib may be effective in patients with PIK3CA-mutated solid tumors or HR-positive advanced breast cancer.

Prognostic impact of presumed breast or ovarian cancer among patients with unfavorable-subset cancer of unknown primary site.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility and prognostic impact of presumed primary breast or ovarian cancer among patients with an unfavorable subset of cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the presumed primary site of CUP and the clinical outcome of site-specific therapy based on such presumptions. METHODS: Patients referred to our center who were diagnosed with unfavorable-subset CUP and treated between April 2007 and March 2015 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected retrospectively from the hospital database and electronic medical records. Presumptive primary breast or ovarian cancer was based on histological and immunohistochemical analyses and metastatic patterns. The outcomes of patients with unfavorable-subset CUP with a putative primary site in the breast or ovary (P-CUP) and of patients with unfavorable-subset CUP, but without P-CUP (U-CUP), were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 780 patients were referred to our hospital with malignancy of unknown origin. Of these, 409 patients were diagnosed with CUP and 344 patients with unfavorable-subset CUP. Following clinicopathological examination, 40 (11.6%) of the 344 patients had P-CUP and the remaining 303 (88.3%) patients had U-CUP. In total, 136 patients received chemotherapy (22 with P-CUP and 114 with U-CUP). Among the 22 patients with P-CUP, three received hormonal therapy for breast cancer, and 19 received chemotherapy based on the presumed primary organ (breast, 4; ovaries, 15). Conventional platinum-based chemotherapy was administered to 105 patients with U-CUP and non-platinum drug treatment to nine patients. The objective response rates were 61.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.6-83.6) and 41.1% (95% CI: 31.8-50.4) for patients with P-CUP and U-CUP, respectively. The median overall survival durations were 50.0 months and 16.9 months (log-rank: P = 0.002) for patients with P-CUP and U-CUP, respectively. P-CUP was identified as an independent predictor of good prognosis according to multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with P-CUP had higher response rates and a better prognosis compared with patients with U-CUP. It might thus be reasonable to classify this subset as a new category of CUP with a favorable prognosis.

Symptom management: the utility of regional cooling for hand-foot syndrome induced by pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a major side effect of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Regional cooling during PLD infusion was shown to improve severe HFS. We investigated the utility of frozen gloves and socks (FGS) as a simpler cooling method. METHODS: To evaluate the utility and safety of regional cooling with FGS for PLD-induced HFS, we retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced ovarian cancer who used FGS during PLD-containing regimens. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were analyzed. The incidence of HFS was 51% (≥ grade 2, 32%) in the PLD group and 38% (≥ grade 2, 6%) in the PLD + CBDCA group. The respective percentages of patients who underwent PLD dose modification/discontinuation were 41%/75% in the PLD group and 9%/30% in the PLD + CBDCA group. The reasons for discontinuation of PLD and PLD + CBDCA therapy were progressive disease, HFS, allergy, oral mucositis, and others. HFS was the only reason for PLD dose modification in both the PLD and PLD + CBDCA groups. The completion rate of FGS was 96%, with discontinuation in three cases due to pain from cooling. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that FGS is a safe, simple method with good tolerability. A prospective study is needed for further assessment.

A case of heavily pretreated metastatic cardiac angiosarcoma treated successfully using eribulin.

Eribulin mesylate (eribulin) is a nontaxane microtubule inhibitor approved in Japan for treating soft tissue sarcoma irrespective of histological subtypes. Thus, our department routinely uses eribulin to treat any histological subtype of sarcoma for patients who have experienced disease progression during standard therapy. However, evidence on the efficacy of eribulin in treating sarcomas that are neither liposarcoma nor leiomyosarcoma is limited. Recently, we encountered a case of a heavily pretreated cardiac angiosarcoma that responded well to eribulin treatment. The patient was a 34-year-old Japanese woman with advanced angiosarcoma, who had been pretreated heavily using several lines of chemotherapy. Eribulin was administered as the eighth line of treatment and the dose was adjusted because of grade 4 neutropenia. After three cycles of treatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a partial tumor response, which was sustained for ~4 months. This case suggests that eribulin may be a potential therapeutic option for angiosarcoma. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefit of eribulin for patients with angiosarcoma and to establish predictive markers for eribulin sensitivity.

Efficacy and safety of eribulin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer not meeting trial eligibility criteria: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of eribulin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer has been demonstrated in phase III trials. However, as patients receiving eribulin in daily practice do not necessarily meet all the eligibility criteria of clinical trials, data for such patients are limited. METHODS: We identified patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, treated with eribulin monotherapy between July 2011 and December 2015 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Patients who would have met the following eligibility criteria from the EMBRACE trial were included in the eligible group, and the rest were included in the ineligible group: 1) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status 0-2; 2) adequate function of principal organs; and 3) absence of active infection. We compared the relative dose intensity (RDI), tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events between the groups. Nominal and continuous values were compared using the Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Survival outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier estimation, and between-group differences were assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients included, 34 were classified into the ineligible group and 169 into the eligible group. Initial dose reduction and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were more common in the ineligible group (initial dose reduction: 23.5% in the ineligible group vs. 7.7% in the eligible group, p = 0.011; treatment discontinuation due to AEs: 11.8% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.045). However, RDI (66% vs. 71%, p = 0.130), response rate (15.6% vs. 18.1%, p = 1.000), PFS (3.7 months vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.913), OS (11.5 months vs. 16.1 months, p = 0.743), AEs requiring hospitalization (5.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 1.000), and grade 3/4 AEs were similar in both groups. PFS, OS, AEs requiring hospitalization, and discontinuation due to AEs in the eligible group were comparable to those found in previous phase III trials. CONCLUSION: The safety and efficacy of eribulin monotherapy was demonstrated in a broader patient population than that eligible for clinical trials. Eribulin may be a treatment option in these patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, considering dose reduction and pre-existing dysfunctions.

The Prognostic Impact of the Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Dose-Dense Therapy for Ovarian Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the use of the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for predicting disease prognosis in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant dose-dense weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin (dd-TC) therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma treated at our hospital from July 2004 to October 2014. Patients received dd-TC therapy as NAC followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Specimens resected during IDS were divided into 4 groups based on pathological response: grade 1, most tumor cells appeared to be viable; grade 2a, most tumor cells had disappeared, whereas the remaining tumor cells were vacuolated or degenerated; grade 2b, small numbers of viable tumor cells were observed; and grade 3, small aggregations of macrophages were seen. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. The median number of NAC cycles was 3 (range, 2-6), and 51 patients (75.0%) achieved complete resection at IDS. Regarding pathological response, 7 (10.3%) patients were classified as grade 1, 11 (16.2%) as grade 2a, 46 (67.7%) as grade 2b, and 4 (5.9%) as grade 3. In univariate and multivariate analyses, grades 2b and 3 pathological responses were significant favorable prognostic factors for progression-free survival (P = 0.028; hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Although the pathological complete response rate to NAC was low in this study, both complete and good pathological responses to NAC might be favorable prognostic factors for PFS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who receive dd-TC.

Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality: A multicenter, long-term, colonoscopy-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited colonoscopy-based cohort data concerning the effectiveness of colonoscopy in reducing colorectal cancer deaths. The aim of this study was to clarify whether colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality. METHODS: A cohort of 18,816 patients who underwent colonoscopy without a diagnosis of colorectal cancer between 2001 and 2010 at high colonoscopy procedure volume centers was selected. Patient characteristics and colonoscopy findings were assessed. The main endpoint was colorectal cancer death (all, right-sided, and left-sided cancers), and data were censored at the time of the final visit or the final colonoscopy. The standardized all colorectal, colon, and rectal cancer mortality rates were estimated with reference to those of the general Japanese population. Additional outcome was all- cause death and the standardized all-cause mortality rate was also estimated. RESULTS: The total observed person-year mortality for colorectal cancer was 67,119. Of these, 4, 3, and 1 patients died from colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers, respectively; these values were significantly lower than the number of expected deaths in the general population, estimated to be 53.1, 34.0, and 19.1, respectively. The standardized mortalities for all colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers were 0.08 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.17), 0.09 (95% CI, 0.02-0.22), and 0.05 (95% CI, 0.0002-0.21), respectively. There were 586 all-cause deaths (3.11%) during the observation period. The standardized all-cause mortality ratios were 0.22 (95% CI, 0.206-0.23). CONCLUSIONS: The colorectal cancer mortality of patients who received colonoscopy without colorectal cancer diagnosis decreased significantly compared with that of individuals in the general population. These results were compatible even in patients with right-sided colon cancer.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with higher expression levels of PD-1 and PD-L1 in early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The presence of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is a favourable prognostic factor in patients with early breast cancer. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 are associated with a variety of adverse features. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationships between TILs, PD-1 and PD-L1 as well as their prognostic implications in early breast cancer. METHODS: We investigated 180 patients with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent subsequent surgery for stage II-III invasive breast carcinoma between 1999 and 2007. TIL expression was classified as low or high using a previously reported scoring model. PD-1 and PD-L1 expression levels were determined by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between PD-1 expression in TILs and PD-L1 expression in cancer cells was also investigated. RESULTS: Higher tumour grade was significantly correlated with PD-L1 expression in tumours (p<0.0001). PD-1 and PD-L1 expression levels were associated with tumour subtype and were highest in triple-negative tumours (p<0.0001). Furthermore, expression of each of PD-1 and PD-L1 was significantly correlated with higher TIL expression and pathological complete response (pCR) (p<0.0001). PD-L1 expression in cancer cells was significantly correlated with PD-1 expression in TILs (p=0.03). The correlations between pCR and expression of each of PD-L1 and PD-1 were not significant. CONCLUSION: Expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in early breast cancer is associated with higher TIL scores and pCR; conversely, expression of these proteins correlates with poor prognostic clinicopathological factors such as tumour grade and subtype. TILs, PD-1 and PD-L1 can potentially predict the response to treatment.

Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas with comparison to potentially related entities.

A growing number of studies suggest critical tumor suppressor roles of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex in a variety of human cancers. The recent discovery of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas has added to the list of tumor groups with the SMARCA4 inactivating mutation. To better characterize these tumors and establish their nosological status, we undertook a clinicopathological and molecular analysis of 12 SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas and compared them with three potentially related disease entities. Eleven men and one woman with SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas (aged 27-82 years, median 39 years) were included in the study. Most of the patients had heavy smoking exposure and pulmonary emphysema/bullae. The primary tumors were large and involved the thoracic region in all cases and simultaneously affected the abdominal cavity in 3 cases. The patients followed a rapid course, with a median survival of 7 months. Histologically, all tumors showed diffuse sheets of mildly dyscohesive, relatively monotonous, and undifferentiated epithelioid cells with prominent nucleoli. Immunohistochemically, all tumors demonstrated a complete absence (8 cases) or diffuse severe reduction (4 cases) of SMARCA4 expression. Cytokeratin, CD34, SOX2, SALL4, and p53 were expressed in 6/12, 10/12, 10/12, 10/12, and 7/10 cases, respectively. SMARCA2 expression was deficient in 11/12 cases, and none (0/8) expressed claudin-4. Targeted sequencing was performed in 5 cases and demonstrated the inactivating SMARCA4 mutation in each case and uncovered alterations in TP53 (5/5), NF1 (2/5), CDKN2A (2/5), KRAS (1/5), and KEAP1 (1/5), among others. Comparative analysis supported the distinctiveness of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas as they were distinguishable from 13 malignant rhabdoid tumors, 15 epithelioid sarcomas, and 12 SMARCA4-deficient lung carcinomas based on clinicopathological and immunohistochemical grounds. SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas constitute a unique, highly lethal entity that requires full recognition and differentiation from other epithelioid malignancies involving the thoracic region.

Feasibility of dose-dense paclitaxel/carboplatin therapy in elderly patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer.

PURPOSE: Weekly dose-dense paclitaxel (PTX) in combination with carboplatin (CBDCA) every 3 weeks (ddTC therapy) is a standard treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. However, there is no detailed analysis of the feasibility of ddTC therapy in elderly patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who received ddTC therapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital from April 2003 to April 2013. We assessed the feasibility of ddTC therapy in elderly patients aged 70 years or older (elderly group), comparing relative dose intensity (RDI) for PTX, CBDCA, and ddTC; adverse events; and rate of chemotherapy discontinuation to those in patients below 70 years of age (younger group). RESULTS: A total of 143 patients (elderly group, 22; younger group, 121) was analyzed. A comparison of RDI between these two groups showed no significant differences for PTX, CBDCA, and ddTC. Nonhematological and hematological toxicity profiles of the elderly and younger groups were similar, except that severe peripheral neuropathy (Grade 2 or higher) was more common in the elderly group. There was no significant difference in the rate of chemotherapy discontinuation (elderly group, 13.6 % vs. younger group, 7.4 %, p = 0.397). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that ddTC therapy was feasible for elderly patients. However, to prevent severe neuropathy, PTX dose reduction deserves consideration.

Significance of delayed primary excision in localized nonmetastatic adult head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma.

Adult rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a highly aggressive tumor. Multidisciplinary treatment is important. However, the role of surgery is controversial. The purpose of this study was to reveal the role of a delayed primary excision (DPE) after induction chemotherapy (IC) in localized nonmetastatic adult head and neck RMS. We retrospectively reviewed 24 adult head and neck RMS. Treatment was classified into the following two groups: the DPE group, who received IC followed by surgery, postoperative radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy (17 patients); the chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group, who received IC followed by chemoradiotherapy (seven patients). We analyzed the efficacy of IC, local control rate (LCR), and overall survival (OS). In the DPE group, 10 patients (59%) underwent complete surgical resection. In the evaluation of the surgical specimens, 14 patients (82%) had residual viable tumors after IC. The response to IC was significantly associated with the 3-year LCR (CR/PR vs. SD/PD: 100% vs. 33%, P = 0.0014). In patients with good response to chemotherapy, the DPE group had a significantly better 3-year LCR compared with that of the CRT group (DPE group vs. CRT group, 100% vs. 44%, P = 0.018). However, the treatment modalities were not associated with OS (DPE group vs. CRT group, 65% vs. 57%: P = 0.98). The recurrence patterns differed according to treatments, and distant metastases were more frequent in the DPE group. DPE may impact local control of localized nonmetastatic adult head and neck RMS. Poor response to IC is a risk factor for local recurrence.

Safety and tolerability of the olaparib tablet formulation in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours.

PURPOSE: This was the first Phase I study to assess the safety and tolerability of the tablet formulation of olaparib (Lynparza™), an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. The pharmacokinetic profile and antitumour activity of olaparib tablets were also assessed. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre study (D081BC00001; NCT01813474), a single dose of olaparib (200 or 300 mg, tablets) was administered on day 1, followed 48 h afterwards by multiple dosing (200 or 300 mg twice daily [bid]) for 28-day cycles. Doses were escalated in successive cohorts, with an expansion cohort enrolled at the highest dose that was confirmed to be tolerable during dose escalation. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and 23 were treated (n = 4, 7 and 12 at 200, 300 and 300 [expansion] mg bid, respectively). No patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, so the maximum tolerated dose was not defined. The most frequent adverse events were nausea (43.5 %), decreased appetite (30.4 %), anaemia (26.1 %) and constipation (26.1 %). No patient had dose reductions, two had dose interruptions, and two discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Absorption of olaparib was rapid following single and multiple dosing, and plasma concentrations declined biphasically after single dosing. No patients had a confirmed antitumour response. CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib tablet doses of 200 and 300 mg bid were considered tolerable in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. Consistent with the global olaparib programme, 300 mg bid was selected as the recommended tablet dose for future studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01813474.

Poorly Differentiated Gastric Adenocarcinoma Can Mimic Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

This report describes two cases with obstructive jaundice caused by poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography scans showed circumferential stenosis in the hilar bile ducts. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed dilatation of the bilateral hepatic ducts and stenosis of the common hepatic ducts from the bifurcation of the bilateral hepatic ducts. The first diagnoses were hilar cholangiocarcinoma and biliary drainage decreased serum bilirubin; however, both patients died of cancer within a short period of time. Autopsies revealed lymphatic vessel invasion and possible subepithelial invasion by gastric adenocarcinoma into the hilar bile ducts. A differential diagnosis should thus be required in suspected cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Ifosfamide and Etoposide Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent/Refractory Rhabdomyosarcoma in Adults.

BACKGROUND: No standard chemotherapy for adults with recurrent/refractory rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has yet been established. The present study aimed to assess the effect of ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) chemotherapy on previously treated RMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with recurrent/refractory RMS were treated with ifosfamide (1,800 g/m(2)/day), etoposide (100 mg/m(2)/day) and mesna (1,080 mg/m(2)/day) for 5 days. The effect and toxicity were evaluated by chart review. RESULTS: Fifteen patients, with a median age of 33 years (range=25-67 years), were treated with IE chemotherapy. A median of six cycles of chemotherapy were administered and an objective response was obtained in eight patients. The median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval=2.3-6.7 months) and overall survival was 14.4 months (95% confidence interval=4.6-28.3 months). Toxicity greater than grade 3 was as follows: neutropenia in all patients, anemia in seven, thrombocytopenia in seven and febrile neutropenia in eight. CONCLUSION: IE chemotherapy could be an alternative optional treatment method in adults with recurrent/refractory RMS.