Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Base de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Future Oncol ; 20(17): 1191-1205, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38420911

RESUMEN

Background: The ARROW study demonstrated that once-weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone (wKd) therapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with twice-weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone therapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients. Aim: To describe the treatment patterns, effectiveness and safety of wKd therapy in real-world settings in Japan. Methods: We investigated data from the medical records of 126 Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Results: The overall response rate was 66.3%. The median progression-free survival was 9.5 months. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade and grade ≥3 were 45.8 and 20.8%, respectively. Conclusion: There were no new or unexpected safety signals in this study. This study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety profiles of wKd therapy in Japan.


Carfilzomib became available for daily clinical practice as a drug for cancer of bone marrow (multiple myeloma) that comes back or does not respond to previous drug (relapsed or refractory). This drug was approved in the USA in 2012, and in Japan in 2016. In this study, we looked at how once-weekly carfilzomib works and how safe it is in real-life situations in Japan. We screened 126 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in Japan. The median age of the patients was 70 years, with 25% being over 75 years. This study also included some patients who were not in the best overall health, had a history of many treatments or had heart complications. In 66.3% of patients, the cancer had disappeared or the extent of the cancer had reduced after treatment. Side effects and serious side effects occurred in 45.8 and 14.2% of patients, respectively. The most common side effects were low levels of blood platelets (9.2%), high blood pressure (5.8%), loose or watery stools (5.0%), fever (5.0%), and low levels of red blood cells (4.2%). Heart disorders occurred in five patients. But all patients recovered or improved with treatment such as blood pressure lowering drugs and diuretics. These results showed that once-weekly carfilzomib works well and is safe in real-world settings in Japan. This information can help us think about how to pick the right patients and handle heart disease risks when using carfilzomib treatment.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona , Mieloma Múltiple , Oligopéptidos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Japón/epidemiología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Esquema de Medicación , Adulto , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología
2.
Int J Hematol ; 108(1): 39-46, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29594921

RESUMEN

In the era of novel therapeutic agents for multiple myeloma (MM), both the significance of achieving the plateau phase and the efficacy of subsequent maintenance therapy remain unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib maintenance therapy (biweekly for 1 year) in transplant-ineligible MM patients who plateaued after bortezomib-based induction therapy. Of 36 evaluable patients, the overall response rate during induction therapy was 61%, with a stringent complete response in 6%, a complete response in 6%, a very good partial response in 17%, and a partial response in 33%. Twenty patients achieved the plateau phase and subsequently received bortezomib maintenance therapy. Median progression-free survival from the induction and maintenance therapies was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval, 11.4-23.7 months) and 10.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7-10.7 months), respectively. During maintenance therapy, there were no cases with grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy, nor was there any improvement in the quality of the response. In conclusion, although maintenance therapy with biweekly bortezomib for up to 1 year was feasible, plateau-oriented bortezomib induction therapy followed by bortezomib maintenance therapy was not adequate in newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM patients.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA