Correlation between Efficacy and Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients with Advanced Solid Cancer Who Received VEGF Pathway Inhibitors: Hypertension within the First Eight Weeks is Associated with Favorable Outcomes of Patients Treated with VEGF Pathway Inhibitors.

Objective Many vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway inhibitors are used in the treatment of patients with various advanced cancers; however, treatments induce cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs), such as hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmia, arterial or venous embolism, and hemorrhage. Some studies have suggested a correlation between efficacy and CVAEs; however, further evidence is required. This study evaluated real-world data concerning the frequency and degree of CVAEs and possible associations between CVAEs and efficacy in such patients. Methods and Patients We analyzed CVAEs observed in 294 patients with advanced cancer who were treated with ramucirumab, regorafenib, pazopanib, sunitinib, or sorafenib. Results CVAEs of any grade and proteinuria within 8 weeks after the initiation of VEGF pathway inhibitors (early) or during the treatment period (total period) were observed in 72%-85% and 77%-92% of the patients, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with a CVAE of grade ≥1 in the early period was favorable compared with the PFS of those who had no CVAE (median, 4.9 vs. 3.5 months, P = 0.016, log-rank test). Furthermore, the PFS of patients with a CVAE grade ≥3 in the early period was favorable compared to that of those with CVAEs of grades 0-2. Taken together, a higher degree of CVAE was correlated with favorable patient outcomes. Conclusion This study revealed the frequency and degree of CVAEs in patients with solid cancers who received VEGF pathway inhibitors in a real-world setting and added evidence regarding the correlation between CVAEs and efficacy of VEGF pathway inhibitors.

Genome-wide DNA methylation status is a predictor of the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Translational research of the EPIC trial.

PURPOSE: The genome-wide DNA methylation status (GWMS) predicts of therapeutic response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies in treating metastatic colorectal cancer. We verified the significance of GWMS as a predictive factor for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Clinical data were obtained from a prospective trial database, and a genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed. GWMS was classified into high-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) and low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC). The patients were divided into subgroups according to the treatment arm (cetuximab plus irinotecan or irinotecan alone) and GWMS, and the clinical outcomes were compared between the subgroups. RESULTS: Of the 112 patients, 58 (51.8%) were in the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm, and 54 (48.2%) were in the irinotecan arm; 47 (42.0%) were in the HMCC, and 65 (58.0%) were in the LMCC group regarding GWMS. Compared with the LMCC group, the progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in the HMCC group in the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm (median 1.4 vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.001, hazard ratio = 2.56), whereas no significant differences were observed in the irinotecan arm. A multivariate analysis showed that GWMS was an independent predictor of PFS and overall survival (OS) in the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, respectively), whereas GWMS did not contribute to either PFS or OS in the irinotecan arm. CONCLUSIONS: GWMS was a predictive factor for the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Chylous Ascites Associated with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer That Improved with Appropriate Treatment: A Case Report.

Chylous ascites is a rare form of ascites with high triglyceride content arising from the thoracoabdominal lymph nodes in the peritoneal cavity due to various benign or malignant etiologies, including pancreatic cancer. During cancer chemotherapy, the accumulation of ascites can lead to the deterioration of the patient's general condition, making chemotherapy administration difficult, and resulting in a poor prognosis. We encountered a rare case of chylous ascites complicated by advanced pancreatic cancer. The patient presented with a discrepancy between the shrinkage of the pancreatic cancer and the accumulation of ascites. Therefore, we were able to promptly diagnose chylous ascites by performing biochemical tests. The patient was treated with octreotide, reportedly effective in treating chylous ascites, which rapidly improved the chylous ascites and general condition of the patient, allowing the patient to continue chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Therefore, physicians should consider the possibility of chylous ascites when clinically unexplained ascites are observed in patients with advanced cancer. The investigation and treatment of chylous ascites should be initiated as soon as possible.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology clinical guidelines: Molecular testing for colorectal cancer treatment, 5th edition.

Molecular testing to determine optimal therapies is essential for managing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In October 2022, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology published the 5th edition of the Molecular Testing Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. In this guideline, in patients with unresectable CRC, RAS/BRAF V600E mutational and mismatch repair tests are strongly recommended prior to first-line chemotherapy to select optimal first- and second-line therapies. In addition, HER2 testing is strongly recommended because the pertuzumab plus trastuzumab combination is insured after fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in Japan. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based RAS testing is also strongly recommended to assess the indications for the readministration of anti-EGFR antibodies. Both tissue- and ctDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling tests are strongly recommended to assess the indications for targeted molecular drugs, although they are currently insured in patients with disease progression after receiving standard chemotherapy (or in whom disease progression is expected in the near future). Mutational and mismatch repair testing is strongly recommended for patients with resectable CRC, and RAS/BRAF V600E mutation testing is recommended to estimate the risk of recurrence. Mutational and mismatch repair and BRAF testing are also strongly recommended for screening for Lynch syndrome. Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease (MRD) testing is strongly recommended for estimating the risk of recurrence based on clinical evidence, although MRD testing was not approved in Japan at the time of the publication of this guideline.

Antibiotics May Interfere with Nivolumab Efficacy in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are often treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Recently, antibiotic intake was reported to lower the efficacy of ICIs in patients with several types of cancers. However, it is unclear if antibiotics affect the efficacy of ICIs in patients with head and neck SCC. We retrospectively assessed the influence of antibiotics on the treatment efficacy of nivolumab, an ICI, in patients with head and neck SCC. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with head and neck SCC treated with nivolumab at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, between 2017 and 2021. Patients who received oral or intravenous antibiotics from a month before the day of nivolumab initiation to the day of the first imaging evaluation of ICI efficacy were assigned to the antibiotic-treated group. The remaining patients were assigned to the antibiotic-untreated group. The response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival time (OS) of both groups were compared. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were assigned to the antibiotic-treated group and 19 to the antibiotic-untreated group. The RR, median PFS, and median OS of the antibiotic-treated group were 23.7%, 3.2 months (95% confidential interval [CI]: 2.0-4.1), and 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.3-15.1) and those of the antibiotic-untreated group were 42.1%, 5.8 months (95% CI: 2.3-16.7), and 18.4 months (95% CI: 6.2-23.1), respectively. The PFS of the antibiotic-untreated group was significantly longer than that of the antibiotic-treated group. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that antibiotic treatment significantly shortens the PFS with nivolumab therapy in patients with head and neck SCC.

A Learning Program for Treatment Recommendations by Molecular Tumor Boards and Artificial Intelligence.

Importance: Substantial heterogeneity exists in treatment recommendations across molecular tumor boards (MTBs), especially for biomarkers with low evidence levels; therefore, the learning program is essential. Objective: To determine whether a learning program sharing treatment recommendations for biomarkers with low evidence levels contributes to the standardization of MTBs and to investigate the efficacy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based annotation system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective quality improvement study used 50 simulated cases to assess concordance of treatment recommendations between a central committee and participants. Forty-seven participants applied from April 7 to May 13, 2021. Fifty simulated cases were randomly divided into prelearning and postlearning evaluation groups to assess similar concordance based on previous investigations. Participants included MTBs at hub hospitals, treating physicians at core hospitals, and AI systems. Each participant made treatment recommendations for each prelearning case from registration to June 30, 2021; participated in the learning program on July 18, 2021; and made treatment recommendations for each postlearning case from August 3 to September 30, 2021. Data were analyzed from September 2 to December 10, 2021. Exposures: The learning program shared the methodology of making appropriate treatment recommendations, especially for biomarkers with low evidence levels. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of MTBs that met prespecified accreditation criteria for postlearning evaluations (approximately 90% concordance with high evidence levels and approximately 40% with low evidence levels). Key secondary end points were chronological enhancements in the concordance of treatment recommendations on postlearning evaluations from prelearning evaluations. Concordance of treatment recommendations by an AI system was an exploratory end point. Results: Of the 47 participants who applied, 42 were eligible. The accreditation rate of the MTBs was 55.6% (95% CI, 35.3%-74.5%; P < .001). Concordance in MTBs increased from 58.7% (95% CI, 52.8%-64.4%) to 67.9% (95% CI, 61.0%-74.1%) (odds ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.06-1.86]; P = .02). In postlearning evaluations, the concordance of treatment recommendations by the AI system was significantly higher than that of MTBs (88.0% [95% CI, 68.7%-96.1%]; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this quality improvement study suggest that use of a learning program improved the concordance of treatment recommendations provided by MTBs to central ones. Treatment recommendations made by an AI system showed higher concordance than that for MTBs, indicating the potential clinical utility of the AI system.

FOLFIRI Chemotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Urachal Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Urachal carcinoma is a rare cancer, with limited evidence regarding systemic chemotherapy for metastatic urachal carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic urachal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic urachal carcinoma treated with FOLFIRI between March 2008 and April 2023 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed using medical records. RESULTS: Six patients with urachal carcinoma received FOLFIRI. The histological type was adenocarcinoma in all patients. The metastatic or recurrent sites were the peritoneum, lungs, lymph nodes, and local relapse sites. Three patients received FOLFIRI as first-line chemotherapy, and the other three received FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy. Two patients had only non-measurable lesions as the targets of tumor response. The best response was the stable disease or non-complete response/non-progressive disease in four patients, with a disease control rate of 67%. The median progression-free survival was 7.5 months. In two patients with ascites only as the site of metastasis, the amount of ascites and serum tumor marker levels decreased after FOLFIRI was initiated. Grade 3/4 toxicities included grade 3 neutropenia in one patient and grade 3 diarrhea in one patient. CONCLUSION: FOLFIRI has modest efficacy and good tolerability for the treatment of metastatic urachal carcinoma.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between carboplatin-etoposide and cisplatin-etoposide combination therapy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma, retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is characterized by a poor prognosis and is generally treated with platinum and etoposide combination therapy as first-line chemotherapy. However, it remains uncertain whether carboplatin and etoposide combination therapy (CE) and cisplatin and etoposide combination therapy (PE) have comparable treatment efficacy. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of CE and PE in patients with NEC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the patient's clinical record from 2005 to 2022 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital. Patients who received either CE or PE were included in the study. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 16.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., USA). RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were enrolled, with 73 patients assigned to the CE group and 31 patients assigned to the PE group. Statistically, the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) time and overall survival (OS) time were 42.6%, 5.1 months (95%CI: 3.5-6.3) and 13.6 months (95%CI: 8.9-17.4), respectively, in the CE groups and 44.4%, 5.6 months (95%CI: 3.1-7.0) and 12.5 months (95%CI: 11.2-14.6), respectively, in the PE groups. There was no significant difference in treatment efficacy between the CE and the PE groups. However, the number of patients with elevated creatinine (3.35 mg/dl and 3.88 mg/dl in two patients, respectively) was significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of CE and PE in patients with NEC is comparable. However, the incidence of renal dysfunction was found to be significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group.

Depth of response may predict clinical outcome in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer treated with pembrolizumab-containing regimens.

Background: Pembrolizumab-containing regimens are standards of care for recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). The depth of response (DpR) predicts the survival of patients with several types of solid cancers; however, its association with the survival outcomes of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with pembrolizumab-containing regimens remains unclear. Methods: This study included 66 patients with R/M HNSCC who received a pemblolizumab-containing regimen as a first-line therapy at Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan. The patients' characteristics, combined positive score, baseline tumor size, tumor response, DpR, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS2, and adverse events were reviewed. The associations between DpR and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results: The 1 year-OS and 1 year-PFS rates of pembrolizumab-containing regimens were 69.4% and 24.4%, respectively. The response rate was 28.8%. The mean and median values of tumor change from baseline were 5.1% and -9.0%. In the correlation analysis, a significant negative correlation was observed between tumor change rate from baseline and survival outcomes (OS: r= -0.41, p=0.0017; PFS: r=-0.49, p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, DpR with tumor change of ≤-45 was associated with better OS and PFS. Conclusion: DpR induced by pembrolizumab-containing regimens may be a predictive factor for OS and PFS in patients with R/M HNSCC.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with DNA mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors, third edition.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have reported the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) advanced solid tumors. The accumulated evidence of tumor agnostic agent has been made since PD-1 inhibitor was approved and used in clinical practice. Therefore, we have revised the guideline "Japan Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion for the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair tumors, cooperated by Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, First Edition". METHODS: Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with dMMR advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO), Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), and Japanese society of pediatric hematology/oncology (JSPHO) voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO and the public comments among all societies' members were done. RESULTS: The current guideline describes two clinical questions and eight recommendations for whom, when, and how MMR status should be tested. CONCLUSION: In this guideline, the committee proposed eight recommendations for performing MMR testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

NEXUS trial: a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases (CRM) has not been established due to the rarity and rapid progression of the disease. Since the unresectable recurrence rate is high, development of novel perioperative therapies are warranted. On December 2020, the BEACON CRC triplet regimen of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab was approved for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan. METHODS: The NEXUS trial is a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. The key inclusion criteria are as follows: histologically diagnosed with colorectal adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma; RAS wild-type and BRAF V600E mutation by tissue or blood; and previously untreated resectable distant metastases. The triplet regimen (encorafenib: 300 mg daily; binimetinib: 45 mg twice daily; cetuximab: 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly, 28 days/cycle) is administered for 3 cycles each before and after curative resection. The primary endpoint of the study is the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the secondary end points are the PFS, disease-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate. The sample size is 32 patients. Endpoints in the NEXUS trial as well as integrated analysis with the nationwide registry data will be considered for seeking regulatory approval for the perioperative use of the triplet regimen. DISCUSSION: The use of the triplet regimen in the perioperative period is expected to be safe and effective in patients with resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT2031220025, April. 16, 2022.

Chapter 3: Management of kidney injury caused by cancer drug therapy, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022.

Cisplatin should be administered with diuretics and Magnesium supplementation under adequate hydration to avoid renal impairment. Patients should be evaluated for eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) during the treatment with pemetrexed, as kidney injury has been reported. Pemetrexed should be administered with caution in patients with a CCr (creatinine clearance) < 45 mL/min. Mesna is used to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis in patients receiving ifosfamide. Febuxostat is effective in avoiding hyperuricemia induced by TLS (tumor lysis syndrome). Preventative rasburicase is recommended in high-risk cases of TLS. Thrombotic microangiopathy could be triggered by anticancer drugs and there is no evidence of efficacy of plasma exchange therapy. When proteinuria occurs during treatment with anti-angiogenic agents or multi-kinase inhibitors, dose reductions or interruptions based on grading should be considered. Grade 3 proteinuria and renal dysfunction require urgent intervention, including drug interruption or withdrawal, and referral to a nephrologist should be considered. The first-line drugs used for blood pressure elevation due to anti-angiogenic agents are ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers). The protein binding of drugs and their pharmacokinetics are considerably altered in patients with hypoalbuminemia. The clearance of rituximab is increased in patients with proteinuria, and the correlation with urinary IgG suggests similar pharmacokinetic changes when using other antibody drugs. AIN (acute interstitial nephritis) is the most common cause of ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitor)-related kidney injury that is often treated with steroids. The need for renal biopsy in patients with kidney injury that occurs during treatment with ICI remains controversial.

[Current Status and Challenges in Tumor Agnostic Treatment].

Development of tumor agnostic treatment based on specific biomarkers has been quite active in recent years. In Japan, pembrolizumab for microsatellite instability high(MSI-high), entrectinib and larotrectinib for NTRK fusion gene and pembrolizumab for tumor mutation burden high(TMB-high)have been approved. In addition to these approvals, dostarlimab for mismatch repair deficiency(dMMR), dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAF V600E, and selpercatinib for RET fusion gene have been approved in the United States as tumor agnostic biomarkers and their treatment. Development of tumor agnostic treatment requires efficient implementation of clinical trials to target rare subtypes. Various efforts are underway to conduct such clinical trials, including the use of appropriate registries and the implementation of decentralized clinical trial. Another approach is to evaluate a number of combination regimens in parallel, as in the trials of KRAS G12C inhibitor, with the aim of improvement of efficacy or overcoming assumed resistant.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with high tumor mutational burden tumors.

The development of novel antitumor agents and accompanying biomarkers has improved survival across several tumor types. Previously, we developed recommendations for tumor-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumors with DNA mismatch repair deficient or neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusions. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in patient with tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H) solid tumors and have been established as a third tumor-agnostic agent, making it necessary to develop the guideline prioritized for these patients. Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with TMB-H advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO), Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), and Japanese society of pediatric hematology/oncology (JSPHO) voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done. The current guideline describes three clinical questions and seven recommendations for whom, when, and how TMB should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with TMB-H advanced solid tumors. In this guideline, the committee proposed seven recommendations for performing TMB testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

Phase II study of biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and exploratory analysis of associations between DNA methylation status and the efficacy of the anti-EGFR antibody: T-CORE1201.

Background: Little is known about the biweekly combined use of cetuximab and chemotherapy as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, DNA methylation status has been reported to be a new possible predictor of the efficacy from the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI as a second-line treatment for KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. We also investigated the predictability of DNA methylation status on the efficacy of the EGFR antibody-containing treatment. Methods: Patients who were refractory or intolerant to the first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and received biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor evaluations were performed every 2 months using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. DNA methylation status of colorectal cancer cells was defined by a modified MethyLight assay. Results: Sixty-six cases were enrolled. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-7.6] months. The median overall survival (mOS) was 12.7 (95% CI, 7.5-15.3) months. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia occurred in 53.0% of patients, whereas skin disorders with a grade 3 or higher occurred in <15% of patients. In multivariate analysis, DNA methylation status could not be an independent predictor of PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.43; P=0.39] and OS (HR, 2.13; P=0.086). However, in RAS/BRAF wild-type patients, the mPFS and mOS in the low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC) group was numerically better than those in the highly-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) group, although the difference was not statistically significant [mPFS: 8.5 (95% CI, 6.1-10.9) vs. 3.3 (95% CI, 1.2-not reached) months, P=0.79; ΔmPFS, 5.2 months; mOS: 15.3 (95% CI, 11.9-23.5) vs. 6.5 (95% CI, 3.1-not reached) months, P=0.53; ΔmOS, 8.8 months]. Conclusions: Biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI is a useful second-line therapy for mCRC. DNA methylation status warrants further exploration as a predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR efficacy in mCRC.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have reported the efficacy of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors against neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion gene-positive advanced solid tumors. The accumulated evidence of tumor-agnostic agent has made since TRK inhibitors were approved and used in clinical practice. Therefore, we have revised the 'Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO)/Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO)-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors, cooperated by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO)'. METHODS: Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done. RESULTS: The current guideline describes 3 clinical questions and 14 recommendations for whom, when, and how NTRK fusion should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. CONCLUSION: The committee proposed 14 recommendations for performing NTRK testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from TRK inhibitors.

Management of patients with presumed germline pathogenic variant from tumor-only genomic sequencing: A retrospective analysis at a single facility.

Cancer treatment is increasingly evolving toward personalized medicine, which sequences numerous cancer-related genes and identifies therapeutic targets. On the other hand, patients with germline pathogenic variants (GPV) have been identified as secondary findings (SF) and oncologists have been urged to handle them. All SF disclosure considerations for patients are addressed and decided at the molecular tumor boards (MTB) in the facility. In this study, we retrospectively summarized the results of all cases in which comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test was conducted at our hospital, and discussed the possibility of presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPV) at MTB. MTB recommended confirmatory testing for 64 patients. Informed consent was obtained from attending physicians for 53 of them, 30 patients requested testing, and 17 patients tested positive for a confirmatory test. Together with already known variants, 4.5 % of the total confirmed in this cohort. Variants verified in this study were BRCA1 (n = 12), BRCA2 (n = 6), MSH2 (n = 2), MSH6 (n = 2), WT1 (n = 2), TP53, MEN1, CHEK2, MLH1, TSC2, PTEN, RB1, and SMARCB1. There was no difference in the tumor's VAF between confirmed positive and negative cases for variants determined as PGPV by MTB. Current results demonstrate the actual number of cases until confirmatory germline test for patients with PGPV from tumor-only CGP test through the discussion at the MTB. The practical results at this single facility will serve as a guide for the management of the selection and distribution of SF in the genome analysis.

Clinical decisions by the molecular tumor board on comprehensive genomic profiling tests in Japan: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: A paradigm shift has occurred in cancer chemotherapy from tumor-specific treatment with cytotoxic agents to personalized medicine with molecular-targeted drugs. Thus, it is essential to identify genomic alterations and molecular features to recommend effective targeted molecular medicines regardless of the tumor site. Nevertheless, it takes considerable expertise to identify treatment targets from primary-sequencing data in order to provide drug recommendations. The Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) denotes a platform that integrates clinical and molecular features for clinical decisions. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyses all the cases of discussion and decision at the MTB in Tohoku University Hospital and summarizes genetic alterations and treatment recommendations. RESULTS: The MTB discussed 1003 comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests conducted in patients with solid cancer, and the resulting rate of assessing treatment recommendations was approximately 19%. Among hundreds of genes in the CGP test, only 30 genetic alterations or biomarkers were used to make treatment recommendations. The leading biomarkers that led to treatment recommendations were tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) (n = 32), ERBB2 amplification (n = 24), BRAF V600E (n = 16), and BRCA1/2 alterations (n = 32). Thyroid cancer accounted for most cancer cases for which treatment recommendation was provided (81.3%), followed by non-small cell lung cancer (42.4%) and urologic cancer (31.3%). The number of tests performed for gastrointestinal cancers was high (n = 359); however, the treatment recommendations for the same were below average (13%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study may be used to simplify treatment recommendations from the CGP reports and help select patients for testing, thereby increasing the accuracy of personalized medicine.

Concordance Between Recommendations From Multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Boards and Central Consensus for Cancer Treatment in Japan.

Importance: Quality assurance of molecular tumor boards (MTBs) is crucial in cancer genome medicine. Objective: To evaluate the concordance of recommendations by MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations at all 12 leading institutions for cancer genomic medicine in Japan using 50 simulated cases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective quality improvement study of 50 simulated cancer cases. Molecular tumor boards from 12 core hospitals independently recommended treatment for 50 cases blinded to the centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations. The study's central committee consisted of representatives from all 12 core hospitals in Japan who selected the 50 simulated cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, including frequently observed genomic alterations. The central committee recommended centrally developed consensus treatment. The concordance rate for genomically matched treatments between MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations was evaluated. Data analysis was conducted from January 22 to March 3, 2021. Exposures: Simulated cases of cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was concordance, defined as the proportion of recommendations by MTBs concordant with centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations. A mixed-effects logistic regression model, adjusted for institutes as a random intercept, was applied. High evidence levels were defined as established biomarkers for which the treatment was ready for routine use in clinical practice, and low evidence levels were defined as biomarkers for genomically matched treatment that were under investigation. Results: The Clinical Practice Guidance for Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (edition 2.1) was used for evidence-level definition. The mean concordance between MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations was 62% (95% CI, 57%-65%). Each MTB concordance varied from 48% to 86%. The concordance rate was higher in the subset of patients with colorectal cancer (100%; 95% CI, 94.0%-100%), ROS1 fusion (100%; 95% CI, 85.5%-100%), and high evidence level A/R (A: 88%; 95% CI, 81.8%-93.0%; R:100%; 95% CI, 92.6%-100%). Conversely, the concordance rate was lower in cases of cervical cancer (11%; 95% CI, 3.1%-26.1%), TP53 mutation (16%; 95% CI, 12.5%-19.9%), and low evidence level C/D/E (C: 30%; 95% CI, 24.7%-35.9%; D: 25%; 95% CI, 5.5%-57.2%; and E: 18%; 95% CI, 13.8%-23.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that evidence level (high [A/R] vs low [C/D/E]: odds ratio, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.8-10.8) and TP53 alteration (yes vs no: odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.10) were significantly associated with concordance. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that genomically matched treatment recommendations differ among MTBs, particularly in genomic alterations with low evidence levels wherein treatment is being investigated. Sharing information on matched therapy for low evidence levels may be needed to improve the quality of MTBs.

BRAF and MEK Inhibitor Treatment for Metastatic Undifferentiated Sarcoma of the Spermatic Cord with BRAF V600E Mutation.

An 18-year-old Japanese man was diagnosed with an undifferentiated sarcoma of the spermatic cord, with multiple distant metastases to the lungs and bones. The patient received doxorubicin-based standard chemotherapy. Although the chemotherapy was effective, it induced severe adverse events, which led to treatment discontinuation. A comprehensive genomic profiling test using resected tumor tissue revealed the BRAF V600E mutation. Based on the result, the patient received combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. The combination therapy achieved a good response with few adverse events. However, 6.5 months later, pleural metastases and meningeal dissemination had emerged. A liquid comprehensive genomic profiling test was performed after the progression to identify the resistance mechanism, which resulted in the detection of no actionable gene alterations other than BRAF V600E. This report shows that the BRAF V600E mutation may be a promising therapeutic target and that resistance to the targeted therapy could also occur in soft tissue sarcoma. The significance of BRAF mutations across different types of cancer should be validated, and it is necessary to apply targeted therapies and develop methods to overcome resistance based on the optimal use of comprehensive genomic profiling tests.