Clinical effects of direct oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with a bioprosthetic valve and atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have a bioprosthetic valve (BPV). However, the data related to elderly patients (aged ≥80 years) with BPV replacement and AF are limited. METHODS: This post-hoc subgroup analysis of a BPV-AF Registry enrolled 752 patients with BPV replacement and AF. The primary net outcome was a composite of cardiac death, stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Among 752 patients, 429 (57%) patients were ≥ 80 and 323 (43%) were < 80 years old. The higher risk in patients aged ≥80 than <80 years was significant for the net outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-3.17; P = 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, there was no statistically significant difference between warfarin (reference) and DOAC users in the risk of net outcomes (adjusted HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.71-2.24; P = 0.44), stroke and systemic embolism (adjusted HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.48-8.38; P = 0.34), and major bleeding (adjusted HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.11-4.98; P = 0.75) in patients aged ≥80 years old as well as those aged <80 years. Among 489 warfarin users, the cumulative incidence of net outcomes tended to be higher in patients aged ≥80 than <80 years (12.2% vs. 5.7% at 1 year, log-rank P = 0.002). Among 263 DOAC users, however, it was similar between patients aged ≥80 and < 80 years. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that DOAC showed similar efficacy and safety compared with warfarin even in elderly patients aged ≥80 years with BPV replacement and AF.

Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation in Severe Aortic Stenosis　- Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2.

BACKGROUND: Data on concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are scarce.Methods and Results: We investigated the risk of concomitant MR in patients with severe AS in the CURRENT AS Registry-2 according to initial treatment strategy (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI], surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR], or conservative). Among 3,365 patients with severe AS, 384 (11.4%) had moderate/severe MR (TAVI: n=126/1,148; SAVR: n=68/591; conservative: n=190/1,626). The cumulative 3-year incidence for death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization was significantly higher in the moderate/severe than no/mild MR group in the entire population (54.6% vs. 34.3%, respectively; P<0.001) and for each treatment strategy (TAVI: 45.0% vs. 31.8% [P=0.006]; SAVR: 31.9% vs. 18.7% [P<0.001]; conservative: 67.8% vs. 41.6% [P<0.001]). The higher adjusted risk of moderate/severe MR relative to no/mild MR for death or HF hospitalization was not significant in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.39; P=0.15); however, the risk was significant in the SAVR (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.04-3.56; P=0.04) and conservative (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.02-1.67; P=0.04) groups, but not in the TAVI group (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.70-1.52; P=0.86), despite no significant interaction (Pinteraction=0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate/severe MR was associated with a higher risk for death or HF hospitalization in the initial SAVR and conservative strategies, while the association was less pronounced in the initial TAVI strategy.

Effectiveness of intraoperative endoscopic evaluation in aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement: a comparison of short- and mid-term results.

OBJECTIVES: Valve-sparing aortic root replacement requires expertise to predict repair results and prevent secondary aortic clamping for valve repair or replacement secondary to aortic valve insufficiency. Thus, intraoperative evaluation of the aortic valve using diastolic pressure at the aortic root may be helpful. The goal of this retrospective study was to compare the early and mid-term results of aortic valve repair with those of valve-sparing aortic root replacement using intraoperative endoscopic evaluation. METHODS: We included 158 patients who underwent aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement at our hospital between December 2003 and January 2022. The patients were divided into a non-endoscopic evaluation group (group NE, n = 97; mean age 55 years) and an endoscopic evaluation group (group E, n = 61; mean age 51 years). RESULTS: The incidence of a second aortic clamping for aortic valve insufficiency was significantly greater in group NE (17.5%) than in group E (1.6%; P = 0.002). The presence of none or trivial aortic valve insufficiency on transthoracic echocardiography at discharge in group E (87.6%) was significantly lower than in group NE (98.4%; P = 0.017). No significant difference in the cumulative incidence of recurrence of moderate AI (P = 0.47), hospitalization for heart failure (P = 0.84) and reoperation (P = 0.25) between groups NE and E. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative endoscopic evaluation during aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement correlated with a lower incidence of second aortic clamping because of aortic valve insufficiency and effective aortic valve insufficiency control.

Delayed surgical repair via right ventricular approach with Impella and extracorporeal life support in post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) is a life-threatening mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Delayed elective surgical repair can be considered in patients who respond well to aggressive heart failure therapy. Impella has been reported as a bridge to allow the deferment of surgery for PIVSD. PRESENTATION OF CASE: This report describes our case of a 62-year-old male with PIVSD and cardiogenic shock. Impella was placed to ensure hemodynamic stability. Subsequently, right heart failure was suspected to be caused by insufficient circulatory support from Impella alone. Emergency surgery was considered, but it was high risk and only a few days had passed since the onset. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was implanted to treat right heart failure and delay surgical repair as long as possible. Six days after Impella implantation, the patient underwent a successful surgical repair via the right ventricle without associated adverse events. DISCUSSION: Impella support can be insufficient for critically ill patients such as those with a larger ventricular septal defect and involvement of right ventricular function. VA-ECMO was implanted to support circulation, reduce the preload in the right ventricle, and avoid shunt inversion induced by increasing Impella flow. The patient was able to undergo a successful delayed repair with VA-ECMO at least one week after the onset of the AMI with hemodynamic stability and no associated adverse events. CONCLUSION: Additional VA-ECMO could help patients who fail to bridge to surgery with Impella to avoid emergency surgery, leading to successful delayed surgical repair.

In-hospital outcomes after SAVR or TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

There were no data comparing the in-hospital outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with those after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in Japan. Among consecutive patients with severe AS between April 2018 and December 2020 in the CURRENT AS Registry-2, we identified 1714 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (TAVI group: 1134 patients, and SAVR group: 580 patients). Patients in the TAVI group were much older (84.4 versus 73.6 years, P < 0.001) and more often had comorbidities than those in the SAVR group. In-hospital death rate was numerically lower in the TAVI group than in the SAVR group (0.6% versus 2.2%). After excluding patients with dialysis, in-hospital death rate was very low and comparable in the TAVI and SAVR groups (0.6% versus 0.8%). The rates of major bleeding and new-onset atrial fibrillation during index hospitalization were higher after SAVR than after TAVI (72% versus 20%, and 26% versus 4.6%, respectively), while the rate of pacemaker implantation was higher after TAVI than after SAVR (8.1% versus 2.4%). Regarding the echocardiographic data at discharge, the prevalence of patient-prosthesis mismatch was lower in the TAVI group than in the SAVR group (moderate: 9.0% versus 26%, and severe: 2.6% versus 4.8%). In this real-world data in Japan, TAVI compared with SAVR was chosen in much older patients with more comorbidities with severe AS. In-hospital death rate was numerically lower in the TAVI group than in the SAVR group.

Diameter changes of the thoracic aorta caused by acute type B aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The impact of type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD) on historical pre-TBAAD diameters of the thoracic aorta is rarely reported. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of changes in aortic diameters induced by dissection, measured with a computed tomography (CT) scan obtained before and after TBAAD. METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2014, CT angiography of 50 non-Marfan patients with nonbicuspid aortic valves diagnosed with TBAAD were compared to historical CTs on file. RESULTS: The ascending aorta and proximal arch showed negligible change. The proximal, mid, and distal aorta diameters changed compared with predissected values (107.7 ± 4.8%, 109.3 ± 4.9%, and 105.7 ± 5.8%, respectively). Neither sex, false lumen status, or mural calcification, nor prior thoracoabdominal aortic ectasia, correlated with the diameter change. Age ≥80 years in the proximal descending aorta did correlate with the diameter change (110.7 ± 4.0% vs 106.1 ± 4.6% p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although identifying predicting factors for an aortic diameter increase all along with the thoracic aorta was still challenging, the degree of diameter change by aortic dissection was 105.7% to 109.3% in descending thoracic aorta, most prominent in middle descending aorta.

Impact of serum haemoglobin-to-creatinine ratio after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVE: The association between a combined anaemia and renal failure index and 1-year prognosis of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unexplored. We aimed to investigate a simple risk score in patients undergoing TAVI. METHODS: A total of 469 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI between 2015 and 2021 were enrolled. After excluding patients undergoing dialysis, the remaining 458 patients were classified according to three tertiles of the serum haemoglobin-to-creatinine (Hgb/Cr) ratio 1 day before TAVI. The primary clinical outcome measure was all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation 1 year after TAVI. RESULTS: In the first, second and third tertiles, the 1-year cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 16.9% versus 7.2% versus 2.0%, respectively (p<0.01), and that of heart failure hospitalisation was 10.7% versus 3.4% versus 0.7%, respectively (p<0.01). The indexes of the area under the curve of the Hgb/Cr ratio for all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation 1 year after TAVI were both 0.73. Cut-off values were 10.1 for all-cause mortality 1 year after TAVI (OR, 4.78; 95% CI 2.43 to 9.74; p<0.01) and 10.4 for heart failure hospitalisation 1 year after TAVI (OR, 5.3; 95% CI 2.21 to 14.1; p<0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the Hgb/Cr ratio was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation 1 year after TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: Hgb/Cr ratio calculation 1 day before TAVI may help predict midterm all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing TAVI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 4143 (The Institutional Review Board of Kurashiki Central Hospital).

Effects of peripheral artery disease on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of data evaluating the effect of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with severe coronary artery disease in real-world practice. METHODS: Among 14,867 consecutive patients who underwent their first coronary revascularization with PCI or isolated CABG between 2011 and 2013 in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3, the current study population consisted of 3380 patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease or left main coronary artery disease. Long-term clinical outcomes were compared between PCI and CABG stratified by the presence or absence of PAD. Median clinical follow-up was 5.9 (IQR: 5.1-6.8) years. RESULTS: There were 461 patients with PAD (PCI: N = 307, CABG: N = 154), and 2919 patients without PAD (PCI: N = 1823, CABG: N = 1096). The cumulative 5-year mortality after coronary revascularization was 31.2 % in patients with PAD and 16.2 % in those without PAD (p < 0.0001). There was a higher risk of PCI relative to CABG for all-cause death in patients with and without PAD (adjusted HR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.99-2.53; p = 0.054, and HR, 1.25; 95%CI, 1.01-1.56; p = 0.04) without interaction (p interaction p = 0.48); Nevertheless, there was no excess risk of PCI relative to CABG for cardiovascular death regardless of PAD. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term mortality after coronary revascularization was significantly higher in severe CAD patients with PAD than those without PAD. There was a higher mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG in patients with and without PAD without interaction, which was mainly driven by excess non-cardiovascular deaths.

Clinical impact of turn-up anastomosis in the treatment of type A acute aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The management of anastomosis and hemostasis of the dissected aorta remains challenging. This study aims to establish an optimal surgical strategy for type A acute aortic dissection by reviewing single-center data using the turn-up anastomosis technique. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2015, 264 consecutive patients with type A acute aortic dissection who underwent emergency surgery within 14 days of symptom onset were enrolled. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67.7 ± 13.4 years, and 129 were males. The operative time and surgical bleeding were 390.9 ± 144.5 min and 2983.8 ± 3026.5 mL, respectively. In-hospital mortality was observed in 25 patients (9.4%), and 3 (1.1%) experienced uncontrolled bleeding (from the aortic root in two patients and coagulopathy due to dabigatran in one patient). Immediate reopening for bleeding was performed in 20 patients, and bleeding from the aortic anastomosis was observed at three proximal and two distal sites. Proximal re-dissection was observed in 18 patients; in all of which, glue was used, although two re-ruptures of the aortic root were observed among those without glue use. The rates of freedom from all-cause death, aortic death, and aortic events at postoperative 5 years were 78.5 ± 2.7%, 86.8 ± 2.1%, and 74.4 ± 2.9%, respectively. When these values were stratified according to the operative extent, no significant differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Turn-up anastomosis facilitates short circulatory arrest, short operative time, and stable hemostasis, with few anastomotic complications during surgery for type A acute aortic dissection.

Multicenter Study of Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Aortic Valve Replacement.

There is controversy regarding appropriate surgical ablation procedures concomitant with nonmitral valve surgery. We retrospectively investigated the impact of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation during aortic valve replacement between 2010 and 2015 in 16 institutions registered through the Japanese Society for Arrhythmia Surgery. Clinical data of 171 patients with paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing aortic valve replacement were collected and classified into full maze operation (n = 79), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (n = 56), and no surgical ablation (n = 36) groups. All patients were followed up and electrocardiograms were recorded in 68% at 2 years. The myocardial ischemia time was significantly longer in the maze group than the others during isolated aortic valve replacement (p ≤ 0.01), but there were no significant differences in 30-day or 2-year mortality rates between groups. The ratios of sinus rhythm at 2 years in paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation in the maze group versus PVI group were 87% versus 97%, respectively (p = 0.24) and 53% versus 42%, respectively (p = 0.47). No patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation in the no surgical ablation group maintained sinus rhythm at 2 years. In conclusion, both maze and PVI during aortic valve replacement are valuable strategies to restore sinus rhythm at 2 years and result in favorable early and midterm survival rates.

Association of Left Atrial Size With Stroke or Systemic Embolism in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Having Undergone Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement From the BPV-AF Registry.

Background: The left atrial volume index (LAVI) is important for predicting thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), but the utility of LAVI for predicting thromboembolism in patients with both bioprosthetic valve replacement and AF remains unclear. Methods and Results: Of 894 patients from a previous multicenter prospective observational registry (BPV-AF Registry), 533 whose LAVI data had been obtained by transthoracic echocardiography were included in this subanalysis. Patients were divided into tertiles (T1-T3) according to LAVI as follows: T1 (n=177), LAVI=21.5-55.3 mL/m2; T2 (n=178), LAVI=55.6-82.1 mL/m2; T3 (n=178), LAVI=82.5-408.0 mL/m2. The primary outcome was defined as either stroke or systemic embolism for a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 15.3±4.2 months. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the primary outcome tended to occur more frequently in the group with the larger LAVI (log-rank P=0.098). Comparison of T1 with T2 plus T3 using Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that patients in T1 experienced significantly fewer primary outcomes (log-rank P=0.028). Furthermore, univariate Cox proportional hazard regression showed that 1.3- and 3.3-fold more primary outcomes occurred in T2 and T3, respectively, than in T1. Conclusions: Larger LAVI was associated with stroke or systemic embolism in patients who had undergone bioprosthetic valve replacement and with a definitive diagnosis of AF.

Impact of quantitative flow ratio on graft function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Recent studies showed that preoperative functional assessment with fractional flow reserve (FFR) could predict a long-term patency of arterial bypass grafts in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel angiography-based approach to estimate FFR. This study aimed to investigate whether preoperative QFR could discriminate arterial bypass function at 1 year after surgery. The PRIDE-METAL registry was a prospective, multicenter observational study that enrolled 54 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. By protocol, left coronary stenoses were revascularized by CABG with arterial grafts, whereas right coronary stenoses were treated with coronary stenting. Follow-up angiography at 1 year after surgery was scheduled to assess arterial graft patency. QFR was performed using index angiography by certified analysts, blinded to bypass graft function. The primary end point of this sub-study was the discriminative ability of QFR for arterial graft function, as assessed by receiver-operating characteristic curve. Among 54 patients enrolled in the PRIDE-METAL registry, index and follow-up angiography was available in 41 patients with 97 anastomoses. QFR were analyzed in 35 patients (71 anastomoses) with an analyzability of 85.5% (71/83). Five bypass grafts were found to be non-functional at 1 year. The diagnostic performance of QFR was substantial (area under the curve: 0.89; 95% confidence interval: 0.83 to 0.96) with an optimal cutoff of 0.76 to predict functionality of bypass grafts. Preoperative QFR is highly discriminative for predicting postoperative arterial graft function.Trial registration: Clinical.gov reference: NCT02894255.

Life Expectancy of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis in Relation to Age and Surgical Risk Score.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding shorter life expectancy after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: Among 3815 patients with severe AS enrolled in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary outcomes after sURgery and medical tREatmeNT in patients with severe Aortic Stenosis) registry, there were 1469 patients (initial AVR: n = 647; conservative strategy: n = 822) with low surgical risk, 1642 patients (initial AVR: n = 433; conservative strategy: n = 1209) with intermediate surgical risk, and 704 patients (initial AVR: n = 117; conservative strategy: n = 587) with high surgical risk. Among 1163 patients who actually underwent surgical AVR as the initial strategy, patients were divided into 4 groups according to age <65 years (n = 185), 65 to 74 (n = 394), 75 to 80 (n = 345), and >80 (n = 239). The expected survival of the general Japanese population was obtained from the Statistics Bureau of Japan. The surgical risk was estimated using The Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) score. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 3.7 years. The cumulative incidences of all-cause death were significantly lower in the initial AVR strategy than in the initial conservative strategy across the 3 STS groups. Shorter life expectancy after surgical AVR was seen especially in younger patients. The observed mortality in low-risk patients was comparable to the expected mortality across all the age-groups, while intermediate-risk patients aged <75 years, and high-risk patients across all age-groups had higher mortality compared with the expected mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The risk stratification according to age and STS score might be useful to estimate shorter life expectancy after AVR, and these findings have implications for decision making in the choice of surgical or transcatheter AVR.

Stent graft placement for traumatic lumbar artery injury in which coil embolization is not feasible.

Lumber artery injuries are anatomically difficult to treat surgically, and coil embolization is a first-line treatment option for them. In some cases, however, there is not enough space for coil embolization, for which stent graft placement can be an alternative therapy. We report a case of traumatic lumbar artery injury in which stent graft placement was performed due to lack of space for coil embolization.

Modified percutaneous coronary intervention-derived risk models (PARIS and CREDO-Kyoto integer scoring systems) applied to Japanese transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.

OBJECTIVE: Postprocedural ischaemic and bleeding risks after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain a major concern. Nevertheless, no reliable risk models incorporating both possibilities are currently available. We aimed to assess the accuracy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-derived models and the performance of a recalibrated model that included variables more applicable to TAVR. METHODS: This study included 26 869 patients who had been enrolled in a national registry. Ischaemic events were defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischaemic attack or peripheral embolism at 1 year. Bleeding events were defined as any bleeding based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document at 1 year. Patterns of Non-adherence to Anti-Platelet Regimen in Stented Patients (PARIS) and Coronary Revascularisation Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) integer scoring systems were tested. The models were recalibrated by applying new variables using the Fine and Gray method. RESULTS: The 1-year cumulative incidences for ischaemic and bleeding events were 2.7% and 3.1%. Patients with high PARIS and CREDO-Kyoto risk scores had higher incidences of both ischaemic (3.3% vs 2.4% vs 2.4%, p<0.001 and 2.8% vs 2.0% vs 0.8%, p<0.001) and bleeding events (3.3% vs 2.5% vs 0.8%, p<0.001 and 3.7% vs 3.0% vs 2.4%, p<0.001) when compared with intermediate and low-risk patients. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curves for these models were 0.53, 0.58, 0.56 and 0.55, respectively. After the models were recalibrated to incorporate variables more applicable to TAVR, the performance of ischaemic and bleeding models modestly improved (0.58 and 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The PCI-derived models demonstrated modest accuracy but was inadequate for risk stratification of TAVR patients at 1-year follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 3395.

Long-term outcomes of balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: Data on long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in Japanese patients beyond 5 years are limited. METHODS: Between June 2010 and December 2014, 55 consecutive inoperable or high surgical risk patients underwent TAVR with SAPIEN XT valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) for severe aortic stenosis at our institution. Among them, 2 patients were excluded from the analysis because one was converted to open surgery during the TAVR procedure and the other could not undergo TAVR due to device delivery failure. We retrospectively analyzed long-term clinical outcomes of these 53 patients (mean age: 84.1 years; mean STS score: 8.4) who had at least a 7-year follow-up after TAVR. RESULTS: The rates of freedom from all-cause and cardiovascular deaths at 7 years were 35.8 % and 79.3 %, respectively. The moderate or severe structural valve deterioration (SVD) rate at 5 and 7 years was 7.2 % and 11.4 %, respectively. The rate of bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) at 7 years was 6.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-year mortality rate of inoperable or high surgical risk patients treated with SAPIEN XT was high, while the cardiovascular mortality rate was acceptable. Although the poor survival rate limited the long-term assessment of SAPIEN XT valve durability, the incidence of SVD and BVF was not rare.