RESUMEN
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Currently, there are few prospective data on the tolerability of combining targeted therapies (TT) with radiation therapy (RT). The objective of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility and toxicity of pairing RT with concurrent TT in cancer patients. The aim was to enhance the existing evidence base for the simultaneous administration of targeted substances together with radiotherapy. METHODS: Prospective study enrollment was conducted at a single institution between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, for all patients diagnosed with histologically confirmed cancer who underwent external beam radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy. The study, known as the "targeted RT study," was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register under DRKS00026193. Systematic documentation of the toxicity profiles of different targeted therapies was performed, and the assessment of acute toxicity followed the guidelines of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version v5.0. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients underwent 683 radiation therapy series. During the course of RT, 51 different TT substances were concurrently administered. External beam radiotherapy was employed for various anatomical sites. The combination of RT and concurrent TT administration was generally well tolerated, with no instances of severe acute toxicity observed. The most commonly reported toxicity was fatigue, ranging from mild to moderate Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) °I-°III. Other frequently observed toxicities included dermatitis, dyspnea, dysphagia, and dry cough. No toxicity greater than moderate severity was recorded at any point. In only 32 patients (4.7% of evaluated RT series), the concurrent substance administration was discontinued due to side effects. However, these side effects did not exceed mild severity according to CTCAE, suggesting that discontinuation was a precautionary measure. Only one patient receiving Imatinib treatment experienced a severe CTCAE °III side effect, leading to discontinuation of the concurrent substance due to the sudden occurrence of melaena during RT. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the current study did not demonstrate a significant increase or additional toxicity when combining radiotherapy and concurrent targeted therapy. However, additional research is required to explore the specific toxicity profiles of the various substances that can be utilized in this context. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00026193. Date of registration 12/27/2022 (retrospectively registered).
Asunto(s)
Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Radioterapia/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer typically includes concomitant chemoradiation, a regimen known to induce severe hematologic toxicity (HT). Particularly, pelvic bone marrow dose exposure has been identified as a contributing factor to this hematologic toxicity. Chemotherapy further increases bone marrow suppression, often necessitating treatment interruptions or dose reductions. A systematic search for original articles published between 1 January 2006 and 7 January 2024 that reported on chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer and hematologic toxicities was conducted. Twenty-four articles comprising 1539 patients were included in the final analysis. HT of grade 2 and higher was observed across all studies and frequently exceeded 50%. When correlating active pelvic bone marrow and HT, significant correlations were found for volumes between 10 and 45 Gy and HT of grade 3 and higher. Several dose recommendations for pelvic bone and pelvic bone marrow sparing to reduce HT were established, including V10 < 90-95%, V20 < 65-86.6% and V40 < 22.8-40%. Applying dose constraints to the pelvic bone/bone marrow is a promising approach for reducing HT, and thus reliable implementation of therapy. However, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to define precise dose constraints and optimize clinical strategies.
RESUMEN
We aimed to evaluate the standard of care of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in elderly female patients (≥65 years) treated outside of clinical trials and to identify potential factors related to the omission of RT and the interaction with endocrine therapy (ET). All women treated with BCS at two major breast centers between 1998 and 2014 were evaluated. Data were provided by the Tumor Registry Munich. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The median follow-up was 88.4 months. Adjuvant RT was performed in 82% (2599/3171) of patients. Irradiated patients were younger (70.9 vs. 76.5 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to receive additional chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and ET (p = 0.014). Non-irradiated patients more often had non-invasive DCIS tumors (pTis: 20.3% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and did not undergo axillary surgery (no axillary surgery: 50.5% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001). Adjuvant RT was associated with improved locoregional tumor control after BCS in invasive tumors (10-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS): 94.0% vs. 75.1%, p < 0.001, 10-year lymph node recurrence-free survival (LNRFS): 98.1% vs. 93.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed significant benefits for local control with postoperative RT. Furthermore, RT led to increased locoregional control even in patients who received ET (10-year LRFS 94.8% with ET + RT vs. 78.1% with ET alone, p < 0.001 and 10-year LNRFS: 98.2% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.003). Similarly, RT alone had significantly better locoregional control rates compared to ET alone (10-year LRFS 92.6% with RT alone vs. 78.1% with ET alone, p < 0.001 and 10-year LNRFS: 98.0% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.014). The present work confirms the efficacy of postoperative RT for breast carcinoma in elderly patients (≥65 years) treated in a modern clinical setting outside of clinical trials, even in patients who receive ET.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Due to improved imaging, oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is diagnosed more frequently. Growing evidence shows that patients with a limited number of metastases benefit from primary-directed radiotherapy (PDT) as well as from metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDT). This survey investigates the current treatment practice for OMPC among German-speaking radiation oncologists. METHODS: Members of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie [DEGRO]) were surveyed regarding their current treatment practice via an anonymous online questionnaire sent by email. The survey included six general items and 14 specific items regarding treatment characteristics. Questionnaires with at least 50% of questions completed were considered for further analysis. RESULTS: A total of 204 responses were received (15% response rate), 167 were considered for further analysis. Most respondents stated to be specialized in treating prostate cancer patients and to treat 10-30 patients with OMPC per annum; 97% considered PSMA-PET/CT necessary to define oligometastatic disease. Opinions differed regarding the use of systemic therapies: 63% of the respondents aimed to defer systemic therapy using radiotherapy in OMPC, whereas 37% considered systemic therapy necessary. In the setting of synchronous OMPC, 97% recommended PDT with or without a combination of MDT and/or systemic therapy. For metachronous nodal or bone oligometastatic recurrence, 98 and 99%, respectively, would opt for MDT. The majority would combine MDT with systemic therapy in patients with metachronous oligorecurrence. Respondents recommended normofractionation, hypofractionation, and SBRT for lymph node metastases in 49, 27, and 24%, respectively. No consensus existed regarding the field size for MDT of lymph node metastases. Most respondents preferred >â¯5 fractions for treatment of bone metastases. CONCLUSION: Local radiotherapy for PDT and MDT is routinely used among respondents of this survey, representing 12% of all German-speaking radiation oncologists. The timing of systemic therapy, fractionation schedules, and field sizes are handled differently and remain an area of active investigation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Oncología por Radiación , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática/radioterapia , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Magnetic resonance imaging (MR)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is a promising technique in the field of radiation oncology providing excellent visualisation of soft-tissues, and allowing for online plan adaptation and tumour tracking. In order to facilitate the accurate dose delivery to the target volume while sparing healthy surrounding normal tissue in the brain or head-and-neck (H&N) region, precise patient immobilisation with good image quality is pertinent. Herein, we present a customised thermoplastic mask holder with an integrated anterior MR receiver coil support system for MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy in the brain and head-and-neck region. The approved medical product was developed by Innovative Technologie Voelp (IT-V), Innsbruck, Austria. MR image uniformity measurements demonstrated improved image uniformity at the expense of decreased signal-to-noise ratio due to a more defined and larger distance between the anterior receiver coil and the phantom or patient. This integrated coil support system represents a practical solution facilitating stable and reproducible anterior coil placement while maintaining the thermoplastic mask holder functionality, a widely established immobilisation technique.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a critical determinant of outcome. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common comorbidity of PE and might also affect RV function. Therefore, we sought to investigate RV dysfunction in PE patients in proportion to the severity of OSA by evaluating the right-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 197 PE patients were evaluated for sleep-disordered breathing by portable monitoring and nocturnal polysomnography. RV dilatation was defined as an RV/LV diameter ratio of ⩾ 1.0. RESULTS: RV dilatation was significantly more frequent in OSA patients compared to study participants without OSA (66.4% vs 49.1%, P = .036). Elevated troponin I values, indicating myocardial injury due to acute, PE-related RV strain, were significantly more frequent in OSA patients with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ⩾ 15/h compared to those with an AHI < 15/h (62.1% vs 45.8%, P = .035). However, RV dysfunction documented by the RV/LV diameter ratio on CTPA was not significantly associated with the severity of OSA in multivariable regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate or severe OSA might compensate acute, PE-related RV strain better, as they are adapted to repetitive right heart pressure overloads during sleep.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The impact of optical surface guidance on the use of portal imaging and the initial set-up duration in patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy of the breast or chest wall was investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed including breast cancer patients who received postoperative radiotherapy between January 2016 and December 2016. One group of patients received treatment before the optical surface scanner was installed (no-OSS) and the other group was positioned using the additional information derived by the optical surface scanner (OSS). The duration of the initial set-up was recorded for each patient and a comparison of both groups was performed. Accordingly, the differences between planned and actually acquired portal images during the course of radiotherapy were compared between both groups. RESULTS: A total of 180 breast cancer patients were included (90 no-OSS, 90 OSS) in this analysis. Of these, 30 patients with left-sided breast cancer received radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH). The mean set-up time was 10â¯min and 18â¯s and no significant difference between the two groups of patients was found (pâ¯= 0.931). The mean set-up time in patients treated without DIBH was 9â¯min and 45â¯s compared to 13â¯min with DIBH (pâ¯< 0.001), as portal imaging was performed in DIBH. No significant difference was found in the number of acquired to the planned number of portal images during the entire radiotherapy treatment for both groups (pâ¯= 0.287). CONCLUSION: Optical surface imaging is a valuable addition for primary patient set-up. The findings confirm that the addition of surface-based imaging did not prolong the clinical workflow and had no significant impact on the number of portal verification images carried out during the course of radiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Tomografía Óptica/métodos , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales/radioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales/cirugíaRESUMEN
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) might influence disease severity in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). 253 survivors of acute PE were evaluated for sleep-disordered breathing by portable monitoring and nocturnal polysomnography. PE patients with an apnea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h were significantly older (p < 0.001), had significantly impaired renal (p < 0.001) and left ventricular functions (p = 0.003), showed significantly elevated troponin I (p = 0.005) and D-dimer levels (p = 0.024), were hospitalised significantly longer (p < 0.001), and had significantly elevated PE severity scores (p = 0.015). Moderate or severe OSA was significantly (p = 0.006) more frequent among intermediate- and high-risk PE patients (81.0%) compared to the low-risk PE cohort (16.3%). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that PE patients in the AHI ≥ 15/h cohort were at significant risk for myocardial injury (p = 0.015). Based on clinical risk stratification models, patients with no relevant OSA syndrome tended to be at a lower risk for short-term mortality (p = 0.068). Acute PE might present more severely in OSA patients, possibly due to nocturnal hypoxemia or OSA-related hypercoagulability.