Associations between the Geriatric-8 and 4-meter gait speed test and subsequent delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with colon cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Feasible screening methods are important to identify older patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between the outcomes of screening for frailty with the Geriatric-8 questionnaire (G8) and the 4-meter gait speed test (4MGST) and subsequent delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy and treatment tolerance in older patients with colon cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included all patients aged ≥70 with primary colon carcinoma who underwent elective surgery between May 2016 and December 2018 and for whom adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated. Data were analysed using multivariate regression models. RESULTS: 97 (73.5%) of 132 eligible patients were screened by the G8 and 85 (64.4%) by the 4MGST. In univariate analyses, patients who scored indicative for frailty on both the G8 (≤14) and the 4MGST (>4 s) significantly more often did not proceed with adjuvant chemotherapy than patients who scored fit on both instruments (OR = 5.10, p = 0.01). After adjustment for gender, stage, and postoperative complications, the OR decreased to 4.22 (p = 0.04). Tolerance of treatment was very high (93%) and did not differ between screening groups. CONCLUSION: Although patients who scored indicative for frailty on both the G8 and the 4MGST significantly more often did not proceed with adjuvant chemotherapy, it is still unknown whether the G8 and the 4MGST are reliable tools for identifying patients who are at high risk for severe chemotoxicity. Nonetheless, this study shows that current selection for adjuvant chemotherapy among older patients with colon cancer is safe with low rates of severe chemotoxicity.

Preoperative handgrip strength is not associated with complications and health-related quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is associated with a high morbidity which may result in a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The pre-operative measurement of handgrip strength (HGS) might be a tool to predict the patient's outcome after CRC surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of pre-operative HGS with the occurrence of postoperative complications and postoperative HRQoL. Stage I to III CRC patients ≥ 18 years were included at diagnosis. Demographic and clinical data as well as HGS were collected before start of treatment. HGS was classified as weak if it was below the gender-specific 25th percentile of our study population; otherwise HGS was classified as normal. The occurrence of postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery was collected from medical records. Cancer-specific HRQoL was measured 6 weeks after treatment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire. Of 295 patients who underwent surgical treatment for CRC, 67 (23%) patients had a weak HGS while 228 (77%) patients had normal HGS. 118 patients (40%) developed a postoperative complication. Complications occurred in 37% of patients with a weak HGS and in 41% of patients with a normal HGS (p = 0.47). After adjustment for age, sex, ASA, BMI and TNM, no significant associations between pre-operative HGS and the occurrence of postoperative complications and between HGS and HRQoL were found. We conclude that a single pre-operative HGS measurement was not associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications or post-treatment HRQoL in stage I-III CRC patients.

The low anterior resection syndrome in a reference population: prevalence and predictive factors in the Netherlands.

AIM: The low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) severely affects quality of life (QoL) after colorectal cancer surgery. There are no data about these complaints and the association with QoL in a reference population. The aim of this study was to assess LARS and the association with QoL in a reference population. METHODS: Six hundred patients who visited the outpatient clinic because of general or trauma surgical indications were asked to participate in this study. They received an invitation letter containing three validated questionnaires to assess LARS (assessed with the LARS score) and both general [European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30] and colorectal-specific (EORTC QLQ-CR29) QoL. RESULTS: Five hundred and one respondents could be included for the analyses. The median age at inclusion was 68 years and 47.3% were men. Major LARS was observed in 15% of patients (11.4% in men and 18.9% in women, P = 0.021). Women reported more urgency (P = 0.070) and incontinence for both flatus (P < 0.001) and stool (P = 0.063) compared to men. In univariate analyses, women reported major LARS significantly more often than men (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.10-3.01). Patients with major LARS scored significantly worse in most QoL domains compared to patients with no/minor LARS. CONCLUSION: This is the first study demonstrating major LARS and the association with QoL in a reference population of patients without colorectal cancer. Our data can assist in the interpretation of LARS in past and future research about abdominal complaints after colorectal cancer surgery.

Functional bowel complaints and quality of life after surgery for colon cancer: prevalence and predictive factors.

AIM: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) severely affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients after surgery for rectal cancer. There are very few studies that have investigated LARS-like symptoms and their effect on QoL after colon cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of functional abdominal complaints and related QoL after colon cancer surgery compared with patients with similar complaints after rectal cancer surgery. METHOD: All patients who underwent colorectal cancer resections between January 2008 and December 2015, and who were free of colostomy for at least 1 year, were eligible (n = 2136). Bowel function was assessed by the LARS score, QoL by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. QoL was compared between the LARS score categories and tumour height categories. RESULTS: A total of 1495 patients (70.0%) were included in the analyses, of whom 1145 had a colonic and 350 a rectal tumour. Symptoms of LARS were observed in 55% after rectal cancer resection compared with 21% after colon cancer resection. Female gender (OR 1.88, CI 1.392-2.528) and a previous diverting stoma (OR 1.84, CI 1.14-2.97) were independently associated with a higher prevalence of LARS after colon cancer surgery. Patients with LARS after colon cancer surgery performed significantly worse in most QoL domains. CONCLUSION: The results of this study highlight the presence of LARS-like symptoms after surgery for colonic cancer. Patients suffering from major LARS-like symptoms after colon resection reported the same debilitating effect on their QoL as patients with major LARS after rectal resection. This should be addressed by colorectal cancer specialists in order to adequately inform patients.

Bowel dysfunction after sigmoid resection underestimated: Multicentre study on quality of life after surgery for carcinoma of the rectum and sigmoid.

AIM: The Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) severely affects quality of life (QoL) after rectal cancer surgery. There are no data about functional complaints after sigmoid cancer surgery. We investigated LARS and QoL in patients with a resection for sigmoid cancer versus patients who had surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: 506 patients after resection for rectal or sigmoid cancer who were at least one year colostomy-free were included between January 2008 and December 2013. Bowel function was assessed by the LARS-Score. QoL was assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29 questionnaires. QoL was compared between the LARS score categories and tumour height categories. RESULTS: 412 respondents (81.5%) could be included for the analyses. The median interval since treatment was 5 years, and the median age at the follow-up point was 72 years. Major LARS increased significantly with decreasing tumour height from one fifth in sigmoid carcinoma to 90% in low rectum carcinoma. Female gender (OR = 2.162; 95% CI: 1.349-3.467), postoperative temporary diverting stoma (OR = 3.457; 95% CI: 2.019-5.919) and tumours located in the middle (OR = 3.193; 95% CI: 1.696-6.010) or lower rectum (OR = 8.247; 95% CI: 1.672-40.678) were independently associated with the development of major LARS. Patients with major LARS fared significantly worse in most QOL domains. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we found that functional abdominal complaints after sigmoid surgery are a major problem, with a negative effect on QoL, even 5 years after treatment. Patients need to be adequately informed about these long-term complaints.

Mesh Versus Patch Repair for Epigastric and Umbilical Hernia (MORPHEUS Trial); One-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

DESIGN: This trial is a randomized controlled, patient-blinded, multicentre, superiority trial. METHODS: All patients ≥18 years with a single, symptomatic and primary umbilical or epigastric hernia (<2 fingers) qualified for participation in the study. Flat polypropylene mesh repair was compared to patch repair (PROCEED® Ventral Patch) (PVP). The objective of this trial was to identify a superior method for umbilical and epigastric hernia repair in terms of complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were randomized in this trial; 348 patients received the intervention (n = 177 PVP vs. n = 171 mesh). No peri-operative complications occurred. PVP placement was significantly faster compared to mesh placement (30 min, SD 11 vs. 35 min, SD 11) and was scored as an easier procedure. At 1-month follow-up, 76 patients suffered any kind of complication. There was no significant difference in the proportion of complications (24.9% for PVP and 18.7% for mesh, p = 0.195). A significant difference was seen in re-operation rate within 1 month, significantly less early re-operations in the mesh group (0.0 vs. 2.8%, p = 0.027). After 1-year follow-up, no significant differences are seen in recurrence rates (n = 13, 7.8% PVP vs. n = 5, 3.3% mesh, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Both mesh and PVP had a comparable amount of reported complications. There was a significantly higher incidence of early re-operations due to early complications in the PVP group. No differences were seen in infection rates and the need for antibiotic treatment. No significant difference was seen in the recurrence rates. REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Dutch Trail Registry (NTR) NTR2514NL33995.060.10. [12].

Long-term outcome of low perianal fistulas treated by fistulotomy: a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Fistulotomy is considered to be the golden standard for the treatment of low perianal fistula but might have more influence on continence status than believed. This study was performed to evaluate the healing rate after a fistulotomy and to show results for continence status. METHODS: A retrospective database study was performed in one university medical center and its six affiliated hospitals. All patients treated with a fistulotomy for a low perianal fistula were identified. Healing and recurrence of the fistula were identified. Questionnaires on continence status and quality of life were mailed to all patients. RESULTS: In total, 537 patients were identified. The primary etiology of the fistulas was cryptoglandular (66.5%). Recurrence was seen in 88 patients (16.4%) resulting in a primary healing rate of 83.6%. After secondary treatment for the recurrence, another 40 patients healed. This resulted in a secondary healing rate of 90.3%. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that at 5 years, the healing rate was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.71-0.85). The mean Vaizey score was 4.67 (SD 4.80). Major incontinence, defined as a Vaizey score of >6, was seen in 95 (28.0%) patients. Only 26.3% of the patients had a perfect continence status (Vaizey score 0). Quality of life was not different from the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Fistulotomy seems to be associated with a healing rate of 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.85) after 5 years. However, major incontinence is still reported by 26.8% of patients and only 26.3% of patients had a perfect continence status.

Evaluation of nutritional status as an independent predictor of post-operative complications and morbidity after gastro-intestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) are screening tools for nutritional risk that have also been used to predict post-operative complications and morbidity, though not all studies confirm the reliability of nutritional screening. Our study aims to evaluate the independent predictive value of nutritional risk screening in addition to currently documented medical, surgical and anesthesiological risk factors for post-operative complications, as well as length of hospital stay. METHODS: This study is a prospective observational cohort study of 129 patients undergoing elective gastro-intestinal-surgery. Patients were screened for nutritional risk upon admission using both MUST and NRS-2002 screening tools. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the independent predictive value of nutritional risk for post-operative complications and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: MUST ≥2 (OR 2.87; 95% CI 1.05-7.87) and peri-operative transfusion (OR 2.78; 95% CI 1.05-7.40) were significant independent predictors for the occurrence of post-operative complications. Peri-operative transfusion (HR 2.40; 95% CI 1.45-4.00), age ≥70 (HR 1.50; 95% CI 1.05-2.16) and open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery (HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.94-2.05) were independent predictors for increased length of hospital stay, whereas American Society of Anesthesiology Score (ASA) and MUST were not. CONCLUSION: Nutritional risk screening (MUST ≥2) is an independent predictor for post-operative complications, but not for increased length of hospital stay.

[Pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy due to familial adenomatous polyposis in 4 patients]. / Pancreassparende totale duodenectomie wegens familiaire adenomateuze polyposis bij 4 patiënten.

In 4 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and multiple severe dysplastic adenomas in the duodenum (a 42-year-old woman and 3 men aged 44, 53 and 33 years, respectively), pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy (PPTD) was carried out. In 2 of the patients, serious early post-operative complications arose (leakage and haemorrhage of the gastrojejunostomy, respectively), and 1 patient developed a late complication (attacks of pancreatitis). During the 1-5-year follow-up period, small villous adenomas were seen in the jejunum (neoduodenum) of 1 of the patients. PPTD is a technically possible procedure which allows targeted treatment to be carried out if duodenum polyps are found upon endoscopic examination.